Curious to get feedback on a potential new format. I would remove most of the record detail (e.g., splitting out by wager type).
Bankroll Beginning / Current: $9,391.00 / $11,638.92 Profit: +$2,247.92 (+23.94%) Average Line / Wager Size: -108 / $104.95
Overall Record 2016: 101-75-12 (57%), +11.39% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk *** 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk ***
Picks of the Day Record 2016: 29-20-4 (59%), +15.36% Return on Risk *** 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk *** 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk ***
0
Curious to get feedback on a potential new format. I would remove most of the record detail (e.g., splitting out by wager type).
Bankroll Beginning / Current: $9,391.00 / $11,638.92 Profit: +$2,247.92 (+23.94%) Average Line / Wager Size: -108 / $104.95
Overall Record 2016: 101-75-12 (57%), +11.39% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk *** 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk ***
Picks of the Day Record 2016: 29-20-4 (59%), +15.36% Return on Risk *** 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk *** 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk ***
I looked long and hard at Boston last night, any concern about Eduardo's 28 inning stint in the minors? His #'s were pedestrian at best, makes me lean toward the over.
Bol on the card today
0
Hey Birds,
I looked long and hard at Boston last night, any concern about Eduardo's 28 inning stint in the minors? His #'s were pedestrian at best, makes me lean toward the over.
what do you think about Houston vs Arizona ML...I know McCullers is coming off a decent start so i feel he is due for a stinker as he is still trying to round out into season shape...Not to mention Arizona has lost been around .500 the last 10 games and i think Corbin is a better pitcher at the moment...
0
what do you think about Houston vs Arizona ML...I know McCullers is coming off a decent start so i feel he is due for a stinker as he is still trying to round out into season shape...Not to mention Arizona has lost been around .500 the last 10 games and i think Corbin is a better pitcher at the moment...
Every win the Cards have had on the road this year has been by 3+ runs and they're facing a badly struggling pitcher in a great hitters park. They should win by at least 4-5
0
Why play Cardinals moneyline instead of runline?
Every win the Cards have had on the road this year has been by 3+ runs and they're facing a badly struggling pitcher in a great hitters park. They should win by at least 4-5
keyword they "should win" by that much, peralta can't keep sucking forever, i think St. Louis wins outright but not more then -1.5...
Remi RL and hight Moneylines are bookies favorite bets
There's no part of Peralta's profiles that leads you to believe that his struggles will change. His peripheral numbers are horrible, doesn't get many Ks, walks a lot of batters. He's badly struggled at home and in his career stats vs STL. STL offense is pacing at an all time great pace. They may put up a 10 spot
only way they don't win by 3-4+ runs is if Leake gets hammered
0
Quote Originally Posted by BRod1979:
keyword they "should win" by that much, peralta can't keep sucking forever, i think St. Louis wins outright but not more then -1.5...
Remi RL and hight Moneylines are bookies favorite bets
There's no part of Peralta's profiles that leads you to believe that his struggles will change. His peripheral numbers are horrible, doesn't get many Ks, walks a lot of batters. He's badly struggled at home and in his career stats vs STL. STL offense is pacing at an all time great pace. They may put up a 10 spot
only way they don't win by 3-4+ runs is if Leake gets hammered
also milwaukee's home park is #9 in the league for most favorable for hitters with a huge edge of homerun hitting teams - STL's biggest strength is the homerun ball. The more you look at this, the more you really love it
0
also milwaukee's home park is #9 in the league for most favorable for hitters with a huge edge of homerun hitting teams - STL's biggest strength is the homerun ball. The more you look at this, the more you really love it
I think I'm playing cards team total over 5 too you guys. I just don't see any way they don't explode in this game. I follow the cards pretty closely being a cubs fan and they really clobber bad pitching...Peralta is awful
0
I think I'm playing cards team total over 5 too you guys. I just don't see any way they don't explode in this game. I follow the cards pretty closely being a cubs fan and they really clobber bad pitching...Peralta is awful
Your stats indicate your PODs are hitting at a higher rate - consistently. I don't know how you handicap games, but wouldn't it be wiser to not bet on your regular plays but increase the wager amount on your PODs?
Just a thought, maybe I'm not interpretating this correctly.
0
Your stats indicate your PODs are hitting at a higher rate - consistently. I don't know how you handicap games, but wouldn't it be wiser to not bet on your regular plays but increase the wager amount on your PODs?
Just a thought, maybe I'm not interpretating this correctly.
Your stats indicate your PODs are hitting at a higher rate - consistently. I don't know how you handicap games, but wouldn't it be wiser to not bet on your regular plays but increase the wager amount on your PODs?
Just a thought, maybe I'm not interpretating this correctly.
I cap my daily amount of risk taken at 7.5% of bankroll.
Some days I scale my PODs are 1.50% of bankroll if I don't plan to have more than 3-4 plays. Otherwise, all bets are flat 1% of bankroll (~$115 right now). Although, i scaled PODs at 1.50% on Sat/Sun. I mainly started tracking them (and highlighting) since other people asked me to do it a few years back.
As far as relative returns go... my overall record is more significant statistically, since only about 25-30% of my picks are PODs. Back of the envelope math tells me I am returning about 10% on risk for regular plays (so about 5% points lower than PODs). I have become more selective over time - as evidenced by the number of plays decreasing each year - and the differential in return between regular and PODs have been converging as a result (each year). Very few people are going to be able to scale bets effectively. My preference would be to just change my selection criteria altogether.
It's possible that I transition to only wagering on what I would - today - consider PODs and increasing my wager size to 2% of bankroll. Before I made a drastic change, I wanted to track it (need evidence to support a change). In the meantime, I continue to learn from both my mistakes and successes so there is value (for me, at least) in experimenting.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
Your stats indicate your PODs are hitting at a higher rate - consistently. I don't know how you handicap games, but wouldn't it be wiser to not bet on your regular plays but increase the wager amount on your PODs?
Just a thought, maybe I'm not interpretating this correctly.
I cap my daily amount of risk taken at 7.5% of bankroll.
Some days I scale my PODs are 1.50% of bankroll if I don't plan to have more than 3-4 plays. Otherwise, all bets are flat 1% of bankroll (~$115 right now). Although, i scaled PODs at 1.50% on Sat/Sun. I mainly started tracking them (and highlighting) since other people asked me to do it a few years back.
As far as relative returns go... my overall record is more significant statistically, since only about 25-30% of my picks are PODs. Back of the envelope math tells me I am returning about 10% on risk for regular plays (so about 5% points lower than PODs). I have become more selective over time - as evidenced by the number of plays decreasing each year - and the differential in return between regular and PODs have been converging as a result (each year). Very few people are going to be able to scale bets effectively. My preference would be to just change my selection criteria altogether.
It's possible that I transition to only wagering on what I would - today - consider PODs and increasing my wager size to 2% of bankroll. Before I made a drastic change, I wanted to track it (need evidence to support a change). In the meantime, I continue to learn from both my mistakes and successes so there is value (for me, at least) in experimenting.
wouldn't it be wiser to not bet on your regular plays but increase the wager amount on your PODs
Lastly, a 10% return on risk is VERY good, which is about what I've returned on regular plays. Not playing games that produce 10% RoR would be blasphemy!
A few years back, people used to sweat feartheweb. he was a talented capper with a high $ P/L (north of $20K at times), but his return on risk was much lower (< 4%) than most would assume. There were far better cappers to follow.
My goal going into the season is to return 5%+
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
wouldn't it be wiser to not bet on your regular plays but increase the wager amount on your PODs
Lastly, a 10% return on risk is VERY good, which is about what I've returned on regular plays. Not playing games that produce 10% RoR would be blasphemy!
A few years back, people used to sweat feartheweb. he was a talented capper with a high $ P/L (north of $20K at times), but his return on risk was much lower (< 4%) than most would assume. There were far better cappers to follow.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.