All Forums | MLB Betting

IS IT ME OR THIS FORUM CHANGED IN BAD? + MLB PLAYS FOR SATURDAY 06.18

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1949
Posts: 56
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #26
I'm leaning on the Wash Under 8.......waiting for the line to go pass -150, then jump on the Nats. too.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #27
I'm leaning under 8, also waiting for the line to go pass -150, then jump on the Nats too.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #28
My bad, double post....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #29
JUMBOJBC
LOVEONEB
COLLEGE
ZMAS13

HOPE YOU GUYS HAVE A GREAT $ATURDAY



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by stevewolve:

I'm leaning under 8, also waiting for the line to go pass -150, then jump on the Nats too.


There are some interesting stats on the over when these two team faces but the pitching stats of the nats staff makes me lean more on the under than the over, i'm with you on this one also
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #31
Adding: ARIZONA ml

Updated and final card:

WAS ml
BOS rl -1,5
TOR @ CIN OVER 9
CLE ml
ARZ ml



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #32
Nats is -150 now, I'm on it, Wash and the Under..GL............
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1053
Posted: #33
GOOD LUCK ON YOUR PLAYS!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by sheeze:

GOOD LUCK ON YOUR PLAYS!!


I was staring at your avatar and reading your reply and i read ass instead of plays hahahahah gl today man!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by stevewolve:

Nats is -150 now, I'm on it, Wash and the Under..GL............


Ok steve we on the same ship now! lol
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #36
NATS & the Under are both good plays...

* nyknut - there's some old timers here who'll stop by and give their opinions in certain threads. I use to never post plays, and I just began posting one play a day this past Wednesday.

Not saying you are one of them, but alot of "new school" posters will post once and not post again for a while. So they don't get remembered or noticed. Does that make sense?? Just gain yourelself some friends/followers/ or even bashers. It'll keep your interests of consisting posting.

stevewolve is a bag of expired douche - but he posts some pretty solid plays. And he mentioned collegegambler who has been hot as of late - I tail him sometimes too - he knows his stuff.

*BOL* with all your plays today, Nut. I'm hopping on my laptop from my iPhone here in about an hour. I'll be back then buddy.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1297
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by collegegambler:

arizona ML   +105 is my only play today fellas.

Chisox have scored 2 runs in last 3 road games.......

Arizona is a good young ballclub with a very good offensive lineup

Snakes


Snakes at home have made me good money this year.  Last night included.  I have a bunch of rules of do not plays that have kept me out of trouble over the years (changes monthly).  One of which is to not take the under in home snake games.  

And for god sakes you Brew crew backers have you ever seen a baseball game before.  The Sooooox murder people at home.  Stay away, save your dam money lol.



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574:

NATS & the Under are both good plays...

* nyknut - there's some old timers here who'll stop by and give their opinions in certain threads. I use to never post plays, and I just began posting one play a day this past Wednesday.

Not saying you are one of them, but alot of "new school" posters will post once and not post again for a while. So they don't get remembered or noticed. Does that make sense?? Just gain yourelself some friends/followers/ or even bashers. It'll keep your interests of consisting posting.

stevewolve is a bag of expired douche - but he posts some pretty solid plays. And he mentioned collegegambler who has been hot as of late - I tail him sometimes too - he knows his stuff.

*BOL* with all your plays today, Nut. I'm hopping on my laptop from my iPhone here in about an hour. I'll be back then buddy.


Thanks for stopping by and sharing your thoughts on this man!

I hope we have a winning day today!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by nyknut:



Ok steve we on the same ship now! lol
 Got Nats RL and the Under...........4-2    after 8 ........3 more outs..........
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #40
Congrat Bro.....4-2 Nats rl and the under, let's get the rest......playing with house money now...............
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 3757
Posted: #41
I LIKE THE INDIANS PLAY BUT OTHER THAN THAT I LIKE THE BREWCREWS LINEUP BETTER THAN THE REDSOX. I LIKE DANKS OVER DUKE AND I LIKE THE WHITESOX LINEUP MORE THAN THE SNAKES LINEUP. AND THE BLUEJAYS REDS GAME COULD GO EITHER WAY. I THINK FOR THE OVER TO HIT THERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO SCORE RUNS EARLY. BUT GOOD LUCK ON ALL UR PLAYS. SOME PEOPLE THINK ITS TALKING SHIT ON THERE PLAYS BUT WHY POST IF U CANT TAKE GOOD CRITICISM.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by 7257MELROSE:

I LIKE THE INDIANS PLAY BUT OTHER THAN THAT I LIKE THE BREWCREWS LINEUP BETTER THAN THE REDSOX. I LIKE DANKS OVER DUKE AND I LIKE THE WHITESOX LINEUP MORE THAN THE SNAKES LINEUP. AND THE BLUEJAYS REDS GAME COULD GO EITHER WAY. I THINK FOR THE OVER TO HIT THERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO SCORE RUNS EARLY. BUT GOOD LUCK ON ALL UR PLAYS. SOME PEOPLE THINK ITS TALKING SHIT ON THERE PLAYS BUT WHY POST IF U CANT TAKE GOOD CRITICISM.

you are right, why post your play if we can't disagree with it......that's why they call it gambling.....no one wins every day....maybe today,I'm the king of the hill..........










 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by stevewolve:

Congrat Bro.....4-2 Nats rl and the under, let's get the rest......playing with house money now...............
SEE BRO! THE FIRST ONE IS IN THE POCKET!!!

WE WERE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF POLARBEAR AND WON.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by 7257MELROSE:

I LIKE THE INDIANS PLAY BUT OTHER THAN THAT I LIKE THE BREWCREWS LINEUP BETTER THAN THE REDSOX. I LIKE DANKS OVER DUKE AND I LIKE THE WHITESOX LINEUP MORE THAN THE SNAKES LINEUP. AND THE BLUEJAYS REDS GAME COULD GO EITHER WAY. I THINK FOR THE OVER TO HIT THERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO SCORE RUNS EARLY. BUT GOOD LUCK ON ALL UR PLAYS. SOME PEOPLE THINK ITS TALKING SHIT ON THERE PLAYS BUT WHY POST IF U CANT TAKE GOOD CRITICISM.


ABSOLUTELY MAN, WE HERE TO DISCUSS OUR PLAYS... THIS IS ACTUALLY WHY I LIKE TO POST THEM, BECAUSE I LIKE TO HEAR OTHERS' OPINIONS AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS ON THE PLAYS WHERE NEEDED
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 23140
Posted: #45
nyknut: I sympathize with you man, but why try to help if the majority of the board is so stuck in it's ways it either pays no attention or tells you you are full of s__t without even a discussion, or making a case for why they do not feel the same as you do? Here is a prime example.

99% of the general public and this board will tell you to add the juice to favorites in baseball and play all dogs for a flat price. Why? They can't tell you why except that that is what they were taught and that is what most people do. Not one single person here or anywhere else can show you a definitive mathematical study that proves that is the correct way to bet baseball. It probably isn't, depending on two different degrees of confidence and defining a "unit" as sometimes the target profit and sometimes the amount of risk. It's sort of like the Lemmings running over the cliff; the leader did it so everyone else blindly followed, no questions asked. Play with that topic a while. You will either be criticized or ignored but you won't get a good definitive answer from anyone and almost all will go on doing what they have always done.
Welcome back, bol
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 17329
Posted: #46
BOL today NY....Nice call on the NATS BRO!

Hope to see ya around all season my friend!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:

nyknut: I sympathize with you man, but why try to help if the majority of the board is so stuck in it's ways it either pays no attention or tells you you are full of s__t without even a discussion, or making a case for why they do not feel the same as you do? Here is a prime example.

99% of the general public and this board will tell you to add the juice to favorites in baseball and play all dogs for a flat price. Why? They can't tell you why except that that is what they were taught and that is what most people do. Not one single person here or anywhere else can show you a definitive mathematical study that proves that is the correct way to bet baseball. It probably isn't, depending on two different degrees of confidence and defining a "unit" as sometimes the target profit and sometimes the amount of risk. It's sort of like the Lemmings running over the cliff; the leader did it so everyone else blindly followed, no questions asked. Play with that topic a while. You will either be criticized or ignored but you won't get a good definitive answer from anyone and almost all will go on doing what they have always done.
Welcome back, bol


Thank you for stopping by my friend, I appreciate it. I agree with what you've just said. Hope you have a good Saturday
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by tidefan07:

BOL today NY....Nice call on the NATS BRO!

Hope to see ya around all season my friend!



I'm glad this Saturday started off well with the Nats!!!
Hopefully it gets going!!!! I'll definitely see you around my friend!! Have a great day man!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 4302
Posted: #49
BOL nyknut. I also took WAS today. Was a great game. I'm also with you on BOS RL. All the best tonight.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 276
Posted: #50
NYK, good luck with your picks, I am taking CWS tonight though. I know they've scored 2 in their last 3 games but if you look at my post theres some stats about dbacks numbers vs lefties in their last 10 and the sox vs lefties. It's a toss up but sox have some good numbers vs duke. Duke won his last game against the struggling marlins, only because of a huge early lead, he still let in 7 runs in 4 innings.

Be careful.

BOL whatever you decide.
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.