All Forums | MLB Betting

Bob's MLB Friday *** 8.5.16 ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5017
Posts: 33
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 6446
Posted: #1
-----------------------------------------------------------
MLB 2016
-----------------------------------------------------------

Summary
Record: 201-163-19 (55%)
Beginning Bankroll: $9,391
Avg. Wager Size: $115 (Unit = 1% of Bankroll)
Profit: +$2,932.00 (+31.22 Units), +6.63% Return on Risk

Splits
ML: 118-89 (57%)
F5: 3-5-3 (38%)
RL: 20-18-3 (53%)
O/U: 60-51-13 (54%)

-----------------------------------------------------------
Performance History
-----------------------------------------------------------

Overall
2016: 201-163-19 (55%), +6.63% Return on Risk
2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk
2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk

Picks of the Day
2016: 57-46-7 (55%), +6.92% Return on Risk
2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk
2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk

-----------------------------------------------------------
Thursday
-----------------------------------------------------------

2-2, +$15.26

-----------------------------------------------------------
Friday
-----------------------------------------------------------

Texas Rangers FG +159, Perez/Keuchel

Boston Red Sox FG +123, Wright/Kazmir

Will have a few more.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 22004
Posted: #2
GL BOB
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 48978
Posted: #3
Giddie up Rangers

I don't understand that Red Sox line at all.


BOL Today
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 708
Posted: #4
GL BOB. Love both picks.   
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 11658
Posted: #5
On Rangers (nice line btw, hard to believe it continues to rise) adding sox....gl to us 










 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 23140
Posted: #6
 BOL 
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 3074
Posted: #7
BOL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 113
Posted: #8
I'm going to almost page 3 to find this thread....  Bumping this out of respect
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 6446
Posted: #9
-----------------------------------------------------------
Friday *** Final ****
-----------------------------------------------------------

Dogs and runs. Good luck gents!

Boston Red Sox FG +123, Wright/Kazmir

Toronto/Kansas City Over 5 F5 -110, Liriano/Gee

Minnesota Twins FG +119, Santana/Snell

Texas Rangers FG +159, Perez/Keuchel

Cleveland/New York Over 8 FG -120, Tomlin/Pineda

Baltimore/Chicago Over 5 F5 -115, Gallardo/Gonzalez
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 3812
Posted: #10
Wow
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 6591
Posted: #11
Wow! You got suckered into taking the Rangers. Surprised. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 4755
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by jdr016:

Wow! You got suckered into taking the Rangers. Surprised. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 4755
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by jdr016:

Wow! You got suckered into taking the Rangers. Surprised. 

Another classy response from the $10/10 team parlay bettor...
Go away, kid.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 6446
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by jdr016:

Wow! You got suckered into taking the Rangers. Surprised. 



Suckered? I played them, bc at that price the Rangers (who I capped at a 46% win probability) were the play. The fact that they lost tonight doesn't mean I was suckered.

Answer honestly. Do you think my losses are bc I was suckered? I can't count the number of times degenerates have come into my threads and told me how much lines were "fishy" and they hit... funny how they never show up afterward in those cases. I have a 4-1 card so far (probably 5-1 after the Red Sox game is graded) and you come in to make some wise comment about 1 damn game. Really?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 4755
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by BirdsOnBat:



Suckered? I played them, bc at that price the Rangers (who I capped at a 46% win probability) were the play. The fact that they lost tonight doesn't mean I was suckered.

Answer honestly. Do you think my losses are bc I was suckered? I can't count the number of times degenerates have come into my threads and told me how much lines were "fishy" and they hit... funny how they never show up afterward in those cases. I have a 4-1 card so far (probably 5-1 after the Red Sox game is graded) and you come in to make some wise comment about 1 damn game. Really?
Bob, don't waste your time responding to this clown.
He REALLY does play $10/10 team parlays....
ENOUGH SAID.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 6446
Posted: #16
^^^^ classic example.

JDR016

"That O's line reeks and the public is all over it!

I know Vegas has been overrating Archer for a while now and to be fair, he is better at home than on the road. But, the Rays offense is terrible and Vegas knows it. 

This should be a pick em game at best. 

Tampa or no play for me. But, I can't back that Tampa lineup. They burned me too many times over the past few weeks. So probably a no play!"

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=27&sub=102295836

Orioles won. Nowhere to be found. I bet if this didn't hit, he would have told me how I was suckered into the Orioles. Monday morning quarterback is the best position.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2015
Posts: 1739
Posted: #17
Thank you Bob!! Sweet dreams baby!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 6446
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Toothfairy1:

Thank you Bob!! Sweet dreams baby!



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2016
Posts: 296
Posted: #19
Well done BOB, thanks.  Sorry you and I both got "suckered" on the Rangers.  Dangit, we will get them tomorrow, thanks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2016
Posts: 103
Posted: #20
nice night of wins!!! Thank you
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 20449
Posted: #21
U sir..... know what's going on....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 6591
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by BirdsOnBat:



Suckered? I played them, bc at that price the Rangers (who I capped at a 46% win probability) were the play. The fact that they lost tonight doesn't mean I was suckered.

Answer honestly. Do you think my losses are bc I was suckered? I can't count the number of times degenerates have come into my threads and told me how much lines were "fishy" and they hit... funny how they never show up afterward in those cases. I have a 4-1 card so far (probably 5-1 after the Red Sox game is graded) and you come in to make some wise comment about 1 damn game. Really?

Wow! Interesting response. Sorry, if I offended you. As I said, I was surprised you were on the Rangers. That line was too good to be true, IMO. After I saw 90% of the money on Texas and no line movement. I made a play on the Astros myself.

Yes, considering all of the action it got. I did consider Texas a sucker bet last night. Sorry if you don't agree. 

Congrats on the rest of your night! I didn't notice your other plays initially. The Texas play stood out as a shock. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 6591
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by BirdsOnBat:

^^^^ classic example.

JDR016

"That O's line reeks and the public is all over it!

I know Vegas has been overrating Archer for a while now and to be fair, he is better at home than on the road. But, the Rays offense is terrible and Vegas knows it. 

This should be a pick em game at best. 

Tampa or no play for me. But, I can't back that Tampa lineup. They burned me too many times over the past few weeks. So probably a no play!"

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=27&sub=102295836

Orioles won. Nowhere to be found. I bet if this didn't hit, he would have told me how I was suckered into the Orioles. Monday morning quarterback is the best position.

Wow! I really must have hit a sore subject with you, Bobby! If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. It's a gambling message board. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 6591
Posted: #24
Also, no idea why I called you Bobby. Must be all of the Bs in your username. 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 6591
Posted: #25
For the record, I think you are a good capper. Not great. But, your insight and knowledge is very good. If you paid more attention to consensus and line movement, you could be a great capper! Just my honest opinion. 


All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.