An adult can see through someone looking for attention with posting about inside information.
Someone who isn't an adult thinks "inside info" is good on a guy who got submitted. Tell me how that works again....?
Lol you obviously know nothing about sports betting. Let me break it down for you REAL SLOW
a guy that had 4.8 odds so you only have to win 1 times out of 4 times and i willl STILL MAKE MONEY. almost knock the other guy THREE TIMES and was dominating, but you still bash that bet???. You truly don't understand sports betting or mma. to say after watching that fight, that betting tim was a bad bet... just shows how ignorant you are
0
Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick:
You are.
An adult can see through someone looking for attention with posting about inside information.
Someone who isn't an adult thinks "inside info" is good on a guy who got submitted. Tell me how that works again....?
Lol you obviously know nothing about sports betting. Let me break it down for you REAL SLOW
a guy that had 4.8 odds so you only have to win 1 times out of 4 times and i willl STILL MAKE MONEY. almost knock the other guy THREE TIMES and was dominating, but you still bash that bet???. You truly don't understand sports betting or mma. to say after watching that fight, that betting tim was a bad bet... just shows how ignorant you are
Now for you mars101, your friend saw right in that fight , it was a coin flip but it was paying almost 5 to 1. So very good value. You came close to win , and with those odds you will end up on the + unit side, i promise you that, i have been betting mma for years and i make money by finding VALUE in fights. You will sometime lose a couple but then you win 1 or 2 fight and you get those units back + profits.
The 5 plays your friend told you to play were good. And i am saying this has someone that has made a play on barao. But i saw wrong in that fight. I thought gagnon had less than a 6% shot to win that fight. Which his very rare for me to think. and i got barao at 1.15 which mean i thought it add value. but gagnon obviously add a better shot than that, so it was a bad bet from my part.
Tim on the other side, i had him at almost a 50% chance to win that fight but the return was not 2 to 1 which would have been a complete pass for me or a play on leites, bu the return wast 5 to 1, and after watching that fight, i know i was right. tim had a better chance than that
I take my time to write you because you don't seem to have been betting mma for has long has i have, so i am only trying to help you. Sometimes by betting those big underdog you will lose a couple. But you only have to win a small percentage to make a profit. in the long run, all that counts his the % to win the fight VS the payout %.
This other guy will win 4 fights in a row at 1.2 average odds and then lose 1 fight and will actually be losing money.
0
Now for you mars101, your friend saw right in that fight , it was a coin flip but it was paying almost 5 to 1. So very good value. You came close to win , and with those odds you will end up on the + unit side, i promise you that, i have been betting mma for years and i make money by finding VALUE in fights. You will sometime lose a couple but then you win 1 or 2 fight and you get those units back + profits.
The 5 plays your friend told you to play were good. And i am saying this has someone that has made a play on barao. But i saw wrong in that fight. I thought gagnon had less than a 6% shot to win that fight. Which his very rare for me to think. and i got barao at 1.15 which mean i thought it add value. but gagnon obviously add a better shot than that, so it was a bad bet from my part.
Tim on the other side, i had him at almost a 50% chance to win that fight but the return was not 2 to 1 which would have been a complete pass for me or a play on leites, bu the return wast 5 to 1, and after watching that fight, i know i was right. tim had a better chance than that
I take my time to write you because you don't seem to have been betting mma for has long has i have, so i am only trying to help you. Sometimes by betting those big underdog you will lose a couple. But you only have to win a small percentage to make a profit. in the long run, all that counts his the % to win the fight VS the payout %.
This other guy will win 4 fights in a row at 1.2 average odds and then lose 1 fight and will actually be losing money.
I don't think either barao or Leites were in any trouble in any of those fights. If both those fights rematched would you seriously bet either gagnon or boetsch?
0
I don't think either barao or Leites were in any trouble in any of those fights. If both those fights rematched would you seriously bet either gagnon or boetsch?
I don't think either barao or Leites were in any trouble in any of those fights. If both those fights rematched would you seriously bet either gagnon or boetsch?
Anyone that says leites was not in any trouble in that fight makes me having a conversation with them, really difficult.
But to answer the question. I would put 1 to win 10 on gagnon easily.
It was a close fight that almost made it to a decision. Barao looks awful recently and i thought he would be superior now that he faced lower competition, but i was wrong and gagnon was able to control him against the cage and even won a good amount of the exchanges on the feet. Gagnon could absolutely win a rematch and i would take 10.00 odds has a gift now that i know it should be 3.5 or 4 maximum.
i hope you understand that i am not saying gagnon would be the favorite to win ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sawman:
I don't think either barao or Leites were in any trouble in any of those fights. If both those fights rematched would you seriously bet either gagnon or boetsch?
Anyone that says leites was not in any trouble in that fight makes me having a conversation with them, really difficult.
But to answer the question. I would put 1 to win 10 on gagnon easily.
It was a close fight that almost made it to a decision. Barao looks awful recently and i thought he would be superior now that he faced lower competition, but i was wrong and gagnon was able to control him against the cage and even won a good amount of the exchanges on the feet. Gagnon could absolutely win a rematch and i would take 10.00 odds has a gift now that i know it should be 3.5 or 4 maximum.
i hope you understand that i am not saying gagnon would be the favorite to win ?
Lol you obviously know nothing about sports betting. Let me break it down for you REAL SLOW
a guy that had 4.8 odds so you only have to win 1 times out of 4 times and i willl STILL MAKE MONEY. almost knock the other guy THREE TIMES and was dominating, but you still bash that bet???. You truly don't understand sports betting or mma. to say after watching that fight, that betting tim was a bad bet... just shows how ignorant you are
I've forgotten more about sports betting than you will ever know. Line moves, making numbers, risk management, etc.
And, again you've confirmed how big of a complete idiot you are. Immediately after your spiel about how much about sports betting you know, you said that you had Boetsch winning close to 50% of the time, however, would be unwilling to bet 2-1. A bet at +200 only needs to win 33% of the time to break even. See the difference there?
You're a total moron.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MMAwizard:
Lol you obviously know nothing about sports betting. Let me break it down for you REAL SLOW
a guy that had 4.8 odds so you only have to win 1 times out of 4 times and i willl STILL MAKE MONEY. almost knock the other guy THREE TIMES and was dominating, but you still bash that bet???. You truly don't understand sports betting or mma. to say after watching that fight, that betting tim was a bad bet... just shows how ignorant you are
I've forgotten more about sports betting than you will ever know. Line moves, making numbers, risk management, etc.
And, again you've confirmed how big of a complete idiot you are. Immediately after your spiel about how much about sports betting you know, you said that you had Boetsch winning close to 50% of the time, however, would be unwilling to bet 2-1. A bet at +200 only needs to win 33% of the time to break even. See the difference there?
i did not say i would not take +200. i deal in decimal so i would not take 2.0 odds
. you are obviously searching for anything just to be negative and to hide how much you know nothing about mma, but each time you talk about a fight or a fighter it REALLY SHOWS, you can't hide it to people that have practiced and watched this sports for years.
But hey... trying to make common sense to someone that thinks inside info means that the fighter will win 100% of the time a fight. shows me you forgot A LOT about sport betting, lol its truly hillarious .
0
Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick:
i did not say i would not take +200. i deal in decimal so i would not take 2.0 odds
. you are obviously searching for anything just to be negative and to hide how much you know nothing about mma, but each time you talk about a fight or a fighter it REALLY SHOWS, you can't hide it to people that have practiced and watched this sports for years.
But hey... trying to make common sense to someone that thinks inside info means that the fighter will win 100% of the time a fight. shows me you forgot A LOT about sport betting, lol its truly hillarious .
But why do you need to come back on this guy treads all the time to bash this person. Stop being so miserable. You think he his a fraud ? you think his picks suck ? Who cares, when i think someone his a fraud i just don't go in his tread
I compare what you are doing to a if in life you would not like someone and think he his a fraud but go to his house all the time to argue with the person and say negative things about him.... why do it ? me i just don't go at that person house so both him and i are happier . In the end stop being so miserable and go make your own treads. this guy his 3-2 and still on the + side. what have you contributed ?
0
But why do you need to come back on this guy treads all the time to bash this person. Stop being so miserable. You think he his a fraud ? you think his picks suck ? Who cares, when i think someone his a fraud i just don't go in his tread
I compare what you are doing to a if in life you would not like someone and think he his a fraud but go to his house all the time to argue with the person and say negative things about him.... why do it ? me i just don't go at that person house so both him and i are happier . In the end stop being so miserable and go make your own treads. this guy his 3-2 and still on the + side. what have you contributed ?
But why do you need to come back on this guy treads all the time to bash this person. Stop being so miserable. You think he his a fraud ? you think his picks suck ? Who cares, when i think someone his a fraud i just don't go in his tread
I compare what you are doing to a if in life you would not like someone and think he his a fraud but go to his house all the time to argue with the person and say negative things about him.... why do it ? me i just don't go at that person house so both him and i are happier . In the end stop being so miserable and go make your own treads. this guy his 3-2 and still on the + side. what have you contributed ?
He is openly lying, and deceiving to other posters. Desperately looking for attention. So, I'm here to let them know the truth, rather than follow someone touting "inside information" but not keeping an accurate record, and leaving losses off his record.
But you never answered my question. You know so much about sports betting (or so you say) and had Boetsch winning near 50% of the time. Surely you know that at +200, winning 50% of the time is very profitable. But yet, you say you wouldn't play +200. Please explain this to me sports betting master......
0
Quote Originally Posted by MMAwizard:
But why do you need to come back on this guy treads all the time to bash this person. Stop being so miserable. You think he his a fraud ? you think his picks suck ? Who cares, when i think someone his a fraud i just don't go in his tread
I compare what you are doing to a if in life you would not like someone and think he his a fraud but go to his house all the time to argue with the person and say negative things about him.... why do it ? me i just don't go at that person house so both him and i are happier . In the end stop being so miserable and go make your own treads. this guy his 3-2 and still on the + side. what have you contributed ?
He is openly lying, and deceiving to other posters. Desperately looking for attention. So, I'm here to let them know the truth, rather than follow someone touting "inside information" but not keeping an accurate record, and leaving losses off his record.
But you never answered my question. You know so much about sports betting (or so you say) and had Boetsch winning near 50% of the time. Surely you know that at +200, winning 50% of the time is very profitable. But yet, you say you wouldn't play +200. Please explain this to me sports betting master......
He is openly lying, and deceiving to other posters. Desperately looking for attention. So, I'm here to let them know the truth, rather than follow someone touting "inside information" but not keeping an accurate record, and leaving losses off his record.
But you never answered my question. You know so much about sports betting (or so you say) and had Boetsch winning near 50% of the time. Surely you know that at +200, winning 50% of the time is very profitable. But yet, you say you wouldn't play +200. Please explain this to me sports betting master......
That's not a reason to come after the fight his done to laugh at him... that's makes no sense. You are making excuses to be a negative ahole.
And i never said +200. i said 2 to 1. which i meant in decimal i would not take 2.00. Do you know what that means ?
2.00 odds in decimal equals +100. and why are you so stuck on this ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick:
He is openly lying, and deceiving to other posters. Desperately looking for attention. So, I'm here to let them know the truth, rather than follow someone touting "inside information" but not keeping an accurate record, and leaving losses off his record.
But you never answered my question. You know so much about sports betting (or so you say) and had Boetsch winning near 50% of the time. Surely you know that at +200, winning 50% of the time is very profitable. But yet, you say you wouldn't play +200. Please explain this to me sports betting master......
That's not a reason to come after the fight his done to laugh at him... that's makes no sense. You are making excuses to be a negative ahole.
And i never said +200. i said 2 to 1. which i meant in decimal i would not take 2.00. Do you know what that means ?
2.00 odds in decimal equals +100. and why are you so stuck on this ?
He is openly lying, and deceiving to other posters. Desperately looking for attention. So, I'm here to let them know the truth, rather than follow someone touting "inside information" but not keeping an accurate record, and leaving losses off his record.
But you never answered my question. You know so much about sports betting (or so you say) and had Boetsch winning near 50% of the time. Surely you know that at +200, winning 50% of the time is very profitable. But yet, you say you wouldn't play +200. Please explain this to me sports betting master......
He is openly lying, and deceiving to other posters. Desperately looking for attention. So, I'm here to let them know the truth, rather than follow someone touting "inside information" but not keeping an accurate record, and leaving losses off his record.
But you never answered my question. You know so much about sports betting (or so you say) and had Boetsch winning near 50% of the time. Surely you know that at +200, winning 50% of the time is very profitable. But yet, you say you wouldn't play +200. Please explain this to me sports betting master......
Dude just admit that you posted Gagnon as a play and your record is 2-3. I agree that after seeing each fight, every single one of the picks was a good pick.
0
Dude just admit that you posted Gagnon as a play and your record is 2-3. I agree that after seeing each fight, every single one of the picks was a good pick.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
