This fantasy league is getting borderline annoying...Sparky you only get 80 oves for a reason, you shouldn't be allowed to pull a stunt that you and philly just pulled... Come on guys, this CANNOT happen again
ManRam this can't happen anymore, and no way ISTEAL should be able to auction players
whats with the fuckin cryin going on all of a sudden,NO STUNT WAS PULLED, it was a bunch of Free Agent guys and vmart for Marmol/Storen, you and isteal need to relax a bit.. it was workin the system and rules a bit, nothing was said by me when you guys pulled off a monster trade so stop already Uriss..
**if people have something to say then we should have a vote by every manager for every single trade from start to finish next year, i didnt get a say in your trade's nor did i but in and say anything.
and isteal isnt gonna be allowed to Auction off his players, no way ManRam lets something like that happen..
0
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:
This fantasy league is getting borderline annoying...Sparky you only get 80 oves for a reason, you shouldn't be allowed to pull a stunt that you and philly just pulled... Come on guys, this CANNOT happen again
ManRam this can't happen anymore, and no way ISTEAL should be able to auction players
whats with the fuckin cryin going on all of a sudden,NO STUNT WAS PULLED, it was a bunch of Free Agent guys and vmart for Marmol/Storen, you and isteal need to relax a bit.. it was workin the system and rules a bit, nothing was said by me when you guys pulled off a monster trade so stop already Uriss..
**if people have something to say then we should have a vote by every manager for every single trade from start to finish next year, i didnt get a say in your trade's nor did i but in and say anything.
and isteal isnt gonna be allowed to Auction off his players, no way ManRam lets something like that happen..
It's not like it matters whether it's veto'ed or not since the trade deadline is among us. But like I said in the league, why does it problem with it?
URISS -- If I you had no 2nd baseman...and I offered you Rickie Weeks for 2 moves...are you saying you would decline that because I have no moves left even though it would help you?
I mean seriously...if I was sending private messages to phillyfan to work this out, and he dropped Wuertz and picked up Wallace, without anyone even bringing up the concept of a "sign and trade" would you care? No...because the outcome turns out to be a trade. It's not like he "threw in" Wallace as a favor. He traded Wallace to me for Storen.
0
It's not like it matters whether it's veto'ed or not since the trade deadline is among us. But like I said in the league, why does it problem with it?
URISS -- If I you had no 2nd baseman...and I offered you Rickie Weeks for 2 moves...are you saying you would decline that because I have no moves left even though it would help you?
I mean seriously...if I was sending private messages to phillyfan to work this out, and he dropped Wuertz and picked up Wallace, without anyone even bringing up the concept of a "sign and trade" would you care? No...because the outcome turns out to be a trade. It's not like he "threw in" Wallace as a favor. He traded Wallace to me for Storen.
There is no reason for calling anyone out from anyone. I see both sides of the argument and everyone else has to as well. On one hand you have the people saying sparky used all of his moves and he should not have access to the free agent pool. TRUE. You have sparky who is not breaking any official rules by what he is doing and getting by at all costs. TRUE. You guys have to understand while running the league i am always put into the middle of all problems and i am always going to have someone upset at me. I hope everyone can understand it and realize why i had to make the decision.
0
There is no reason for calling anyone out from anyone. I see both sides of the argument and everyone else has to as well. On one hand you have the people saying sparky used all of his moves and he should not have access to the free agent pool. TRUE. You have sparky who is not breaking any official rules by what he is doing and getting by at all costs. TRUE. You guys have to understand while running the league i am always put into the middle of all problems and i am always going to have someone upset at me. I hope everyone can understand it and realize why i had to make the decision.
it doesnt matter sparky, its grown men worrying about other people's business when they shouldnt, if the commissioner had a problem with it then he would of declined it and ManRam can pick out a "shady deal" and obviously he didnt see anything wrong with it, sparky's 1B guy go hurt and he needed a FA guy, i needed a closer then once we got talking i didnt need uribe and figured he could use a multiple position guy to fill any holes or injuries from now till the end. in the end it was a multi-player trade with 1 guy coming from the FA list and i highly doubt any of you were after Brett Wallace anyway..
0
it doesnt matter sparky, its grown men worrying about other people's business when they shouldnt, if the commissioner had a problem with it then he would of declined it and ManRam can pick out a "shady deal" and obviously he didnt see anything wrong with it, sparky's 1B guy go hurt and he needed a FA guy, i needed a closer then once we got talking i didnt need uribe and figured he could use a multiple position guy to fill any holes or injuries from now till the end. in the end it was a multi-player trade with 1 guy coming from the FA list and i highly doubt any of you were after Brett Wallace anyway..
Now what if I WERE to trade for Thole (hypothetically speaking). Would that trade be declined? Or any other trade for a player just picked up? I just want to know so I don't waste my time if someone picks up a guy I'm interested in.
0
All it was, was a loop hole.
Now what if I WERE to trade for Thole (hypothetically speaking). Would that trade be declined? Or any other trade for a player just picked up? I just want to know so I don't waste my time if someone picks up a guy I'm interested in.
whats with the fuckin cryin going on all of a sudden,NO STUNT WAS PULLED, it was a bunch of Free Agent guys and vmart for Marmol/Storen, you and isteal need to relax a bit.. it was workin the system and rules a bit, nothing was said by me when you guys pulled off a monster trade so stop already Uriss..
**if people have something to say then we should have a vote by every manager for every single trade from start to finish next year, i didnt get a say in your trade's nor did i but in and say anything.
and isteal isnt gonna be allowed to Auction off his players, no way ManRam lets something like that happen..
Relax yourself bro, slow your fuckin role! If Sparky used up his 80 moves, thats the rule
0
Quote Originally Posted by --phillyfan--:
whats with the fuckin cryin going on all of a sudden,NO STUNT WAS PULLED, it was a bunch of Free Agent guys and vmart for Marmol/Storen, you and isteal need to relax a bit.. it was workin the system and rules a bit, nothing was said by me when you guys pulled off a monster trade so stop already Uriss..
**if people have something to say then we should have a vote by every manager for every single trade from start to finish next year, i didnt get a say in your trade's nor did i but in and say anything.
and isteal isnt gonna be allowed to Auction off his players, no way ManRam lets something like that happen..
Relax yourself bro, slow your fuckin role! If Sparky used up his 80 moves, thats the rule
It's not like it matters whether it's veto'ed or not since the trade deadline is among us. But like I said in the league, why does it problem with it?
URISS -- If I you had no 2nd baseman...and I offered you Rickie Weeks for 2 moves...are you saying you would decline that because I have no moves left even though it would help you?
I mean seriously...if I was sending private messages to phillyfan to work this out, and he dropped Wuertz and picked up Wallace, without anyone even bringing up the concept of a "sign and trade" would you care? No...because the outcome turns out to be a trade. It's not like he "threw in" Wallace as a favor. He traded Wallace to me for Storen.
Its cheating the system... maybe you shouldn't use 80 moves with 5 weeks left in the regular season
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:
It's not like it matters whether it's veto'ed or not since the trade deadline is among us. But like I said in the league, why does it problem with it?
URISS -- If I you had no 2nd baseman...and I offered you Rickie Weeks for 2 moves...are you saying you would decline that because I have no moves left even though it would help you?
I mean seriously...if I was sending private messages to phillyfan to work this out, and he dropped Wuertz and picked up Wallace, without anyone even bringing up the concept of a "sign and trade" would you care? No...because the outcome turns out to be a trade. It's not like he "threw in" Wallace as a favor. He traded Wallace to me for Storen.
Its cheating the system... maybe you shouldn't use 80 moves with 5 weeks left in the regular season
All I'm saying is that if I have a guy you want, and the only way to get him is by getting someone off free agency, you wouldn't do it to make your team better because it's, as you say, "cheating"?
All you have to do is worry about your team. It's not like I traded Cargo and Cruz for Kuo.
0
All I'm saying is that if I have a guy you want, and the only way to get him is by getting someone off free agency, you wouldn't do it to make your team better because it's, as you say, "cheating"?
All you have to do is worry about your team. It's not like I traded Cargo and Cruz for Kuo.
I disagree, why make a "moves rule" if you are allowed to use "loop holes"... I honestly don't care, its just annoying
Final Say:
"Abusing" the system would be what I was trying to do. I wanted to drop Rauch and have someone pick up a player for me. Nobody did that. So I moved on. Storen is a respectable player, a closer who will get you saves, and saves is a catagory that everyone wants. I traded HIM for a free agent. If I traded Rauch for a free agent, I could see where you could be against this.
I ran out of moves that allowed me to drop my worst player to pick up another. However...I still have the ability to trade a player that someone else wants (that I wouldn't drop otherwise) to get a player that they don't mind giving up a move for.
But as stated...I'm not making the playoffs anyway so none of this matters.
0
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:
I disagree, why make a "moves rule" if you are allowed to use "loop holes"... I honestly don't care, its just annoying
Final Say:
"Abusing" the system would be what I was trying to do. I wanted to drop Rauch and have someone pick up a player for me. Nobody did that. So I moved on. Storen is a respectable player, a closer who will get you saves, and saves is a catagory that everyone wants. I traded HIM for a free agent. If I traded Rauch for a free agent, I could see where you could be against this.
I ran out of moves that allowed me to drop my worst player to pick up another. However...I still have the ability to trade a player that someone else wants (that I wouldn't drop otherwise) to get a player that they don't mind giving up a move for.
But as stated...I'm not making the playoffs anyway so none of this matters.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.