All Forums | General Discussion

Osama Bin Laden killing was a complete hoax

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5720
Posts: 158
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #51
Was Bin Laden a cat?

Did he have 9 lives?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #52
 they threw him into the ocean 24 hours after he was killed




please
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #53
no pictures of corpse




 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 8001
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:



they both work for the same folks

10 years of wars and bombs equals major interest payments to lenders. Gulf of Tonkin incident was a false flag for the same reason...war = profits

someone google Operation Northwoods. that was real...was this a big fat set up? no idea but the conspiracy is much more believable than the official story...especially with half of Seal team 6 going down by  friendly fire (as per afghan tv)

rip seals


The more you post, the more respect I give you.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #55
 he was killed and rushed to the ocean immediately 


you guys are really sumthin boy Ill tell you
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #56
Obsessive, multiple personality and 
schizophrenic disorder.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #57
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:

Obsessive, multiple personality and 
schizophrenic disorder.




you would make a great lawyer I see  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71023
Posted: #59
Gotcha.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #60
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 66698
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by RedDustRising:


The Govt lying to us is one thing. Everyone knows they do. Now, concocting a fantastical story and influencing thousands of people to keep it a secret is a another thing. 

You, sir, are a tool.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

50 years ago...both big fat fakes to drag us into wars. it worked on LBJ, not JFK...maybe one of the reason he was murdered
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

50 years ago...both big fat fakes to drag us into wars. it worked on LBJ, not JFK...maybe one of the reason he was murdered



seriously dont bother with these donkeys... youd have better luck trying to teach your cat how to handicap japanese baseball
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1999
Posted: #63
I think it is interesting that all of a sudden 22-25 of the same navy seals team 6 were killed. Just seems strange to me...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 583
Posted: #64
Why is it  always the same people who come on here and try to defend the official story? (searchwarrant,kaponofor3,hutch). You guys crack me up. Seach always spouts some facist viewpoint like" its for the greater good sit down and shut up", Kaponofor3 always quotes joe rogan for reason,and hutch always takes the government is to stupid to do anything like this viewpoint. You guys should get some new material. You guys can believe whatever you want but why always insult people and call them crazy whenever someone thinks something other than they see on the evening news? What a bunch of losers. I get you believe what you see on tv but why are the same people always attacking someone who doesnt. Just dont post or just ignore threads like this. Are you getting paid to just sit around and shoot down conspiracy theories or something? What kind of person just sits around and has 50k posts the majority of which are always spouting some nonsense in support of some official story or politically correct viewpoint?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by JonnyTwoTime:

I think it is interesting that all of a sudden 22-25 of the same navy seals team 6 were killed. Just seems strange to me...



once again the donkeys have no answer... but they will maintaim their innocence...

because to accept otherwise would be "unpatriotic"


unfuckinreal, 

truly staggering you fucks
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by greedler:

Why is it  always the same people who come on here and try to defend the official story? (searchwarrant,kaponofor3,hutch). You guys crack me up. Seach always spouts some facist viewpoint like" its for the greater good sit down and shut up", Kaponofor3 always quotes joe rogan for reason,and hutch always takes the government is to stupid to do anything like this viewpoint. You guys should get some new material. You guys can believe whatever you want but why always insult people and call them crazy whenever someone thinks something other than they see on the evening news? What a bunch of losers. I get you believe what you see on tv but why are the same people always attacking someone who doesnt. Just dont post or just ignore threads like this. Are you getting paid to just sit around and shoot down conspiracy theories or something? What kind of person just sits around and has 50k posts the majority of which are always spouting some nonsense in support of some official story or politically correct viewpoint?


they are just stupid donkeys  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 439
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

50 years ago...both big fat fakes to drag us into wars. it worked on LBJ, not JFK...maybe one of the reason he was murdered

Interesting, but I'm still no believer.

Operation Northwoods was never acted upon. JFK knew this proposal was ludicrous.

Gulf of Tonkin: Clearly one attack happened. The second "attack" could very well have been bad intel. LBJ was chomping at the bit to go to war and he jumped the gun. The simple fact is we were fired upon in the first attack, which ultimately exonerates LBJ, IMO. I hardly constitute this as a justifiable conspiracy theory.

But thank you for presenting tangible evidence unlike the sad, gullible dogunder.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 12250
Posted: #68
The fact that your stupid fucking ass is out of the box is beyond me.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 56707
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by dogunder:



they are just stupid donkeys  

Stop already with the insults..you were just released the other day.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


Stop already with the insults..you were just released the other day.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 583
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by RedDustRising:


Interesting, but I'm still no believer.

Operation Northwoods was never acted upon. JFK knew this proposal was ludicrous.

Gulf of Tonkin: Clearly one attack happened. The second "attack" could very well have been bad intel. LBJ was chomping at the bit to go to war and he jumped the gun. The simple fact is we were fired upon in the first attack, which ultimately exonerates LBJ, IMO. I hardly constitute this as a justifiable conspiracy theory.

But thank you for presenting tangible evidence unlike the sad, gullible dogunder.

Heres some more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjO6NFLLE04 

 

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

"New Pearl Harbor"

Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" (51).[13]

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[39][40][41] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[42] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[43] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community 

The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."[2]  - Karl Rove

 

  Theres some stuff. Nothings going to prove anything 100% its just goes to show the kind of thinking that really goes on in these peoples heads and think group around washington.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 583
Posted: #72
 The most revelvant being what Karl rove  said. They know they can make up anything and get the public to buy it
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2642
Posted: #73
Worst thread since Yeoman.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 11523
Posted: #74
good job searchwarrant   
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 6142
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

I love it how these people give our government credit for being the best secret keepers in the world when they can't even keep a blow job in the oval office from getting out.....Nixon couldn't even keep Watergate secret.  Time after time, these politicians get busted with hookers....or having affairs.....or tweeting sexually explicit stuff.

For the most part, these folks are complete buffoons....yet they get credit for pulling off the most unbelievable conspiracies fathomable in some cases (insert JFK and moon landing here as well). 




Yeah and Building #7 was a controlled demolition....

If the U.S. government was in charge of the 911 plot, all 3 buildings would still be standing.... wtf?
All Forums | General Discussion
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.