All Forums | MLB Betting

Los Angeles Angels Win today (FIXED)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4295
Posts: 49
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 198
Posted: #26
Lol. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 10302
Posted: #27
he got lucky in first one..2nd one should be auto-fade. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 4036
Posted: #28
Shit whats happening?!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 4036
Posted: #29
Still early lets go halos
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 24567
Posted: #30
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 1096
Posted: #31
you guys realize kendall graveman has done well agains this angels lineup right...?


how are you so confident in a pitcher like lincecum that litearlly only pitched one game this season? betting on the run line already? really? 

this is some really bad capping in my opinion. hope it works out for you but really? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 198
Posted: #32
This just gets better and better...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 232
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by MONEYMISFITS:

you guys realize kendall graveman has done well agains this angels lineup right...?


how are you so confident in a pitcher like lincecum that litearlly only pitched one game this season? betting on the run line already? really? 

this is some really bad capping in my opinion. hope it works out for you but really? 

...and Lincecum is at 83 pitches after 3 innings
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 198
Posted: #34
So right now we are to expect 5 runs from the Angels. You know to cover that spread 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 3997
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by squirrelhunter:

F the haters.

Most people in this forum fit into one of more of the following:

1. Live with their parents.
2. Broke.
3. On public assistance.
4. No college degree.
5. No job.
6. Lie about the amount they bet.

I proudly fit into ZERO of those. Did I hit home with some of you losers in this forum?

What's wrong living with your parents? I work IT for the Feds and advise these crooks I work with on what to play....sports wagering the only thing to keep us sane here at the federal level....I can think of worse losers besides gambling like beating on their wives 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 1096
Posted: #36
this thread makes me sad
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2016
Posts: 554
Posted: #37
Here we go guys!

Angels to score 4 in bot 9 to pull off the miraculous comeback victory! 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2016
Posts: 554
Posted: #38
Oh I meant 5 because apparently this was a run line bet 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 279
Posted: #39
Ok now, this is interesting 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 10302
Posted: #40
this is all part of the FIX 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2016
Posts: 554
Posted: #41
I'm interested to see the damage control 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1005
Posted: #42
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2015
Posts: 653
Posted: #43
FADE
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1005
Posted: #44
I need to find...or maybe start one...a site like this, where people are vetted, or screened somehow to avoid this counter-productive insane (who does this?) bullshit!

Please at least tell me the mods have this duchebags IP address and can block...

Potential for this site (1000 heads are better than one) is off the charts...will check back in next year (yeah, this kind of crap makes me realize I am too intelligent to keep touching the hot stove) and rely on weather reports, and all the awesome empirical (objective vs. subjective) information that Is available to make an informed choice...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 23140
Posted: #45
Just an observation you understand but I am pretty sure if I was privy to fixed games I could do better than 50% and lose $ on the juice.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 184
Posted: #46
Just an observation you understand but I am pretty sure if I was privy to fixed games I could do better than 50% and lose $ on the juice.
 
But wait, he will have "loaded up on the first game". Wait and see
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2016
Posts: 252
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by DanDiego:

I need to find...or maybe start one...a site like this, where people are vetted, or screened somehow to avoid this counter-productive insane (who does this?) bullshit!Please at least tell me the mods have this duchebags IP address and can block...Potential for this site (1000 heads are better than one) is off the charts...will check back in next year (yeah, this kind of crap makes me realize I am too intelligent to keep touching the hot stove) and rely on weather reports, and all the awesome empirical (objective vs. subjective) information that Is available to make an informed choice...


You would think... Problem is, less than 1% of gamblers even have the ability to possibly win... Less than 1% of those actually have the discipline to see it through... Less than 1% of those are willing to share anything with anyone. If you're looking to Covers for winners... Good luck! There are a few diamonds in the rough here (better 10 years ago) but most of it is just nonsense from kids with way too much false confidence.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 23140
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by rm990:



You would think... Problem is, less than 1% of gamblers even have the ability to possibly win... Less than 1% of those actually have the discipline to see it through... Less than 1% of those are willing to share anything with anyone. If you're looking to Covers for winners... Good luck! There are a few diamonds in the rough here (better 10 years ago) but most of it is just nonsense from kids with way too much false confidence.
Another "Prospect" that has knowledge of what Covers was ten years ago. How many user names have you had in those ten years and why are you ashamed of all of them? Or are you just pimping yourself since you are the OP?

Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8185
Posted: #49
I've been fixed. It isn't that bad.
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.