Why don't you go back to that other place that you post at, or is there not enough traffic there?
Why don't you go back to that other place that you post at, or is there not enough traffic there?
I guess no one here has EVER done ANYTHING WRONG on any level,
and felt bad about it...and asked for forgiveness. Or maybe you did ask and did
not receive it the way you thought you should. Perhaps that's the reason for
the feeling of indifference about what happened today. The man seemed very
sincere in his apology about the HORRIBLE acts he took part in towards dogs.
Leonard Little killed a woman (a HUMAN BEING) while drunk behind the wheel. She
was as (if not more) defenseless as the dogs, yet Leonard got 3 MONTHS IN JAIL
and suspended for only 8 games!! I guess it's better to be a DOG in this
country than a HUMAN BEING!
I guess no one here has EVER done ANYTHING WRONG on any level,
and felt bad about it...and asked for forgiveness. Or maybe you did ask and did
not receive it the way you thought you should. Perhaps that's the reason for
the feeling of indifference about what happened today. The man seemed very
sincere in his apology about the HORRIBLE acts he took part in towards dogs.
Leonard Little killed a woman (a HUMAN BEING) while drunk behind the wheel. She
was as (if not more) defenseless as the dogs, yet Leonard got 3 MONTHS IN JAIL
and suspended for only 8 games!! I guess it's better to be a DOG in this
country than a HUMAN BEING!
... On so Vick have people writing his statements now... he
have now found Jesus... for crying out loud. That seems to be the standard
excuse now a days... i found Jesus and i am sorry sorry sorry.
"Vick also said he was sorry "to all the young
kids out there for my immature acts."
"What I did was very immature so that means I need to grow up," he
said.
He said that he was "disappointed in myself" and that "dog
fighting is a terrible thing and I ... reject it."
He said, "Through this situation I've found Jesus."
... On so Vick have people writing his statements now... he
have now found Jesus... for crying out loud. That seems to be the standard
excuse now a days... i found Jesus and i am sorry sorry sorry.
"Vick also said he was sorry "to all the young
kids out there for my immature acts."
"What I did was very immature so that means I need to grow up," he
said.
He said that he was "disappointed in myself" and that "dog
fighting is a terrible thing and I ... reject it."
He said, "Through this situation I've found Jesus."
Why don't you go back to that other place that you post at, or is there not enough traffic there?
why dont you STFU?
these are indeed 64,000 dollar questions
Why don't you go back to that other place that you post at, or is there not enough traffic there?
why dont you STFU?
these are indeed 64,000 dollar questions
Leonard Little killed a woman (a HUMAN BEING) while drunk behind the wheel. She was as (if not more) defenseless as the dogs, yet Leonard got 3 MONTHS IN JAIL and suspended for only 8 games!! I guess it's better to be a DOG in this country than a HUMAN BEING!
Small minds often need a helping hand.
m-whatever-98: Did Mr.Little deliberately go out to kill that woman? did he get behind the wheel with the intentionality of not only aiming to act (drive) in such a way as to result in the death of another living being, but to have people profit off that death? I think you would find if the answer was yes to these questions - as they are in Mr.Vick's instance - then people would have a much different attitude to Mr.Little.
But that wasn't Mr.Little's intentions. What the public see in Mr.Little's instance is "there but for the grace of God go I", since so many of the masses choose to drink (to whatever degree) then drive. If anything, Mr.Little invites sympathy. What so many of the masses dont do is bred dogs so they can't fight other dogs on the way to a painful death - its quite the opposite: many of the masses own dogs as family pets and as such view them with great love. therefore their perception of this event is naturally quite different to their relating to Mr.Little's event.
You are comparing apples & oranges, and in so doing expect to somehow score points for the incongruency you're seemly revealing, when in fact you're only revealing the extent of your ignorance.
Is it a good thing Mr.Little killed a woman while drunk? No.
Does his sentence seem short in light of his actions? yes it does - I wouldn't be happy as the parent of the woman killed seeing her accidental killer serve such a short sentence.
Is there any comparison of intentionality between Mr.Little & Mr.Vick's actions? None whatsoever.
Leonard Little killed a woman (a HUMAN BEING) while drunk behind the wheel. She was as (if not more) defenseless as the dogs, yet Leonard got 3 MONTHS IN JAIL and suspended for only 8 games!! I guess it's better to be a DOG in this country than a HUMAN BEING!
Small minds often need a helping hand.
m-whatever-98: Did Mr.Little deliberately go out to kill that woman? did he get behind the wheel with the intentionality of not only aiming to act (drive) in such a way as to result in the death of another living being, but to have people profit off that death? I think you would find if the answer was yes to these questions - as they are in Mr.Vick's instance - then people would have a much different attitude to Mr.Little.
But that wasn't Mr.Little's intentions. What the public see in Mr.Little's instance is "there but for the grace of God go I", since so many of the masses choose to drink (to whatever degree) then drive. If anything, Mr.Little invites sympathy. What so many of the masses dont do is bred dogs so they can't fight other dogs on the way to a painful death - its quite the opposite: many of the masses own dogs as family pets and as such view them with great love. therefore their perception of this event is naturally quite different to their relating to Mr.Little's event.
You are comparing apples & oranges, and in so doing expect to somehow score points for the incongruency you're seemly revealing, when in fact you're only revealing the extent of your ignorance.
Is it a good thing Mr.Little killed a woman while drunk? No.
Does his sentence seem short in light of his actions? yes it does - I wouldn't be happy as the parent of the woman killed seeing her accidental killer serve such a short sentence.
Is there any comparison of intentionality between Mr.Little & Mr.Vick's actions? None whatsoever.
Small minds often need a helping hand.
m-whatever-98: Did Mr.Little deliberately go out to kill that woman? did he get behind the wheel with the intentionality of not only aiming to act (drive) in such a way as to result in the death of another living being, but to have people profit off that death? I think you would find if the answer was yes to these questions - as they are in Mr.Vick's instance - then people would have a much different attitude to Mr.Little.
But that wasn't Mr.Little's intentions. What the public see in Mr.Little's instance is "there but for the grace of God go I", since so many of the masses choose to drink (to whatever degree) then drive. If anything, Mr.Little invites sympathy. What so many of the masses dont do is bred dogs so they can't fight other dogs on the way to a painful death - its quite the opposite: many of the masses own dogs as family pets and as such view them with great love. therefore their perception of this event is naturally quite different to their relating to Mr.Little's event.
You are comparing apples & oranges, and in so doing expect to somehow score points for the incongruency you're seemly revealing, when in fact you're only revealing the extent of your ignorance.
Is it a good thing Mr.Little killed a woman while drunk? No.
Does his sentence seem short in light of his actions? yes it does - I wouldn't be happy as the parent of the woman killed seeing her accidental killer serve such a short sentence.
Is there any comparison of intentionality between Mr.Little & Mr.Vick's actions? None whatsoever.
Small minds often need a helping hand.
m-whatever-98: Did Mr.Little deliberately go out to kill that woman? did he get behind the wheel with the intentionality of not only aiming to act (drive) in such a way as to result in the death of another living being, but to have people profit off that death? I think you would find if the answer was yes to these questions - as they are in Mr.Vick's instance - then people would have a much different attitude to Mr.Little.
But that wasn't Mr.Little's intentions. What the public see in Mr.Little's instance is "there but for the grace of God go I", since so many of the masses choose to drink (to whatever degree) then drive. If anything, Mr.Little invites sympathy. What so many of the masses dont do is bred dogs so they can't fight other dogs on the way to a painful death - its quite the opposite: many of the masses own dogs as family pets and as such view them with great love. therefore their perception of this event is naturally quite different to their relating to Mr.Little's event.
You are comparing apples & oranges, and in so doing expect to somehow score points for the incongruency you're seemly revealing, when in fact you're only revealing the extent of your ignorance.
Is it a good thing Mr.Little killed a woman while drunk? No.
Does his sentence seem short in light of his actions? yes it does - I wouldn't be happy as the parent of the woman killed seeing her accidental killer serve such a short sentence.
Is there any comparison of intentionality between Mr.Little & Mr.Vick's actions? None whatsoever.
Easy there Father Nelson, didn't realize you were the one deciding who goes where when they die. Take it easy, I will find some alter boys for you to play with.
Easy there Father Nelson, didn't realize you were the one deciding who goes where when they die. Take it easy, I will find some alter boys for you to play with.
Easy there Father Nelson, didn't realize you were the one deciding who goes where when they die. Take it easy, I will find some alter boys for you to play with.
Easy there Father Nelson, didn't realize you were the one deciding who goes where when they die. Take it easy, I will find some alter boys for you to play with.
What school did you go to where they taught that under no circumstances no matter what shall you ever capitalize a word to begin a sentence?JESUS CHRIST that's annoying.
What school did you go to where they taught that under no circumstances no matter what shall you ever capitalize a word to begin a sentence?JESUS CHRIST that's annoying.
What school did you go to where they taught that under no circumstances no matter what shall you ever capitalize a word to begin a sentence?JESUS CHRIST that's annoying.
What school did you go to where they taught that under no circumstances no matter what shall you ever capitalize a word to begin a sentence?JESUS CHRIST that's annoying.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.