Man, what is wrong with people.
A 60 year old that has penetration with a ten year old little boy, or a 60+ year old making the 10 year old give him a blow job IS NOT the same kind of thing as not feeding your kids the right food.
What is wrong with you? Are you just looking for something to argue with?
I am not even remotely saying that what Sandusky did was anything less than pure eveil.
Does me saying that that the childhood obesity epidemic also has a terrible burden on children's lives mean that what Sandusky did is not bad?
Why is it an either or thing? So if one is bad than the other can not also be bad? Come on man use your head a little here. Do you really think that I am saying that raping a kid is not bad?
Annoys me to even have to be typing this to defend my comment.
It is just that it is easy to not realize the impact that it will have future generations because it is a gradual process?
Once again one being bad does not diminish the seriousness of the other.
Man, what is wrong with people.
A 60 year old that has penetration with a ten year old little boy, or a 60+ year old making the 10 year old give him a blow job IS NOT the same kind of thing as not feeding your kids the right food.
What is wrong with you? Are you just looking for something to argue with?
I am not even remotely saying that what Sandusky did was anything less than pure eveil.
Does me saying that that the childhood obesity epidemic also has a terrible burden on children's lives mean that what Sandusky did is not bad?
Why is it an either or thing? So if one is bad than the other can not also be bad? Come on man use your head a little here. Do you really think that I am saying that raping a kid is not bad?
Annoys me to even have to be typing this to defend my comment.
It is just that it is easy to not realize the impact that it will have future generations because it is a gradual process?
Once again one being bad does not diminish the seriousness of the other.
ok dude. glad to see that you are able to see past your nose
ok dude. glad to see that you are able to see past your nose
Weeble,
your not saying we cant call sandusky a rapist are you? Because the court papers pretty much call him that.
Weeble,
your not saying we cant call sandusky a rapist are you? Because the court papers pretty much call him that.
What is wrong with you? Are you just looking for something to argue with?
I am not even remotely saying that what Sandusky did was anything less than pure eveil.
Does me saying that that the childhood obesity epidemic also has a terrible burden on children's lives mean that what Sandusky did is not bad?
Why is it an either or thing? So if one is bad than the other can not also be bad? Come on man use your head a little here. Do you really think that I am saying that raping a kid is not bad?
Annoys me to even have to be typing this to defend my comment.
It is just that it is easy to not realize the impact that it will have future generations because it is a gradual process?
Once again one being bad does not diminish the seriousness of the other.
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
What is wrong with you? Are you just looking for something to argue with?
I am not even remotely saying that what Sandusky did was anything less than pure eveil.
Does me saying that that the childhood obesity epidemic also has a terrible burden on children's lives mean that what Sandusky did is not bad?
Why is it an either or thing? So if one is bad than the other can not also be bad? Come on man use your head a little here. Do you really think that I am saying that raping a kid is not bad?
Annoys me to even have to be typing this to defend my comment.
It is just that it is easy to not realize the impact that it will have future generations because it is a gradual process?
Once again one being bad does not diminish the seriousness of the other.
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
ok. well I will add you to my list of people who can successfully twist around words and refuse to think critically..
to think that my comments are even remotely stating that being a pedophile is not of utmost evil is insane.
ok. well I will add you to my list of people who can successfully twist around words and refuse to think critically..
to think that my comments are even remotely stating that being a pedophile is not of utmost evil is insane.
ok. well I will add you to my list of people who can successfully twist around words and refuse to think critically..
to think that my comments are even remotely stating that being a pedophile is not of utmost evil is insane.
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
ok. well I will add you to my list of people who can successfully twist around words and refuse to think critically..
to think that my comments are even remotely stating that being a pedophile is not of utmost evil is insane.
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
I only mentioned childhood obesity because it was mentioned earlier in the thread. And like it or not it seemed to take over the thread to a certain extent (about half way through) and so I thought it was not so far out of bounds to comment on it. I was not defending his stance or arguing his stance. I was simply stating that I agree that childhood obesity is a serious issue and that it is also a scenario that can have long lasting effects on a childs future however, you do not hear it talked about very much. My post was more to point out that it is a serious issue that I think many people can and do overlook.
Now for all of you that want to twist my words and view it as saying that being a pedophile is ok. well that is on you. I am not sure what else i can say.
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
I only mentioned childhood obesity because it was mentioned earlier in the thread. And like it or not it seemed to take over the thread to a certain extent (about half way through) and so I thought it was not so far out of bounds to comment on it. I was not defending his stance or arguing his stance. I was simply stating that I agree that childhood obesity is a serious issue and that it is also a scenario that can have long lasting effects on a childs future however, you do not hear it talked about very much. My post was more to point out that it is a serious issue that I think many people can and do overlook.
Now for all of you that want to twist my words and view it as saying that being a pedophile is ok. well that is on you. I am not sure what else i can say.
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
see my post above. relax a bit man. try to think outside the box a bit. i was just going with the flow of the thread.
Why are you even talking about child obesity?
It looked to me as if you were trying to minimize the actions of a creep. .
see my post above. relax a bit man. try to think outside the box a bit. i was just going with the flow of the thread.
I just don't understand how child obesity can be mentioned as the same kind of thing as sexual abuse on a child.
That makes zero sense to me and i think that the people that say it are going to minimize child abuse .... however, i see how that was not your intention.
I just don't understand how child obesity can be mentioned as the same kind of thing as sexual abuse on a child.
That makes zero sense to me and i think that the people that say it are going to minimize child abuse .... however, i see how that was not your intention.
I was almost 100 percent sure that is what you meant, but i just wanted to check with you before i called him a monster again
I was almost 100 percent sure that is what you meant, but i just wanted to check with you before i called him a monster again
as far as the guys here who have said parents feeding their kids sugar is on par with what sandusky has done, need some help.
You also might want to start putting some of that blame on the friggin dirtbag companies who are making all this crap and selling it to us knowing its very bad for you. I would guess the majority of people in our country really dont know what foods are bad for you and just think, hey if a company is selling it to the public it must be okay to eat.
It would be great if all we could buy was healthy food, because thats all companies were allowed to sell, but thats not gonna happen. Look how bad alcohol and cigs are, yet both are still legally sold everyday, yet the govt and companies know that both are very bad for all of us. Wonder why that is? couldnt have anything to do with and the drug companies getting to make all the nasty drugs to heal us from all the bad things we put into our bodies?
And i would bet my left nut, the guys comparing sugar to sandusky, ate tons of sugary things growing up themselves.
So to mattbrot, i say who is really at fault, the parents or the dirtbag companies who keep making and selling us the bad shit. You sure as hell dont see the giant companies who make95 percent of the foods we all eat everyday, saying hey, from now on all were going to sell is good healthy foods and nothing bad is going to come out of our plants anymore.
as far as the guys here who have said parents feeding their kids sugar is on par with what sandusky has done, need some help.
You also might want to start putting some of that blame on the friggin dirtbag companies who are making all this crap and selling it to us knowing its very bad for you. I would guess the majority of people in our country really dont know what foods are bad for you and just think, hey if a company is selling it to the public it must be okay to eat.
It would be great if all we could buy was healthy food, because thats all companies were allowed to sell, but thats not gonna happen. Look how bad alcohol and cigs are, yet both are still legally sold everyday, yet the govt and companies know that both are very bad for all of us. Wonder why that is? couldnt have anything to do with and the drug companies getting to make all the nasty drugs to heal us from all the bad things we put into our bodies?
And i would bet my left nut, the guys comparing sugar to sandusky, ate tons of sugary things growing up themselves.
So to mattbrot, i say who is really at fault, the parents or the dirtbag companies who keep making and selling us the bad shit. You sure as hell dont see the giant companies who make95 percent of the foods we all eat everyday, saying hey, from now on all were going to sell is good healthy foods and nothing bad is going to come out of our plants anymore.
see my post above. relax a bit man. try to think outside the box a bit. i was just going with the flow of the thread.
see my post above. relax a bit man. try to think outside the box a bit. i was just going with the flow of the thread.
as far as the guys here who have said parents feeding their kids sugar is on par with what sandusky has done, need some help.
You also might want to start putting some of that blame on the friggin dirtbag companies who are making all this crap and selling it to us knowing its very bad for you. I would guess the majority of people in our country really dont know what foods are bad for you and just think, hey if a company is selling it to the public it must be okay to eat.
It would be great if all we could buy was healthy food, because thats all companies were allowed to sell, but thats not gonna happen. Look how bad alcohol and cigs are, yet both are still legally sold everyday, yet the govt and companies know that both are very bad for all of us. Wonder why that is? couldnt have anything to do with and the drug companies getting to make all the nasty drugs to heal us from all the bad things we put into our bodies?
And i would bet my left nut, the guys comparing sugar to sandusky, ate tons of sugary things growing up themselves.
So to mattbrot, i say who is really at fault, the parents or the dirtbag companies who keep making and selling us the bad shit. You sure as hell dont see the giant companies who make95 percent of the foods we all eat everyday, saying hey, from now on all were going to sell is good healthy foods and nothing bad is going to come out of our plants anymore.
as far as the guys here who have said parents feeding their kids sugar is on par with what sandusky has done, need some help.
You also might want to start putting some of that blame on the friggin dirtbag companies who are making all this crap and selling it to us knowing its very bad for you. I would guess the majority of people in our country really dont know what foods are bad for you and just think, hey if a company is selling it to the public it must be okay to eat.
It would be great if all we could buy was healthy food, because thats all companies were allowed to sell, but thats not gonna happen. Look how bad alcohol and cigs are, yet both are still legally sold everyday, yet the govt and companies know that both are very bad for all of us. Wonder why that is? couldnt have anything to do with and the drug companies getting to make all the nasty drugs to heal us from all the bad things we put into our bodies?
And i would bet my left nut, the guys comparing sugar to sandusky, ate tons of sugary things growing up themselves.
So to mattbrot, i say who is really at fault, the parents or the dirtbag companies who keep making and selling us the bad shit. You sure as hell dont see the giant companies who make95 percent of the foods we all eat everyday, saying hey, from now on all were going to sell is good healthy foods and nothing bad is going to come out of our plants anymore.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.