Sorry Giga, but your ancient post regarding being limited by a sportsbook was bash worthy. Although your intent may have been to warn people not to use them, the way you positioned it made you come across as being arrogant.
0
Sorry Giga, but your ancient post regarding being limited by a sportsbook was bash worthy. Although your intent may have been to warn people not to use them, the way you positioned it made you come across as being arrogant.
ive heard of people getting limited, essentially banned with the limits they are left with, at sportsbookreview.com forum
i really dont know why they would lie about it
If you bet any significant amount, you will get limit if only betting their best line out there. I have no idea why poster respond to sharpsh!t, that guy is right he will never get limit. Air bettor don't get limited, how do you limit someone who bet $0.50 like sharpsh!t...lol. That guy responds with emoticon & 1 liner, wonder if he actual read post before responding.
I don't post pick because I don't believe that's the right way to make money. Many time I bet on both side kinda like hedging. You have to cap the fight/fighter base what your preview value of that fighter. Let say everyone post their picks is Jon Jone, will I likely bet his opponent if is +1100. Jones might get disqualify, he might get injury like in the Chael Sonnen fight. So if you try to make money follow poster pick, you will likely not succeed. But I am glad there are player like sharpsh!t & sadman, it surely will benefit me if there is more player like them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Qncyk1:
ive heard of people getting limited, essentially banned with the limits they are left with, at sportsbookreview.com forum
i really dont know why they would lie about it
If you bet any significant amount, you will get limit if only betting their best line out there. I have no idea why poster respond to sharpsh!t, that guy is right he will never get limit. Air bettor don't get limited, how do you limit someone who bet $0.50 like sharpsh!t...lol. That guy responds with emoticon & 1 liner, wonder if he actual read post before responding.
I don't post pick because I don't believe that's the right way to make money. Many time I bet on both side kinda like hedging. You have to cap the fight/fighter base what your preview value of that fighter. Let say everyone post their picks is Jon Jone, will I likely bet his opponent if is +1100. Jones might get disqualify, he might get injury like in the Chael Sonnen fight. So if you try to make money follow poster pick, you will likely not succeed. But I am glad there are player like sharpsh!t & sadman, it surely will benefit me if there is more player like them.
Sorry Giga, but your ancient post regarding being limited by a sportsbook was bash worthy. Although your intent may have been to warn people not to use them, the way you positioned it made you come across as being arrogant.
I was very new when I got ban & limit, so it freak me out since I am doing so well maybe it is beginner luck. That post is for me, not to warn other. My post is hoping a veteran will guide me to other site where they don't limit or ban you, maybe have higher tolerance from winning. I am glad I found pinnacle & matchbook. Matchbook is awesome but it is short live. My post is to ask for help, not to brag but it likely sound like I am bragging. In hindsight, it is good that a book limit or ban player, it show responsibility of the book to have money to pay players balance. New books out there who don't limit player have very high risk of closing out shop, so Ladbrokes & unibet is ok in my book although I can't bet there.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MR219:
Sorry Giga, but your ancient post regarding being limited by a sportsbook was bash worthy. Although your intent may have been to warn people not to use them, the way you positioned it made you come across as being arrogant.
I was very new when I got ban & limit, so it freak me out since I am doing so well maybe it is beginner luck. That post is for me, not to warn other. My post is hoping a veteran will guide me to other site where they don't limit or ban you, maybe have higher tolerance from winning. I am glad I found pinnacle & matchbook. Matchbook is awesome but it is short live. My post is to ask for help, not to brag but it likely sound like I am bragging. In hindsight, it is good that a book limit or ban player, it show responsibility of the book to have money to pay players balance. New books out there who don't limit player have very high risk of closing out shop, so Ladbrokes & unibet is ok in my book although I can't bet there.
I was very new when I got ban & limit, so it freak me out since I am doing so well maybe it is beginner luck. That post is for me, not to warn other. My post is hoping a veteran will guide me to other site where they don't limit or ban you, maybe have higher tolerance from winning. I am glad I found pinnacle & matchbook. Matchbook is awesome but it is short live. My post is to ask for help, not to brag but it likely sound like I am bragging. In hindsight, it is good that a book limit or ban player, it show responsibility of the book to have money to pay players balance. New books out there who don't limit player have very high risk of closing out shop, so Ladbrokes & unibet is ok in my book although I can't bet there.
Thank you for clarifying the intent of that post.
I think if more people understood where you were coming from when you initially posted it, you would've gotten a more positive response and not been bashed by anyone.
I understand completely. Bet365 is the same way when they post MMA lines for non-UFC cards. They really limit the amount I can bet on those cards, but that is why I also have a pinnacle sports account as well to get around that so I can bet what I want.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GigaOuts:
I was very new when I got ban & limit, so it freak me out since I am doing so well maybe it is beginner luck. That post is for me, not to warn other. My post is hoping a veteran will guide me to other site where they don't limit or ban you, maybe have higher tolerance from winning. I am glad I found pinnacle & matchbook. Matchbook is awesome but it is short live. My post is to ask for help, not to brag but it likely sound like I am bragging. In hindsight, it is good that a book limit or ban player, it show responsibility of the book to have money to pay players balance. New books out there who don't limit player have very high risk of closing out shop, so Ladbrokes & unibet is ok in my book although I can't bet there.
Thank you for clarifying the intent of that post.
I think if more people understood where you were coming from when you initially posted it, you would've gotten a more positive response and not been bashed by anyone.
I understand completely. Bet365 is the same way when they post MMA lines for non-UFC cards. They really limit the amount I can bet on those cards, but that is why I also have a pinnacle sports account as well to get around that so I can bet what I want.
If you bet any significant amount, you will get limit if only betting their best line out there. I have no idea why poster respond to sharpsh!t, that guy is right he will never get limit. Air bettor don't get limited, how do you limit someone who bet $0.50 like sharpsh!t...lol. That guy responds with emoticon & 1 liner, wonder if he actual read post before responding.
I don't post pick because I don't believe that's the right way to make money. Many time I bet on both side kinda like hedging. You have to cap the fight/fighter base what your preview value of that fighter. Let say everyone post their picks is Jon Jone, will I likely bet his opponent if is +1100. Jones might get disqualify, he might get injury like in the Chael Sonnen fight. So if you try to make money follow poster pick, you will likely not succeed. But I am glad there are player like sharpsh!t & sadman, it surely will benefit me if there is more player like them.
Giga, I must say that I find your strategy absolutely baffling! I understand that some people will try to hedge on pointspread betting for NFL and College Football in an attempt to try to middle so that both sides cash but you cannot do that with a money line bet.
I can understand trying to lock in on an MMA bet early to try and get a good line, but sometimes the risk of finding out about a bad weight cut or other issues and trying to buy off at a much worse line is actually more costly than if you had waited until closer to bell time to lock in. Especially considering that most books restrict the amount of money they will allow you to bet when they first open the lines, Then relax these limits closer to bell time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GigaOuts:
If you bet any significant amount, you will get limit if only betting their best line out there. I have no idea why poster respond to sharpsh!t, that guy is right he will never get limit. Air bettor don't get limited, how do you limit someone who bet $0.50 like sharpsh!t...lol. That guy responds with emoticon & 1 liner, wonder if he actual read post before responding.
I don't post pick because I don't believe that's the right way to make money. Many time I bet on both side kinda like hedging. You have to cap the fight/fighter base what your preview value of that fighter. Let say everyone post their picks is Jon Jone, will I likely bet his opponent if is +1100. Jones might get disqualify, he might get injury like in the Chael Sonnen fight. So if you try to make money follow poster pick, you will likely not succeed. But I am glad there are player like sharpsh!t & sadman, it surely will benefit me if there is more player like them.
Giga, I must say that I find your strategy absolutely baffling! I understand that some people will try to hedge on pointspread betting for NFL and College Football in an attempt to try to middle so that both sides cash but you cannot do that with a money line bet.
I can understand trying to lock in on an MMA bet early to try and get a good line, but sometimes the risk of finding out about a bad weight cut or other issues and trying to buy off at a much worse line is actually more costly than if you had waited until closer to bell time to lock in. Especially considering that most books restrict the amount of money they will allow you to bet when they first open the lines, Then relax these limits closer to bell time.
QUOTE Originally Posted by ParlayJoe17:Hey Giga, screw all the arguing etc. and get on here and post some of your plays! Sounds like you are a winning player and you may be concerned about losing some value due to line moves etc. after being limited, but sounds like you are bright and would have some good insight for everybody. No need to quibble!He's not. Trust me on this one. QUOTEPerhaps 5Dimes should offer a prop bet on whether Giga will create a UFC 185 thread and post his plays ahead of the event. My guess on the opening line would be:YES. +25000NO -1000000000
I got NO for $10 to win 1 penny, lol.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MR219:
QUOTE Originally Posted by ParlayJoe17:Hey Giga, screw all the arguing etc. and get on here and post some of your plays! Sounds like you are a winning player and you may be concerned about losing some value due to line moves etc. after being limited, but sounds like you are bright and would have some good insight for everybody. No need to quibble!He's not. Trust me on this one. QUOTEPerhaps 5Dimes should offer a prop bet on whether Giga will create a UFC 185 thread and post his plays ahead of the event. My guess on the opening line would be:YES. +25000NO -1000000000
We must limit your wagering for this particular prop bet because you are such a sharp bettor and you might clean us out on this play.
Unfortunately, we have voided your $10 bet and have now lowered your betting limit on this prop to a maximum wager of $0.18. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks for your understanding.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari29:
I got NO for $10 to win 1 penny, lol.
Dear Sir and/or Madame,
We must limit your wagering for this particular prop bet because you are such a sharp bettor and you might clean us out on this play.
Unfortunately, we have voided your $10 bet and have now lowered your betting limit on this prop to a maximum wager of $0.18. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Dear Sir and/or Madame,We must limit your wagering for this particular prop bet because you are such a sharp bettor and you might clean us out on this play.Unfortunately, we have voided your $10 bet and have now lowered your betting limit on this prop to a maximum wager of $0.18. We are sorry for the inconvenience.Thanks for your understanding.
First off, its Sir!!! Second, I'm sharp as a butter knife. Third do I still get my penny???
0
Quote Originally Posted by MR219:
Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari29:
I got NO for $10 to win 1 penny, lol.
Dear Sir and/or Madame,We must limit your wagering for this particular prop bet because you are such a sharp bettor and you might clean us out on this play.Unfortunately, we have voided your $10 bet and have now lowered your betting limit on this prop to a maximum wager of $0.18. We are sorry for the inconvenience.Thanks for your understanding.
First off, its Sir!!! Second, I'm sharp as a butter knife. Third do I still get my penny???
Giga, I must say that I find your strategy absolutely baffling!
Yes I don't pick the fighter who I think will win the match because there is many time I am wrong. So I pick fighter base on perceive value I assign to a fighter when capping. So I flip flopping picks constantly due to the fluctuation of the odd.
Let take an extreme example like ufn 61- Bigfoot vs Mir, there is 11 upset. If you bet base on value, you should make very good money in that event.
Sam Alvey at +310 vs Cezar Ferreira
Frankie Saenz at +900 vs Iuri Alcantara
Adrian Martins at +410 vs Rustam Khabilov
I, like everyone else all picking Ferreira, Alcantara, & Khabilov to win but I am not going to bet at those odd. Giving the odd of Sam Alvey, Frankie Saenz, & Adrian Martins, you have to force yourself to bet something on those ridiculous odd. So picking a fighter & betting on a fighter is 2 very different things for me.
0
Giga, I must say that I find your strategy absolutely baffling!
Yes I don't pick the fighter who I think will win the match because there is many time I am wrong. So I pick fighter base on perceive value I assign to a fighter when capping. So I flip flopping picks constantly due to the fluctuation of the odd.
Let take an extreme example like ufn 61- Bigfoot vs Mir, there is 11 upset. If you bet base on value, you should make very good money in that event.
Sam Alvey at +310 vs Cezar Ferreira
Frankie Saenz at +900 vs Iuri Alcantara
Adrian Martins at +410 vs Rustam Khabilov
I, like everyone else all picking Ferreira, Alcantara, & Khabilov to win but I am not going to bet at those odd. Giving the odd of Sam Alvey, Frankie Saenz, & Adrian Martins, you have to force yourself to bet something on those ridiculous odd. So picking a fighter & betting on a fighter is 2 very different things for me.
Dear Sir and/or Madame,We must limit your wagering for this particular prop bet because you are such a sharp bettor and you might clean us out on this play.Unfortunately, we have voided your $10 bet and have now lowered your betting limit on this prop to a maximum wager of $0.18. We are sorry for the inconvenience.Thanks for your understanding. First off, its Sir!!! Second, I'm sharp as a butter knife. Third do I still get my penny???
Dear Madame,
Thanks once again for contacting 5Dames customer service. As mentioned in our previous correspondence to you, if we were to honor that bet, we would definitely go bankrupt and we certainly cannot allow that to happen!
Thanks again for your understanding and your continued loyalty.
Eddie M
Customer Service Representative/Part-time Turkish Bathouse Towel Attendant
5Dames Sportsbook
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari29:
Dear Sir and/or Madame,We must limit your wagering for this particular prop bet because you are such a sharp bettor and you might clean us out on this play.Unfortunately, we have voided your $10 bet and have now lowered your betting limit on this prop to a maximum wager of $0.18. We are sorry for the inconvenience.Thanks for your understanding. First off, its Sir!!! Second, I'm sharp as a butter knife. Third do I still get my penny???
Dear Madame,
Thanks once again for contacting 5Dames customer service. As mentioned in our previous correspondence to you, if we were to honor that bet, we would definitely go bankrupt and we certainly cannot allow that to happen!
Thanks again for your understanding and your continued loyalty.
Eddie M
Customer Service Representative/Part-time Turkish Bathouse Towel Attendant
Giga, I must say that I find your strategy absolutely baffling!
Yes I don't pick the fighter who I think will win the match because there is many time I am wrong. So I pick fighter base on perceive value I assign to a fighter when capping. So I flip flopping picks constantly due to the fluctuation of the odd.
Let take an extreme example like ufn 61- Bigfoot vs Mir, there is 11 upset. If you bet base on value, you should make very good money in that event.
Sam Alvey at +310 vs Cezar Ferreira
Frankie Saenz at +900 vs Iuri Alcantara
Adrian Martins at +410 vs Rustam Khabilov
I, like everyone else all picking Ferreira, Alcantara, & Khabilov to win but I am not going to bet at those odd. Giving the odd of Sam Alvey, Frankie Saenz, & Adrian Martins, you have to force yourself to bet something on those ridiculous odd. So picking a fighter & betting on a fighter is 2 very different things for me.
Yes, I think we all understand the concept of betting for perceived value and not necessarily because we think that fighters going to win. However, you can still share that information if you would like and no one will judge you if those plays lose if that is your reasoning for the bet.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GigaOuts:
Giga, I must say that I find your strategy absolutely baffling!
Yes I don't pick the fighter who I think will win the match because there is many time I am wrong. So I pick fighter base on perceive value I assign to a fighter when capping. So I flip flopping picks constantly due to the fluctuation of the odd.
Let take an extreme example like ufn 61- Bigfoot vs Mir, there is 11 upset. If you bet base on value, you should make very good money in that event.
Sam Alvey at +310 vs Cezar Ferreira
Frankie Saenz at +900 vs Iuri Alcantara
Adrian Martins at +410 vs Rustam Khabilov
I, like everyone else all picking Ferreira, Alcantara, & Khabilov to win but I am not going to bet at those odd. Giving the odd of Sam Alvey, Frankie Saenz, & Adrian Martins, you have to force yourself to bet something on those ridiculous odd. So picking a fighter & betting on a fighter is 2 very different things for me.
Yes, I think we all understand the concept of betting for perceived value and not necessarily because we think that fighters going to win. However, you can still share that information if you would like and no one will judge you if those plays lose if that is your reasoning for the bet.
You're right. There's no reason a person would lie on an internet betting forum, about being banned/limited from a book.....
i dont think you understand.
the bloggers that i were referring to had no reason to lie. it wasnt a derelict thread such as this with three or four guys pulling out their person to see whose was bigger
the topic was brought up on a thread where limiting or banning was not even the original subject matter. it was mentioned in a completely non-chalant matter as the people coudl care less if you believed them or not
not everyone comes to betting forums for psychological reasons to make themselves feel bigger and better while attacking other bloggers. its one of the reasons many people dont participate on these forums
i could pm you one week of my nfl action and you would know why i dont participate on the covers nfl forum arguing with fuken derelict 20 bettors
0
Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick:
You're right. There's no reason a person would lie on an internet betting forum, about being banned/limited from a book.....
i dont think you understand.
the bloggers that i were referring to had no reason to lie. it wasnt a derelict thread such as this with three or four guys pulling out their person to see whose was bigger
the topic was brought up on a thread where limiting or banning was not even the original subject matter. it was mentioned in a completely non-chalant matter as the people coudl care less if you believed them or not
not everyone comes to betting forums for psychological reasons to make themselves feel bigger and better while attacking other bloggers. its one of the reasons many people dont participate on these forums
i could pm you one week of my nfl action and you would know why i dont participate on the covers nfl forum arguing with fuken derelict 20 bettors
Been on a absolute tear for 2015 winning with incredible value dog picks. Granted I'm not going to win every + dog but am picking at a positive clip with + profit.
All of my picks are legit and recorded with legit profits. I do not play ridiculous favorites nor do I pay hugely juiced odds (save for parlays)
Consulted with the MMA guru and he has the picks ready to go. Lock, stock & barrel my friends. I usually tend to avoid parlays because long term they don't offer any real value. When you can realistically see a parlay hitting above the 90% then you have to hit it. That's the situation here so that is why I am playing a parlay.
Pettis
Nelson
Pearson
Rosholt
Duffey
1 Unit play @ 7.45. If this hits we'll be laughing all the way to the bank.
I do not state I will win every bet but I DO GUARANTEE to be profitable if you follow my plays. I will not go tout or expect monetary compensation for the picks I give out.
Expect a bounce back and we'll gain back those lost units.
Is this your 10th loss in a row now?!? I guess you can officially flush your tout aspirations down the drain.
Better luck with your next covers username.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mars101:
Been on a absolute tear for 2015 winning with incredible value dog picks. Granted I'm not going to win every + dog but am picking at a positive clip with + profit.
All of my picks are legit and recorded with legit profits. I do not play ridiculous favorites nor do I pay hugely juiced odds (save for parlays)
Consulted with the MMA guru and he has the picks ready to go. Lock, stock & barrel my friends. I usually tend to avoid parlays because long term they don't offer any real value. When you can realistically see a parlay hitting above the 90% then you have to hit it. That's the situation here so that is why I am playing a parlay.
Pettis
Nelson
Pearson
Rosholt
Duffey
1 Unit play @ 7.45. If this hits we'll be laughing all the way to the bank.
I do not state I will win every bet but I DO GUARANTEE to be profitable if you follow my plays. I will not go tout or expect monetary compensation for the picks I give out.
Expect a bounce back and we'll gain back those lost units.
Is this your 10th loss in a row now?!? I guess you can officially flush your tout aspirations down the drain.
the bloggers that i were referring to had no reason to lie. it wasnt a derelict thread such as this with three or four guys pulling out their person to see whose was bigger
the topic was brought up on a thread where limiting or banning was not even the original subject matter. it was mentioned in a completely non-chalant matter as the people coudl care less if you believed them or not
not everyone comes to betting forums for psychological reasons to make themselves feel bigger and better while attacking other bloggers. its one of the reasons many people dont participate on these forums
i could pm you one week of my nfl action and you would know why i dont participate on the covers nfl forum arguing with fuken derelict 20 bettors
I don't need to see a betting ticket. That doesn't mean anything to me. Whether someone bets $5,000, $500, or $5 a game is irrelevant. I certainly don't care about it, and in all my time at the books, the amount of money is not correlated to how sharp someone is. There are more tourists visiting Las Vegas with money who place sports bets, than runners betting for sharps.
In regards to Giga, he was trying to say he was banned because he was sharp. First things first, I can guarantee you that no book has a banned a losing player like him. Especially an offshore book, where they basically govern themselves. Second, that guy is a complete idiot.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Qncyk1:
i dont think you understand.
the bloggers that i were referring to had no reason to lie. it wasnt a derelict thread such as this with three or four guys pulling out their person to see whose was bigger
the topic was brought up on a thread where limiting or banning was not even the original subject matter. it was mentioned in a completely non-chalant matter as the people coudl care less if you believed them or not
not everyone comes to betting forums for psychological reasons to make themselves feel bigger and better while attacking other bloggers. its one of the reasons many people dont participate on these forums
i could pm you one week of my nfl action and you would know why i dont participate on the covers nfl forum arguing with fuken derelict 20 bettors
I don't need to see a betting ticket. That doesn't mean anything to me. Whether someone bets $5,000, $500, or $5 a game is irrelevant. I certainly don't care about it, and in all my time at the books, the amount of money is not correlated to how sharp someone is. There are more tourists visiting Las Vegas with money who place sports bets, than runners betting for sharps.
In regards to Giga, he was trying to say he was banned because he was sharp. First things first, I can guarantee you that no book has a banned a losing player like him. Especially an offshore book, where they basically govern themselves. Second, that guy is a complete idiot.
I don't need to see a betting ticket. That doesn't mean anything to me. Whether someone bets $5,000, $500, or $5 a game is irrelevant. I certainly don't care about it, and in all my time at the books, the amount of money is not correlated to how sharp someone is. There are more tourists visiting Las Vegas with money who place sports bets, than runners betting for sharps.
In regards to Giga, he was trying to say he was banned because he was sharp. First things first, I can guarantee you that no book has a banned a losing player like him. Especially an offshore book, where they basically govern themselves. Second, that guy is a complete idiot.
lol...what a f*cking idiot.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick:
I don't need to see a betting ticket. That doesn't mean anything to me. Whether someone bets $5,000, $500, or $5 a game is irrelevant. I certainly don't care about it, and in all my time at the books, the amount of money is not correlated to how sharp someone is. There are more tourists visiting Las Vegas with money who place sports bets, than runners betting for sharps.
In regards to Giga, he was trying to say he was banned because he was sharp. First things first, I can guarantee you that no book has a banned a losing player like him. Especially an offshore book, where they basically govern themselves. Second, that guy is a complete idiot.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
