Starting / Current Bankroll: $5,216 / $5,427.35 (+211.35, +4.05%)
MLB 2015 --- Picks of the Day
YTD: 5-4-1 (56%) *** +8.41% Return on Risk ***
ML: 3-4 (43%)
F5: 0-0-0 (0%)
RL: 0-0-1 (0%)
O/U: 2-0-0 (100%)
MLB 2014
Overall: 826-685-112 (55%) *** +4.13% Return on Risk ***
PODs: 121-72-16 (63%) *** +16.60% Return on Risk ***
Bet Sizing: 1 Unit is 1% of my bankroll (~$54 as of today). Scaling your bets with your bankroll is incredibly important. A $100 wager on a $5K bankroll is riskier than a $100 wager on a $10K. Don't take more relative risk when your bankroll is depleted, and likewise take more dollar risk as your bankroll grows. From a risk perspective, betting as a % of bankroll accomplishes a flat amount of relative risk from one day to the next.
Return on Risk: Profit($)/Total Wagers($). This is the only way to compare betting performance among cappers. Don't let anyone tell you differently. Once you get a decent sample size of wagers, +$10,000 on $200,000 of risk is no different - in terms of performance - from being up +$100 on $2,000 of risk.
Picks of the Day (POD) / Regular Play (RP): I color code my plays to differentiate between my favorite plays (orange) and my regular value plays (blue).
Diversification/Money Management: Remember, you can express a view in a number of ways and it's about finding the cheapest way with the best risk/reward profile. Don't fall into the trap of putting too much risk in one place. If there is one takeaway this is it. Diversification is key to money management.
Number of plays: I often elect to spread my risk out by selecting wagers that express the same view. So, while the number of bets might seem high, 2-3 plays on the same game can often be consolidated into 1 play with more concentrated risk. For example, sometimes I split my risk between the first 5 innings and the full game while also placing a wager on the run total.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
MLB 2015 --- Overall
YTD: 16-12-1 (57%) *** +8.34% Return on Risk ***
ML: 12-8 (60%)
F5: 0-1-0 (0%)
RL: 0-0-1 (0%)
O/U: 4-2-0 (67%)
Parlays: 0-1-0 (0%)
Starting / Current Bankroll: $5,216 / $5,427.35 (+211.35, +4.05%)
MLB 2015 --- Picks of the Day
YTD: 5-4-1 (56%) *** +8.41% Return on Risk ***
ML: 3-4 (43%)
F5: 0-0-0 (0%)
RL: 0-0-1 (0%)
O/U: 2-0-0 (100%)
MLB 2014
Overall: 826-685-112 (55%) *** +4.13% Return on Risk ***
PODs: 121-72-16 (63%) *** +16.60% Return on Risk ***
Bet Sizing: 1 Unit is 1% of my bankroll (~$54 as of today). Scaling your bets with your bankroll is incredibly important. A $100 wager on a $5K bankroll is riskier than a $100 wager on a $10K. Don't take more relative risk when your bankroll is depleted, and likewise take more dollar risk as your bankroll grows. From a risk perspective, betting as a % of bankroll accomplishes a flat amount of relative risk from one day to the next.
Return on Risk: Profit($)/Total Wagers($). This is the only way to compare betting performance among cappers. Don't let anyone tell you differently. Once you get a decent sample size of wagers, +$10,000 on $200,000 of risk is no different - in terms of performance - from being up +$100 on $2,000 of risk.
Picks of the Day (POD) / Regular Play (RP): I color code my plays to differentiate between my favorite plays (orange) and my regular value plays (blue).
Diversification/Money Management: Remember, you can express a view in a number of ways and it's about finding the cheapest way with the best risk/reward profile. Don't fall into the trap of putting too much risk in one place. If there is one takeaway this is it. Diversification is key to money management.
Number of plays: I often elect to spread my risk out by selecting wagers that express the same view. So, while the number of bets might seem high, 2-3 plays on the same game can often be consolidated into 1 play with more concentrated risk. For example, sometimes I split my risk between the first 5 innings and the full game while also placing a wager on the run total.
While my first week of MLB could have been better by my standards, many of the games I wagered on turned out to be very close games (coin flip like outcomes). I was on the wrong side of most of them. Of the 22 sides wagers I placed, 11 of them were decided by 1 run. I was on the losing side of 8 of them. Basically, of my 9 losses on side plays 7 of them (78%) were decided by 1 run (one was a -1 RL push). I suspect that over the course of the season, this will converge closer to a 50/50 split on 1-run games. Full steam ahead!
Monday's Card
Kansas City Royals (D. Duffy) FG, -125 --- Risk 1.50% of Bankroll
Washington Nationals (J. Zimmermann) FG, +105 --- Risk 1.50% of Bankroll
Detroit Tigers (A. Sanchez) FG, -103 --- Risk 1.00% of Bankroll
Miami (Latos) / Atlanta (Miller) Over 7 FG, +100 --- Risk 1.00% of Bankroll
Leans: Yankees (Pineda) +114; Cubs (Lester) -139
Really tempted to take the Yankees, but I will probably layoff after the long games over the weekend. Pineda looks really cheap here. I arrived at a -125 ish line for him. If we can get +110 or so F5 that might be the better play. We shall see.
0
Sunday's Results*
Record: 2-1-1 (67%)
Risked: 5.00% of Bankroll ($268) --- WA line of -124
While my first week of MLB could have been better by my standards, many of the games I wagered on turned out to be very close games (coin flip like outcomes). I was on the wrong side of most of them. Of the 22 sides wagers I placed, 11 of them were decided by 1 run. I was on the losing side of 8 of them. Basically, of my 9 losses on side plays 7 of them (78%) were decided by 1 run (one was a -1 RL push). I suspect that over the course of the season, this will converge closer to a 50/50 split on 1-run games. Full steam ahead!
Monday's Card
Kansas City Royals (D. Duffy) FG, -125 --- Risk 1.50% of Bankroll
Washington Nationals (J. Zimmermann) FG, +105 --- Risk 1.50% of Bankroll
Detroit Tigers (A. Sanchez) FG, -103 --- Risk 1.00% of Bankroll
Miami (Latos) / Atlanta (Miller) Over 7 FG, +100 --- Risk 1.00% of Bankroll
Leans: Yankees (Pineda) +114; Cubs (Lester) -139
Really tempted to take the Yankees, but I will probably layoff after the long games over the weekend. Pineda looks really cheap here. I arrived at a -125 ish line for him. If we can get +110 or so F5 that might be the better play. We shall see.
Rodney almost cost the M's today. He's a clown. Can't stand him.
after missing the Nationals -1 POD w/ 2 outs (on only one hit) in extra innings, I was about to lose it during the 9th inning of the Mariners game!
what looked like 2-0 on PODs almost turned into 0-2, so I was happy w/ 1-0-1 on them at the end of the day.
I have def run into a lopsided amount of luck to the downside so far. I know this bc I track all of my plays and study them meticulously, so that I don't make repetitive mistakes!
0
Quote Originally Posted by alldub:
Rodney almost cost the M's today. He's a clown. Can't stand him.
after missing the Nationals -1 POD w/ 2 outs (on only one hit) in extra innings, I was about to lose it during the 9th inning of the Mariners game!
what looked like 2-0 on PODs almost turned into 0-2, so I was happy w/ 1-0-1 on them at the end of the day.
I have def run into a lopsided amount of luck to the downside so far. I know this bc I track all of my plays and study them meticulously, so that I don't make repetitive mistakes!
Keep the great picks going bird. I get all of your games in except for the F5 ones as I don't like to hedge risk that way. The best baseball capper out here. It doesn't matter if you lose a little more than the others... honesty in my books is much better for the bankroll I'm dealing with.
0
Keep the great picks going bird. I get all of your games in except for the F5 ones as I don't like to hedge risk that way. The best baseball capper out here. It doesn't matter if you lose a little more than the others... honesty in my books is much better for the bankroll I'm dealing with.
like you card a lot, may as well keep riding the tigers ha
I agree with your yankee thoughts. I was a little surprised to see them as dogs , that might be tempting. Yanks have had pretty good success vs Chen his last 5 starts vs them
GL this week BoB
0
like you card a lot, may as well keep riding the tigers ha
I agree with your yankee thoughts. I was a little surprised to see them as dogs , that might be tempting. Yanks have had pretty good success vs Chen his last 5 starts vs them
BoB: "Really tempted to
take the Yankees, but I will probably layoff after the long games over
the weekend. Pineda looks really cheap here. I arrived at a -125 ish
line for him. If we can get +110 or so F5 that might be the better play.
We shall see"
Interesting. I landed at -113. Great minds think alike? BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
BoB: "Really tempted to
take the Yankees, but I will probably layoff after the long games over
the weekend. Pineda looks really cheap here. I arrived at a -125 ish
line for him. If we can get +110 or so F5 that might be the better play.
We shall see"
Interesting. I landed at -113. Great minds think alike? BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.