I think it's more important to look at what defenses those 2
quarterbacks are going to be facing the rest of your Fantasy season. I
would have to say that Rogers has the better matchups than Vick.
And if your fantasy "Superbowl" is on week 16 like most other guys,
you will have Hillis at home against Baltimore and Vick at home against
the Vikings.
If anything, I would trade Vick for Hillis.
Once again the numbers (at least from my league) say to do the opposite.
In the remaining 5 games of the season the avg points per game that the 5 defenses still to be played by each QB is
Vick: avg points to opposing QB is 18.55 pts/game.
Rogers: avg points to opposing QB is 19.10 pts/game.
So slight advantage to Rogers (about 0.5 point advantage)
In week 16 (super bowl week).
Vick plays Minny: Minny just gave up 35.15 to Rogers. Minny averages 18.14 to opposing QBs. Minny will be out of it and there is a good chance that Philly will be playing for the division title and/or home field advantage in playoffs.
Rogers plays New Your Giants: Giants give up 15.55 to opposing QBs. Both teams will most likely have a lot to play for in this last game of the season.
Hillis plays Balt: Balt gives up 16.12 to opposing RBs.
So this information combined with the numbers in my above post suggest that of the three players in question the best combination is Vick and Hillis.You are getting a slight upgrade at QB (in fantasy terms) and a significant upgrade at RB.
This should be your first priority. Priority #2 should be to get Hillis even if it means giving up Vick. Bottom line is that you are solid at QB either way and need some beefing up at RB.
0
I think it's more important to look at what defenses those 2
quarterbacks are going to be facing the rest of your Fantasy season. I
would have to say that Rogers has the better matchups than Vick.
And if your fantasy "Superbowl" is on week 16 like most other guys,
you will have Hillis at home against Baltimore and Vick at home against
the Vikings.
If anything, I would trade Vick for Hillis.
Once again the numbers (at least from my league) say to do the opposite.
In the remaining 5 games of the season the avg points per game that the 5 defenses still to be played by each QB is
Vick: avg points to opposing QB is 18.55 pts/game.
Rogers: avg points to opposing QB is 19.10 pts/game.
So slight advantage to Rogers (about 0.5 point advantage)
In week 16 (super bowl week).
Vick plays Minny: Minny just gave up 35.15 to Rogers. Minny averages 18.14 to opposing QBs. Minny will be out of it and there is a good chance that Philly will be playing for the division title and/or home field advantage in playoffs.
Rogers plays New Your Giants: Giants give up 15.55 to opposing QBs. Both teams will most likely have a lot to play for in this last game of the season.
Hillis plays Balt: Balt gives up 16.12 to opposing RBs.
So this information combined with the numbers in my above post suggest that of the three players in question the best combination is Vick and Hillis.You are getting a slight upgrade at QB (in fantasy terms) and a significant upgrade at RB.
This should be your first priority. Priority #2 should be to get Hillis even if it means giving up Vick. Bottom line is that you are solid at QB either way and need some beefing up at RB.
Like Jack Smack said before though, the guy that he is trying to trade with has Roethlisberger, so taking Rogers and giving up Hillis would probably not be a good move on his part.
0
Like Jack Smack said before though, the guy that he is trying to trade with has Roethlisberger, so taking Rogers and giving up Hillis would probably not be a good move on his part.
yea well they didnt trade, enjoyed reading you guys post's
Bottom line is if I am in the 10-12 draft spot like I was in this years league, Ill pray peyton hillis is still there, and I will never pick a QB in the first round again, too many opportunities during the season to pick up replacements, and I cant find a RB to save my life. Im starting mo morris this week at rb
I have arian foster, justin forsett, and mo morris fresh off waiver wire. DeAngelo just killed me this year
0
yea well they didnt trade, enjoyed reading you guys post's
Bottom line is if I am in the 10-12 draft spot like I was in this years league, Ill pray peyton hillis is still there, and I will never pick a QB in the first round again, too many opportunities during the season to pick up replacements, and I cant find a RB to save my life. Im starting mo morris this week at rb
I have arian foster, justin forsett, and mo morris fresh off waiver wire. DeAngelo just killed me this year
I think it's more important to look at what defenses those 2 quarterbacks are going to be facing the rest of your Fantasy season. I would have to say that Rogers has the better matchups than Vick.
And if your fantasy "Superbowl" is on week 16 like most other guys, you will have Hillis at home against Baltimore and Vick at home against the Vikings.
If anything, I would trade Vick for Hillis.
Good thing you never made that trade.
In my league Rogers had 61 points and Hillis had 6.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Crowkillers:
I think it's more important to look at what defenses those 2 quarterbacks are going to be facing the rest of your Fantasy season. I would have to say that Rogers has the better matchups than Vick.
And if your fantasy "Superbowl" is on week 16 like most other guys, you will have Hillis at home against Baltimore and Vick at home against the Vikings.
If anything, I would trade Vick for Hillis.
Good thing you never made that trade.
In my league Rogers had 61 points and Hillis had 6.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.