A rare Sunday evening UFC card hits Fox Sports 1 tonight. There are several fights on this card that may be worthy of a very small bet, but you're probably just better off sticking with the ones you're most confident in. That's what I'm going to attempt to do here. Lots of unknowns, short notices, etc. in these fights.
I love the Dillashaw/Cruz match-up and I hope it lives up to the hype. To me, it all comes down to what version of Cruz we get. The Mizugaki outcome didn't really show me much, so I'm still left wondering how Cruz looks after all those years of injuries and time off. I want to see how good that footwork still is. Since we don't know how he'll look for sure, I see no way you can take Cruz at such small odds here. It's either Dillashaw or pass in my opinion. 5Dimes offers a nice little prop that allows your bet to be cancelled if it goes the distance. The odds obviously change a bit for this prop, so it's usually only useful in certain situations. I think this is the perfect situation. I don't see Cruz having the power to finish Dillashaw. Cruz's only chance here is to outpoint him to a decision. And even that probably won't happen. I think Dillashaw has good enough takedown defense to keep the fight standing for the most part, where he will have an output and power advantage. If the fight manages to go the distance, then I get my money back. It's essentially me picking Dillashaw "Inside the Distance" with a little bit of an insurance policy in case he doesn't get the job done (keep in mind I don't think Cruz can finish him). This seems to be the perfect way to wager on this fight in my opinion.
Pettis got schooled by RDA last time out and then had another injury setback. Hard to say how great Pettis will look here, but I certainly feel more confident in him than Alvarez. Alvarez has been in so many wars, got picked apart by Cerrone (who has a similar kicking game to Pettis), and then got dropped by Gilbert and did almost nothing the rest of the fight. He's just too shot in my opinion and I don't think he offers enough power on the feet to starch Pettis. If he tries to close the distance and utilize his wrestling, maybe he has a shot. I don't see it playing out that way. I think he it becomes a kickboxing match and Pettis lands something pretty. This is a "get back on track" type of fight for Pettis that the UFC is handing him in my opinion. He will be main paraly cog for me.
The rest of my plays are smaller. Browne/Mitrione should knock each other out, Cruickshank sucks and is going to get blasted by Felder at some point, Rosa is the better fighter who's not coming in on short notice, and Barroso is one of the most boring/inactive fighters on the roster. There's my quick analysis on those fights lol. Good luck on your bets guys!
UFC Fight Night 81
10 Unit Play T.J. Dillashaw (Scorecards = No Action) (-185)
5 Unit Play C. Wade + A. Pettis (-150)
3 Unit Plays P. Felder + A. Pettis (-120) E. Mutapcic + T. Browne/M. Mitrione Under 3 Rounds (-120) C. Rosa + A. Pettis (-120)
2016 Record: 4-0 (+22.5 units)
*All plays are made on a scale of 1-10 units
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
A rare Sunday evening UFC card hits Fox Sports 1 tonight. There are several fights on this card that may be worthy of a very small bet, but you're probably just better off sticking with the ones you're most confident in. That's what I'm going to attempt to do here. Lots of unknowns, short notices, etc. in these fights.
I love the Dillashaw/Cruz match-up and I hope it lives up to the hype. To me, it all comes down to what version of Cruz we get. The Mizugaki outcome didn't really show me much, so I'm still left wondering how Cruz looks after all those years of injuries and time off. I want to see how good that footwork still is. Since we don't know how he'll look for sure, I see no way you can take Cruz at such small odds here. It's either Dillashaw or pass in my opinion. 5Dimes offers a nice little prop that allows your bet to be cancelled if it goes the distance. The odds obviously change a bit for this prop, so it's usually only useful in certain situations. I think this is the perfect situation. I don't see Cruz having the power to finish Dillashaw. Cruz's only chance here is to outpoint him to a decision. And even that probably won't happen. I think Dillashaw has good enough takedown defense to keep the fight standing for the most part, where he will have an output and power advantage. If the fight manages to go the distance, then I get my money back. It's essentially me picking Dillashaw "Inside the Distance" with a little bit of an insurance policy in case he doesn't get the job done (keep in mind I don't think Cruz can finish him). This seems to be the perfect way to wager on this fight in my opinion.
Pettis got schooled by RDA last time out and then had another injury setback. Hard to say how great Pettis will look here, but I certainly feel more confident in him than Alvarez. Alvarez has been in so many wars, got picked apart by Cerrone (who has a similar kicking game to Pettis), and then got dropped by Gilbert and did almost nothing the rest of the fight. He's just too shot in my opinion and I don't think he offers enough power on the feet to starch Pettis. If he tries to close the distance and utilize his wrestling, maybe he has a shot. I don't see it playing out that way. I think he it becomes a kickboxing match and Pettis lands something pretty. This is a "get back on track" type of fight for Pettis that the UFC is handing him in my opinion. He will be main paraly cog for me.
The rest of my plays are smaller. Browne/Mitrione should knock each other out, Cruickshank sucks and is going to get blasted by Felder at some point, Rosa is the better fighter who's not coming in on short notice, and Barroso is one of the most boring/inactive fighters on the roster. There's my quick analysis on those fights lol. Good luck on your bets guys!
UFC Fight Night 81
10 Unit Play T.J. Dillashaw (Scorecards = No Action) (-185)
5 Unit Play C. Wade + A. Pettis (-150)
3 Unit Plays P. Felder + A. Pettis (-120) E. Mutapcic + T. Browne/M. Mitrione Under 3 Rounds (-120) C. Rosa + A. Pettis (-120)
I like the Dillashaw/No action pick. I think it will be Cruz by decision, but if the fight gets finished it will definitely be Dillashaw. In fact, I love every pick here except Felder, and really I'm 50/50 on that fight.
Excellent picks. BOL. Should be a good night for you.
0
I like the Dillashaw/No action pick. I think it will be Cruz by decision, but if the fight gets finished it will definitely be Dillashaw. In fact, I love every pick here except Felder, and really I'm 50/50 on that fight.
Excellent picks. BOL. Should be a good night for you.
10 Unit Play T.J. Dillashaw (Scorecards = No Action) (-185) *Push*
5 Unit Play C. Wade + A. Pettis (-150)
3 Unit Plays P. Felder + A. Pettis (-120) E. Mutapcic + T. Browne/M. Mitrione Under 3 Rounds (-120) C. Rosa + A. Pettis (-120)
Overall Tonight: 0-4-1 (-18.3 units)
2016 Record: 4-4 (+4.2 units)
*All plays are made on a scale of 1-10 units
Well, that event didn't quite go as I had hoped. Most of my predictions were actually spot on, with Felder, Rosa, and Wade winning, on top of the Browne/Mitrione fight staying in the distance. However, Pettis cost me a winning night because he allowed Alvarez to hold him up against the fence for 2/3 of the fight. Credit to Alvarez for trying to use the same type of blueprint that Guida/RDA used to beat Pettis. I just didn't think Alvarez actually had it in him to fight a smart fight that way. I still felt like Pettis was dominating the standing exchanges and could argue he took the 1st round because of it. But I guess the judges were rewarding Alvarez for the fence pushing. Pettis still had a chance to win in the 3rd if he could have kept it standing but he didn't learn his lesson. What a disappointing 1st fight back after losing your title. This was a taylor-made matchup for him and he blew it. That's a bad bet on my part. Really didn't think Pettis would lose that fight. Also didn't think he would lose by decision. I figured if anything, he'd have to lose by a fluke KO or random sub.
The Dillashaw/Cruz fight went about as I expected too, knowing Cruz likely wouldn't win by a finish. With so many unknowns about Cruz after his injuries and layoff, it was a tough fight to bet. And definitely difficult to assume we'd see the best version of Cruz. I have to say Cruz looked very impressive and still had great footwork and movement. That said, it was an extremely close fight and a tough one to score. I personally thought TJ won it 48-47, but I won't argue 48-47 for Cruz either. Some of the judges' scorecards were absolutely mind-boggling though. I saw one judge didn't give TJ Round 4, which I thought was the most decisive round in the entire fight lol. How does any judge give 4 rounds to either guy to be honest? Let alone 2 judges going the opposite way? In all honesty, this kind of reminded me of how the Lawler/Condit fight went. I thought Condit did enough to win that fight, yet the judges said otherwise and it wasn't enough for Robbie to lose his belt. I felt the same thing happened here, where Cruz fought well, but I didn't think he did enough to warrant TJ losing his belt. I thought an argument could be made that TJ took 1 of those first 3 rounds. Doesn't really matter in terms of my bet, though, as the only way I was going to cash was a Dillashaw finish. Good fight though and I'm happy for Cruz. What a long and difficult road back that had to have been, and he always stayed positive when most guys probably would have given up. See you guys next event!
0
UFC Fight Night 81
10 Unit Play T.J. Dillashaw (Scorecards = No Action) (-185) *Push*
5 Unit Play C. Wade + A. Pettis (-150)
3 Unit Plays P. Felder + A. Pettis (-120) E. Mutapcic + T. Browne/M. Mitrione Under 3 Rounds (-120) C. Rosa + A. Pettis (-120)
Overall Tonight: 0-4-1 (-18.3 units)
2016 Record: 4-4 (+4.2 units)
*All plays are made on a scale of 1-10 units
Well, that event didn't quite go as I had hoped. Most of my predictions were actually spot on, with Felder, Rosa, and Wade winning, on top of the Browne/Mitrione fight staying in the distance. However, Pettis cost me a winning night because he allowed Alvarez to hold him up against the fence for 2/3 of the fight. Credit to Alvarez for trying to use the same type of blueprint that Guida/RDA used to beat Pettis. I just didn't think Alvarez actually had it in him to fight a smart fight that way. I still felt like Pettis was dominating the standing exchanges and could argue he took the 1st round because of it. But I guess the judges were rewarding Alvarez for the fence pushing. Pettis still had a chance to win in the 3rd if he could have kept it standing but he didn't learn his lesson. What a disappointing 1st fight back after losing your title. This was a taylor-made matchup for him and he blew it. That's a bad bet on my part. Really didn't think Pettis would lose that fight. Also didn't think he would lose by decision. I figured if anything, he'd have to lose by a fluke KO or random sub.
The Dillashaw/Cruz fight went about as I expected too, knowing Cruz likely wouldn't win by a finish. With so many unknowns about Cruz after his injuries and layoff, it was a tough fight to bet. And definitely difficult to assume we'd see the best version of Cruz. I have to say Cruz looked very impressive and still had great footwork and movement. That said, it was an extremely close fight and a tough one to score. I personally thought TJ won it 48-47, but I won't argue 48-47 for Cruz either. Some of the judges' scorecards were absolutely mind-boggling though. I saw one judge didn't give TJ Round 4, which I thought was the most decisive round in the entire fight lol. How does any judge give 4 rounds to either guy to be honest? Let alone 2 judges going the opposite way? In all honesty, this kind of reminded me of how the Lawler/Condit fight went. I thought Condit did enough to win that fight, yet the judges said otherwise and it wasn't enough for Robbie to lose his belt. I felt the same thing happened here, where Cruz fought well, but I didn't think he did enough to warrant TJ losing his belt. I thought an argument could be made that TJ took 1 of those first 3 rounds. Doesn't really matter in terms of my bet, though, as the only way I was going to cash was a Dillashaw finish. Good fight though and I'm happy for Cruz. What a long and difficult road back that had to have been, and he always stayed positive when most guys probably would have given up. See you guys next event!
I took on a few too many parlays and they fell through from the pettis fight. My fault on that bet didnt do my research.
For me I Iike to put parlays with the first bet being the 80 percent chance fight. There usually is one or two tester fight followed up with a lot of build up fights then the main card.
Next card Northcutt will be in two parlays, hes in the build up stage in his career. I will look for the fighters with knockout power that has a good chance at taking out his opponent, a few matches that stylistically benefit one fighter over the other and the matchups where fighters have a lot of movement vs a technical point fighter.
Still need to tighten up my betting though.
0
bad nights happen.
I took on a few too many parlays and they fell through from the pettis fight. My fault on that bet didnt do my research.
For me I Iike to put parlays with the first bet being the 80 percent chance fight. There usually is one or two tester fight followed up with a lot of build up fights then the main card.
Next card Northcutt will be in two parlays, hes in the build up stage in his career. I will look for the fighters with knockout power that has a good chance at taking out his opponent, a few matches that stylistically benefit one fighter over the other and the matchups where fighters have a lot of movement vs a technical point fighter.
yea, I really liked Wade a lot last night too and he won easily. Hindsight of course, but I wish I would have used him in more of my plays. Or just bet a lot of my fighters straight up instead of trying to reduce the juice. Regardless, Pettis fought a disappointing fight, in a matchup that gave him several advantages on paper. That being said, Alvarez also only threw 4 ground strikes during his 6 takedowns. It was kind of a lame fight overall. If Pettis was a little more active and was able to stay off the cage for long periods of time, he probably easily wins it
0
yea, I really liked Wade a lot last night too and he won easily. Hindsight of course, but I wish I would have used him in more of my plays. Or just bet a lot of my fighters straight up instead of trying to reduce the juice. Regardless, Pettis fought a disappointing fight, in a matchup that gave him several advantages on paper. That being said, Alvarez also only threw 4 ground strikes during his 6 takedowns. It was kind of a lame fight overall. If Pettis was a little more active and was able to stay off the cage for long periods of time, he probably easily wins it
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.