17-3 $5866.44 Article #20
Hello fellas! ||an_clap.gif' border=0>
I would've preferred sides but I've been going heavily with my intuition and it's taken me this far. Like they say, if it ain't broke...
Be very careful with sides tonight. If you feel it's too obvious, chances are, it's not the right side! ||an_wink.gif' border=0>
_______________________________________________
My Pick: Mariners/Red Sox Under 9 +100
Good Luck!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
17-3 $5866.44 Article #20
Hello fellas! ||an_clap.gif' border=0>
I would've preferred sides but I've been going heavily with my intuition and it's taken me this far. Like they say, if it ain't broke...
Be very careful with sides tonight. If you feel it's too obvious, chances are, it's not the right side! ||an_wink.gif' border=0>
_______________________________________________
My Pick: Mariners/Red Sox Under 9 +100
Good Luck!
17-3 $5866.44
Article #20
This got out of line in 1st issue I think....s/b Article #21
Can't pick winners lol ... just pick minor errors.
(What's up with CWS line today? -176? s/b -120 or so)
0
17-3 $5866.44
Article #20
This got out of line in 1st issue I think....s/b Article #21
Can't pick winners lol ... just pick minor errors.
(What's up with CWS line today? -176? s/b -120 or so)
Hello boys!
TY and GL to all of us tonight!
Hi Rick, actually it's not an error as the very first article had both Mets and Under. I believe it was against the Yanks too. About your Chitown boys...the only read i got out of it was that it's very damn expensive!||an_roll_laugh.gif' border=0> I honestly think that Chicago Sox have got the best pitching crew in the majors if not, at the very least, in the top 3. It's funny how the hype about the Jays pitching got so blown out of proportion then all of a sudden, you got BJ Ryan blowing back-to-back saves (actually, not sure if they were b2b but 2 blown saves recently for sure) and you start questioning the hype. Meanwhile ChiSox have been there in the top 3 or 4 in AL in terms of team ERA and nobody talks about their pitching prowess. Not even The Angels were able to hang with them. I am weary of their offense which is why I didn't pick them tonight. Minny is a team that has been hitting well. That's too much to pay for a team that relies on defense too much. Just my take. GL!
ck...Jays tonight, perhaps but when I looked at Marcum's numbers against the Orioles, I got a weird vibe. Jays' team ERA has gone down from being the best in the whole of majors at 2 something to 4+. Sometimes these things are contagious. I always admired Marcum's passion for pitching and I honestly wish him the best tonight being a Torontonian. Definitely not taking the Astros who are hitting .234 against the Cards who have been solid offensively hitting at .288 last week or so. Both teams are subpar in pitching last week or so at 4+ at least for each. I would not recommend this automatically but take a closer look at Cleveland's team total Over 4 as an option. Verlander's numbers against the Indians are pathetic and Cleveland's team hitting has climbed up from just above .200 in the last couple of weeks to .300. My concern about this is Hafner is out but I'm not saying take Cleveland either. Their team ERA lately has been really bad. I just think that it's likely they're going to put up some runs and 4 is reasonable. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
Hello boys!
TY and GL to all of us tonight!
Hi Rick, actually it's not an error as the very first article had both Mets and Under. I believe it was against the Yanks too. About your Chitown boys...the only read i got out of it was that it's very damn expensive!||an_roll_laugh.gif' border=0> I honestly think that Chicago Sox have got the best pitching crew in the majors if not, at the very least, in the top 3. It's funny how the hype about the Jays pitching got so blown out of proportion then all of a sudden, you got BJ Ryan blowing back-to-back saves (actually, not sure if they were b2b but 2 blown saves recently for sure) and you start questioning the hype. Meanwhile ChiSox have been there in the top 3 or 4 in AL in terms of team ERA and nobody talks about their pitching prowess. Not even The Angels were able to hang with them. I am weary of their offense which is why I didn't pick them tonight. Minny is a team that has been hitting well. That's too much to pay for a team that relies on defense too much. Just my take. GL!
ck...Jays tonight, perhaps but when I looked at Marcum's numbers against the Orioles, I got a weird vibe. Jays' team ERA has gone down from being the best in the whole of majors at 2 something to 4+. Sometimes these things are contagious. I always admired Marcum's passion for pitching and I honestly wish him the best tonight being a Torontonian. Definitely not taking the Astros who are hitting .234 against the Cards who have been solid offensively hitting at .288 last week or so. Both teams are subpar in pitching last week or so at 4+ at least for each. I would not recommend this automatically but take a closer look at Cleveland's team total Over 4 as an option. Verlander's numbers against the Indians are pathetic and Cleveland's team hitting has climbed up from just above .200 in the last couple of weeks to .300. My concern about this is Hafner is out but I'm not saying take Cleveland either. Their team ERA lately has been really bad. I just think that it's likely they're going to put up some runs and 4 is reasonable. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
Thanks for clearing that up bobbyd ... and CWS are no bargin at the price risk/reward out of whack. They have always had their hands full playing them, still should win with some run support. 60% win chance & need 64% for break-even @ -176.
GL
0
Thanks for clearing that up bobbyd ... and CWS are no bargin at the price risk/reward out of whack. They have always had their hands full playing them, still should win with some run support. 60% win chance & need 64% for break-even @ -176.
GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
