If 20 right wing candidates cannot win on 2008, 2012, 2016, they cannot win in 2020 after the Clintons get through with them.
The reason is so obvious, The Dems push for the rights of the middle class, Reps push for the rights of the top ten percent. Yet the Reps still haven't figured it out
Duh !
And there are no more slick Ronald Reagans on the horizon that make it look like the are for the middle class.
0
If 20 right wing candidates cannot win on 2008, 2012, 2016, they cannot win in 2020 after the Clintons get through with them.
The reason is so obvious, The Dems push for the rights of the middle class, Reps push for the rights of the top ten percent. Yet the Reps still haven't figured it out
Duh !
And there are no more slick Ronald Reagans on the horizon that make it look like the are for the middle class.
Theres no value in losing, unless its the lesson learned.
Value is calculated based on price and determined BEFORE the event takes place.
If Clinton was +500 to win the Presidency, you'd be a fool not to bet on it....even if she ends up losing. Because the price you would be getting would be WAY better than her actual odds of winning.
If Clinton wins, do you think it was wise if someone bet her at -1000 to win? Well, the bet won. But it's a horrible play because her real odds weren't even close to that.
You don't get to determine value after an event goes off and you find out if you won or lost.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Theres no value in losing, unless its the lesson learned.
Value is calculated based on price and determined BEFORE the event takes place.
If Clinton was +500 to win the Presidency, you'd be a fool not to bet on it....even if she ends up losing. Because the price you would be getting would be WAY better than her actual odds of winning.
If Clinton wins, do you think it was wise if someone bet her at -1000 to win? Well, the bet won. But it's a horrible play because her real odds weren't even close to that.
You don't get to determine value after an event goes off and you find out if you won or lost.
The reason is so obvious, The Dems push for the rights of the middle class, Reps push for the rights of the top ten percent. Yet the Reps still haven't figured it out
_____________________________
Why wasn't this obvious when the repubs held the White House from 2000-2008?
0
The reason is so obvious, The Dems push for the rights of the middle class, Reps push for the rights of the top ten percent. Yet the Reps still haven't figured it out
_____________________________
Why wasn't this obvious when the repubs held the White House from 2000-2008?
The reason is so obvious, The Dems push for the rights of the middle class, Reps push for the rights of the top ten percent. Yet the Reps still haven't figured it out
_____________________________
Why wasn't this obvious when the repubs held the White House from 2000-2008?
It was obvious, Bush was not elected by the popular vote in 2000.
In 2004, we were focus on the Bush war. Yet Bush's margin of victory in the popular vote was the smallest ever by a reelected incumbent president.
Bush's ownership society included let people invest the social security money in the stock market. encouraging people to buy bigger homes, encouraging them to buy their own health insurance !
How did that turn out for ya ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
The reason is so obvious, The Dems push for the rights of the middle class, Reps push for the rights of the top ten percent. Yet the Reps still haven't figured it out
_____________________________
Why wasn't this obvious when the repubs held the White House from 2000-2008?
It was obvious, Bush was not elected by the popular vote in 2000.
In 2004, we were focus on the Bush war. Yet Bush's margin of victory in the popular vote was the smallest ever by a reelected incumbent president.
Bush's ownership society included let people invest the social security money in the stock market. encouraging people to buy bigger homes, encouraging them to buy their own health insurance !
Decent bet. She'll get the Dems, minority AND the womens votes....Seriously doubt the Repubs can drum some body up that will be able to compete with that.....
Carly Fiorina Shapes Herself as the Republican Foil to Hillary Clinton
WASHINGTON
— She has been the chief executive of Hewlett-Packard, a senior
adviser to a Republican presidential nominee and a candidate for the
United States Senate. But Carly Fiorina recently took on her boldest
role yet: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s loudest critic.
Over
the past few weeks, Ms. Fiorina has mocked Mrs. Clinton’s
globe-trotting as secretary of state, assailed Mrs. Clinton’s use of
only a private email account to do official business, and even accused
Mrs. Clinton of stealing intellectual property. From her. Twice.
Ms.
Fiorina insists she has no problem with Mrs. Clinton personally — only
with her liberal philosophy and policies, and what she dismisses as an
unimpressive record on getting things done.
“Like Hillary Clinton,
I too, have traveled hundreds of thousands of miles around the globe,
but unlike her, I have actually accomplished something,” she told
conservatives in Iowa in January. “Mrs. Clinton: Flying is an activity,
not an accomplishment.”
Decent bet. She'll get the Dems, minority AND the womens votes....Seriously doubt the Repubs can drum some body up that will be able to compete with that.....
Carly Fiorina Shapes Herself as the Republican Foil to Hillary Clinton
WASHINGTON
— She has been the chief executive of Hewlett-Packard, a senior
adviser to a Republican presidential nominee and a candidate for the
United States Senate. But Carly Fiorina recently took on her boldest
role yet: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s loudest critic.
Over
the past few weeks, Ms. Fiorina has mocked Mrs. Clinton’s
globe-trotting as secretary of state, assailed Mrs. Clinton’s use of
only a private email account to do official business, and even accused
Mrs. Clinton of stealing intellectual property. From her. Twice.
Ms.
Fiorina insists she has no problem with Mrs. Clinton personally — only
with her liberal philosophy and policies, and what she dismisses as an
unimpressive record on getting things done.
“Like Hillary Clinton,
I too, have traveled hundreds of thousands of miles around the globe,
but unlike her, I have actually accomplished something,” she told
conservatives in Iowa in January. “Mrs. Clinton: Flying is an activity,
not an accomplishment.”
Holy garbage! Hillary Clinton goes full-blown Donald Trump bashing San Francisco's sanctuary city policy after Kate Steinle murder
The political
winds be a shiftin'! Shows the power of the issue. One woman's
horrible murder can change the entire political dynamic in the United
States. From HuffPo, actual quote today from Hillary Clinton:
"The city made a
mistake, not to deport someone that the federal government strongly
felt should be deported," she said in an interview. "So I have
absolutely no support for a city that ignores the strong evidence that
should be acted on." https://www.libertarianrepublican.net/2015/07/holy-garbage-hillary-clinton-goes-full.html
Go Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by VanDutch:
What a Maggot.
Run Trump Run...
Holy garbage! Hillary Clinton goes full-blown Donald Trump bashing San Francisco's sanctuary city policy after Kate Steinle murder
The political
winds be a shiftin'! Shows the power of the issue. One woman's
horrible murder can change the entire political dynamic in the United
States. From HuffPo, actual quote today from Hillary Clinton:
"The city made a
mistake, not to deport someone that the federal government strongly
felt should be deported," she said in an interview. "So I have
absolutely no support for a city that ignores the strong evidence that
should be acted on." https://www.libertarianrepublican.net/2015/07/holy-garbage-hillary-clinton-goes-full.html
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.