Great middle opportunities with the Atlantis numbers. HST, KC, MN have a 6 game difference. CIN has a 4 game difference while CC,LAA,MIA,WASH have a 3 game difference. Difficult to believe that these numbers are so far apart.
GL
0
Great middle opportunities with the Atlantis numbers. HST, KC, MN have a 6 game difference. CIN has a 4 game difference while CC,LAA,MIA,WASH have a 3 game difference. Difficult to believe that these numbers are so far apart.
Great middle opportunities with the Atlantis numbers. HST, KC, MN have a 6 game difference. CIN has a 4 game difference while CC,LAA,MIA,WASH have a 3 game difference. Difficult to believe that these numbers are so far apart. GL
It is possible LVH checked the action at Atlantis and adjusted accordingly to balance their action. Eventually all books will do some adjusting for the same reason. If the numbers move the same way at Atlantis it is not because they respect LVH numbers more than their own, it is a reflection of where the money is going.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:
Great middle opportunities with the Atlantis numbers. HST, KC, MN have a 6 game difference. CIN has a 4 game difference while CC,LAA,MIA,WASH have a 3 game difference. Difficult to believe that these numbers are so far apart. GL
It is possible LVH checked the action at Atlantis and adjusted accordingly to balance their action. Eventually all books will do some adjusting for the same reason. If the numbers move the same way at Atlantis it is not because they respect LVH numbers more than their own, it is a reflection of where the money is going.
[Quote: Originally Posted by KeyElement] It is possible LVH checked the action at Atlantis and adjusted accordingly to balance their action. Eventually all books will do some adjusting for the same reason. If the numbers move the same way at Atlantis it is not because they respect LVH numbers more than their own, it is a reflection of where the money is going.
[/Quote You make a good point. However, in the 2 years that I have tracked both books opening numbers, the biggest difference in the 2 books was 4. In 2012, STL was 83.5 with the LVH and 87.5 with the Atlantis. It went over. There have been a number of 3 game differences with the vast majority favoring the Atlantis side with respect to the outcome. This is not to say that the Atlantis trend will continue but to see four 6 game differences is very interesting. It will be equally as interesting to see where the final numbers land with both books.
GL
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by KeyElement] It is possible LVH checked the action at Atlantis and adjusted accordingly to balance their action. Eventually all books will do some adjusting for the same reason. If the numbers move the same way at Atlantis it is not because they respect LVH numbers more than their own, it is a reflection of where the money is going.
[/Quote You make a good point. However, in the 2 years that I have tracked both books opening numbers, the biggest difference in the 2 books was 4. In 2012, STL was 83.5 with the LVH and 87.5 with the Atlantis. It went over. There have been a number of 3 game differences with the vast majority favoring the Atlantis side with respect to the outcome. This is not to say that the Atlantis trend will continue but to see four 6 game differences is very interesting. It will be equally as interesting to see where the final numbers land with both books.
[/Quote You make a good point. However, in the 2 years that I have tracked both books opening numbers, the biggest difference in the 2 books was 4. In 2012, STL was 83.5 with the LVH and 87.5 with the Atlantis. It went over. There have been a number of 3 game differences with the vast majority favoring the Atlantis side with respect to the outcome. This is not to say that the Atlantis trend will continue but to see four 6 game differences is very interesting. It will be equally as interesting to see where the final numbers land with both books.
GL
[/Quote]If so, a guy might be wise to bet the differences at LVH right now. The Royals especially caught my eye.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
[/Quote You make a good point. However, in the 2 years that I have tracked both books opening numbers, the biggest difference in the 2 books was 4. In 2012, STL was 83.5 with the LVH and 87.5 with the Atlantis. It went over. There have been a number of 3 game differences with the vast majority favoring the Atlantis side with respect to the outcome. This is not to say that the Atlantis trend will continue but to see four 6 game differences is very interesting. It will be equally as interesting to see where the final numbers land with both books.
GL
[/Quote]If so, a guy might be wise to bet the differences at LVH right now. The Royals especially caught my eye.
I agree. The Atlantis would like to make it lower than 57.5 but they know it would be too much out of line with the other shops. Still, a 6 game difference is notable.
The "Disastros" have set a team goal of 75 this year. It is difficult to believe that they can go from 51 to 75 with just a handful of offseason changes. Feldman, Qualls, Williams and Fowler (bad law firm?) will help but unless they can find a way to drastically cut down on the offensive K's and cut down on walks to the opposition, they could see a rerun of last year's horror film. Plus being in the old AL East, now known as the AL West, isn't helping them one bit. Playing 45% of their games against those boys,... well you know. I have a feeling that the current 63.5 will go down plus added juice on the under will appear. Might want to "belly up" to the counter soon. Of course, when they win their 64th game on September 4th, I hope you will not remind me of this post. Highly unlikely though.One man's thoughts.
GL
0
I agree. The Atlantis would like to make it lower than 57.5 but they know it would be too much out of line with the other shops. Still, a 6 game difference is notable.
The "Disastros" have set a team goal of 75 this year. It is difficult to believe that they can go from 51 to 75 with just a handful of offseason changes. Feldman, Qualls, Williams and Fowler (bad law firm?) will help but unless they can find a way to drastically cut down on the offensive K's and cut down on walks to the opposition, they could see a rerun of last year's horror film. Plus being in the old AL East, now known as the AL West, isn't helping them one bit. Playing 45% of their games against those boys,... well you know. I have a feeling that the current 63.5 will go down plus added juice on the under will appear. Might want to "belly up" to the counter soon. Of course, when they win their 64th game on September 4th, I hope you will not remind me of this post. Highly unlikely though.One man's thoughts.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.