by the way SOSA.......if you're speaking English now...... Did you ever explain to us "child molester haters".......how that kid (jordan chandler ?)......was able to ACCURATELY describe : location of "splotch" when PECKER was flaccid.....AND erect ? * HTF i wonder did he know that our pal MJ was circumcised ?.......guess just yet another real good guess about length of pubic hair ?........AND location of another splotch.....on ass ?...(we gotta get this lil fucker on covers pickin winners).....been admiring your admirable work here and did not want to miss anything....... throw in ....if actually child himself..... your theory as to why the tons of porn in ol MJ's rack.........over 70 mags......several books including 2 dedicated solely to nude young boys......an artsy effort with extra detail given to genitalia....".barely legal" was a big player........a strange choice for a child i thought ......also enjoyed GAY PORN.....a very odd choice for our innocent child MJ........there are about 900 FUCKING other delicacies i would like to better understand ......to properly embrace this icon.......i am not currently willing .....but feel i have the potential .........to look the other way..... if my children ever get molested by someone that can sing and dance real fuckin good....would appreciate any help you offer in this matter.....
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
NJDEVILS will handle this for me.
by the way SOSA.......if you're speaking English now...... Did you ever explain to us "child molester haters".......how that kid (jordan chandler ?)......was able to ACCURATELY describe : location of "splotch" when PECKER was flaccid.....AND erect ? * HTF i wonder did he know that our pal MJ was circumcised ?.......guess just yet another real good guess about length of pubic hair ?........AND location of another splotch.....on ass ?...(we gotta get this lil fucker on covers pickin winners).....been admiring your admirable work here and did not want to miss anything....... throw in ....if actually child himself..... your theory as to why the tons of porn in ol MJ's rack.........over 70 mags......several books including 2 dedicated solely to nude young boys......an artsy effort with extra detail given to genitalia....".barely legal" was a big player........a strange choice for a child i thought ......also enjoyed GAY PORN.....a very odd choice for our innocent child MJ........there are about 900 FUCKING other delicacies i would like to better understand ......to properly embrace this icon.......i am not currently willing .....but feel i have the potential .........to look the other way..... if my children ever get molested by someone that can sing and dance real fuckin good....would appreciate any help you offer in this matter.....
I am the farthest thing from sad. If you think making fun of someone dying than I will come to your mothers funeral and start cracking jokes. I'll give you 1 second before you get "sad" and angry. Low-life.
So, you are comparing the relationship between a kid fucker that you do not know to the relationship of my mother and I?
No need to argue with unrealistic thinking people like you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
I am the farthest thing from sad. If you think making fun of someone dying than I will come to your mothers funeral and start cracking jokes. I'll give you 1 second before you get "sad" and angry. Low-life.
So, you are comparing the relationship between a kid fucker that you do not know to the relationship of my mother and I?
No need to argue with unrealistic thinking people like you.
Sosa is the lowlife..."Your mother" type put-downs are the refuge of the intellectually challenged.And he is definitely challenged.Actually he is a fucking retard...
0
Sosa is the lowlife..."Your mother" type put-downs are the refuge of the intellectually challenged.And he is definitely challenged.Actually he is a fucking retard...
by the way SOSA.......if you're speaking English now...... Did you ever explain to us "child molester haters".......how that kid (jordan chandler ?)......was able to ACCURATELY describe : location of "splotch" when PECKER was flaccid.....AND erect ? * HTF i wonder did he know that our pal MJ was circumcised ?.......guess just yet another real good guess about length of pubic hair ?........AND location of another splotch.....on ass ?...(we gotta get this lil fucker on covers pickin winners).....been admiring your admirable work here and did not want to miss anything....... throw in ....if actually child himself..... your theory as to why the tons of porn in ol MJ's rack.........over 70 mags......several books including 2 dedicated solely to nude young boys......an artsy effort with extra detail given to genitalia....".barely legal" was a big player........a strange choice for a child i thought ......also enjoyed GAY PORN.....a very odd choice for our innocent child MJ........there are about 900 FUCKING other delicacies i would like to better understand ......to properly embrace this icon.......i am not currently willing .....but feel i have the potential .........to look the other way..... if my children ever get molested by someone that can sing and dance real fuckin good....would appreciate any help you offer in this matter.....
Please show me where the little boy describes Michael's penis SOFT and HARD.......show me where he tells whether or not Michael was circumcized. Please show me where he describes the length of Michael's pubic hair....Please show me where he describes the "splotches on Mj's ass"
And then when you show me the boys testimony, I want you to show me the proof. I can tell you Shaq has a 2inch pecker, until you see it, its useless. I'll be waiting.
The only thing I've read was that there were some similarities but NOTHING NEAR CLOSE TO ACCURATE. Please show me the proof. No one has proof. All they have is hear say. Money hungry peoples hearsay is useless.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:
by the way SOSA.......if you're speaking English now...... Did you ever explain to us "child molester haters".......how that kid (jordan chandler ?)......was able to ACCURATELY describe : location of "splotch" when PECKER was flaccid.....AND erect ? * HTF i wonder did he know that our pal MJ was circumcised ?.......guess just yet another real good guess about length of pubic hair ?........AND location of another splotch.....on ass ?...(we gotta get this lil fucker on covers pickin winners).....been admiring your admirable work here and did not want to miss anything....... throw in ....if actually child himself..... your theory as to why the tons of porn in ol MJ's rack.........over 70 mags......several books including 2 dedicated solely to nude young boys......an artsy effort with extra detail given to genitalia....".barely legal" was a big player........a strange choice for a child i thought ......also enjoyed GAY PORN.....a very odd choice for our innocent child MJ........there are about 900 FUCKING other delicacies i would like to better understand ......to properly embrace this icon.......i am not currently willing .....but feel i have the potential .........to look the other way..... if my children ever get molested by someone that can sing and dance real fuckin good....would appreciate any help you offer in this matter.....
Please show me where the little boy describes Michael's penis SOFT and HARD.......show me where he tells whether or not Michael was circumcized. Please show me where he describes the length of Michael's pubic hair....Please show me where he describes the "splotches on Mj's ass"
And then when you show me the boys testimony, I want you to show me the proof. I can tell you Shaq has a 2inch pecker, until you see it, its useless. I'll be waiting.
The only thing I've read was that there were some similarities but NOTHING NEAR CLOSE TO ACCURATE. Please show me the proof. No one has proof. All they have is hear say. Money hungry peoples hearsay is useless.
So, you are comparing the relationship between a kid fucker that you do not know to the relationship of my mother and I?
No need to argue with unrealistic thinking people like you.
Listen low life...I am comparing two deaths. You happen to think deaths are funny. I;ll come to your mothers funeral and start cracking jokes. Then I will wait for your "thats not funny" response. Low life.
0
Quote Originally Posted by husker6974:
So, you are comparing the relationship between a kid fucker that you do not know to the relationship of my mother and I?
No need to argue with unrealistic thinking people like you.
Listen low life...I am comparing two deaths. You happen to think deaths are funny. I;ll come to your mothers funeral and start cracking jokes. Then I will wait for your "thats not funny" response. Low life.
Please show me where the little boy describes Michael's penis SOFT and HARD.......show me where he tells whether or not Michael was circumcized. Please show me where he describes the length of Michael's pubic hair....Please show me where he describes the "splotches on Mj's ass"
And then when you show me the boys testimony, I want you to show me the proof. I can tell you Shaq has a 2inch pecker, until you see it, its useless. I'll be waiting.
The only thing I've read was that there were some similarities but NOTHING NEAR CLOSE TO ACCURATE. Please show me the proof. No one has proof. All they have is hear say. Money hungry peoples hearsay is useless.
that stuff is sealed......judge would not allow it to be to be presented (probably right thing to do ?)...this from1st trial....where MJ paid around 20 million for everything to go away. remember they actually got warrant to search his home and photograph his PEEPEE...DA/others who saw...confirmed later that (Jordan Chandler's) description was "spot on"...<sorry
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
Please show me where the little boy describes Michael's penis SOFT and HARD.......show me where he tells whether or not Michael was circumcized. Please show me where he describes the length of Michael's pubic hair....Please show me where he describes the "splotches on Mj's ass"
And then when you show me the boys testimony, I want you to show me the proof. I can tell you Shaq has a 2inch pecker, until you see it, its useless. I'll be waiting.
The only thing I've read was that there were some similarities but NOTHING NEAR CLOSE TO ACCURATE. Please show me the proof. No one has proof. All they have is hear say. Money hungry peoples hearsay is useless.
that stuff is sealed......judge would not allow it to be to be presented (probably right thing to do ?)...this from1st trial....where MJ paid around 20 million for everything to go away. remember they actually got warrant to search his home and photograph his PEEPEE...DA/others who saw...confirmed later that (Jordan Chandler's) description was "spot on"...<sorry
that stuff is sealed......judge would not allow it to be to be
presented (probably right thing to do ?)...this from1st trial...where
MJ paid around 20 million for everything to go away . *didn't go to trial > meant to say 1st time he was up on charges (1993 ?).......wasn't allowed to be used in last trial because judge felt it affect his ability to be judged fairly * as widely loved as ol MJ was...seems odd that SO MANY closest to him would be involved in this conspiracy to ruin his "good" name .....several housekeepers....security guards > family members...+++......many had pretty much same story...tales of "jesus juice"...(MJ's word for alcohol)....description of mags they looked at (together and left out for them to see when he was gone).....he "eased" several into porn ...by showing them nude pictures of fat chicks.....kinda what their mom might look like.....> "see it's OK ....nudity is beautiful kinda thing"....
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
0
that stuff is sealed......judge would not allow it to be to be
presented (probably right thing to do ?)...this from1st trial...where
MJ paid around 20 million for everything to go away . *didn't go to trial > meant to say 1st time he was up on charges (1993 ?).......wasn't allowed to be used in last trial because judge felt it affect his ability to be judged fairly * as widely loved as ol MJ was...seems odd that SO MANY closest to him would be involved in this conspiracy to ruin his "good" name .....several housekeepers....security guards > family members...+++......many had pretty much same story...tales of "jesus juice"...(MJ's word for alcohol)....description of mags they looked at (together and left out for them to see when he was gone).....he "eased" several into porn ...by showing them nude pictures of fat chicks.....kinda what their mom might look like.....> "see it's OK ....nudity is beautiful kinda thing"....
"Prosecution evidence from the 1993 allegations would also be used against the entertainer in the 2005 People v. Jackson child sexual abuse trial, where he was acquitted on all counts.[11][12]"
Jordan (the kid from 1993) later filed a request for a restraining order against his father.
Guess the father was getting too greedy...
Rumors say Jordan is regretting lying back then - we'll see.
0
"Prosecution evidence from the 1993 allegations would also be used against the entertainer in the 2005 People v. Jackson child sexual abuse trial, where he was acquitted on all counts.[11][12]"
Jordan (the kid from 1993) later filed a request for a restraining order against his father.
Guess the father was getting too greedy...
Rumors say Jordan is regretting lying back then - we'll see.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.