Men and women are equal.
If a woman's team has a higher total numbers than a mans.
Then the women are clearly better.
You really can not factor in that women are no good in sports. Also how many good teams can you really have with women to select from for the roster?
In golf, girls are getting scholarships if they can break 87 while guys are getting nothing unless they can break 73-74.
Hell we might as well tell this girls team they are Universal World Champs because they are clearly the best.
Men and women are equal.
If a woman's team has a higher total numbers than a mans.
Then the women are clearly better.
You really can not factor in that women are no good in sports. Also how many good teams can you really have with women to select from for the roster?
In golf, girls are getting scholarships if they can break 87 while guys are getting nothing unless they can break 73-74.
Hell we might as well tell this girls team they are Universal World Champs because they are clearly the best.
this pretty much sums it up. i made the mistake of turning on sportscenter last night because i wanted to see this alleged fumble that gave louisville the game and they started off with footage of wooden. i knew i'd have to sit through a bunch of uconn women nonsense and went to sleep. my fault for watching espn when there isn't a game on.
this pretty much sums it up. i made the mistake of turning on sportscenter last night because i wanted to see this alleged fumble that gave louisville the game and they started off with footage of wooden. i knew i'd have to sit through a bunch of uconn women nonsense and went to sleep. my fault for watching espn when there isn't a game on.
The record is most consecutive wins for a Division 1 college basketball team. So no...high school wouldn't count. Hell...they probably have some high school out there currently over 100 wins in a row somewhere. Just like if it was Division 2. They'd mention it after it happened.
And I disagree. It IS because they're women. Is there really parity in woman's basketball? All you have to do is ask the Nation's best if they want to go to UConn or Tennessee (for the most part). And, over the past few years, it's been UConn. You can't get that in men's basketball (past or present). There are so many players who want to go to different schools. Duke, UNC, John Calipari etc.
The women have shown that it's not comparable to the men's team by the way they blew out their opponents. Aside from Baylor earlier in the season...check their scores. Don't they win by an average of 20 points? All relevant players are at UConn...everyone else is irrelevant aside from that man who plays at Baylor.
Oh yea...ESPN is a joke.
The record is most consecutive wins for a Division 1 college basketball team. So no...high school wouldn't count. Hell...they probably have some high school out there currently over 100 wins in a row somewhere. Just like if it was Division 2. They'd mention it after it happened.
And I disagree. It IS because they're women. Is there really parity in woman's basketball? All you have to do is ask the Nation's best if they want to go to UConn or Tennessee (for the most part). And, over the past few years, it's been UConn. You can't get that in men's basketball (past or present). There are so many players who want to go to different schools. Duke, UNC, John Calipari etc.
The women have shown that it's not comparable to the men's team by the way they blew out their opponents. Aside from Baylor earlier in the season...check their scores. Don't they win by an average of 20 points? All relevant players are at UConn...everyone else is irrelevant aside from that man who plays at Baylor.
Oh yea...ESPN is a joke.
The dudes in the morning were saying they both should stand on their own. I agree. Not sure what the other clowns have said today.
Even coach Arriema (spelling?) said the two are not comparable.
The dudes in the morning were saying they both should stand on their own. I agree. Not sure what the other clowns have said today.
Even coach Arriema (spelling?) said the two are not comparable.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.