Hi Sosa....here was my opion to Sungod regarding Rhodes or TJones. I definitely think Rhodes is your best play. I live in Tampa right up from the stadium, and Graham is still playing a blocking full-back roll this week for Dunn. He could still score, but probably not much for yardage. Parker is def. out so Moore is starting for sure and should great against the Bungals. He nearly had 100 yds against a tough Jags D last week, so look for him to bust 100 for sure tomorrow unless something bad happens. Cinci's Rush D is just as bad as GB's is. You probably won't go wrong with either Moore or Rhodes tomorrow (play both if you can, lol), but I'd bench Graham. But here's my write up to Sungod on Rhodes in GB also:
GB gives up about 40 more yards rushing p/g than Oakland does, so with that you'd think Rhodes should be the better play. And who knows how many passes Brett the Jet will huck which might take Jones out of a good chunk of that game. They're both road games and I don't think either D has shown to be much better at home than on the road so far. Jones had a big game last week with 3 TD's (1 rec, 2 rush), but attempts and yardage-wise against a weak Bungals D he only touched it 17 for 65 yards. Jets are all pass and you can't try and rely on your RB always getting TD passes. On the other side you know Dungy likes balance and Rhodes ran it 25 times for 73 and 1 TD against an always nasty Ravens D...that's impressive right there. If he gets those kinds of attempts against GB then he's over 100 yards easily and could have 1 TD or maybe 2 if you're lucky, and plus if you get a 100 yard bonus like in my league then he could have a huge scoring game for you tomorrow.
0
Hi Sosa....here was my opion to Sungod regarding Rhodes or TJones. I definitely think Rhodes is your best play. I live in Tampa right up from the stadium, and Graham is still playing a blocking full-back roll this week for Dunn. He could still score, but probably not much for yardage. Parker is def. out so Moore is starting for sure and should great against the Bungals. He nearly had 100 yds against a tough Jags D last week, so look for him to bust 100 for sure tomorrow unless something bad happens. Cinci's Rush D is just as bad as GB's is. You probably won't go wrong with either Moore or Rhodes tomorrow (play both if you can, lol), but I'd bench Graham. But here's my write up to Sungod on Rhodes in GB also:
GB gives up about 40 more yards rushing p/g than Oakland does, so with that you'd think Rhodes should be the better play. And who knows how many passes Brett the Jet will huck which might take Jones out of a good chunk of that game. They're both road games and I don't think either D has shown to be much better at home than on the road so far. Jones had a big game last week with 3 TD's (1 rec, 2 rush), but attempts and yardage-wise against a weak Bungals D he only touched it 17 for 65 yards. Jets are all pass and you can't try and rely on your RB always getting TD passes. On the other side you know Dungy likes balance and Rhodes ran it 25 times for 73 and 1 TD against an always nasty Ravens D...that's impressive right there. If he gets those kinds of attempts against GB then he's over 100 yards easily and could have 1 TD or maybe 2 if you're lucky, and plus if you get a 100 yard bonus like in my league then he could have a huge scoring game for you tomorrow.
my 2 starting rb's are LT and rhodes now [graham on bench]
my 2 starting wr's are steve smith and andre johnson
one flex spot is braylon .....do you think i should replace braylon with mewelde? hmmmmmm.....i also have sammy morris who is projected at 16 points but im not buying it like expired milk.
0
thanks alot guys esp. MTBIKER for the writeup
my 2 starting rb's are LT and rhodes now [graham on bench]
my 2 starting wr's are steve smith and andre johnson
one flex spot is braylon .....do you think i should replace braylon with mewelde? hmmmmmm.....i also have sammy morris who is projected at 16 points but im not buying it like expired milk.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.