Looks like one of the
biggest traps I've ever seen! I get it, it's Kershaw and the Dodgers are on a hot streak, but
this isn't a huge mismatch. So far this year, no line of -275 or higher has
lost, and is due for a correction. Moreover, I just did a search of the
last 5 years of lines higher than -275. In general the line hits at a
rate of 81%, but when you look at just the month of June over 5 years,
the win rate of these lines is only 53%. It seems mid-June is the time,
historically, that these big favorites start losing. Another interesting
fact is Kershaw is coming off an extra
day of rest. They pushed him back a day just so he could start this
series. In games where he has 6 days of rest, the Dodgers win only 42%
of the time, and for you run-line bettors, they only cover -1.5 in 1 out
of 7! There's a whole other host of indicators pointing towards this
one being a trap! Putting a Hamilton on Mets!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Looks like one of the
biggest traps I've ever seen! I get it, it's Kershaw and the Dodgers are on a hot streak, but
this isn't a huge mismatch. So far this year, no line of -275 or higher has
lost, and is due for a correction. Moreover, I just did a search of the
last 5 years of lines higher than -275. In general the line hits at a
rate of 81%, but when you look at just the month of June over 5 years,
the win rate of these lines is only 53%. It seems mid-June is the time,
historically, that these big favorites start losing. Another interesting
fact is Kershaw is coming off an extra
day of rest. They pushed him back a day just so he could start this
series. In games where he has 6 days of rest, the Dodgers win only 42%
of the time, and for you run-line bettors, they only cover -1.5 in 1 out
of 7! There's a whole other host of indicators pointing towards this
one being a trap! Putting a Hamilton on Mets!
Wheeler will get out pitched. Mets will get out hit. Going against Kershaw is like dropping a 100$ bill on the ground and hoping nobody picks it up. Dodgers or no wager at all.
0
Wheeler will get out pitched. Mets will get out hit. Going against Kershaw is like dropping a 100$ bill on the ground and hoping nobody picks it up. Dodgers or no wager at all.
Wheeler will get out pitched. Mets will get out hit. Going against Kershaw is like dropping a 100$ bill on the ground and hoping nobody picks it up. Dodgers or no wager at all.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bryan3069:
Wheeler will get out pitched. Mets will get out hit. Going against Kershaw is like dropping a 100$ bill on the ground and hoping nobody picks it up. Dodgers or no wager at all.
Wheeler will get out pitched. Mets will get out hit. Going against Kershaw is like dropping a 100$ bill on the ground and hoping nobody picks it up. Dodgers or no wager at all.
Agree. Just lmfao at anyone trying to find angles around Kershaw at home w/ a squad that just shot 30 runs on a beaten and battered Reds team.
Betting against Kershaw is like throwing BP to Bellinger and hoping he doesn't hit one out.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bryan3069:
Wheeler will get out pitched. Mets will get out hit. Going against Kershaw is like dropping a 100$ bill on the ground and hoping nobody picks it up. Dodgers or no wager at all.
Agree. Just lmfao at anyone trying to find angles around Kershaw at home w/ a squad that just shot 30 runs on a beaten and battered Reds team.
Betting against Kershaw is like throwing BP to Bellinger and hoping he doesn't hit one out.
Listen i understand Kershaw is arguably the best pitcher in today's MLB but why in the world would you jump on a -310 ML when it is possible for kershaw to lose. He does have 2 losses on the season
0
Listen i understand Kershaw is arguably the best pitcher in today's MLB but why in the world would you jump on a -310 ML when it is possible for kershaw to lose. He does have 2 losses on the season
Listen i understand Kershaw is arguably the best pitcher in today's MLB but why in the world would you jump on a -310 ML when it is possible for kershaw to lose. He does have 2 losses on the season
these are one of those things either take the kersh or lay off. unless you bet 10 dollars a game then have at the Mets ML.
but if you are betting real money why lay on the mets.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pocketaces33:
Listen i understand Kershaw is arguably the best pitcher in today's MLB but why in the world would you jump on a -310 ML when it is possible for kershaw to lose. He does have 2 losses on the season
these are one of those things either take the kersh or lay off. unless you bet 10 dollars a game then have at the Mets ML.
but if you are betting real money why lay on the mets.
but if you are betting real money why lay on the mets.
Big value. I already cashed a $50 to win $100 on one of Kershaw's losses this year. The books make it an easy read when they truly think Kershaw will win, and when they're inflating their line's to wipe out bankrolls. Personally, I think this is the latter, but time will tell!
0
Quote Originally Posted by justlol:
but if you are betting real money why lay on the mets.
Big value. I already cashed a $50 to win $100 on one of Kershaw's losses this year. The books make it an easy read when they truly think Kershaw will win, and when they're inflating their line's to wipe out bankrolls. Personally, I think this is the latter, but time will tell!
There is no value in this game on either side. This should be a no bet for everyone. Do you play every hand in poker? This is 2-7 offsuit- muck the hand- there are far better hands out there today.
M4N
0
There is no value in this game on either side. This should be a no bet for everyone. Do you play every hand in poker? This is 2-7 offsuit- muck the hand- there are far better hands out there today.
There is no value in this game on either side. This should be a no bet for everyone. Do you play every hand in poker? This is 2-7 offsuit- muck the hand- there are far better hands out there today.
Sportsbetting isn't like poker in the hands you get. It is however similar in getting to know your opponent. In this case, the books. The square books are juicing the line hard, and the square books are keeping it reasonable. Usually a sign that the underdog will win. One of the squarest books around, sportsbook.com, has a 7-dime gap between favorite and dog. To me, it looks like they're wiping out bankrolls on the top end, and paying relatively little to the other 10% betting the dog. Even with a 2-7 offsuit, sometimes you flop 4 of kind 2's!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Money4Nuthin:
There is no value in this game on either side. This should be a no bet for everyone. Do you play every hand in poker? This is 2-7 offsuit- muck the hand- there are far better hands out there today.
Sportsbetting isn't like poker in the hands you get. It is however similar in getting to know your opponent. In this case, the books. The square books are juicing the line hard, and the square books are keeping it reasonable. Usually a sign that the underdog will win. One of the squarest books around, sportsbook.com, has a 7-dime gap between favorite and dog. To me, it looks like they're wiping out bankrolls on the top end, and paying relatively little to the other 10% betting the dog. Even with a 2-7 offsuit, sometimes you flop 4 of kind 2's!
Lol, I've played poker for over 30 years, may play another 30, I have never seen 2-2-2 as a flop, and I guarantee I will not long live long enough to ever flop that with a 2-7, Kershaw will lose many times as -250 or bigger favorite before that will happen....
0
Lol, I've played poker for over 30 years, may play another 30, I have never seen 2-2-2 as a flop, and I guarantee I will not long live long enough to ever flop that with a 2-7, Kershaw will lose many times as -250 or bigger favorite before that will happen....
Mets leading the league in runs scored on the road.
At the same time they are 3rd in runs conceded on the road.
Over is a lock.
Don't know about over being a lock with Kershaw having a 1.49 lifetime era vs the Mets but then again I'm on the under so yes you are right. Dodgers score 8 themselves tonight
0
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
Mets leading the league in runs scored on the road.
At the same time they are 3rd in runs conceded on the road.
Over is a lock.
Don't know about over being a lock with Kershaw having a 1.49 lifetime era vs the Mets but then again I'm on the under so yes you are right. Dodgers score 8 themselves tonight
Kershaw is 7-0 lifetime vs Mets with a 1.50 ERA. Dodgers are 25-10 @ home this year.....Oh..Dodgers crush righties. You best parlay the under with the Mets if you like the Mets.. They will not get more than 2 runs on Kershaw. If they win they win 2-1 or 3-2.
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
Kershaw is 7-0 lifetime vs Mets with a 1.50 ERA. Dodgers are 25-10 @ home this year.....Oh..Dodgers crush righties. You best parlay the under with the Mets if you like the Mets.. They will not get more than 2 runs on Kershaw. If they win they win 2-1 or 3-2.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.