Say it was possible (like in games) to pick between any current or former player to have on your team. Would you say the Lakers current and former player roster would beat the Celtics current and former player roster? 15man roster and you play a regular game. Who are you picking?
I easy would take the Lakers roster with the likes of Magic, Kareem, Baylor, Shaq, Kobe, West..etc over Bird, Walton, KG, Pierce
Thoughts?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Who Wins between Celtic Greats and Lakers Greats?
Say it was possible (like in games) to pick between any current or former player to have on your team. Would you say the Lakers current and former player roster would beat the Celtics current and former player roster? 15man roster and you play a regular game. Who are you picking?
I easy would take the Lakers roster with the likes of Magic, Kareem, Baylor, Shaq, Kobe, West..etc over Bird, Walton, KG, Pierce
Walton? LOL, I would think maybe a guy named Bill Russell- the guy with more rings than fingers- might crack that all time Celts lineup over Mr. Walton, haha. I think ESPN did a thing on this today.
0
Walton? LOL, I would think maybe a guy named Bill Russell- the guy with more rings than fingers- might crack that all time Celts lineup over Mr. Walton, haha. I think ESPN did a thing on this today.
Walton? LOL, I would think maybe a guy named Bill Russell- the guy with more rings than fingers- might crack that all time Celts lineup over Mr. Walton, haha. I think ESPN did a thing on this today.
Im not really a Celtics fan so I am not all that deep in their history. However, when you watch the news and interviews Walton's name is brought up a lot now with his connection to the Celtics vs his son on Lakers. I do agree, Russell's name should be added top 5 for them
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBlonde:
Walton? LOL, I would think maybe a guy named Bill Russell- the guy with more rings than fingers- might crack that all time Celts lineup over Mr. Walton, haha. I think ESPN did a thing on this today.
Im not really a Celtics fan so I am not all that deep in their history. However, when you watch the news and interviews Walton's name is brought up a lot now with his connection to the Celtics vs his son on Lakers. I do agree, Russell's name should be added top 5 for them
oh my bad misread post...I still got lakers in 7 tho!!!!!! I think magic and jerry west would be to much for celts in the end. plus D and rebounding of wilt, shaq, and vlade divac (haha)
0
oh my bad misread post...I still got lakers in 7 tho!!!!!! I think magic and jerry west would be to much for celts in the end. plus D and rebounding of wilt, shaq, and vlade divac (haha)
Cousy, Bird, Havlicek, Russell are the top 4 no doubt for the Celtics. Then you have a tough battle between McHale, Pierce, and Cowens for the #5 guy. Throw in Jones and DJ on the bench and you have one hell of a 9 man rotation.
The Fakers have Kobe, Magic, Wilt, Baylor, and either West or Shaq as their 5th depending on if you want size or overall skill. The problem is after those guys the list goes to either Cooper or Goodrich.
The Lakers have the better starting lineup, but the C's have more depth IMO. The reason I would take the Celtics is that Wilt, West, and Magic for the most part played little to no defense. The Celtics team with Russell, McHale, Havlicek, and Bird would eat up the Lakers offense.
0
Cousy, Bird, Havlicek, Russell are the top 4 no doubt for the Celtics. Then you have a tough battle between McHale, Pierce, and Cowens for the #5 guy. Throw in Jones and DJ on the bench and you have one hell of a 9 man rotation.
The Fakers have Kobe, Magic, Wilt, Baylor, and either West or Shaq as their 5th depending on if you want size or overall skill. The problem is after those guys the list goes to either Cooper or Goodrich.
The Lakers have the better starting lineup, but the C's have more depth IMO. The reason I would take the Celtics is that Wilt, West, and Magic for the most part played little to no defense. The Celtics team with Russell, McHale, Havlicek, and Bird would eat up the Lakers offense.
Cousy, Bird, Havlicek, Russell are the top 4 no doubt for the Celtics. Then you have a tough battle between McHale, Pierce, and Cowens for the #5 guy. Throw in Jones and DJ on the bench and you have one hell of a 9 man rotation.
The Fakers have Kobe, Magic, Wilt, Baylor, and either West or Shaq as their 5th depending on if you want size or overall skill. The problem is after those guys the list goes to either Cooper or Goodrich.
The Lakers have the better starting lineup, but the C's have more depth IMO. The reason I would take the Celtics is that Wilt, West, and Magic for the most part played little to no defense. The Celtics team with Russell, McHale, Havlicek, and Bird would eat up the Lakers offense.
I agree with your 5 for the Celtics.. for the Lakers I would add Kareem instead of Shaq or West..he would remind me of a current day Gasol with his tall and slim body. That Lakers team would be an up and down team...high scoring offense for sure. Celtics would be a defensive powerhouse. Would be an unbelievable finals series with those 9man's
0
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
Cousy, Bird, Havlicek, Russell are the top 4 no doubt for the Celtics. Then you have a tough battle between McHale, Pierce, and Cowens for the #5 guy. Throw in Jones and DJ on the bench and you have one hell of a 9 man rotation.
The Fakers have Kobe, Magic, Wilt, Baylor, and either West or Shaq as their 5th depending on if you want size or overall skill. The problem is after those guys the list goes to either Cooper or Goodrich.
The Lakers have the better starting lineup, but the C's have more depth IMO. The reason I would take the Celtics is that Wilt, West, and Magic for the most part played little to no defense. The Celtics team with Russell, McHale, Havlicek, and Bird would eat up the Lakers offense.
I agree with your 5 for the Celtics.. for the Lakers I would add Kareem instead of Shaq or West..he would remind me of a current day Gasol with his tall and slim body. That Lakers team would be an up and down team...high scoring offense for sure. Celtics would be a defensive powerhouse. Would be an unbelievable finals series with those 9man's
YA CUZ YOUR THREADS ABOUT SCREWING YOUR WIFE ARE SO MUCH BETTER
ONLY GUY i KNOW WHO EXPECTS TO GET PROPS FOR FUCKING HIS WIFE LOL
ERICLINNY = WANNABE "PLAYA"
Heres where he'll come back and tell me that his wife is hotter than anything I could get my hands on and how he used to fuck hot chick after hot chick before he was married.
His reply will take a little longer now that he has to think of a new one lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by EricLinny:
Man you really need to stop making threads
YA CUZ YOUR THREADS ABOUT SCREWING YOUR WIFE ARE SO MUCH BETTER
ONLY GUY i KNOW WHO EXPECTS TO GET PROPS FOR FUCKING HIS WIFE LOL
ERICLINNY = WANNABE "PLAYA"
Heres where he'll come back and tell me that his wife is hotter than anything I could get my hands on and how he used to fuck hot chick after hot chick before he was married.
His reply will take a little longer now that he has to think of a new one lol
you guys are dumb....alot of the players that played back in the day wouldnt do shit in todays nba......like you really think having john havlicek and kevin mchale instead of allen and pierce is a huge difference?...please. If mchale and havlicek played today, they wudnt even be in the nba. Magic and bird are the 2 exceptions, but even bill russell today wouldnt be as dominant. Players today are 10X as strong and athletic as they used to be
0
you guys are dumb....alot of the players that played back in the day wouldnt do shit in todays nba......like you really think having john havlicek and kevin mchale instead of allen and pierce is a huge difference?...please. If mchale and havlicek played today, they wudnt even be in the nba. Magic and bird are the 2 exceptions, but even bill russell today wouldnt be as dominant. Players today are 10X as strong and athletic as they used to be
you guys are dumb....alot of the players that played back in the day wouldnt do shit in todays nba......like you really think having john havlicek and kevin mchale instead of allen and pierce is a huge difference?...please. If mchale and havlicek played today, they wudnt even be in the nba. Magic and bird are the 2 exceptions, but even bill russell today wouldnt be as dominant. Players today are 10X as strong and athletic as they used to be
good point.. but with the increase of technology, training methods, fitness levels and all of that... what if the classic veterans could be in great shape and form like current players.. now rate their skill. i always thought that if Kareem and his skyhook played in NBA now that he would get pushed further out and not be allowed near inside the paint.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jrdwade12345:
you guys are dumb....alot of the players that played back in the day wouldnt do shit in todays nba......like you really think having john havlicek and kevin mchale instead of allen and pierce is a huge difference?...please. If mchale and havlicek played today, they wudnt even be in the nba. Magic and bird are the 2 exceptions, but even bill russell today wouldnt be as dominant. Players today are 10X as strong and athletic as they used to be
good point.. but with the increase of technology, training methods, fitness levels and all of that... what if the classic veterans could be in great shape and form like current players.. now rate their skill. i always thought that if Kareem and his skyhook played in NBA now that he would get pushed further out and not be allowed near inside the paint.
How about going way back into history with George Mikan who won 5 NBA titles in the early fifties for the Minneapolis Lakers. Different time and different players but, Mikan was the most dominant player of his era.
Wow what incredible players and history both these teams have had. I am a huge Laker fan and it pains me but, with Russell, Cousy, Bird, Hondo and Rondo I think the Celtics take it.
That was very hard for me to say.
0
How about going way back into history with George Mikan who won 5 NBA titles in the early fifties for the Minneapolis Lakers. Different time and different players but, Mikan was the most dominant player of his era.
Wow what incredible players and history both these teams have had. I am a huge Laker fan and it pains me but, with Russell, Cousy, Bird, Hondo and Rondo I think the Celtics take it.
you guys are dumb....alot of the players that played back in the day wouldnt do shit in todays nba......like you really think having john havlicek and kevin mchale instead of allen and pierce is a huge difference?...please. If mchale and havlicek played today, they wudnt even be in the nba. Magic and bird are the 2 exceptions, but even bill russell today wouldnt be as dominant. Players today are 10X as strong and athletic as they used to be
Basketball is about more than dunking. McHale has more post moves than the whole NBA today combined.
Havlicek was a flat out gamer, constant hustle and defense.
Let me guess, Dr J would be on par with Shannon Brown?
0
Quote Originally Posted by jrdwade12345:
you guys are dumb....alot of the players that played back in the day wouldnt do shit in todays nba......like you really think having john havlicek and kevin mchale instead of allen and pierce is a huge difference?...please. If mchale and havlicek played today, they wudnt even be in the nba. Magic and bird are the 2 exceptions, but even bill russell today wouldnt be as dominant. Players today are 10X as strong and athletic as they used to be
Basketball is about more than dunking. McHale has more post moves than the whole NBA today combined.
Havlicek was a flat out gamer, constant hustle and defense.
Let me guess, Dr J would be on par with Shannon Brown?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.