With Millions of Illegal Immigrants Entering Arizona, Crime is Down Across the Board
Obama is suing Arizona and is going to put a stop to their insanity.
Obama is suing Arizona and is going to put a stop to their insanity.
Obama is suing Arizona and is going to put a stop to their insanity.
Obama is suing Arizona and is going to put a stop to their insanity.
That really wouldn't be an option since Mexico has incredibly restrictive immigration laws and even overstaying your visa can land you in jail. ![]()
That really wouldn't be an option since Mexico has incredibly restrictive immigration laws and even overstaying your visa can land you in jail. ![]()
How is what they are doing any different than simply enforcing a federal law on the books that is not being enforced?
exactly. the arizona law in many times more liberal than the federal law that is already on the books. the federal law says that any police officer can pull anyone over, or question the citizenship for any reason whatsoever. for any reason. the az law says a person has to be at least suspected of a crime of some kind to be questioned about their immigration status.
btw......very low chance that this law is overturned
How is what they are doing any different than simply enforcing a federal law on the books that is not being enforced?
exactly. the arizona law in many times more liberal than the federal law that is already on the books. the federal law says that any police officer can pull anyone over, or question the citizenship for any reason whatsoever. for any reason. the az law says a person has to be at least suspected of a crime of some kind to be questioned about their immigration status.
btw......very low chance that this law is overturned
That really wouldn't be an option since Mexico has incredibly restrictive immigration laws and even overstaying your visa can land you in jail. ![]()
That really wouldn't be an option since Mexico has incredibly restrictive immigration laws and even overstaying your visa can land you in jail. ![]()
Obama is suing Arizona and is going to put a stop to their insanity.
Yeah,why should the people that actually live in Arizona have their vote count.Obama knows what is best for them. ![]()
Obama is suing Arizona and is going to put a stop to their insanity.
Yeah,why should the people that actually live in Arizona have their vote count.Obama knows what is best for them. ![]()
exactly. the arizona law in many times more liberal than the federal law that is already on the books. the federal law says that any police officer can pull anyone over, or question the citizenship for any reason whatsoever. for any reason. the az law says a person has to be at least suspected of a crime of some kind to be questioned about their immigration status.
btw......very low chance that this law is overturned
Actually, that is completely false. Arizona will become the first State to allow for the police to seize the detainee on the low threshold of lawful police contact (which can be for pretty much anything). That isn't close to the Federal law's standard for police contact and obtaining identification. ![]()
exactly. the arizona law in many times more liberal than the federal law that is already on the books. the federal law says that any police officer can pull anyone over, or question the citizenship for any reason whatsoever. for any reason. the az law says a person has to be at least suspected of a crime of some kind to be questioned about their immigration status.
btw......very low chance that this law is overturned
Actually, that is completely false. Arizona will become the first State to allow for the police to seize the detainee on the low threshold of lawful police contact (which can be for pretty much anything). That isn't close to the Federal law's standard for police contact and obtaining identification. ![]()
Basically what you are saying is that we should give our country up? Am I reading this correctly?
Basically what you are saying is that we should give our country up? Am I reading this correctly?
Some people might not know that since the 1940s, federal law has required non-citizens who are in the United States permanently to carry on their person, at all times, the official documents proving that they are here legally — green card, work visa, etc. That has been the law for 70 years, and the new Arizona law does not change it.
Some people might not know that since the 1940s, federal law has required non-citizens who are in the United States permanently to carry on their person, at all times, the official documents proving that they are here legally — green card, work visa, etc. That has been the law for 70 years, and the new Arizona law does not change it.
They have to be stopped for something else before they can ask for ID.
Some people might not know that since the 1940s, federal law has required non-citizens who are in the United States permanently to carry on their person, at all times, the official documents proving that they are here legally — green card, work visa, etc. That has been the law for 70 years, and the new Arizona law does not change it.
Because Byron York said so? ![]()
You could at least change a couple of the words. ![]()
They don't have to be stopped and therein lies the rub. It only needs to be a lawful police encounter. Not a stop, not suspected criminal activity. ![]()
They have to be stopped for something else before they can ask for ID.
Some people might not know that since the 1940s, federal law has required non-citizens who are in the United States permanently to carry on their person, at all times, the official documents proving that they are here legally — green card, work visa, etc. That has been the law for 70 years, and the new Arizona law does not change it.
Because Byron York said so? ![]()
You could at least change a couple of the words. ![]()
They don't have to be stopped and therein lies the rub. It only needs to be a lawful police encounter. Not a stop, not suspected criminal activity. ![]()
Because Byron York said so? ![]()
You could at least change a couple of the words. ![]()
They don't have to be stopped and therein lies the rub. It only needs to be a lawful police encounter. Not a stop, not suspected criminal activity. ![]()
"Yo, Holmes. Where's a good place to get a taco?"
That could be a lawful police encounter, the way the thing is written. "By the way, you got ID?"
Because Byron York said so? ![]()
You could at least change a couple of the words. ![]()
They don't have to be stopped and therein lies the rub. It only needs to be a lawful police encounter. Not a stop, not suspected criminal activity. ![]()
"Yo, Holmes. Where's a good place to get a taco?"
That could be a lawful police encounter, the way the thing is written. "By the way, you got ID?"
I don't know if this is the same article someone posted a couple weeks back in the politics forum, but it is using the same reporting style for sure. The article itself doesn't state anything about if crime is down with illegals, just crime in general. Yet he tries to lean the story towards it means crime is down with illegals as well. So basically this article is assuming or pushing the reader to assume that crime with illegals is down too, where that may or may not be the actual case. Personally, I think the reporter did a shitty job with the story in that regard.
I don't know if this is the same article someone posted a couple weeks back in the politics forum, but it is using the same reporting style for sure. The article itself doesn't state anything about if crime is down with illegals, just crime in general. Yet he tries to lean the story towards it means crime is down with illegals as well. So basically this article is assuming or pushing the reader to assume that crime with illegals is down too, where that may or may not be the actual case. Personally, I think the reporter did a shitty job with the story in that regard.
Who is the court going to believe when these issues come up, the policeman or the minority?
Sure..we all know that the minority individual who had their rights disregarded will be believed over a policeman.
Nothing to be concerned about..just Arizona cleaning up the streets, pretty soon they will pave them with gold, I am looking forward to that.
Who is the court going to believe when these issues come up, the policeman or the minority?
Sure..we all know that the minority individual who had their rights disregarded will be believed over a policeman.
Nothing to be concerned about..just Arizona cleaning up the streets, pretty soon they will pave them with gold, I am looking forward to that.
Tell that to the family of the rancher that was killed by an illegal a couple months ago.
Tell that to the family of the rancher that was killed by an illegal a couple months ago.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,931
- Thursday 09/24/2026 686
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,440
- Falcons vs Packers TNF in-game live 2,151
- NFL LOCKED IN! 100,338
- ***Macwesties * Thur. * Sun. Sept. 24, 27, 2026 * Week #3 * NFL Football Plays* 4,199
- PART DEUX 339
- Happening just recently . . . 34,755
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 24,634
- ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,257
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
