All Forums | MLB Betting

Fridays Plays

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 29145
Posts: 216
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 13879
Posted: #126
pitchers name for a play = wussieman lingo
 
gees dude....where have YOU been?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 537
Posted: #127
Quote Originally Posted by kshifrin:

5. I was just trying to clear the bet type for everybody. If he likes a pitcher, why wouldn't he like opposite TT under? What's wrong with that?

In the FWIW category, I understand where you are coming from as I too think these things a little backwards; even if it does get me to the same result that everyone else comes to. 

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 52
Posted: #128
gLUCK
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 66361
Posted: #129
i hope you had a wonderful night last night aj, filled with lots of booz, hookers, and a good ole fashioned bulls ass kicking
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 34
Posted: #130
It seems like we have a Hall Monitor on this forum that never makes any bets, but seems to criticize a lot of different people for asking questions or giving there opinions.  Have a nice day !!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 14936
Posted: #131
Quote Originally Posted by badlands:

i hope you had a wonderful night last night aj, filled with lots of booz, hookers, and a good ole fashioned bulls ass kicking


I did (minus the hookers)

Bulls just had an off night, it happens. Game 4 will be an easy win.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 66361
Posted: #132
just because you can afford to buy a high class escort with your winnings doesnt mean they arent hookers bud
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 14936
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by badlands:

just because you can afford to buy a high class escort with your winnings doesnt mean they arent hookers bud


are you sure
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 66361
Posted: #134
well thats what weeble said the rule is in canada
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 74
Posted: #135
i don't recall making fun of anyone.

i had thought you didn't know who lincecum was, so i merely suggested that one should be MINIMALLY knowledgeable when betting.

mind you,

when someone writes "lincecum -120", i tend to think "giants -120" not "Ariz v. SF TT Under BLAH BLAH"

thanks!


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 74
Posted: #136
i don't recall making fun of anyone.

i had thought you didn't know who lincecum was, so i merely suggested that one should be MINIMALLY knowledgeable when betting.

mind you,

when someone writes "lincecum -120", i tend to think "giants -120" not "Ariz v. SF TT Under BLAH BLAH"

thanks!


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 286
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by xmaynardx:

i don't recall making fun of anyone.

i had thought you didn't know who lincecum was, so i merely suggested that one should be MINIMALLY knowledgeable when betting.

mind you,

when someone writes "lincecum -120", i tend to think "giants -120" not "Ariz v. SF TT Under BLAH BLAH"

thanks!


What about SF 1st 5 innigs? Wrong choice 2?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 2955
Posted: #138
Quote Originally Posted by kshifrin:

1. AJ likes TT bets

2. AJ likes Lincecum

3. AJ never posted play like that before (by the pitcher name), probably it was a mistake (he meant the SF as he cleared later in the discussion) 

4. When I ask him about the bet, it does not mean that I don;t know who is Lincecum, like some of you guys trying to bring up

5. I was just trying to clear the bet type for everybody. If he likes a pitcher, why wouldn't he like opposite TT under? What's wrong with that?

6. Sorry for my English, this is my 3rd language

7. BOL for every1, don't be smart idiots when u trying to make fun of any1

Fluffer

I'd rather be playing D&D.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 286
Posted: #139
Quote Originally Posted by jagerfury:

Fluffer

nice 2 meat u, I'm kshifrin
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 72
Posted: #140
kshifrin give it a rest bro. You made a stupid comment a few people jabbed you for it, now you know what it means, let it go. Don't get your feelings hurt dude.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1875
Posted: #141

Quote Originally Posted by kshifrin:

can u read the whole discation before posting ur stupid coment?

please tell me, son, what the hell is a stupid COMENT?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1875
Posted: #142

Quote Originally Posted by kshifrin:

nice 2 meat u, I'm kshifrin

Fluffer

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1817
Posted: #143
aj, i never comment on the plays you make, and tail frequently.
 
since ive proven I cant make money researching plays, i make my picks based on holy shit lines, and blindly bet with the house, which has been really profitable. like if wash was favored today over santana, id bet wash realizing the house knows more than i do about something...
 
cy young ONLY -120 against a shitty offense and DD that has proven himself to implode per the 08 season?
 
just looks like a blind bet with the dbacks...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 443
Posted: #144
AJ - White Sox made a pitching change -- G Floyd is starting, not Buehrle anymore.  Can't tell if ur WSox play took this into consideration.  Still at -125 on BetJamaica. 
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 94466
Posted: #145
Quote Originally Posted by badlands:

well thats what weeble said the rule is in canada


LIAR!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 5073
Posted: #146
bunch of dipshits here commenting on one posters ignorant question. Way to put 30+ responses here for something so small.
 
You guys are such tools. WHy dont you guys start a thread and compare each others peckers in another forum?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 14936
Posted: #147
Quote Originally Posted by toft33:

AJ - White Sox made a pitching change -- G Floyd is starting, not Buehrle anymore.  Can't tell if ur WSox play took this into consideration.  Still at -125 on BetJamaica. 


The play is with Floyd on the mound.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 544
Posted: #148

Quote Originally Posted by kshifrin:

AJ, what is Lincecum play?

I was gone for awhile. Can I please join the list of smartasses.

Afterall, that's what I'm here for.

kshifrin

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 14936
Posted: #149
Quote Originally Posted by FadeMeAllDay:

aj, i never comment on the plays you make, and tail frequently.
 
since ive proven I cant make money researching plays, i make my picks based on holy shit lines, and blindly bet with the house, which has been really profitable. like if wash was favored today over santana, id bet wash realizing the house knows more than i do about something...
 
cy young ONLY -120 against a shitty offense and DD that has proven himself to implode per the 08 season?
 
just looks like a blind bet with the dbacks...


I hear what you're saying, sort of like the white sox yesterday.

Davis has been the better pitcher this year, the Giants offense has sucked, the Giants are 0-6 on the road, and the Dbacks won this same Davis/Lincecum matchup in SF just a week ago so I'm not sure how much higher they could have made this line.
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 26448
Posted: #150
Damn guys,leave the poor guy alone,think hes been bash enough,
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.