It time for people in this country to start calling it like it is , people . black and white need to start protecting themselves against these thug ,animals.
0
It time for people in this country to start calling it like it is , people . black and white need to start protecting themselves against these thug ,animals.
and scalabrine just give it up man. this is pure ghetto trash, nothing else. you make yourself look like a friggin piece of garbage defending idiots like this.
0
disgusting story.
and scalabrine just give it up man. this is pure ghetto trash, nothing else. you make yourself look like a friggin piece of garbage defending idiots like this.
I'll tell you what it's supposed to mean since he won't and his parasite followers won't either. Of course you know what it means.
It means that it's a 'black sounding' name and therefore, we shouldn't be surprised by any this from what he believes is a morally bankrupt culture.
Of course, he allows for plausible deniability by just inferring it with 'nuff said' which gives him and his parasites wiggle room to throw the race card at ME when I call him out for it. These are the very same tactics used by the GOP when they attempt, and are still attempting, to pass voter suppression laws along racial lines.
And ya know what's amazing?
I'll pretty much guarantee that the Newton shooting, where TWENTY children were shot by a white male, didn't even cross his mind.
Why? Because the white shooter had a mental illness and his mother didn't lock up her guns. But NONE of that had to do with his race.
And why doesn't it have to do with race with him when it comes to the Newton shooting?
1) Because he's white and would never look at his race in the same terms he looks at the black race (even though the crime was much bloodier in terms of total dead)
2) There's no such thing as 'white on white' crime for him. But black on black crime is the primary basis for the way he wants you to perceive the black race. Black on black crime = relevant. White on white crime (even the atrocity at Newton) = irrelevant.
I don't waste much time with these dopes any more. The only thing they know about black history or even the history of civil rights are the words 'Al and Jesse' as shown here.
I would advise you not to waste your time with them either. The real cockroaches are not even a few inches above this post.
I actually somewhat agree with this the only problem is Scal doesnt believe what he says here. He is just as racist as anyone else but he thinks its ok because he is racist against whites and thats ok..
All of these crimes are done by thugs cockroaches, sick human beings, whatever word you want to call them and its not about the color of their skin but simply the sickening crimes they commit
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I'll tell you what it's supposed to mean since he won't and his parasite followers won't either. Of course you know what it means.
It means that it's a 'black sounding' name and therefore, we shouldn't be surprised by any this from what he believes is a morally bankrupt culture.
Of course, he allows for plausible deniability by just inferring it with 'nuff said' which gives him and his parasites wiggle room to throw the race card at ME when I call him out for it. These are the very same tactics used by the GOP when they attempt, and are still attempting, to pass voter suppression laws along racial lines.
And ya know what's amazing?
I'll pretty much guarantee that the Newton shooting, where TWENTY children were shot by a white male, didn't even cross his mind.
Why? Because the white shooter had a mental illness and his mother didn't lock up her guns. But NONE of that had to do with his race.
And why doesn't it have to do with race with him when it comes to the Newton shooting?
1) Because he's white and would never look at his race in the same terms he looks at the black race (even though the crime was much bloodier in terms of total dead)
2) There's no such thing as 'white on white' crime for him. But black on black crime is the primary basis for the way he wants you to perceive the black race. Black on black crime = relevant. White on white crime (even the atrocity at Newton) = irrelevant.
I don't waste much time with these dopes any more. The only thing they know about black history or even the history of civil rights are the words 'Al and Jesse' as shown here.
I would advise you not to waste your time with them either. The real cockroaches are not even a few inches above this post.
I actually somewhat agree with this the only problem is Scal doesnt believe what he says here. He is just as racist as anyone else but he thinks its ok because he is racist against whites and thats ok..
All of these crimes are done by thugs cockroaches, sick human beings, whatever word you want to call them and its not about the color of their skin but simply the sickening crimes they commit
and scalabrine just give it up man. this is pure ghetto trash, nothing else. you make yourself look like a friggin piece of garbage defending idiots like this.
Who is DEFENDING them?
You can't differentiate what is a racist statement made by the OP about this being a 'black' crime (by referencing the name of the killer) and a general rebuke that the Fed has not labeled this a hat crime nor has the OP or the media brought race into the equation, that is that the shooters 'whiteness' had something to do with one of the worst murders in recent history.
And by his 'whiteness', i mean I it not as a white on black crime but a white on white crime which isn't a buzz phrase in the media or most any other Caucasian mind. Perhaps it should be after a murder of TWETNY CHILDREN!
READ and attempt to analyze based on what people actually say, not what you think they say or want them to say...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Colts03:
disgusting story.
and scalabrine just give it up man. this is pure ghetto trash, nothing else. you make yourself look like a friggin piece of garbage defending idiots like this.
Who is DEFENDING them?
You can't differentiate what is a racist statement made by the OP about this being a 'black' crime (by referencing the name of the killer) and a general rebuke that the Fed has not labeled this a hat crime nor has the OP or the media brought race into the equation, that is that the shooters 'whiteness' had something to do with one of the worst murders in recent history.
And by his 'whiteness', i mean I it not as a white on black crime but a white on white crime which isn't a buzz phrase in the media or most any other Caucasian mind. Perhaps it should be after a murder of TWETNY CHILDREN!
READ and attempt to analyze based on what people actually say, not what you think they say or want them to say...
I actually somewhat agree with this the only problem is Scal doesnt believe what he says here. He is just as racist as anyone else but he thinks its ok because he is racist against whites and thats ok..
All of these crimes are done by thugs cockroaches, sick human beings, whatever word you want to call them and its not about the color of their skin but simply the sickening crimes they commit
God you are lost. You think I think whites are an inferior race? Is that right? By scolding an OP about using race as a base for this crime with no evidence. Interesting...
0
Quote Originally Posted by NoWorries21:
I actually somewhat agree with this the only problem is Scal doesnt believe what he says here. He is just as racist as anyone else but he thinks its ok because he is racist against whites and thats ok..
All of these crimes are done by thugs cockroaches, sick human beings, whatever word you want to call them and its not about the color of their skin but simply the sickening crimes they commit
God you are lost. You think I think whites are an inferior race? Is that right? By scolding an OP about using race as a base for this crime with no evidence. Interesting...
God you are lost. You think I think whites are an inferior race? Is that right? By scolding an OP about using race as a base for this crime with no evidence. Interesting...
Its this thread to go with the others. You think ALL whites are out to get blacks. Therefore u come across as a racist. I believe that most here will agree with me that you are the one lost. And if a couple people disagree with you thats fine but when EVERYBODY does maybe you should look in the mirror. Just a thought.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
God you are lost. You think I think whites are an inferior race? Is that right? By scolding an OP about using race as a base for this crime with no evidence. Interesting...
Its this thread to go with the others. You think ALL whites are out to get blacks. Therefore u come across as a racist. I believe that most here will agree with me that you are the one lost. And if a couple people disagree with you thats fine but when EVERYBODY does maybe you should look in the mirror. Just a thought.
The media only pushes what they want you to hear. Like posting pictures of the killers from 8 years ago when they were in church. The media will never label a Black on White crime as a hate crime anyways regardless of the circumstances. I am surprised this made the news at all. These types of crimes usually go unnoticed and uncovered, much like the Pearcy Massacre. I guess the fact that the victim was so young prompted the coverage.
If 2 white teens would have robbed a Black woman and shot her baby in the face, I would be shocked if this were not considered a Hate Crime.
So you believe blacks are generally 'given a pass' with regard to how they are portrayed in the media as compared to whites?
Whenever these stories hit the news blotter, you hear the same idiotic statement like Slovak's "I'm surprised this made the news at all!!!"
Yet it happens time and time again as though there is severe underreporting and blacks get a pass. Yet they say "I'm surprised..." so much, it becomes the normal headline and they don't even realize there is nothing surprising about It and blacks actually don't get 'a pass.'
Nevermind the fact this is just his flimsy opinion with no large scale empirical evidence of any kind to back up such a statement. But who cares about that? He's catering to crod and WMI and noworries so his ego is soothed....so sad...like a child...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
The media only pushes what they want you to hear. Like posting pictures of the killers from 8 years ago when they were in church. The media will never label a Black on White crime as a hate crime anyways regardless of the circumstances. I am surprised this made the news at all. These types of crimes usually go unnoticed and uncovered, much like the Pearcy Massacre. I guess the fact that the victim was so young prompted the coverage.
If 2 white teens would have robbed a Black woman and shot her baby in the face, I would be shocked if this were not considered a Hate Crime.
So you believe blacks are generally 'given a pass' with regard to how they are portrayed in the media as compared to whites?
Whenever these stories hit the news blotter, you hear the same idiotic statement like Slovak's "I'm surprised this made the news at all!!!"
Yet it happens time and time again as though there is severe underreporting and blacks get a pass. Yet they say "I'm surprised..." so much, it becomes the normal headline and they don't even realize there is nothing surprising about It and blacks actually don't get 'a pass.'
Nevermind the fact this is just his flimsy opinion with no large scale empirical evidence of any kind to back up such a statement. But who cares about that? He's catering to crod and WMI and noworries so his ego is soothed....so sad...like a child...
Its this thread to go with the others. You think ALL whites are out to get blacks. Therefore u come across as a racist. I believe that most here will agree with me that you are the one lost. And if a couple people disagree with you thats fine but when EVERYBODY does maybe you should look in the mirror. Just a thought.
Oh really? So the new definition of 'racism' is someone who thinks whites are 'out to get blacks.' As though I've ever said or implied such a statement. Let's all make it up as we go along.
That's an interesting definition!
I wonder why would 'Everybody' disagree with me when the dominant demographic of this site is quite similar to the average viewer of Fox news:
Middle-class white males.
'Most people' on this site disagree with a guy who says 'white on white' crime should be brought up as a discussion of the Newton massacre after the OP implies a murder occurred BECAUSE someone was black: SHOCKER!!!
I need a mirror!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by NoWorries21:
Its this thread to go with the others. You think ALL whites are out to get blacks. Therefore u come across as a racist. I believe that most here will agree with me that you are the one lost. And if a couple people disagree with you thats fine but when EVERYBODY does maybe you should look in the mirror. Just a thought.
Oh really? So the new definition of 'racism' is someone who thinks whites are 'out to get blacks.' As though I've ever said or implied such a statement. Let's all make it up as we go along.
That's an interesting definition!
I wonder why would 'Everybody' disagree with me when the dominant demographic of this site is quite similar to the average viewer of Fox news:
Middle-class white males.
'Most people' on this site disagree with a guy who says 'white on white' crime should be brought up as a discussion of the Newton massacre after the OP implies a murder occurred BECAUSE someone was black: SHOCKER!!!
Crod, you have a-lot of hate there man. Saying mental illness is the only reason a white person would commit an atrocious act like in Newton is clearly idiotic. I suggest you meet some black people, they are just as hard working as you think you are.
And the few I have the honor of calling my friends are far more intelligent than you.
0
Crod, you have a-lot of hate there man. Saying mental illness is the only reason a white person would commit an atrocious act like in Newton is clearly idiotic. I suggest you meet some black people, they are just as hard working as you think you are.
And the few I have the honor of calling my friends are far more intelligent than you.
You guys need to stop arguing with Mr Know It All aka Al Sharpton Jr. He will argue just to argue, just like Al. He is without a doubt what you say he is. A racist
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
You guys need to stop arguing with Mr Know It All aka Al Sharpton Jr. He will argue just to argue, just like Al. He is without a doubt what you say he is. A racist
Wow ! Those are 2 insanely ugly human beings. At least I think they're human. No... they're not. The fact that they'd cover up their child's heinous crime proves that they have no place among humanity.
0
Quote Originally Posted by crod1980:
@ JEFFMARKETCAP
Isn't is funny? Making excuses just like scalabrine does. Well guess what?
Surprise, surprise, surprise
The auntie and mom of the suspects were arrested for lying to police in an attempt to cover it up. And the weapon was found.
Wow ! Those are 2 insanely ugly human beings. At least I think they're human. No... they're not. The fact that they'd cover up their child's heinous crime proves that they have no place among humanity.
Crod, you have a-lot of hate there man. Saying mental illness is the only reason a white person would commit an atrocious act like in Newton is clearly idiotic. I suggest you meet some black people, they are just as hard working as you think you are.
And the few I have the honor of calling my friends are far more intelligent than you.
Sorry Bro, I haven't been this pissed off since this happened.
Crod, you have a-lot of hate there man. Saying mental illness is the only reason a white person would commit an atrocious act like in Newton is clearly idiotic. I suggest you meet some black people, they are just as hard working as you think you are.
And the few I have the honor of calling my friends are far more intelligent than you.
Sorry Bro, I haven't been this pissed off since this happened.
Saying mental illness is the only reason a white person would commit an atrocious act like in Newton is clearly idiotic.
So you are saying that a sane white man goes and kills twenty kids for fun? And that doesn't make him crazy? he didn't rob them, he didn't rape them and had no motive. Mental illness is the only reason why anyone regardless of color would go on a lone shooting rampage like that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mafioso:
Saying mental illness is the only reason a white person would commit an atrocious act like in Newton is clearly idiotic.
So you are saying that a sane white man goes and kills twenty kids for fun? And that doesn't make him crazy? he didn't rob them, he didn't rape them and had no motive. Mental illness is the only reason why anyone regardless of color would go on a lone shooting rampage like that.
Do a google search and look what these people related to De'Marquise have been posting on their Facebook accounts(most of the stuff is deleted, but people have saved the screen captures) this was nothing more than 2 teen thugs looking to rob and then kill some white people.
0
Not about race huh?
Do a google search and look what these people related to De'Marquise have been posting on their Facebook accounts(most of the stuff is deleted, but people have saved the screen captures) this was nothing more than 2 teen thugs looking to rob and then kill some white people.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.