All Forums | MLB Betting

CHASE THE PLAYOFFS...RD.3

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 33419
Posts: 379
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 383
Posted: #201
Quote Originally Posted by Codearmani:

Just came home, just got a hour to left before the first games begin. What are you guys on? I am already on:

Ball state -3 2U 
BYU +14 1 U 
Duke +10.5 1U

Looking for a 3-0 night 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1164
Posted: #202
5-1 Shady on your RR so far congrats and rooting for you on P.ST - Iowa game.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1109
Posted: #203
Angle nice call on kent st.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #204
0-3.  Ugly.  But a wise 'winner' once told me that if you find something that wins >55% of the time, it can be a 85-90% winner [by chasing].   Personally, I'm doubling the 7pm  games... But then again I won all 3 of my big games today: ball st, kent st and BYU- so it's easier when your playing w/ house money.

Btw, those 3 games all came from great cappers on covers - not me!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #205
Kst +3', over 34'
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 204
Posted: #206
Well said Schiman thanks for the great insight guys well appreciated
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #207
Unc -7. 
Fade home dogs w/ a calc num b/w 14-21. Duke 14+10.5-7= 17.5.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 204
Posted: #208
What do those calculations mean Schiman the scores 20-6
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #209
Okla 2H -13'
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #210

I have a question regarding the proline numbers on the spreadsheet.  Why are we using +8.5?  Is 8 a key number in CFB?  I dont recall that it is so just wondering.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #211
Quote Originally Posted by fernandes119:

What do those calculations mean Schiman the scores 20-6

Read about Porkys 2H system. There is a ton of buzz about it. I post here b/c I like this forum- too much negativity elsewhere.

Basically, take the equation back to the initial odds, if the 2H is off from this calc by more than a set number then bet the set number.  I back test my numbers via a computer over a few years data... Wrong a lot , but right >55% of the time 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #212
Marshall +4 2/H?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #213
differential of 22
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #214
Sorry, hit submit too quick. 
So the diff is 14 on the duke game, they're dogs by 10.5 to start.  if Vegas is correct, unc needs 24.5 to break even on the cover.  2H odds was -7.  That's 17.5 off the 'set' number.  I've seen that over the past 3 years, 14-21 set numbers on home dogs loses 40% of the time- so I'm just playing odds.

Hope that makes sense. Tread lightly, I hate steering people wrong.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #215
Quote Originally Posted by js4u:

Marshall +4 2/H?

I missed  getting it in, but it's a 16' set number... It's def due, but I found away dogs even out over time- the fact that Purdue lost earlier makes me want to chase this.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 296
Posted: #216
Been away most the day and after a terrible early set only only down a little. Hoping to cap off the Saturday with Oregon state -9.5,  any thoughts before I lock it in?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #217

schiman

Marshall is a 22 pt differential.

14(score diff) +4(game spread) =18+4 (2/H line) =22 diffeential

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 383
Posted: #218
no, dont have any opinion on that game mj 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #219

schiman

Marshall is a 22 pt differential.

14 (score diff) +4 (game spread) =18+4 (2/H line) =22 differential

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #220
Penn State is a 26.5 point differential on the spread for the 2/H
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3563
Posted: #221
WOULDN'T PENN ST +1.5 HAVE TO  BE A PLAY?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 296
Posted: #222
@codearmani

Thanks. Just thinking oregon state needs to focus on this game before a tough next four.  Utah coming of UCLA that was winnable and may be a let down. I state needs to keep pace with Oregon.  

Also maybe a bit of payback since Utah won last year. 

Oregon state needs a statement/blowout win.  I like their passing game even with backup QB. 

I'll play it and see what happens. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 138
Posted: #223
I agree js4u, that's the tough thing about college, I had to get dinner and missed it 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1164
Posted: #224
Thanks  Schiman just watching now but very much appreciate what you are formulating.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #225

MR TINGLES  Yes Penn tate was a play with a differential of 24.5

The play was Penn State +1 2/H

All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.