All Forums | General Discussion

JFK Assassination

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2543
Posts: 49
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #1
Conspiracy or lone gunman?  And one or two reasons why you think that is the case.


GO!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #2
Rear head shot has me confused.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 6464
Posted: #3
Conspiracy for certain.

1. The CIA played JFK for a fool in the Bay of Pigs. He was forever lost from their control after that. He swore to dismantle their little geopolitical terror party. (Too many with too much to lose, therefore he had to be eliminated)

2. Oswald smells like he a was a former or current CIA asset. Of course, he was conveniently murdered to complete the deception.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 22
Posted: #4
Conspiracy - Single Bullet Theory is preposterous
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:

Rear head shot has me confused.

In the London trial, Bugliosi proved (using the Zapruder film) that JFK's head actually moved a couple of inches forward at impact and then 8 inches backward after that.  But you have to watch it frame by frame to see it.  Now you still might believe someone shot him from the front, but these are the facts.  




 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by Thunder37:

Conspiracy - Single Bullet Theory is preposterous

How so?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by slikstiks99:

Conspiracy for certain.

1. The CIA played JFK for a fool in the Bay of Pigs. He was forever lost from their control after that. He swore to dismantle their little geopolitical terror party. (Too many with too much to lose, therefore he had to be eliminated)

2. Oswald smells like he a was a former or current CIA asset. Of course, he was conveniently murdered to complete the deception.

Why did he have to be murdered to complete the deception?  And why Jack Ruby?  Jack Ruby was mentally unstable.....a blabber mouth.   A guy who loved the police (let them into his clubs for free all the time).  If Oswald had to be murdered to complete the deception, why wasn't Ruby murdered to silence him?  Why choose a baffoon (and Ruby most assuredly was one) to off Oswald?

Both these guys were unstable and unpredictable.  That's the type of person that the government and the mob hire to do such an important job?  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 32143
Posted: #8


Fatal gunshot wound hit JFK from the front and blew half his head off the back on exit.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:



Fatal gunshot wound hit JFK from the front and blew half his head off the back on exit.

Why did his head move forward at impact?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 14428
Posted: #10
one of my earliest memories as a child.  I was four years old and everyone was watching tv and crying.  so strange

I can't go into too much detail for fear of my well being.....but everyone in La knows the New Orleans mob conducted the hit.  I'm not typing the name of the boss in the Crescent City at the time, but you know who he was.....or google it or whatever  Jack Ruby belonged to him.

Payback for brother Bobby's agressive litigation against la cosa nostra as Attorney General...... Plain and simple because those people were friends of the president's dad when he was a bootlegger during prohibition.  they controlled the polls in many areas and got Jack elected to POTUS.

End of story..IMO
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #11

The 3rd round that literally fell out of John's head in the car was a pointed shape rifle round. (like a modern 223 round).

This mystery round was turned over by his wife to doctors and was never brought up until recently. Rounds that came out of Oswalt's rifle were dome shaped.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:


In the London trial, Bugliosi proved (using the Zapruder film) that JFK's head actually moved a couple of inches forward at impact and then 8 inches backward after that.  But you have to watch it frame by frame to see it.  Now you still might believe someone shot him from the front, but these are the facts.  
 
Hutchman I've only seen the movie that was made. The slow motion frame by frame was pretty thorough I thought.  Only explanation I can think of is that the brain stem and reflexes might react with unpredictable movements front and back on impact. Just guessing here. Be difficult to test unless we can find some deathrow inmate that's willing to take a headshot in a convertable.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #13

....either way, bullistics back then were borderline non existent.

I go with two shooters. One rifle more advanced then Oswalt's with a higher velocity round being fired. That round would spin and twist all over that vehicle after impact.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 1987
Posted: #14
Oswald wasn't nearly skilled enough to pull the shots off. End of story. Just that plain simple.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2206
Posted: #15
Just an opinion, but I think JFK was taking care of by an institution that starts with a C. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by doggs:

Just an opinion, but I think JFK was taking care of by an institution that starts with a C. 

Agree Pro firing squad on that street. Little kid Oswalt was just the guy to setup.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54459
Posted: #17

Shots were too good and too quick to come from 1 gun.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 8808
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:

....either way, bullistics back then were borderline non existent.

I go with two shooters. One rifle more advanced then Oswalt's with a higher velocity round being fired. That round would spin and twist all over that vehicle after impact.

able to check dna from a cold case file 30 yrs ago but they cant check the bullets fired from the gun now?  where is oswalts gun now?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by soup-can:

able to check dna from a cold case file 30 yrs ago but they cant check the bullets fired from the gun now?  where is oswalts gun now?

Exactly. Casings? Rounds? Rifle? Oswalt's hand print on rifle?

Where is all of this stough?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #20

Gun powder on Oswalt's hand/forearm? You positively cannot fire a rifle or handgun without residual on exposed skin, especially on a bolt action rifle when you're clearing multiple rounds out of the ejection port.

Dig up the body.

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #21
...receiver...scuse me.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18777
Posted: #22
I find it hard to believe you think it's a lone gunman after all the evidence Hutch. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1590
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

I find it hard to believe you think it's a lone gunman after all the evidence Hutch. 


He's one of those people that believe if the government says it, it must be true. Sheep is what most call them
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #24

History Channel is going ape shot with evidence that questions Oswalt's involvement. Objective in my opinion..both sides.

 

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 6293
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:

Gun powder on Oswalt's hand/forearm? You positively cannot fire a rifle or handgun without residual on exposed skin, especially on a bolt action rifle when you're clearing multiple rounds out of the ejection port.

Dig up the body.


 

Even if residue was found how would you know it was from the rifle or from the pistol used by Jack Ruby?  I'm sure there residue would be left after being shot at point blank.

All Forums | General Discussion
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.