Lance Armstrong will be
stripped of seven Tour de France titles, given lifetime ban from
Olympics as he drops appeal of doping charges
Disgraced
cyclist will no longer fight charges he led sophisticated doping
conspiracy, will not have to hear former teammates testify against him,
but now leaves himself vulnerable
Lance Armstrong will be
stripped of seven Tour de France titles, given lifetime ban from
Olympics as he drops appeal of doping charges
Disgraced
cyclist will no longer fight charges he led sophisticated doping
conspiracy, will not have to hear former teammates testify against him,
but now leaves himself vulnerable
for the record, ClubDirtSports.com empathizes with lance in that we never fought allegations that we have been doping for many years and it enhanced our performance in certain areas unrelated to athletic endeavors.
0
for the record, ClubDirtSports.com empathizes with lance in that we never fought allegations that we have been doping for many years and it enhanced our performance in certain areas unrelated to athletic endeavors.
What a stupid post. Out of the top 100 cyclists, 100 did PED's. It's one thing if he had an advantage, but he never did. It's not even a question of him beating people "on the straight" as cycling was the breeding grounds for groundbreaking dope.
Trust me, there wasn't somebody with superior talent that was slighted because every major team was doped to the gills in the 90's. In fact, any news here at all? Didn't think so..
0
What a stupid post. Out of the top 100 cyclists, 100 did PED's. It's one thing if he had an advantage, but he never did. It's not even a question of him beating people "on the straight" as cycling was the breeding grounds for groundbreaking dope.
Trust me, there wasn't somebody with superior talent that was slighted because every major team was doped to the gills in the 90's. In fact, any news here at all? Didn't think so..
What a stupid post. Out of the top 100 cyclists, 100 did PED's. It's one thing if he had an advantage, but he never did. It's not even a question of him beating people "on the straight" as cycling was the breeding grounds for groundbreaking dope.
Trust me, there wasn't somebody with superior talent that was slighted because every major team was doped to the gills in the 90's. In fact, any news here at all? Didn't think so..
Of course he had an advantage. He had better doctors.
It's not cheating though. Doping has been accepted in that sport for ..well since it began..
And it's still there to this day. The average speed is the same today as in the 90s where doping was rampant.
If it was slower then nobody would watch.
0
Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:
What a stupid post. Out of the top 100 cyclists, 100 did PED's. It's one thing if he had an advantage, but he never did. It's not even a question of him beating people "on the straight" as cycling was the breeding grounds for groundbreaking dope.
Trust me, there wasn't somebody with superior talent that was slighted because every major team was doped to the gills in the 90's. In fact, any news here at all? Didn't think so..
Of course he had an advantage. He had better doctors.
It's not cheating though. Doping has been accepted in that sport for ..well since it began..
And it's still there to this day. The average speed is the same today as in the 90s where doping was rampant.
He had another advanatge over other cyclists too, in that he only really raced the TDF and not other events. (Cycling fans - correct me if am wrong there...)
It shows you how smart the cheaters are when Armstrong and Bonds never failed a test.
0
About time this cheater got busted.
He had another advanatge over other cyclists too, in that he only really raced the TDF and not other events. (Cycling fans - correct me if am wrong there...)
It shows you how smart the cheaters are when Armstrong and Bonds never failed a test.
Lance Armstrong can suck a dick. Stupid cheater finally getting what he deserves. Too bad they can't take away all the money he's made and donate it to people with cancer.
All the money he raised for cancer is likely just to ...
1. make more money for himself and 2. improve his image.
This guy ranks right there with Joe Pa on the piece of shit index.
0
The Tour de France is a fucking joke...
Lance Armstrong can suck a dick. Stupid cheater finally getting what he deserves. Too bad they can't take away all the money he's made and donate it to people with cancer.
All the money he raised for cancer is likely just to ...
1. make more money for himself and 2. improve his image.
This guy ranks right there with Joe Pa on the piece of shit index.
My question is: He has still never tested positive for anything and the US doping agency is not disputing that so what are they basing things on? The word of riders he beat?
0
My question is: He has still never tested positive for anything and the US doping agency is not disputing that so what are they basing things on? The word of riders he beat?
Lance Armstrong can suck a dick. Stupid cheater finally getting what he deserves. Too bad they can't take away all the money he's made and donate it to people with cancer.
All the money he raised for cancer is likely just to ...
1. make more money for himself and 2. improve his image.
This guy ranks right there with Joe Pa on the piece of shit index.
Are you fucking serious?!?! You are comparing him to Joe Pa??? What Lance Armstrong did (or might have done) is microscopic compared to letting little boys get raped. You are ridiculous.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Madden:
The Tour de France is a fucking joke...
Lance Armstrong can suck a dick. Stupid cheater finally getting what he deserves. Too bad they can't take away all the money he's made and donate it to people with cancer.
All the money he raised for cancer is likely just to ...
1. make more money for himself and 2. improve his image.
This guy ranks right there with Joe Pa on the piece of shit index.
Are you fucking serious?!?! You are comparing him to Joe Pa??? What Lance Armstrong did (or might have done) is microscopic compared to letting little boys get raped. You are ridiculous.
The whole damn steroid/HGH era has tainted all of sports to a depressing end. Throw in the "for the love of money" contracts nowadays, and it seemingly makes viewing sports less important as well.
ESPN and other media hype these type of stories to no end when they're winning, and then endlessly ram it down our throats when they fail.
0
The whole damn steroid/HGH era has tainted all of sports to a depressing end. Throw in the "for the love of money" contracts nowadays, and it seemingly makes viewing sports less important as well.
ESPN and other media hype these type of stories to no end when they're winning, and then endlessly ram it down our throats when they fail.
How can you strip a 7 time champion of something that has never been proven?
It's the USA, you know, where you are INNOCENT until proven GUILTY. He was never proven guilty, therefore he is innocent.
Maybe he is giving up on this fight because all odds are stacked against him, and it has completely taken over his life. He is at the point that he said fuck it, you have no proof, we both know you don't, so I'll stop fighting to prove something is false that doesn't even exist.
Hey Madden, show me some proof. And I don't mean what someone's grandma told their 5th cousin that was best friends with Sally who told Jimmy it was true. I want the US doping agency to come forward and say, yes, he has tested positive. But guess what, it won't happen because he hasn't.
Just put it this way. Think about if someone came to me and said that you killed someone, so in turn you get arrested for murder and go to jail for 25+ years. How is that in any way shape or form morally correct? Easy answer, it's not.
0
How can you strip a 7 time champion of something that has never been proven?
It's the USA, you know, where you are INNOCENT until proven GUILTY. He was never proven guilty, therefore he is innocent.
Maybe he is giving up on this fight because all odds are stacked against him, and it has completely taken over his life. He is at the point that he said fuck it, you have no proof, we both know you don't, so I'll stop fighting to prove something is false that doesn't even exist.
Hey Madden, show me some proof. And I don't mean what someone's grandma told their 5th cousin that was best friends with Sally who told Jimmy it was true. I want the US doping agency to come forward and say, yes, he has tested positive. But guess what, it won't happen because he hasn't.
Just put it this way. Think about if someone came to me and said that you killed someone, so in turn you get arrested for murder and go to jail for 25+ years. How is that in any way shape or form morally correct? Easy answer, it's not.
Innocent people give up the fight all the time. It costs money.....stress......and IF it's a "he said, she said thing," there is nothing he can do about it.
If he is guilty (and he might be), show me the lab evidence. This guy was in cycling when people were getting busted right and left. Yet he never failed a test. If he's a cheater, show me the empircal evidence....not just some sour grapes from other riders.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PokinSmot:
if you were innocent...
would you give up
OR
keep fighting?
Innocent people give up the fight all the time. It costs money.....stress......and IF it's a "he said, she said thing," there is nothing he can do about it.
If he is guilty (and he might be), show me the lab evidence. This guy was in cycling when people were getting busted right and left. Yet he never failed a test. If he's a cheater, show me the empircal evidence....not just some sour grapes from other riders.
By not going through the whole process he can maintain his current stance that he was clean. Deny deny deny.
I can understand that I guess... He doesn't have many other options.
He has done a lot of good for a lot of people but I question if he's doing it with good intentions...If he shuts up about cycling and stays away from and focuses solely on working to help people with cancer he will earn my respect. Either way he's still a phony.
Do you honestly believe that his wasn't cheating? How about Barry Bonds? His head must have grown naturally...
0
The proof will come out soon enough...
By not going through the whole process he can maintain his current stance that he was clean. Deny deny deny.
I can understand that I guess... He doesn't have many other options.
He has done a lot of good for a lot of people but I question if he's doing it with good intentions...If he shuts up about cycling and stays away from and focuses solely on working to help people with cancer he will earn my respect. Either way he's still a phony.
Do you honestly believe that his wasn't cheating? How about Barry Bonds? His head must have grown naturally...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
