Bet Sizing: 1 Unit is 1% of my bankroll (~$21 as of today). Admittedly, I place relatively small wagers in comparison to other bettors on individual plays. But, to put things into perspective, if you were a dime bettor and followed all of my plays you would be up $, on the season based on my return on risk performance.
Number of plays: I have received some feedback regarding the amount of action (plays) I have each day. I often elect to spread my risk out by selecting wagers that express the same view. So, while the number of bets might seem high, 2-3 plays on the same game can often be consolidated into 1 play with more concentrated risk. For example, sometimes I split my risk between the first 5 innings and the full game while also placing a wager on the run total.
Diversification/Money Management: Remember, you can express a view in a number of ways and it's about finding the cheapest way with the best risk/reward profile. Don't fall into the trap of putting too much risk in one place. You (and I) will lose "sure thing" wagers, so limiting the damage from one pick is imperative. If there is one takeaway this is it. Diversification is key to money management. There's a reason why I have placed 1,000+ wagers this season and still have my original bankroll (and some profit) to play with in the second half! As the season goes on, I will begin wagering plays with higher payouts but only with a portion of my profit.
Picks of the Day (POD) / Regular Play (RP): Going forward I will color code my plays to differentiate between my favorite plays (orange) and my regular value plays (blue). I won't necessarily size any differently. A few people approached me and asked me to do this, so I am going to try it out for the second half of the season. Maybe I will discover something that I can incorporate for the next season.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Overall Record
YTD: 672-547-93 (55%) *** +4.06% Return on Risk ***
ML: 193-172 (53%)
F5: 163-135-54 (55%)
RL: 29-42 (41%)
O/U: 286-198-38 (59%)
Starting / Current Bankroll: $1,500 / $2,079 (+39%)
Picks of the Day Record
YTD: 54-32-8 (63%) *** +16.60% Return on Risk ***
ML: 12-7 (63%)
F5: 18-10-3 (64%)
RL: 3-4 (43%)
O/U: 21-11-5 (66%)
Yesterday's Results, 8/13/2014
Record: 7-4-0 (64%)
Risked / To Win: 11.00 Units / 9.67 Units (avg. line of -116)
Bet Sizing: 1 Unit is 1% of my bankroll (~$21 as of today). Admittedly, I place relatively small wagers in comparison to other bettors on individual plays. But, to put things into perspective, if you were a dime bettor and followed all of my plays you would be up $, on the season based on my return on risk performance.
Number of plays: I have received some feedback regarding the amount of action (plays) I have each day. I often elect to spread my risk out by selecting wagers that express the same view. So, while the number of bets might seem high, 2-3 plays on the same game can often be consolidated into 1 play with more concentrated risk. For example, sometimes I split my risk between the first 5 innings and the full game while also placing a wager on the run total.
Diversification/Money Management: Remember, you can express a view in a number of ways and it's about finding the cheapest way with the best risk/reward profile. Don't fall into the trap of putting too much risk in one place. You (and I) will lose "sure thing" wagers, so limiting the damage from one pick is imperative. If there is one takeaway this is it. Diversification is key to money management. There's a reason why I have placed 1,000+ wagers this season and still have my original bankroll (and some profit) to play with in the second half! As the season goes on, I will begin wagering plays with higher payouts but only with a portion of my profit.
Picks of the Day (POD) / Regular Play (RP): Going forward I will color code my plays to differentiate between my favorite plays (orange) and my regular value plays (blue). I won't necessarily size any differently. A few people approached me and asked me to do this, so I am going to try it out for the second half of the season. Maybe I will discover something that I can incorporate for the next season.
got a lean on Mil Chi? Fiers was amazing in his first season but then they tried to make him a reliever and he busted out and got sent back down. I get the feeling it was more the Brewers fault he didn't stick than his. Most of his the runs he allwoed were concentrated in a few games IIRC. He's got that experience under his belt faces a subpar team and opposite Jackson who is, well, Jackson,
0
got a lean on Mil Chi? Fiers was amazing in his first season but then they tried to make him a reliever and he busted out and got sent back down. I get the feeling it was more the Brewers fault he didn't stick than his. Most of his the runs he allwoed were concentrated in a few games IIRC. He's got that experience under his belt faces a subpar team and opposite Jackson who is, well, Jackson,
I saw the Braves over (F5) moved to +100 right after I locked it in! boooo.
No Braun or Ramirez, both of whom have hit Jackson in the past, in the lineup today. Segura is also out.
Man, Jackson is probably one of the most frustrating pitchers have in a game you're trying to cap… he has electric stuff and is capable of being lights out on any given day, but he also has complete meltdowns where he can't find the strike zone (or finds too much of it).
I was originally leaning Milwaukee, but I am probably laying off after seeing the lineup.
0
I saw the Braves over (F5) moved to +100 right after I locked it in! boooo.
No Braun or Ramirez, both of whom have hit Jackson in the past, in the lineup today. Segura is also out.
Man, Jackson is probably one of the most frustrating pitchers have in a game you're trying to cap… he has electric stuff and is capable of being lights out on any given day, but he also has complete meltdowns where he can't find the strike zone (or finds too much of it).
I was originally leaning Milwaukee, but I am probably laying off after seeing the lineup.
blah blah blah, thought about taking the dodgers but the lines were doing a dance and it confused me, one more run for the free-roll bro
one might argue that taking Braun out of the 2 spot helps the brewers, he needs his steroids back, Parra is fully capable of handling the load in the field and at the plate, he hits like a 2 hitter is supposed to hit, also it bolsters the pinch hitters
Mil -129 for me
0
blah blah blah, thought about taking the dodgers but the lines were doing a dance and it confused me, one more run for the free-roll bro
one might argue that taking Braun out of the 2 spot helps the brewers, he needs his steroids back, Parra is fully capable of handling the load in the field and at the plate, he hits like a 2 hitter is supposed to hit, also it bolsters the pinch hitters
What's your feelings about diamondbacks vs marlins o/u? I'm leaning under..
I like the Under 4 F5 (-110) more than Under 8 FG (-120), but I need to see more from Penny before I play with unders when he is on the mound (regardless of how quiet the Zona bats have been).
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dlin420:
What's your feelings about diamondbacks vs marlins o/u? I'm leaning under..
I like the Under 4 F5 (-110) more than Under 8 FG (-120), but I need to see more from Penny before I play with unders when he is on the mound (regardless of how quiet the Zona bats have been).
It would be nice if the Braves could muster up the energy to score 1 run off this gas can… for pete's sake. only 9 outs to work with to get this 5th run!
0
It would be nice if the Braves could muster up the energy to score 1 run off this gas can… for pete's sake. only 9 outs to work with to get this 5th run!
For some reason I wanted to take KC but could not pull the trigger, KC hasn't seen samardzija yet, I think I'm going to play Oakland and the first half under at 3.5 but looking at some things
0
For some reason I wanted to take KC but could not pull the trigger, KC hasn't seen samardzija yet, I think I'm going to play Oakland and the first half under at 3.5 but looking at some things
how come your POD's dont match the money you risk? im just curious cause i would assume you would want to bet more on POD and less on regular plays..
I have been diligently tracking my performance this season.
Run totals vs. Sides
NL vs. AL
Dogs vs. Favorites
Individual Teams
.500+ teams vs. sub-.500 teams
etc.
I wanted a full season of wagering data before I played with sizing differently for PODs. At the end of the day, most people are incapable of sizing bets based on implied probability vs. "realized" probability differentials (bc they don't calculate the differentials).
Highlighting which ones I am most confident in was only in response to people asking me to do so, and I have only been doing it for about a month. Next season I will incorporate sizing based on PODs and RPs (more than likely).
from my first post: "I won't necessarily size any differently. A few people approached me and asked me to do this, so I am going to try it out for the second half of the season. Maybe I will discover something that I can incorporate for the next season."
0
Quote Originally Posted by DodgersFan89:
how come your POD's dont match the money you risk? im just curious cause i would assume you would want to bet more on POD and less on regular plays..
I have been diligently tracking my performance this season.
Run totals vs. Sides
NL vs. AL
Dogs vs. Favorites
Individual Teams
.500+ teams vs. sub-.500 teams
etc.
I wanted a full season of wagering data before I played with sizing differently for PODs. At the end of the day, most people are incapable of sizing bets based on implied probability vs. "realized" probability differentials (bc they don't calculate the differentials).
Highlighting which ones I am most confident in was only in response to people asking me to do so, and I have only been doing it for about a month. Next season I will incorporate sizing based on PODs and RPs (more than likely).
from my first post: "I won't necessarily size any differently. A few people approached me and asked me to do this, so I am going to try it out for the second half of the season. Maybe I will discover something that I can incorporate for the next season."
damn, I changed my mind and flipped from KC f5 to oakland f5, but got a split, milwaukee was gift have 5 units on it split between f4ml and f5rl, Fiers is a beast
looking at some things bbl to post my picks
0
damn, I changed my mind and flipped from KC f5 to oakland f5, but got a split, milwaukee was gift have 5 units on it split between f4ml and f5rl, Fiers is a beast
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.