All Forums | Fantasy Sports

im in a keeper league (fantasy)

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1805
Posts: 43
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #26

I guess it depends on how deep your league is. Are you talking about him as a keeper?

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #27
yes over gates.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #28

gates = 4th

freddy jack = 6th

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #29
12 people in my league
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4236
Posted: #30

I would probably have to lean towards Gates as well.

Fred Jackson in the 6th isn't bad either though. He's a little underrated in my book. Where did you see he would lose GL carries? And to who? Spiller? If that's true then the Bills are even dumber than I thought.

Oh, and don't ever listen to Matthew Berry. The guys a moron. If ESPN had any clue then none of their fantasy guys would have a job. Save maybe Christopher Harris who writes a decent fantasy article once in a while.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #31
The Bills are expected to open the 2011 season with Fred Jackson as the starter at running back. He will likely share carries with C.J. Spiller, but Jackson proved in 2010 he can get the job done as the every-down running back. After getting off to slow start following a broken hand in training camp, Jackson finished the year with 222 carries for 927 yards and five touchdowns, 31 catches for 215 yards and two touchdowns and two fumbles. He had four games with double digits in Fantasy points and 10 with at least seven points. He now has back-to-back seasons of 1,100 total yards, and even though he's 29 he remains a quality Fantasy option in the majority of leagues as a No. 3 running back. Spiller will get more work in his second year in the NFL, but Jackson should still be the starter and work at the goal line. He's worth drafting around Round 6 in most formats. (Updated 5/2/11)
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #32

i thinks hes underated too.

he can put up solid numbers.

gates might be the "safest" play.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #33

https://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football/ffl/story?page=NFLDK2K11_TMRManifesto

Gates.

Wether or not you think Matthew Berry is an idiot or not here is compelling evidence as to why you should keep Gates and aim for Vick with your situation. Numbers don't lie.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4236
Posted: #34

I only recommend reading that Draft Manifesto if you want to waste a lot of time and get a headache.

10,000 words on why Vick will have a better season than Brady's magical 2007 (absurd), and that you should draft lots of RBs and WRs.
I could write 10,000 words of babble about why you SHOULDN'T take Vick #1 but everyone has their own opinion.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4236
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by claude_gir0ux:

 
The Bills are expected to open the 2011 season with Fred Jackson as the starter at running back. He will likely share carries with C.J. Spiller, but Jackson proved in 2010 he can get the job done as the every-down running back. After getting off to slow start following a broken hand in training camp, Jackson finished the year with 222 carries for 927 yards and five touchdowns, 31 catches for 215 yards and two touchdowns and two fumbles. He had four games with double digits in Fantasy points and 10 with at least seven points. He now has back-to-back seasons of 1,100 total yards, and even though he's 29 he remains a quality Fantasy option in the majority of leagues as a No. 3 running back. Spiller will get more work in his second year in the NFL, but Jackson should still be the starter and work at the goal line. He's worth drafting around Round 6 in most formats. (Updated 5/2/11)
 

If he can put up over 1100 yards with 7 TDs and 30+ receptions again, then he can be a middle of the road to low end #2 RB in the weak crop of RBs we have this year.
He's my 24th ranked RB so low end #2/high end #3 for sure.

All that being said, I still lean to Gates.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #36

WOW

so if keep someone two years in a row, HE BECOMES A 1ST rounder.

so fellas.....

i cant keep gates. just cant.

also i was wrong about FA being 6th, its 7th

choices now are....

sanchez (7th rounder)

bradford (7th rounder)

fred jackson (7th rounder)

jones drew (1st round)

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #37

leaning jackson or mjd....

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by blstuart:

If he can put up over 1100 yards with 7 TDs and 30+ receptions again, then he can be a middle of the road to low end #2 RB in the weak crop of RBs we have this year.
He's my 24th ranked RB so low end #2/high end #3 for sure.

All that being said, I still lean to Gates.

Are you saying 24th overall player or 24 overall RB? Cause there is a huge difference in which round he would go. I'm just trying to clarify.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by claude_gir0ux:

WOW

so if keep someone two years in a row, HE BECOMES A 1ST rounder.

so fellas.....

i cant keep gates. just cant.

also i was wrong about FA being 6th, its 7th

choices now are....

sanchez (7th rounder)

bradford (7th rounder)

fred jackson (7th rounder)

jones drew (1st round)

 

So if you keep Gates he becomes your 1st round pick? That is unfortunate and I wouldn't recommend it. Can you trade draft picks in this league? If not Jackson in the 7th may be the best choice. I'm not a big fan of MJD. He is probably a 2nd round choice this year. I wish we knew your draft position but without knowing it I would want to keep my first draft choice free rather than taking MJD.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by blstuart:

I only recommend reading that Draft Manifesto if you want to waste a lot of time and get a headache.

10,000 words on why Vick will have a better season than Brady's magical 2007 (absurd), and that you should draft lots of RBs and WRs.
I could write 10,000 words of babble about why you SHOULDN'T take Vick #1 but everyone has their own opinion.

Give me some reasons. I actually agree with Berry on his Vick and Gates assessments and gives really good statistical evidence for his opinion.

Vick's passing numbers were comparable to Mannings without accounting for Vick's running stats. In fact, if you want a comparison for a guy in this thread. Vick's running numbers were only about 6 points behind Fred Jackson's.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by claude_gir0ux:

leaning jackson or mjd....

Take it for what it's worth but on yahoo mock draft Fred Jackson is averaging as an 11th round pick. MJD is averaging as a 1st round pick(although as I said earlier I'm not huge on him).

I guess in your situation though maybe MJD is the way to go.

https://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/36655/draftanalysis?tab=SD&pos=RB&sort=DA_AP

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #42
so keep mjd or jackson as a 7th rounder
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 20623
Posted: #43
went w mark sanchez in the 7th
All Forums | Fantasy Sports
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.