I don't care if you have the 9 best hitters in MLB, if he's on you won't hit one ball hard and lucky to score any type of runs. To make him a home dog like this is confusing. I don't think he should be a home dog to anyone. Give me the M's +132.
Just called a bluff on that Dodgers move. Not buying the steam.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I don't care if you have the 9 best hitters in MLB, if he's on you won't hit one ball hard and lucky to score any type of runs. To make him a home dog like this is confusing. I don't think he should be a home dog to anyone. Give me the M's +132.
Just called a bluff on that Dodgers move. Not buying the steam.
exactly for those two reasons above. He is nowhere near as dominate as he was when he won the CY young award, and Texas is the highest skilled team right now
0
exactly for those two reasons above. He is nowhere near as dominate as he was when he won the CY young award, and Texas is the highest skilled team right now
Please, the perception of them is much higher than is derserved. Great pitching will always shut down great hitting. The value this game holds is too much to pass.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mjack:
Because Texas looks like the 1927 Yankees?
Please, the perception of them is much higher than is derserved. Great pitching will always shut down great hitting. The value this game holds is too much to pass.
I don't care if you have the 9 best hitters in MLB, if he's on you won't hit one ball hard and lucky to score any type of runs. To make him a home dog like this is confusing. I don't think he should be a home dog to anyone. Give me the M's +132.
Just called a bluff on that Dodgers move. Not buying the steam.
more i thought about it thats why i did..i couldnt understand why dodgers with that lineup opened as favs..adn than i realised thats why i shud stay away..my night looked gross before but is turniing around..loved felix..but the way my night was looking..didnt wanna dig a hole..goodluck
0
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
I don't care if you have the 9 best hitters in MLB, if he's on you won't hit one ball hard and lucky to score any type of runs. To make him a home dog like this is confusing. I don't think he should be a home dog to anyone. Give me the M's +132.
Just called a bluff on that Dodgers move. Not buying the steam.
more i thought about it thats why i did..i couldnt understand why dodgers with that lineup opened as favs..adn than i realised thats why i shud stay away..my night looked gross before but is turniing around..loved felix..but the way my night was looking..didnt wanna dig a hole..goodluck
more i thought about it thats why i did..i couldnt understand why dodgers with that lineup opened as favs..adn than i realised thats why i shud stay away..my night looked gross before but is turniing around..loved felix..but the way my night was looking..didnt wanna dig a hole..goodluck
Better to be safe than sorry, GL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hitterno24:
more i thought about it thats why i did..i couldnt understand why dodgers with that lineup opened as favs..adn than i realised thats why i shud stay away..my night looked gross before but is turniing around..loved felix..but the way my night was looking..didnt wanna dig a hole..goodluck
When the Rangers are starting Darvish he'll never be a dog... unless he's facing someone like Verlander or Sabathia on the road.
These lines are made off power ratings... and I'd venture to say the combination of Darvish/Rangers has the highest power rating out there. Verlander/Tigers and Sabathia/Yankees would be in the conversation as well.
Sorry, but to think Seattle should be favored here just doesn't make any sense.
0
I disagree with you here, 165.
When the Rangers are starting Darvish he'll never be a dog... unless he's facing someone like Verlander or Sabathia on the road.
These lines are made off power ratings... and I'd venture to say the combination of Darvish/Rangers has the highest power rating out there. Verlander/Tigers and Sabathia/Yankees would be in the conversation as well.
Sorry, but to think Seattle should be favored here just doesn't make any sense.
When the Rangers are starting Darvish he'll never be a dog... unless he's facing someone like Verlander or Sabathia on the road.
These lines are made off power ratings... and I'd venture to say the combination of Darvish/Rangers has the highest power rating out there. Verlander/Tigers and Sabathia/Yankees would be in the conversation as well.
Sorry, but to think Seattle should be favored here just doesn't make any sense.
Felix should never be a dog at home. I don't care who the team is or pitcher. How you can compare Darvish not even 60 games into the year against Felix is not fair. We still don't know what Darvish is yet, let's see his numbers at the end of the year before we even put him in the same breath as King.
You guys think these teams are way better than they are. I'll be on the M's tomorrow again vs a guy who is just 4-4 when his team takes the mound yet he's laying a ridiculous number. The Rangers road record will regress more and more. Now is the time to fade them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tone10:
I disagree with you here, 165.
When the Rangers are starting Darvish he'll never be a dog... unless he's facing someone like Verlander or Sabathia on the road.
These lines are made off power ratings... and I'd venture to say the combination of Darvish/Rangers has the highest power rating out there. Verlander/Tigers and Sabathia/Yankees would be in the conversation as well.
Sorry, but to think Seattle should be favored here just doesn't make any sense.
Felix should never be a dog at home. I don't care who the team is or pitcher. How you can compare Darvish not even 60 games into the year against Felix is not fair. We still don't know what Darvish is yet, let's see his numbers at the end of the year before we even put him in the same breath as King.
You guys think these teams are way better than they are. I'll be on the M's tomorrow again vs a guy who is just 4-4 when his team takes the mound yet he's laying a ridiculous number. The Rangers road record will regress more and more. Now is the time to fade them.
165 yards....i have been watching you cap games since your epic run a few years back ...you think outside the box and are a welcomed capper on this site.....you dont win em all ....but you make money and thats what its all about....keep up your posting....great job as always
0
165 yards....i have been watching you cap games since your epic run a few years back ...you think outside the box and are a welcomed capper on this site.....you dont win em all ....but you make money and thats what its all about....keep up your posting....great job as always
165 yards....i have been watching you cap games since your epic run a few years back ...you think outside the box and are a welcomed capper on this site.....you dont win em all ....but you make money and thats what its all about....keep up your posting....great job as always
Thanks, I'll post a couple games later tonight. The West Coast games are the ones I'm looking at.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jnemeh:
165 yards....i have been watching you cap games since your epic run a few years back ...you think outside the box and are a welcomed capper on this site.....you dont win em all ....but you make money and thats what its all about....keep up your posting....great job as always
Thanks, I'll post a couple games later tonight. The West Coast games are the ones I'm looking at.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.