• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Lions-Bills Early Leans
      • Early Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | General Discussion

    No matter how many times you tell them, no matter how many examples, to GD lemmings it's NEVER about

    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
    thecentaur
    GimmeMoneyNow
    benhogan76
    TheDrizzle77
    scalabrine
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2881
    Posts: 56
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
     
    thecentaur
    thecentaur
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2012
    Posts: 2049
    Posted: May. 24, 2015 - 3:12 AM ET #26

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Scalabrine,

    Gray was a criminal that had been involved in more than 20 criminal court cases.

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

    Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) The United States Supreme Court states that fleeing in a high crime area at the sight of police is enough to create reasonable suspicion. Indicating that reasonable suspicion rest heavily on normal human behavior, stating that flight at the mere sight of police is a sign that there exists "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is afoot, there by justifying an investigatory stop by the police.

    Russell and Malissa were both dangerous crack heads with criminal records driving a deadly weapon while high on crack. Society is better off without them.

    ... Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers pursuing an unarmed suspect may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

    Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is neutralized, down, and no longer a threat to themselves, their partners or the public.Police were following protocol, the law, and broke no laws.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igQDvYOt_iA

    I wish I could send a copy of this video to every household in America.


    Great post

    Unfortunately you are dealing in facts.  Scatabrane is allergic to that. 

    Read his posts.  Full of emotions, insults, attempts to shame, abstracts, conjecture, and other meaningless bull garbage that goes on and on.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Scalabrine,

    Gray was a criminal that had been involved in more than 20 criminal court cases.

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

    Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) The United States Supreme Court states that fleeing in a high crime area at the sight of police is enough to create reasonable suspicion. Indicating that reasonable suspicion rest heavily on normal human behavior, stating that flight at the mere sight of police is a sign that there exists "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is afoot, there by justifying an investigatory stop by the police.

    Russell and Malissa were both dangerous crack heads with criminal records driving a deadly weapon while high on crack. Society is better off without them.

    ... Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers pursuing an unarmed suspect may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

    Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is neutralized, down, and no longer a threat to themselves, their partners or the public.Police were following protocol, the law, and broke no laws.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igQDvYOt_iA

    I wish I could send a copy of this video to every household in America.


    Great post

    Unfortunately you are dealing in facts.  Scatabrane is allergic to that. 

    Read his posts.  Full of emotions, insults, attempts to shame, abstracts, conjecture, and other meaningless bull garbage that goes on and on.
     
    GimmeMoneyNow
    GimmeMoneyNow
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2015
    Posts: 2874
    Posted: May. 24, 2015 - 9:08 AM ET #27

    Quote Originally Posted by thecentaur:


    Great post

    Unfortunately you are dealing in facts.  Scatabrane is allergic to that. 

    Read his posts.  Full of emotions, insults, attempts to shame, abstracts, conjecture, and other meaningless bull garbage that goes on and on.


    Man, Scalabrine's wound up tighter that Neil Peart's snare drum! Does anybody know a chick who would do this guy so he can finally lose his virginity and some of that pent up anger? Preferably an unarmed black chick that doesn't run from the police...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by thecentaur:


    Great post

    Unfortunately you are dealing in facts.  Scatabrane is allergic to that. 

    Read his posts.  Full of emotions, insults, attempts to shame, abstracts, conjecture, and other meaningless bull garbage that goes on and on.


    Man, Scalabrine's wound up tighter that Neil Peart's snare drum! Does anybody know a chick who would do this guy so he can finally lose his virginity and some of that pent up anger? Preferably an unarmed black chick that doesn't run from the police...
     
    benhogan76
    benhogan76
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 63807
    Posted: May. 24, 2015 - 8:15 PM ET #28

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Guys you can't take a bigot out of his own mud and shi* for him.

    So let me get this straight for all the forum to hear:

     

    You have now gone out of your way  to post a story that JUSTIFIES, first cops shooting at a car ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY SEVEN TIMES, and second, 4 seconds after what is equivalent to a war assault on a car when everyone has stopped shooting, the people in the car are alive and shot nearly two DOZEN times in total, this cop who jumped on the hood and then shot them through the front windshield and fired....

    AN ADDITIONAL 15 SHOTS, all through the front windshield, all at unarmed blacks, because, HE feared for HIS LIFE.

     

    And your defense for all those shots and standing on THE HOOD of the car, shooting those who are unarmed, in a car that has stopped, shooting what is people who basically look like the red star in the BB gun game at a county fair because they lead the police on a high speed chase.

     

    If you lead the cops on a police chase, are shot up like swiss cheese, are then stopped, unarmed and are clinging to life, a cop has a right to jump on your car and BLOW YOU AWAY to finish the job.

    Come here and justify that to me. Please do that.


    Give me in clear concise points why cops are justified in any and every shot they take. You justify 137 shots because 'they ran'. You justify jumping on the hood of a car that is stopped and taking an additional 15 kill shots, because 'they ran'.

    Ya see BWS, you are incapable of breaking down the finer points to every situation. You're 'out' is "Welp! Shouldn't of run!" As though that justifies 137 shots. As though that justifies the hood hopping and 1.5 dozen kill shots. You do know that's what this trial was about right? Excessive force. Can you look into a case? Can you see the finer details before you make a fool of yourself, because you are clearly incapable of even offering a smidgen of a valid counter to anything I'm saying here other than "Welp! Run and get what you deserve!" And they deserve 18 kill shots...while unarmed and their car is stopped.

    Yes, that is effective policing.

     

    I mean, why do you think I call you and others here pig bigots?

    Would you go into a black community and just shrug your shoulders and say "Welp! Shouldn't of run!" as though police have never before had a car chase or foot chase before. Earth to troglodytes here, PEOPLE RUN. That's part of the job. Is the other part BLOWING them away while jumping on their hood for running?

    You could give a SHI* about black lives, except of course when you money is on the line in an NBA/NFL game.


    You post a casual , as though it's a 'shame shame shame' issue, like someone insulted your covers post (oh you don't even post games, sorry). These are human lives that you could care less about that many millions of others do, running or no, criminal or otherwise.

    Wow.

    There you have it folks. Plain as day.


    What a scumbag...

    how many police officers fired their guns?  We're all white?
    Don’t tell me the law. Tell me the judge.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Guys you can't take a bigot out of his own mud and shi* for him.

    So let me get this straight for all the forum to hear:

     

    You have now gone out of your way  to post a story that JUSTIFIES, first cops shooting at a car ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY SEVEN TIMES, and second, 4 seconds after what is equivalent to a war assault on a car when everyone has stopped shooting, the people in the car are alive and shot nearly two DOZEN times in total, this cop who jumped on the hood and then shot them through the front windshield and fired....

    AN ADDITIONAL 15 SHOTS, all through the front windshield, all at unarmed blacks, because, HE feared for HIS LIFE.

     

    And your defense for all those shots and standing on THE HOOD of the car, shooting those who are unarmed, in a car that has stopped, shooting what is people who basically look like the red star in the BB gun game at a county fair because they lead the police on a high speed chase.

     

    If you lead the cops on a police chase, are shot up like swiss cheese, are then stopped, unarmed and are clinging to life, a cop has a right to jump on your car and BLOW YOU AWAY to finish the job.

    Come here and justify that to me. Please do that.


    Give me in clear concise points why cops are justified in any and every shot they take. You justify 137 shots because 'they ran'. You justify jumping on the hood of a car that is stopped and taking an additional 15 kill shots, because 'they ran'.

    Ya see BWS, you are incapable of breaking down the finer points to every situation. You're 'out' is "Welp! Shouldn't of run!" As though that justifies 137 shots. As though that justifies the hood hopping and 1.5 dozen kill shots. You do know that's what this trial was about right? Excessive force. Can you look into a case? Can you see the finer details before you make a fool of yourself, because you are clearly incapable of even offering a smidgen of a valid counter to anything I'm saying here other than "Welp! Run and get what you deserve!" And they deserve 18 kill shots...while unarmed and their car is stopped.

    Yes, that is effective policing.

     

    I mean, why do you think I call you and others here pig bigots?

    Would you go into a black community and just shrug your shoulders and say "Welp! Shouldn't of run!" as though police have never before had a car chase or foot chase before. Earth to troglodytes here, PEOPLE RUN. That's part of the job. Is the other part BLOWING them away while jumping on their hood for running?

    You could give a SHI* about black lives, except of course when you money is on the line in an NBA/NFL game.


    You post a casual , as though it's a 'shame shame shame' issue, like someone insulted your covers post (oh you don't even post games, sorry). These are human lives that you could care less about that many millions of others do, running or no, criminal or otherwise.

    Wow.

    There you have it folks. Plain as day.


    What a scumbag...

    how many police officers fired their guns?  We're all white?
     
    TheDrizzle77
    TheDrizzle77
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 2685
    Posted: May. 24, 2015 - 9:12 PM ET #29

    I'm not one for racism, but I do know how to spot the biggest one in a thread.  In this thread, it is easily Scalabrine.

    You just flat out hate white people.  I mean it's oozing out of every word you type.  Not sure if it is a self-loathing deal, or what, but your fight against the fellow white man is more apparent than ever.

    Whenever anybody brings up an actual, real life, true fact about anything white on black, black on black or pro-black civil unrest you immediately jump to conclusions, calling that person a "bigot," "racist," or "liar."  Not every white person is like John Tuturro's character from Do the Right Thing.  You need to really focus on common sense, and the view from each side.

    In 2014 Homewood made its 6th consecutive trip to the No. 1 spot in violent crimes (216) committed in the city of Pittsburgh.  Close to 94% of that community is of African-American race.  Now is it racist of me to say that the majority of crime happening in this neighborhood is black on black?  Or is it actual fact?   

    The majority of these officers that have to patrol these high crime areas are not like the Baltimore six in jail.  I support them for doing something most of us would never even think of.  They are trying their best to keep black community's safe.  I don't doubt that there are racist cops, lazy cops and stupid cops, but I do feel, however, that the majority of them are doing their best in the line of duty, but are stuck in extremely compromising situations in these violent neighborhoods.

    I mean we all have to be politically correct in this world.  We all have to say, oh no, oh no, there are just as many white people perpetrating violent crimes in Homewood as black.  The minute we say, hey, you know what, facts state that 68% of those arrested for violent crimes happening in Allegheny County in 2014 was African-American, we are labeled racists and bigots. 

    Until we let go of the racist card as a bailout, and actually attack the issue as to why black on black crime is such a problem in our country, it'll just continue to get worse and worse.  And police officers--not like the BALTIMORE SIX, but actual honest, bipartisan cops--will continue to have itchy trigger fingers in those high crime areas.  

    If you are really down for helping the black community, you'd get off General Discussion, quit starting racial fires, forget about the police for a second, and actually reach out, help the black youth find jobs, activities and community outreach.  People like you, the media and black "leaders" do nothing more than sprinkle fertilizer on a well-lit fire.  Instead of blaming black individuals you reach for racism.  You circle these rare police brutality moments and treat it like it is an everyday occurrence that an innocent black man is being slaughtered by a white cop.  Meanwhile, what really is happening every day is an innocent black man is being killed by a black man.  But God forbid we focus on that.  








    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm not one for racism, but I do know how to spot the biggest one in a thread.  In this thread, it is easily Scalabrine.

    You just flat out hate white people.  I mean it's oozing out of every word you type.  Not sure if it is a self-loathing deal, or what, but your fight against the fellow white man is more apparent than ever.

    Whenever anybody brings up an actual, real life, true fact about anything white on black, black on black or pro-black civil unrest you immediately jump to conclusions, calling that person a "bigot," "racist," or "liar."  Not every white person is like John Tuturro's character from Do the Right Thing.  You need to really focus on common sense, and the view from each side.

    In 2014 Homewood made its 6th consecutive trip to the No. 1 spot in violent crimes (216) committed in the city of Pittsburgh.  Close to 94% of that community is of African-American race.  Now is it racist of me to say that the majority of crime happening in this neighborhood is black on black?  Or is it actual fact?   

    The majority of these officers that have to patrol these high crime areas are not like the Baltimore six in jail.  I support them for doing something most of us would never even think of.  They are trying their best to keep black community's safe.  I don't doubt that there are racist cops, lazy cops and stupid cops, but I do feel, however, that the majority of them are doing their best in the line of duty, but are stuck in extremely compromising situations in these violent neighborhoods.

    I mean we all have to be politically correct in this world.  We all have to say, oh no, oh no, there are just as many white people perpetrating violent crimes in Homewood as black.  The minute we say, hey, you know what, facts state that 68% of those arrested for violent crimes happening in Allegheny County in 2014 was African-American, we are labeled racists and bigots. 

    Until we let go of the racist card as a bailout, and actually attack the issue as to why black on black crime is such a problem in our country, it'll just continue to get worse and worse.  And police officers--not like the BALTIMORE SIX, but actual honest, bipartisan cops--will continue to have itchy trigger fingers in those high crime areas.  

    If you are really down for helping the black community, you'd get off General Discussion, quit starting racial fires, forget about the police for a second, and actually reach out, help the black youth find jobs, activities and community outreach.  People like you, the media and black "leaders" do nothing more than sprinkle fertilizer on a well-lit fire.  Instead of blaming black individuals you reach for racism.  You circle these rare police brutality moments and treat it like it is an everyday occurrence that an innocent black man is being slaughtered by a white cop.  Meanwhile, what really is happening every day is an innocent black man is being killed by a black man.  But God forbid we focus on that.  








     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 1:43 AM ET #30

    I'm not one for racism, but I do know how to spot the biggest one in a thread.  In this thread, it is easily Scalabrine.

    You just flat out hate white people.  I mean it's oozing out of every word you type.  
     
     
    Ok, I will say this again and I will say this unequivocally:
     
    I
     
    AM

    WHITE
     
    I don't have a 'token one white friend' as many here say to make them sound like they are not racist. I have many white friends that I've had my entire life.
     
    My parents are white. My grandparents are white. My great-grandparents were white.
     
    Do I hate my white parents and friends and colleagues and neighbors and tons of people I interact...all because I call out police abuse and the bigots on this site, one of which is you and I can assure you that I could get 99% of all minorities and progressive minded whites to agree me you are a pig bigot (and you don't even know it, that's the sad part) if I showed them what you type here? Yes, I HATE these people (putting the word sarcasm here fearing he might quote that sentence).
     
     
    Now, go look up the word racist or racism and tell me, how a progressive minded white individual, like the same ones you see on TV marching is solidarity with blacks during the protests, when 12 year old black boys are shot and killed in 2 seconds without warning for holding a toy gun (oh and let's not mention the cop who TACKLED Tamir Rice's sister when she came to his aid and threw him in the back of a police car, and for several minutes let him bleed out on a pavement to die, failing to give him medical attention), where black men are choked to death all on video as they plead they cannot breath and they ultimately die...
     
    Yes, THOSE white people who march against those police abuses are the people who HATE....whites. Makes perfect sense.
     
    THAT folks is why I sit here and call most of you fu**ing idiots. This kid centaur is front and center leading the pack.
     
    Because you don't know down from up or up from down.
     
    You don't even know the definition of racist or racism and have yet to look it up and align it with a white person who points out police abuse and/or calls out the raging, pathetic bigots on this site.
     
    Now centaur, I say it again. Look up the definition of the word racist and tell how a white person who lives the life I described above is racist against....wait for it...white people (and hates them too).
     
     
    You are a child both mentally and in this debate. WHAT have you proven to me or anyone else?

    Your avatar says it all. Getting your rocks off on cheerleader undergarments every time you sign on to a gambling website. And you expect people to take you seriously? You don't even know the basic definitions of the words you use.
     
    No folks, the cops who shot Tamir Rice, or choked Eric Garner or the cop who shot Walter Scott, the man running away 5 times in the back, or the cops who shot John Crawford in Walmart...ya know most of the cops I speak out against.

    To speak out against them and their actions is now hate...of whites...because all those cops were white.
     
    And I'M THE RACIST folks. Not them....NOT the cops.

    That is who I deal with on covers. Children. Bigot children, but children nonetheless.

    Be careful who you are addressing because I will embarrass you as I have before Centaur. You are out of your league here.
     
    Now go on Dictionary.com before you speak to me again. And until you do, I will continue to call you a FU**ING IDIOT for not even knowing what you are saying.

    Now clean up your act, learn how to present an argument in a proper fashion or I will have nothing more to say to you. You are a waste of time and not on my level (not like any of your bigoted cronies are here either so don't feel bad).
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm not one for racism, but I do know how to spot the biggest one in a thread.  In this thread, it is easily Scalabrine.

    You just flat out hate white people.  I mean it's oozing out of every word you type.  
     
     
    Ok, I will say this again and I will say this unequivocally:
     
    I
     
    AM

    WHITE
     
    I don't have a 'token one white friend' as many here say to make them sound like they are not racist. I have many white friends that I've had my entire life.
     
    My parents are white. My grandparents are white. My great-grandparents were white.
     
    Do I hate my white parents and friends and colleagues and neighbors and tons of people I interact...all because I call out police abuse and the bigots on this site, one of which is you and I can assure you that I could get 99% of all minorities and progressive minded whites to agree me you are a pig bigot (and you don't even know it, that's the sad part) if I showed them what you type here? Yes, I HATE these people (putting the word sarcasm here fearing he might quote that sentence).
     
     
    Now, go look up the word racist or racism and tell me, how a progressive minded white individual, like the same ones you see on TV marching is solidarity with blacks during the protests, when 12 year old black boys are shot and killed in 2 seconds without warning for holding a toy gun (oh and let's not mention the cop who TACKLED Tamir Rice's sister when she came to his aid and threw him in the back of a police car, and for several minutes let him bleed out on a pavement to die, failing to give him medical attention), where black men are choked to death all on video as they plead they cannot breath and they ultimately die...
     
    Yes, THOSE white people who march against those police abuses are the people who HATE....whites. Makes perfect sense.
     
    THAT folks is why I sit here and call most of you fu**ing idiots. This kid centaur is front and center leading the pack.
     
    Because you don't know down from up or up from down.
     
    You don't even know the definition of racist or racism and have yet to look it up and align it with a white person who points out police abuse and/or calls out the raging, pathetic bigots on this site.
     
    Now centaur, I say it again. Look up the definition of the word racist and tell how a white person who lives the life I described above is racist against....wait for it...white people (and hates them too).
     
     
    You are a child both mentally and in this debate. WHAT have you proven to me or anyone else?

    Your avatar says it all. Getting your rocks off on cheerleader undergarments every time you sign on to a gambling website. And you expect people to take you seriously? You don't even know the basic definitions of the words you use.
     
    No folks, the cops who shot Tamir Rice, or choked Eric Garner or the cop who shot Walter Scott, the man running away 5 times in the back, or the cops who shot John Crawford in Walmart...ya know most of the cops I speak out against.

    To speak out against them and their actions is now hate...of whites...because all those cops were white.
     
    And I'M THE RACIST folks. Not them....NOT the cops.

    That is who I deal with on covers. Children. Bigot children, but children nonetheless.

    Be careful who you are addressing because I will embarrass you as I have before Centaur. You are out of your league here.
     
    Now go on Dictionary.com before you speak to me again. And until you do, I will continue to call you a FU**ING IDIOT for not even knowing what you are saying.

    Now clean up your act, learn how to present an argument in a proper fashion or I will have nothing more to say to you. You are a waste of time and not on my level (not like any of your bigoted cronies are here either so don't feel bad).
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 1:48 AM ET #31

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Scalabrine,

    Gray was a criminal that had been involved in more than 20 criminal court cases.

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

    Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) The United States Supreme Court states that fleeing in a high crime area at the sight of police is enough to create reasonable suspicion. Indicating that reasonable suspicion rest heavily on normal human behavior, stating that flight at the mere sight of police is a sign that there exists "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is afoot, there by justifying an investigatory stop by the police.

    Russell and Malissa were both dangerous crack heads with criminal records driving a deadly weapon while high on crack. Society is better off without them.

    ... Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers pursuing an unarmed suspect may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

    Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is neutralized, down, and no longer a threat to themselves, their partners or the public.Police were following protocol, the law, and broke no laws.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igQDvYOt_iA

    I wish I could send a copy of this video to every household in America.

     

    Thanks for using the copy and paste feature on those Supreme Court cases I was familiar with when you were pooping your Elmo Huggies.

    Now get in line and take a number kid.

    It'll be like waiting for cold cuts at your local grocery store. I may call your number. I may not. But hold onto that ticket for dear life or papa may break out his leather belt because you never got home to make him his bratwurst and head cheese sandwich.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Scalabrine,

    Gray was a criminal that had been involved in more than 20 criminal court cases.

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

    Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) The United States Supreme Court states that fleeing in a high crime area at the sight of police is enough to create reasonable suspicion. Indicating that reasonable suspicion rest heavily on normal human behavior, stating that flight at the mere sight of police is a sign that there exists "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is afoot, there by justifying an investigatory stop by the police.

    Russell and Malissa were both dangerous crack heads with criminal records driving a deadly weapon while high on crack. Society is better off without them.

    ... Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers pursuing an unarmed suspect may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

    Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is neutralized, down, and no longer a threat to themselves, their partners or the public.Police were following protocol, the law, and broke no laws.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igQDvYOt_iA

    I wish I could send a copy of this video to every household in America.

     

    Thanks for using the copy and paste feature on those Supreme Court cases I was familiar with when you were pooping your Elmo Huggies.

    Now get in line and take a number kid.

    It'll be like waiting for cold cuts at your local grocery store. I may call your number. I may not. But hold onto that ticket for dear life or papa may break out his leather belt because you never got home to make him his bratwurst and head cheese sandwich.

     
    bill702
    bill702
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 2235
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 2:27 AM ET #32

    I like videos like this where you can literally set it up to get the results you want. What exactly does this video prove?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I like videos like this where you can literally set it up to get the results you want. What exactly does this video prove?
     
    thecentaur
    thecentaur
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2012
    Posts: 2049
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 2:41 AM ET #33

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Thanks for using the copy and paste feature on those Supreme Court cases I was familiar with when you were pooping your Elmo Huggies.

    Now get in line and take a number kid.

    It'll be like waiting for cold cuts at your local grocery store. I may call your number. I may not. But hold onto that ticket for dear life or papa may break out his leather belt because you never got home to make him his bratwurst and head cheese sandwich.


    Guy posts actual and pertinent facts

    Scatabrane responds with narcissistic smack talk and Huggies/bratwurst sandwich imagery

    Same old same old

    Is there a better way of referencing supreme court cases than copy and pasting them exactly?  Had he summarized them in his own words would you have liked that better?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Thanks for using the copy and paste feature on those Supreme Court cases I was familiar with when you were pooping your Elmo Huggies.

    Now get in line and take a number kid.

    It'll be like waiting for cold cuts at your local grocery store. I may call your number. I may not. But hold onto that ticket for dear life or papa may break out his leather belt because you never got home to make him his bratwurst and head cheese sandwich.


    Guy posts actual and pertinent facts

    Scatabrane responds with narcissistic smack talk and Huggies/bratwurst sandwich imagery

    Same old same old

    Is there a better way of referencing supreme court cases than copy and pasting them exactly?  Had he summarized them in his own words would you have liked that better?
     
    VegasVandal
    VegasVandal
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 26913
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 4:27 AM ET #34

    Scal, doesn't the fact that no one is agreeing with a single word you are saying tell you anything?

    There is nothing wrong with being strange. I cannot fault you for that. It's just the way you are but calling out civil  people making logical arguments shows nothing but the immature, childish person in you.

    You think everyone in here is just out to get you and is just this jerkoff bigot pig? That's your argument why the entire forum is telling you that you are wrong on this subject?

    I didn't see anyone say they agreed with what took place in the video. I don't either. It's sickening but if you really care about helping the cause of black injustice then you should take some steps to ensure things change. Is any of that happening by you creating a thread and calling everyone F**king idiots? No. Go form a political team and run for office if you feel so strongly. Surely such a beautiful mind as yours should be wasted on us bigoted FOX news watching morons right?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Scal, doesn't the fact that no one is agreeing with a single word you are saying tell you anything?

    There is nothing wrong with being strange. I cannot fault you for that. It's just the way you are but calling out civil  people making logical arguments shows nothing but the immature, childish person in you.

    You think everyone in here is just out to get you and is just this jerkoff bigot pig? That's your argument why the entire forum is telling you that you are wrong on this subject?

    I didn't see anyone say they agreed with what took place in the video. I don't either. It's sickening but if you really care about helping the cause of black injustice then you should take some steps to ensure things change. Is any of that happening by you creating a thread and calling everyone F**king idiots? No. Go form a political team and run for office if you feel so strongly. Surely such a beautiful mind as yours should be wasted on us bigoted FOX news watching morons right?

     
    VegasVandal
    VegasVandal
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 26913
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 4:39 AM ET #35

    How about this guy being detained illegally for carrying an AR?

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rPEhNa5QXo

     

    What color is his skin?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    How about this guy being detained illegally for carrying an AR?

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rPEhNa5QXo

     

    What color is his skin?

     
    TRAIN69
    TRAIN69
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2002
    Posts: 55587
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 9:33 AM ET #36

    Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

    Answer this please....

    1) How many interactions do the police have daily in the US with blacks.....

    2) How many blacks have been killed or beaten by those cops.....


    Isolated incidents indeed. 


    Actually surprised there isnt more, as there probably should be. Cops show great restrai t and professionalism. My hats off to them. 
    Thats what I thought. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

    Answer this please....

    1) How many interactions do the police have daily in the US with blacks.....

    2) How many blacks have been killed or beaten by those cops.....


    Isolated incidents indeed. 


    Actually surprised there isnt more, as there probably should be. Cops show great restrai t and professionalism. My hats off to them. 
    Thats what I thought. 
     
    TheDrizzle77
    TheDrizzle77
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 2685
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 1:38 PM ET #37

    Scal, I know that you are white.  You can document that when I wrote Not sure if it is a self-loathing deal, or what, but your fight against the fellow white man is more apparent than ever.

    And you are clearly going off the deep end.  I used to agree with some of the things that you wrote, but you are building the foundation of a man losing his mind.

    Maybe you should run an archeology trip into the word racism.  If you dug far enough you would see how nothing I'm saying is remotely racist.  Christt, I'm the only one on here that found a "draw muhammad" contest remarkably racist, and was pelted for it.  Yet you just immediately jump off the rails and plaster me with bigot and racist and pig.

    And you completely danced around good statistics I posted.  You completely cut off the next four paragraphs.  Do you not want to help out with the real issue of America: black on black crime, and how we can stand up and support the black community without blaming racial tension?

    You are not helping your case here, you never will.  You sound like a stuck up, apathetic isolated narcissist that calls out other people for not doing anything about police brutality AND black on black crime, yet all you do is sit behind a computer and spark racial flames.  A real man that can criticize others is one that is proactive and solves problems he's "fighting" in a productive, tangible way in the community.  His plight is seen and known by those affected.  But you're clearly not a man.  Simply turned into an internet troll/bully.  That's pretty pathetic.

    Calling everybody racists and bigots does NOTHING positive, and it won't change anything.  If they were racist yesterday, they will be tomorrow with or without your feedback.  When you hopefully judge yourself one day you'll see that what you were fighting for all this time you were really fighting against.  You're using name-calling and red scare tactics in the name of racism as your weaponry. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Scal, I know that you are white.  You can document that when I wrote Not sure if it is a self-loathing deal, or what, but your fight against the fellow white man is more apparent than ever.

    And you are clearly going off the deep end.  I used to agree with some of the things that you wrote, but you are building the foundation of a man losing his mind.

    Maybe you should run an archeology trip into the word racism.  If you dug far enough you would see how nothing I'm saying is remotely racist.  Christt, I'm the only one on here that found a "draw muhammad" contest remarkably racist, and was pelted for it.  Yet you just immediately jump off the rails and plaster me with bigot and racist and pig.

    And you completely danced around good statistics I posted.  You completely cut off the next four paragraphs.  Do you not want to help out with the real issue of America: black on black crime, and how we can stand up and support the black community without blaming racial tension?

    You are not helping your case here, you never will.  You sound like a stuck up, apathetic isolated narcissist that calls out other people for not doing anything about police brutality AND black on black crime, yet all you do is sit behind a computer and spark racial flames.  A real man that can criticize others is one that is proactive and solves problems he's "fighting" in a productive, tangible way in the community.  His plight is seen and known by those affected.  But you're clearly not a man.  Simply turned into an internet troll/bully.  That's pretty pathetic.

    Calling everybody racists and bigots does NOTHING positive, and it won't change anything.  If they were racist yesterday, they will be tomorrow with or without your feedback.  When you hopefully judge yourself one day you'll see that what you were fighting for all this time you were really fighting against.  You're using name-calling and red scare tactics in the name of racism as your weaponry. 
     
    Skipbone
    Skipbone
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 6368
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 1:48 PM ET #38

    Scalaweenie
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Scalaweenie
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 3:57 PM ET #39

    Scalabrine,

    Eric Garner: Garner had been arrested over 30 times. His autopsy showed that the officer did not kill him by using a choke hold. The officer used a rear seat belt hold. Police are trained to use a lateral vascular neck restraint, not to choke out people. He died because of resisting arrest, acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease. Garner did not die at the scene. He suffered cardiac arrest in the ambulance. The lesson to be learned from all this is to take care of your health, don't break the law, comply with officers orders, and don't resist arrest.

    Walter Scott: We don't know what happened directly before the shooting. All we know is that Scott had been arrested 10 times and that he ran from his car for no reason. Scott also had a history of aggression. If Scott threatened the officer in any way, officer Slager has Tennessee v. Garner on his side.

    Tamir Rice: The kid was pointing what looked like a real firearm at people. An officer has .25 of a second to make a life and death decision. The kid reached for his waist as soon as the officer arrived at the scene. There was no time for verbal commands to be given. The kid was shot at center mass while reaching for his waist. The officer followed protocol, the law, and did what he was trained in the academy to do in that exact situation.

    According to the penal code, a person is justified in using deadly force against another if a reasonable person in the acting officers situation would have not retreated. US law states, the use of deadly force is also authorized when a person poses a significant threat to a law enforcement officer, usually when the officer is at risk of serious bodily injury or death.

    Police view rice's sister as a supportive spectator. Police take a Use of Force course in the police academy and are taught that supportive spectators are a serious threat. People can't just burst onto a crime scene. The officer is trained to protect the crime scene and to be fearful of supportive spectators. The officer did exactly what he was trained to do.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Scalabrine,

    Eric Garner: Garner had been arrested over 30 times. His autopsy showed that the officer did not kill him by using a choke hold. The officer used a rear seat belt hold. Police are trained to use a lateral vascular neck restraint, not to choke out people. He died because of resisting arrest, acute and chronic bronchial asthma, obesity, and heart disease. Garner did not die at the scene. He suffered cardiac arrest in the ambulance. The lesson to be learned from all this is to take care of your health, don't break the law, comply with officers orders, and don't resist arrest.

    Walter Scott: We don't know what happened directly before the shooting. All we know is that Scott had been arrested 10 times and that he ran from his car for no reason. Scott also had a history of aggression. If Scott threatened the officer in any way, officer Slager has Tennessee v. Garner on his side.

    Tamir Rice: The kid was pointing what looked like a real firearm at people. An officer has .25 of a second to make a life and death decision. The kid reached for his waist as soon as the officer arrived at the scene. There was no time for verbal commands to be given. The kid was shot at center mass while reaching for his waist. The officer followed protocol, the law, and did what he was trained in the academy to do in that exact situation.

    According to the penal code, a person is justified in using deadly force against another if a reasonable person in the acting officers situation would have not retreated. US law states, the use of deadly force is also authorized when a person poses a significant threat to a law enforcement officer, usually when the officer is at risk of serious bodily injury or death.

    Police view rice's sister as a supportive spectator. Police take a Use of Force course in the police academy and are taught that supportive spectators are a serious threat. People can't just burst onto a crime scene. The officer is trained to protect the crime scene and to be fearful of supportive spectators. The officer did exactly what he was trained to do.

     
    benhogan76
    benhogan76
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 63807
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 4:10 PM ET #40

    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    how many police officers fired their guns?  We're all white?
    Don’t tell me the law. Tell me the judge.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    how many police officers fired their guns?  We're all white?
     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 4:23 PM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    how many police officers fired their guns?  We're all white?

    13 officers fired shots at the scene after the chase, I recall the news saying that some (at least 2) were black.   Haven't been able to find the exact number in any recent article, there may be more info in some older articles from closer to the time of the shooting (2012)
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    how many police officers fired their guns?  We're all white?

    13 officers fired shots at the scene after the chase, I recall the news saying that some (at least 2) were black.   Haven't been able to find the exact number in any recent article, there may be more info in some older articles from closer to the time of the shooting (2012)
     
    bigvern1013
    bigvern1013
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 3051
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 6:07 PM ET #42

    Unfortunately, I broke down and watched the video. Not really sure what it proves, and what the point is......

    Context is everything. If I slung my hunting rifle over my shoulder and walked into town (a small, Montana town), then I could pretty much guarantee that I am going to be confronted by law enforcement. Who knows how that interaction will unfold?

    If I slung the same rifle over my shoulder and walked into downtown Oakland CA, then I could pretty much guarantee an encounter with law enforcement. Who knows how that interaction will unfold?

    Same action, different place......more than likely a very different result. Outcome depends on the day, the players, etc. 

    Simply put, everything on the planet is not about race. Not real sure where scal gets the energy to ramble on at length about race daily.

    Never Make A Winner A Loser. Never.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Unfortunately, I broke down and watched the video. Not really sure what it proves, and what the point is......

    Context is everything. If I slung my hunting rifle over my shoulder and walked into town (a small, Montana town), then I could pretty much guarantee that I am going to be confronted by law enforcement. Who knows how that interaction will unfold?

    If I slung the same rifle over my shoulder and walked into downtown Oakland CA, then I could pretty much guarantee an encounter with law enforcement. Who knows how that interaction will unfold?

    Same action, different place......more than likely a very different result. Outcome depends on the day, the players, etc. 

    Simply put, everything on the planet is not about race. Not real sure where scal gets the energy to ramble on at length about race daily.

     
    Killer_B
    Killer_B
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 6288
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 7:00 PM ET #43

    It's called common sense. For all we know both of those videos were set-ups. Obviously different neighborhoods, who knows if anything just happened in the neighborhood prior to the 2nd scene. Some could've called in that the black man was acting irrationally before the cop showed up. 

    There's no doubt that black & white are treated differently. Look at the crime rates and the murder statistics. Do you not believe there will not be consequences for such statistics? Cops would be completely suicidal not to react differently to corn rows than 2 clean cut white dudes. That's just the way it is, I have no problem with it, and I won't apologize for it in the same way you won't apologize for the riots/looting in Baltimore over an ALLEGED offense against a repeatedly convicted heroin dealer.

    I find it amusing that you try to make some concrete across the board point due to this video...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    It's called common sense. For all we know both of those videos were set-ups. Obviously different neighborhoods, who knows if anything just happened in the neighborhood prior to the 2nd scene. Some could've called in that the black man was acting irrationally before the cop showed up. 

    There's no doubt that black & white are treated differently. Look at the crime rates and the murder statistics. Do you not believe there will not be consequences for such statistics? Cops would be completely suicidal not to react differently to corn rows than 2 clean cut white dudes. That's just the way it is, I have no problem with it, and I won't apologize for it in the same way you won't apologize for the riots/looting in Baltimore over an ALLEGED offense against a repeatedly convicted heroin dealer.

    I find it amusing that you try to make some concrete across the board point due to this video...
     
    benhogan76
    benhogan76
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 63807
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 7:57 PM ET #44

    Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


    13 officers fired shots at the scene after the chase, I recall the news saying that some (at least 2) were black.   Haven't been able to find the exact number in any recent article, there may be more info in some older articles from closer to the time of the shooting (2012)
    i have no idea, read article about it on Friday.  Just thought it odd that they mentioned a lot of officers fired their guns but only mentioned the race of the one that killed the victim.  

    Whole story seems very odd to me, if it as it was reported can't see how shooter isn't guilty of at least manslaughter 
    Don’t tell me the law. Tell me the judge.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


    13 officers fired shots at the scene after the chase, I recall the news saying that some (at least 2) were black.   Haven't been able to find the exact number in any recent article, there may be more info in some older articles from closer to the time of the shooting (2012)
    i have no idea, read article about it on Friday.  Just thought it odd that they mentioned a lot of officers fired their guns but only mentioned the race of the one that killed the victim.  

    Whole story seems very odd to me, if it as it was reported can't see how shooter isn't guilty of at least manslaughter 
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 8:39 PM ET #45

    Benhogan76,

    Freaking Canadians... manslaughter is a crime. The officer didn't commit a crime. According to the United States Supreme Court, the officer was completely justified to use deadly force in that situation.

    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) [1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless " the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

    I'm sick of this unarmed bullsh1t. Those crack heads led police on a dangerous and reckless 22 mile chase at 100 mph while high on crack. Lucky no innocent people were seriously hurt or killed.

    Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is over. There is no law on how many bullets can be used to stop criminals. The world is better off without those two crack heads. Those officers deserve a round of applause and a medal.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Benhogan76,

    Freaking Canadians... manslaughter is a crime. The officer didn't commit a crime. According to the United States Supreme Court, the officer was completely justified to use deadly force in that situation.

    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) [1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless " the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

    I'm sick of this unarmed bullsh1t. Those crack heads led police on a dangerous and reckless 22 mile chase at 100 mph while high on crack. Lucky no innocent people were seriously hurt or killed.

    Police officers are trained to shoot until the threat is over. There is no law on how many bullets can be used to stop criminals. The world is better off without those two crack heads. Those officers deserve a round of applause and a medal.

     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 9:17 PM ET #46

    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    i have no idea, read article about it on Friday.  Just thought it odd that they mentioned a lot of officers fired their guns but only mentioned the race of the one that killed the victim.  

    Whole story seems very odd to me, if it as it was reported can't see how shooter isn't guilty of at least manslaughter 

    The judge actually said there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to find Brelo guilty of the secondary charges (felonious assault), but because of the perception of a threat. 

    Here is the judges complete verdict:

    https://localtvwjw.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/odonnell-ruling.pdf
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    i have no idea, read article about it on Friday.  Just thought it odd that they mentioned a lot of officers fired their guns but only mentioned the race of the one that killed the victim.  

    Whole story seems very odd to me, if it as it was reported can't see how shooter isn't guilty of at least manslaughter 

    The judge actually said there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to find Brelo guilty of the secondary charges (felonious assault), but because of the perception of a threat. 

    Here is the judges complete verdict:

    https://localtvwjw.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/odonnell-ruling.pdf
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 10:30 PM ET #47

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDrizzle77:

    Scal, I know that you are white.  You can document that when I wrote Not sure if it is a self-loathing deal, or what, but your fight against the fellow white man is more apparent than ever.

    And you are clearly going off the deep end.  I used to agree with some of the things that you wrote, but you are building the foundation of a man losing his mind.

    Maybe you should run an archeology trip into the word racism.  If you dug far enough you would see how nothing I'm saying is remotely racist.  Christt, I'm the only one on here that found a "draw muhammad" contest remarkably racist, and was pelted for it.  Yet you just immediately jump off the rails and plaster me with bigot and racist and pig.

    And you completely danced around good statistics I posted.  You completely cut off the next four paragraphs.  Do you not want to help out with the real issue of America: black on black crime, and how we can stand up and support the black community without blaming racial tension?

    You are not helping your case here, you never will.  You sound like a stuck up, apathetic isolated narcissist that calls out other people for not doing anything about police brutality AND black on black crime, yet all you do is sit behind a computer and spark racial flames.  A real man that can criticize others is one that is proactive and solves problems he's "fighting" in a productive, tangible way in the community.  His plight is seen and known by those affected.  But you're clearly not a man.  Simply turned into an internet troll/bully.  That's pretty pathetic.

    Calling everybody racists and bigots does NOTHING positive, and it won't change anything.  If they were racist yesterday, they will be tomorrow with or without your feedback.  When you hopefully judge yourself one day you'll see that what you were fighting for all this time you were really fighting against.  You're using name-calling and red scare tactics in the name of racism as your weaponry. 

     

    I'll ask again because you and everyone here has NEVER answered the question, and continue to evade it.

    And now I have to post the definition because you are incapable of looking it up.

    Racist: a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

     

    Now tell me, as someone who is white, how I qualify as being a racist?

     

    And Drizzle, you are a pig. You CONSTANTLY defame blacks ALL THE TIME on this site with the other scum here like you have nothing better to do.

    I am the ONLY guy who will call you out for it and will continue to do so.

    If you think that is 'going off the rails' you are more of a child than I previously thought. Someone calls you a pig bigot (you are) and disagrees with you, then that person is 'going off the rails'.

    And yes you deserve all the derogatory comments I throw your way in the same manner you throw them at blacks on this site every day. You've earned them with your conduct here.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDrizzle77:

    Scal, I know that you are white.  You can document that when I wrote Not sure if it is a self-loathing deal, or what, but your fight against the fellow white man is more apparent than ever.

    And you are clearly going off the deep end.  I used to agree with some of the things that you wrote, but you are building the foundation of a man losing his mind.

    Maybe you should run an archeology trip into the word racism.  If you dug far enough you would see how nothing I'm saying is remotely racist.  Christt, I'm the only one on here that found a "draw muhammad" contest remarkably racist, and was pelted for it.  Yet you just immediately jump off the rails and plaster me with bigot and racist and pig.

    And you completely danced around good statistics I posted.  You completely cut off the next four paragraphs.  Do you not want to help out with the real issue of America: black on black crime, and how we can stand up and support the black community without blaming racial tension?

    You are not helping your case here, you never will.  You sound like a stuck up, apathetic isolated narcissist that calls out other people for not doing anything about police brutality AND black on black crime, yet all you do is sit behind a computer and spark racial flames.  A real man that can criticize others is one that is proactive and solves problems he's "fighting" in a productive, tangible way in the community.  His plight is seen and known by those affected.  But you're clearly not a man.  Simply turned into an internet troll/bully.  That's pretty pathetic.

    Calling everybody racists and bigots does NOTHING positive, and it won't change anything.  If they were racist yesterday, they will be tomorrow with or without your feedback.  When you hopefully judge yourself one day you'll see that what you were fighting for all this time you were really fighting against.  You're using name-calling and red scare tactics in the name of racism as your weaponry. 

     

    I'll ask again because you and everyone here has NEVER answered the question, and continue to evade it.

    And now I have to post the definition because you are incapable of looking it up.

    Racist: a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

     

    Now tell me, as someone who is white, how I qualify as being a racist?

     

    And Drizzle, you are a pig. You CONSTANTLY defame blacks ALL THE TIME on this site with the other scum here like you have nothing better to do.

    I am the ONLY guy who will call you out for it and will continue to do so.

    If you think that is 'going off the rails' you are more of a child than I previously thought. Someone calls you a pig bigot (you are) and disagrees with you, then that person is 'going off the rails'.

    And yes you deserve all the derogatory comments I throw your way in the same manner you throw them at blacks on this site every day. You've earned them with your conduct here.

     
    bettingforfun
    bettingforfun
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2014
    Posts: 2042
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 11:08 PM ET #48

    Is a person racist if they put down their own race?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Is a person racist if they put down their own race?
     
    Killer_B
    Killer_B
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 6288
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 11:50 PM ET #49

    29 shootings in Baltimore this weekend... Geez, I wonder who's doing all the shooting.

    https://touch.baltimoresun.com/#section/830/article/p2p-83623528/

    "This block used to be beautiful," Gunn said. "Out back, the kids are running and playing. It is really nice. But out front on Fayette Street, people are running for the drugs."

    She said drug dealing is now commonplace in Poppleton, but she rarely sees police officers on her block doing anything about it.

    Exactly what are the police supposed to do? If they detain the Freddie Grays of the community, they'll get charged with false imprisonment according to the Baltimore Prosecutor - Mrs. Mosby.
    Either the cops take an aggressive approach and get supported when sh*t happens, or this is what you get... It will be a record murder total in Baltimore this year...

    The city officials (all dems and majority black) are huddling now trying to stop the violence. Good luck, you supporting throwing the cops under the bus, why don't they go out and try to stop it playing nicey nice. Maybe give candy to the drug dealers and tell them to move along.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    29 shootings in Baltimore this weekend... Geez, I wonder who's doing all the shooting.

    https://touch.baltimoresun.com/#section/830/article/p2p-83623528/

    "This block used to be beautiful," Gunn said. "Out back, the kids are running and playing. It is really nice. But out front on Fayette Street, people are running for the drugs."

    She said drug dealing is now commonplace in Poppleton, but she rarely sees police officers on her block doing anything about it.

    Exactly what are the police supposed to do? If they detain the Freddie Grays of the community, they'll get charged with false imprisonment according to the Baltimore Prosecutor - Mrs. Mosby.
    Either the cops take an aggressive approach and get supported when sh*t happens, or this is what you get... It will be a record murder total in Baltimore this year...

    The city officials (all dems and majority black) are huddling now trying to stop the violence. Good luck, you supporting throwing the cops under the bus, why don't they go out and try to stop it playing nicey nice. Maybe give candy to the drug dealers and tell them to move along.
     
     
    TheDrizzle77
    TheDrizzle77
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 2685
    Posted: May. 25, 2015 - 11:55 PM ET #50

    Well my work here is done.  You officially look like you have absolutely lost your mind.  It's almost scary, but at least we get to see what the real scalabrine is all about, and for that I'm proud to have helped fully expose your anti-medicated hate tirade.  A self-loathing, white-hating, every white is racist but me, self-promoting, no conclusion-having narcissist. 

    The only area I steered wrong in is that no, you are not a racist.  It was stupid of me to say that.  You exhibit self-hatred.  A white guy that hates the white race.  Reverse racism maybe you could reach for.  I guess unnecessary to define it in any other way than to just plainly say, you clearly are majorly oppressed by white people.

    Other than that, I'm not going to visit whatever ground floor of zero credibility and the factory of lunacy you brought your own self too.  

    And when I think about it, an internet troll calling me a racist means about as much too me as the last toilet flush I experienced.  

    Good luck with the fight.  Since you never once talked about how you help out with the black community, and apparently never will, I'll just always remember Covers' scalabrine as the red scare racist caller whose only difference made in the name of the fight against racial tension was to spend his days and nights on covers finding the "bigots" of the sports gambling sector because they didn't respond right to a youtube video.  He never knew their names, but by God any screen name titled "thecentaur" will be forever blacklisted in the E-world...thanks to the mighty, grueling  journey of covers' scalabrine. 

    Your content makes skipbone's comments look Shakespearian.  


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Well my work here is done.  You officially look like you have absolutely lost your mind.  It's almost scary, but at least we get to see what the real scalabrine is all about, and for that I'm proud to have helped fully expose your anti-medicated hate tirade.  A self-loathing, white-hating, every white is racist but me, self-promoting, no conclusion-having narcissist. 

    The only area I steered wrong in is that no, you are not a racist.  It was stupid of me to say that.  You exhibit self-hatred.  A white guy that hates the white race.  Reverse racism maybe you could reach for.  I guess unnecessary to define it in any other way than to just plainly say, you clearly are majorly oppressed by white people.

    Other than that, I'm not going to visit whatever ground floor of zero credibility and the factory of lunacy you brought your own self too.  

    And when I think about it, an internet troll calling me a racist means about as much too me as the last toilet flush I experienced.  

    Good luck with the fight.  Since you never once talked about how you help out with the black community, and apparently never will, I'll just always remember Covers' scalabrine as the red scare racist caller whose only difference made in the name of the fight against racial tension was to spend his days and nights on covers finding the "bigots" of the sports gambling sector because they didn't respond right to a youtube video.  He never knew their names, but by God any screen name titled "thecentaur" will be forever blacklisted in the E-world...thanks to the mighty, grueling  journey of covers' scalabrine. 

    Your content makes skipbone's comments look Shakespearian.  


    All Forums | General Discussion
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 447,488 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/15/2026 642 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,222 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 251 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 3,678 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 3,014 Covers arrow
    • Trump lies so much. 20,679 Covers arrow
    • Obviously the true face of the republican party 31,196 Covers arrow
    • What damage to America does the traitor and his party plan for the rest of the year.? 25,628 Covers arrow
    • Another looney Trump comment today. 11,547 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.