Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
Scalabrine,
Gray was a criminal that had been involved in more than 20 criminal court cases.
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) The United States Supreme Court states that fleeing in a high crime area at the sight of police is enough to create reasonable suspicion. Indicating that reasonable suspicion rest heavily on normal human behavior, stating that flight at the mere sight of police is a sign that there exists "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is afoot, there by justifying an investigatory stop by the police.
Russell and Malissa were both dangerous crack heads with criminal records driving a deadly weapon while high on crack. Society is better off without them.
... Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers pursuing an unarmed suspect may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.
Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is neutralized, down, and no longer a threat to themselves, their partners or the public.Police were following protocol, the law, and broke no laws.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igQDvYOt_iA
I wish I could send a copy of this video to every household in America.
Scalabrine,
Gray was a criminal that had been involved in more than 20 criminal court cases.
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) The United States Supreme Court states that fleeing in a high crime area at the sight of police is enough to create reasonable suspicion. Indicating that reasonable suspicion rest heavily on normal human behavior, stating that flight at the mere sight of police is a sign that there exists "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is afoot, there by justifying an investigatory stop by the police.
Russell and Malissa were both dangerous crack heads with criminal records driving a deadly weapon while high on crack. Society is better off without them.
... Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers pursuing an unarmed suspect may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.
Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is neutralized, down, and no longer a threat to themselves, their partners or the public.Police were following protocol, the law, and broke no laws.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igQDvYOt_iA
I wish I could send a copy of this video to every household in America.
Great post
Unfortunately you are dealing in facts. Scatabrane is allergic to that.
Read his posts. Full of emotions, insults, attempts to shame, abstracts, conjecture, and other meaningless bull garbage that goes on and on.
0
, as though it's a 'shame shame shame' issue, like someone insulted your covers post (oh you don't even post games, sorry). These are human lives that you could care less about that many millions of others do, running or no, criminal or otherwise.
Hot Forum Topics
