I feel like whenever I absolutely love a play it seems to shit the bed more often than not. And maybe it's just because I get nervous hammering the snot outta a game because I know it's not good money management so if/when I do lose it hurts that much more. But man how do we not slam the CUBS for a massive play ??
The first angle that worries me a bit is that this is a rivalry game and as we know in those games the standing don't matter as much as they do in other games. Even when one team is at the top and the other in the cellar the games have a tendency to go either way or be closer than they should be on paper.
But these two teams are headed in opposite directions. The BUCS are 33-35 on the year which is worse than just about anybody expected. But if you did a lil deeper it looks even worse. They started the year winning 4 in a row and 5 of 7. And were actually 15-9 through their first 24 games of the season. Therefore they are 18-26 over their L44 games. They also have lost 4 in a row,9 of 10 and are only 5 and 16 during their last 21 games overall.
The CUBS on the other hand just keep on winning at an amazing pace. They've 2 in a row and have a chance to sweep the 3 game set tonight. They're also insane at home hitting at a 75% clip going 24-8 at Wrigles and are a league best 26 games over 500 overall with a 46-20 mark on the season.
Now the BUCS do have a talented young (Canadian stock) arm on the bump tonight and with not a ton of video on him the CUBS don't have a bunch to work with. And Taillon does have strong numbers through his first 2 starts with a 1-0 record and 1.93 era. However both starts have come against a METS team that is not exactly tearing the cover off the ball recently. So tonight facing the CUBS at home he will get a sizable upgrade in level of competition. And he'll also have the added eyes of a stand alone nationally televised Sunday night game from one of the most historic fields in sport.
His counterpart will be Cubs right-hander Kyle Hendricks who despite a pedestrian record of 4-6 on the year. Has a very solid 3.05 ERA. And his numbers at Wrigley are top notch going 3-1 with a 1.99 ERA in his 6 home starts this year....conversely he's just 1-5 with a 4.36 era in a half dozen road starts.
So all things considered I just don't see why I shouldn't lay at least a considerable play on the CUBS F5 ML,F5 -0.5,GAME ML and GAME -1.5. And I will also be taking the CUBS to score first and if the line was't insane after that I'd like to add on some more because the crazy line is justified with the CUBS owing a brilliant 30-4 mark when they get on the board first.
I guess the only really concern is why the hell are the best team in the bigs with a starter thats insanely good at home and facing a rookie thats never played on a stage as close to this big before. Just -155 ??? I really expected this line to be pushing -200 given all the factors above.
So is this just great value and an awesome price on the class of the league. Or is this line fishier than Lada Gaga's hoo hoo after a triple encore ???????????????????????????
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I feel like whenever I absolutely love a play it seems to shit the bed more often than not. And maybe it's just because I get nervous hammering the snot outta a game because I know it's not good money management so if/when I do lose it hurts that much more. But man how do we not slam the CUBS for a massive play ??
The first angle that worries me a bit is that this is a rivalry game and as we know in those games the standing don't matter as much as they do in other games. Even when one team is at the top and the other in the cellar the games have a tendency to go either way or be closer than they should be on paper.
But these two teams are headed in opposite directions. The BUCS are 33-35 on the year which is worse than just about anybody expected. But if you did a lil deeper it looks even worse. They started the year winning 4 in a row and 5 of 7. And were actually 15-9 through their first 24 games of the season. Therefore they are 18-26 over their L44 games. They also have lost 4 in a row,9 of 10 and are only 5 and 16 during their last 21 games overall.
The CUBS on the other hand just keep on winning at an amazing pace. They've 2 in a row and have a chance to sweep the 3 game set tonight. They're also insane at home hitting at a 75% clip going 24-8 at Wrigles and are a league best 26 games over 500 overall with a 46-20 mark on the season.
Now the BUCS do have a talented young (Canadian stock) arm on the bump tonight and with not a ton of video on him the CUBS don't have a bunch to work with. And Taillon does have strong numbers through his first 2 starts with a 1-0 record and 1.93 era. However both starts have come against a METS team that is not exactly tearing the cover off the ball recently. So tonight facing the CUBS at home he will get a sizable upgrade in level of competition. And he'll also have the added eyes of a stand alone nationally televised Sunday night game from one of the most historic fields in sport.
His counterpart will be Cubs right-hander Kyle Hendricks who despite a pedestrian record of 4-6 on the year. Has a very solid 3.05 ERA. And his numbers at Wrigley are top notch going 3-1 with a 1.99 ERA in his 6 home starts this year....conversely he's just 1-5 with a 4.36 era in a half dozen road starts.
So all things considered I just don't see why I shouldn't lay at least a considerable play on the CUBS F5 ML,F5 -0.5,GAME ML and GAME -1.5. And I will also be taking the CUBS to score first and if the line was't insane after that I'd like to add on some more because the crazy line is justified with the CUBS owing a brilliant 30-4 mark when they get on the board first.
I guess the only really concern is why the hell are the best team in the bigs with a starter thats insanely good at home and facing a rookie thats never played on a stage as close to this big before. Just -155 ??? I really expected this line to be pushing -200 given all the factors above.
So is this just great value and an awesome price on the class of the league. Or is this line fishier than Lada Gaga's hoo hoo after a triple encore ???????????????????????????
The Pirates teed off of Hendricks last year, combine that with the Buc's kids performance and Hendricks very recent pitching, I think the game is capped well. took a small play on Chi RL but thinking about taking the over for a larger play.
0
The Pirates teed off of Hendricks last year, combine that with the Buc's kids performance and Hendricks very recent pitching, I think the game is capped well. took a small play on Chi RL but thinking about taking the over for a larger play.
Line is kinda fishy. As fishy as lady gaga's bottom lips? Hmmm... I don't know about that... That's PRETTY DARN FISHY, DD. Think the line is showing Taillon love but as you said, the Mets stink probably worse than lady gaga's pink taco. I don't like laying a ton of juice but I do like the under 9 here. Hendrickwont give up more than 2-3 IMO and yes Taillon is stepping up in class, but I think he is a pretty good young talent. If he only gives up 4 that's a success for him if he can go maybe 6 2/3 IP. Cubs RL looks good and the under but I think I'm going to just play the under. BOL
0
Line is kinda fishy. As fishy as lady gaga's bottom lips? Hmmm... I don't know about that... That's PRETTY DARN FISHY, DD. Think the line is showing Taillon love but as you said, the Mets stink probably worse than lady gaga's pink taco. I don't like laying a ton of juice but I do like the under 9 here. Hendrickwont give up more than 2-3 IMO and yes Taillon is stepping up in class, but I think he is a pretty good young talent. If he only gives up 4 that's a success for him if he can go maybe 6 2/3 IP. Cubs RL looks good and the under but I think I'm going to just play the under. BOL
The Pirates teed off of Hendricks last year, combine that with the Buc's kids performance and Hendricks very recent pitching, I think the game is capped well. took a small play on Chi RL but thinking about taking the over for a larger play.
Well his last 2 starts were on the road and his home/away splits are night and day. His 3rd most recent start was at home and he threw 8 IP,gave up 3 hits,1 walk and 2 runs both earned. And even with the last 2 starts coming on the road his last 3 overall he's gone 18.1 innings allowing just 13 hits with a respectable whip of just 1.09 and a solid 3.44 era.
So not sure his current form warrants such a low line.
0
Quote Originally Posted by YesIndeedNanoo:
The Pirates teed off of Hendricks last year, combine that with the Buc's kids performance and Hendricks very recent pitching, I think the game is capped well. took a small play on Chi RL but thinking about taking the over for a larger play.
Well his last 2 starts were on the road and his home/away splits are night and day. His 3rd most recent start was at home and he threw 8 IP,gave up 3 hits,1 walk and 2 runs both earned. And even with the last 2 starts coming on the road his last 3 overall he's gone 18.1 innings allowing just 13 hits with a respectable whip of just 1.09 and a solid 3.44 era.
So not sure his current form warrants such a low line.
Line is kinda fishy. As fishy as lady gaga's bottom lips? Hmmm... I don't know about that... That's PRETTY DARN FISHY, DD. Think the line is showing Taillon love but as you said, the Mets stink probably worse than lady gaga's pink taco. I don't like laying a ton of juice but I do like the under 9 here. Hendrickwont give up more than 2-3 IMO and yes Taillon is stepping up in class, but I think he is a pretty good young talent. If he only gives up 4 that's a success for him if he can go maybe 6 2/3 IP. Cubs RL looks good and the under but I think I'm going to just play the under. BOL
Yeah you're right that is pretty fishy. A girl that works sales for us went to one of her concerts and sat in the nose bleeds. But because of the smell that was the 10th row from the stage. When she came into work the nest day we were forced to burn her coat.
Anyways I'm not touching the total so BOL with whatever you play. But careful with the under the wind looks to be blowing out to centre with gusts up to DD mph
0
Quote Originally Posted by TreyInventor:
Line is kinda fishy. As fishy as lady gaga's bottom lips? Hmmm... I don't know about that... That's PRETTY DARN FISHY, DD. Think the line is showing Taillon love but as you said, the Mets stink probably worse than lady gaga's pink taco. I don't like laying a ton of juice but I do like the under 9 here. Hendrickwont give up more than 2-3 IMO and yes Taillon is stepping up in class, but I think he is a pretty good young talent. If he only gives up 4 that's a success for him if he can go maybe 6 2/3 IP. Cubs RL looks good and the under but I think I'm going to just play the under. BOL
Yeah you're right that is pretty fishy. A girl that works sales for us went to one of her concerts and sat in the nose bleeds. But because of the smell that was the 10th row from the stage. When she came into work the nest day we were forced to burn her coat.
Anyways I'm not touching the total so BOL with whatever you play. But careful with the under the wind looks to be blowing out to centre with gusts up to DD mph
Consider two of those games were against the Mets.
I've seen better hitters at a drug bust.......
I agree and did...." However both starts have come against a METS team that is not exactly tearing the cover off the ball recently. So tonight facing the CUBS at home he will get a sizable upgrade in level of competition."
0
Quote Originally Posted by LogCottage:
Consider two of those games were against the Mets.
I've seen better hitters at a drug bust.......
I agree and did...." However both starts have come against a METS team that is not exactly tearing the cover off the ball recently. So tonight facing the CUBS at home he will get a sizable upgrade in level of competition."
I looked up lady gaga and lesbian (because thats how I think) and youre right, thats pretty fishy.
And Im taking Cubs RL. Just think Hendricks recent (road) starts and the Pirates kid pitcher do warrant this line based on the history of Hendricks against the Bucs last year. Further, Hendricks was good last time at home, like you pointed out. small play for me.
0
I looked up lady gaga and lesbian (because thats how I think) and youre right, thats pretty fishy.
And Im taking Cubs RL. Just think Hendricks recent (road) starts and the Pirates kid pitcher do warrant this line based on the history of Hendricks against the Bucs last year. Further, Hendricks was good last time at home, like you pointed out. small play for me.
I looked up lady gaga and lesbian (because thats how I think) and youre right, thats pretty fishy.
And Im taking Cubs RL. Just think Hendricks recent (road) starts and the Pirates kid pitcher do warrant this line based on the history of Hendricks against the Bucs last year. Further, Hendricks was good last time at home, like you pointed out. small play for me.
I think I'm gonna mix it up and go F5 ML,-0.5,game ML and game -1.5 as well as score first. I have been blasting the CUBBIES all year but lately I've had to be more and more creative with my book not offering the CUBS F5 -0.5 quite often now and me not willing to lay the insane tags on the F5 and game ML's. I try not to go over -160ish unless it's a special spot or scenario. Tonight qualifies and the -155 is well within my wheelhouse.....BOL2US MORK
0
Quote Originally Posted by YesIndeedNanoo:
I looked up lady gaga and lesbian (because thats how I think) and youre right, thats pretty fishy.
And Im taking Cubs RL. Just think Hendricks recent (road) starts and the Pirates kid pitcher do warrant this line based on the history of Hendricks against the Bucs last year. Further, Hendricks was good last time at home, like you pointed out. small play for me.
I think I'm gonna mix it up and go F5 ML,-0.5,game ML and game -1.5 as well as score first. I have been blasting the CUBBIES all year but lately I've had to be more and more creative with my book not offering the CUBS F5 -0.5 quite often now and me not willing to lay the insane tags on the F5 and game ML's. I try not to go over -160ish unless it's a special spot or scenario. Tonight qualifies and the -155 is well within my wheelhouse.....BOL2US MORK
Hey TreyInventor, looked at it more. Going Under too larger play for me. thx. Hopefully it works out
I only used the total in the parlay but I concur on the U 9 being the way to go. That said my blessing may be a curse since my newly updated wagerline records have me at 35-13 for moneyline selections and only 2-5 for totals
0
Quote Originally Posted by YesIndeedNanoo:
Hey TreyInventor, looked at it more. Going Under too larger play for me. thx. Hopefully it works out
I only used the total in the parlay but I concur on the U 9 being the way to go. That said my blessing may be a curse since my newly updated wagerline records have me at 35-13 for moneyline selections and only 2-5 for totals
WagerType:PARLAY (2 TEAMS) Date: Team: Jun 19 NBA [2513] TOTAL o104-105 (2H CLEVELAND CAVALIERS vrs 2H GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS) Jun 19 NBA [2514] 2H GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS EV Risking 25 USD To Win 73 USD Ticket#: ********
0
Not sure what the funk that was
WagerType:PARLAY (2 TEAMS) Date: Team: Jun 19 NBA [2513] TOTAL o104-105 (2H CLEVELAND CAVALIERS vrs 2H GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS) Jun 19 NBA [2514] 2H GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS EV Risking 25 USD To Win 73 USD Ticket#: ********
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.