which bookie are you working for lmfao why are you purposely steering guys in the wrong direction. its not funny man
The OP has a proven track record bud. There are hundreds of other douchebags on this site that are clearly bookies; go call them out. The OP is not one.
0
Quote Originally Posted by justlol:
which bookie are you working for lmfao why are you purposely steering guys in the wrong direction. its not funny man
The OP has a proven track record bud. There are hundreds of other douchebags on this site that are clearly bookies; go call them out. The OP is not one.
You may very well be right here. Picking against Max Scherzer is a tricky proposition, but the Nationals forget how to hit when he's throwing, shut out in three of his last four outings. And while he's dominated the league, lifetime against the Sox he's only 4-4 with a 6.05 ERA. That Nationals are hitting just .220 in the last week anyway, compared to .288 by the Red Sox, and no team has been better against righties than Boston. Keep in mind, Rick Porcello is no slouch, and Boston is 11-6 when he starts, nearly identical to the 12-5 mark for Washington when the mighty Scherzer takes the hill. It's worth an upset flyer on one of the league's top teams.
0
You may very well be right here. Picking against Max Scherzer is a tricky proposition, but the Nationals forget how to hit when he's throwing, shut out in three of his last four outings. And while he's dominated the league, lifetime against the Sox he's only 4-4 with a 6.05 ERA. That Nationals are hitting just .220 in the last week anyway, compared to .288 by the Red Sox, and no team has been better against righties than Boston. Keep in mind, Rick Porcello is no slouch, and Boston is 11-6 when he starts, nearly identical to the 12-5 mark for Washington when the mighty Scherzer takes the hill. It's worth an upset flyer on one of the league's top teams.
Whats funny is ive been doing this thing where i fade the sunday night winner and back the sunday night loser sometimes if the shoe fits. I like having both braves and sox @ +odds tonight. Agree that sox seem a bit too obvious but hard to back scherzer lately. Good luck scorp
0
Whats funny is ive been doing this thing where i fade the sunday night winner and back the sunday night loser sometimes if the shoe fits. I like having both braves and sox @ +odds tonight. Agree that sox seem a bit too obvious but hard to back scherzer lately. Good luck scorp
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.