Let me explain something to all the people who are following your picks.
You claim you are up 60 units, and you are using the lines at Matchbook to calculate this profit.
By using these lines, which give you an extra 10 cents on every win and cost you 10 cents less on every loss, you are able to claim +60 units when those of us betting your games at normal sportsbooks are dead even.
You have posted approximately 600 plays since the season started.
Six hundred plays, earning an extra .10 units on every winner and losing .10 units less on every loser gives you 60 extra units of profit that none of us have earned when betting your games.
Let's be honest here. For most of us betting your picks, you are dead even on the season. NOT +60 UNITS.
Not even close, brother.
why don't you just get an acct at matchbook and call it a day?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sportswatcher:
Let me explain something to all the people who are following your picks.
You claim you are up 60 units, and you are using the lines at Matchbook to calculate this profit.
By using these lines, which give you an extra 10 cents on every win and cost you 10 cents less on every loss, you are able to claim +60 units when those of us betting your games at normal sportsbooks are dead even.
You have posted approximately 600 plays since the season started.
Six hundred plays, earning an extra .10 units on every winner and losing .10 units less on every loser gives you 60 extra units of profit that none of us have earned when betting your games.
Let's be honest here. For most of us betting your picks, you are dead even on the season. NOT +60 UNITS.
Not even close, brother.
why don't you just get an acct at matchbook and call it a day?
Listen you stupid jacka$% How much more are you going to stalk me.
Let start out with point #1. If anyone clicks on your name, it gives a history of every post you've made on Covers. What does it say that in the past 2 1/2 months, the only posts you have made on all of Covers are in my threads and stalking me with nonsense?
Secondly, MB lines are approximately 4-5 cents better than typical 10 cent shops as rather than 10 cent spreads they have 1-2 cent spreads. Therefore, dividing that by both teams means each side gets about a 4-5 cent advantage.
Thirdly, you obviously aren't too bright to say that one would get extra money for every win or loss. I play mostly underdogs you moron. Everytime an underdog loses, it cost even money regardless of the line or 4-5 cent advantage because they are the underdog so there is no savings. However, you are clearly too dumb to understand it. Secondly, everytime I play a favorite that wins or a total laying juice that wins, I get no benefit because once again, your feeble brain doesn't understand the point that it pays even money. Therefore, on about 25% of my plays, you could argue I get about a 4 cent advantage and the rest it has no benefit so therefore one could argue that maybe it is worth 6-10 units.
So I ask you this question you stalking jerkoff. If Chase is offering customers 5% interest on checking accounts and Citibank is offering 1% on checking accounts and you bank at Citibank, who's the moron?
I hope you find yourself in the Penalty Box for stalking because you clearly deserve it.
Classic! Nice job game
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
Listen you stupid jacka$% How much more are you going to stalk me.
Let start out with point #1. If anyone clicks on your name, it gives a history of every post you've made on Covers. What does it say that in the past 2 1/2 months, the only posts you have made on all of Covers are in my threads and stalking me with nonsense?
Secondly, MB lines are approximately 4-5 cents better than typical 10 cent shops as rather than 10 cent spreads they have 1-2 cent spreads. Therefore, dividing that by both teams means each side gets about a 4-5 cent advantage.
Thirdly, you obviously aren't too bright to say that one would get extra money for every win or loss. I play mostly underdogs you moron. Everytime an underdog loses, it cost even money regardless of the line or 4-5 cent advantage because they are the underdog so there is no savings. However, you are clearly too dumb to understand it. Secondly, everytime I play a favorite that wins or a total laying juice that wins, I get no benefit because once again, your feeble brain doesn't understand the point that it pays even money. Therefore, on about 25% of my plays, you could argue I get about a 4 cent advantage and the rest it has no benefit so therefore one could argue that maybe it is worth 6-10 units.
So I ask you this question you stalking jerkoff. If Chase is offering customers 5% interest on checking accounts and Citibank is offering 1% on checking accounts and you bank at Citibank, who's the moron?
I hope you find yourself in the Penalty Box for stalking because you clearly deserve it.
Let me explain something to all the people who are following your picks.
You claim you are up 60 units, and you are using the lines at Matchbook to calculate this profit.
By using these lines, which give you an extra 10 cents on every win and cost you 10 cents less on every loss, you are able to claim +60 units when those of us betting your games at normal sportsbooks are dead even.
You have posted approximately 600 plays since the season started.
Six hundred plays, earning an extra .10 units on every winner and losing .10 units less on every loser gives you 60 extra units of profit that none of us have earned when betting your games.
Let's be honest here. For most of us betting your picks, you are dead even on the season. NOT +60 UNITS.
Not even close, brother.
haha...just saw this...definately a classic verbal raping
0
Quote Originally Posted by sportswatcher:
Let me explain something to all the people who are following your picks.
You claim you are up 60 units, and you are using the lines at Matchbook to calculate this profit.
By using these lines, which give you an extra 10 cents on every win and cost you 10 cents less on every loss, you are able to claim +60 units when those of us betting your games at normal sportsbooks are dead even.
You have posted approximately 600 plays since the season started.
Six hundred plays, earning an extra .10 units on every winner and losing .10 units less on every loser gives you 60 extra units of profit that none of us have earned when betting your games.
Let's be honest here. For most of us betting your picks, you are dead even on the season. NOT +60 UNITS.
Not even close, brother.
haha...just saw this...definately a classic verbal raping
For the love of christ can someone please explain to me why these idiot managers with 7-8-9 run leads leave their piece of shit relievers in the game after they give up the lead. They put guys in with era's near 8.00 & think their gonna get lineups out? Why not use your best guys & slam the door & go for the kill? Ozzie Guillen is doing just this & is gonna loose the game, it happens every nite it seems. Teams with HUGE leads that let slip away cuz they put shitty relievers with high era's in..I don't get it. They then have to put their closers in anyway so why not just do it earlier...
0
For the love of christ can someone please explain to me why these idiot managers with 7-8-9 run leads leave their piece of shit relievers in the game after they give up the lead. They put guys in with era's near 8.00 & think their gonna get lineups out? Why not use your best guys & slam the door & go for the kill? Ozzie Guillen is doing just this & is gonna loose the game, it happens every nite it seems. Teams with HUGE leads that let slip away cuz they put shitty relievers with high era's in..I don't get it. They then have to put their closers in anyway so why not just do it earlier...
I hear ya but its amazing that they work so hard all game to get a big lead then they just let the opposite team get right back in it & it seems like they don't give a f.ck that they do. It seems every nite you see it.
0
I hear ya but its amazing that they work so hard all game to get a big lead then they just let the opposite team get right back in it & it seems like they don't give a f.ck that they do. It seems every nite you see it.
I understand completely and we've all asked ourselves the same question lol.. one reason is they use the big lead situations as "garbage time" to get some work for the trash at the back end of their pens
0
I understand completely and we've all asked ourselves the same question lol.. one reason is they use the big lead situations as "garbage time" to get some work for the trash at the back end of their pens
I agree i just think once they give up 1 or 2 runs they should go then with the good guys not let the garbage guy give up 5 or 6 & then say oh shit we'd better get somebody up in the bullpen we now have a ballgame...
0
I agree i just think once they give up 1 or 2 runs they should go then with the good guys not let the garbage guy give up 5 or 6 & then say oh shit we'd better get somebody up in the bullpen we now have a ballgame...
Yup. It is the leading cause of high blood pressure (little known fact). My personal fave is when the closer loads them up and say blows a 2 run lead.. then they leave HIM in to give up the game winning runs while he's at it
0
Yup. It is the leading cause of high blood pressure (little known fact). My personal fave is when the closer loads them up and say blows a 2 run lead.. then they leave HIM in to give up the game winning runs while he's at it
I think I know who it is. It's my bookie. He says the same thing to me every week has the same arguments....he says, "Game, you play too many games per day and your 51% winning percentage ain't all that:," as he hands me an envelope full of Benjamins each week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
I think I know who it is. It's my bookie. He says the same thing to me every week has the same arguments....he says, "Game, you play too many games per day and your 51% winning percentage ain't all that:," as he hands me an envelope full of Benjamins each week.
Let me explain something to all the people who are following your picks.
You claim you are up 60 units, and you are using the lines at Matchbook to calculate this profit.
By using these lines, which give you an extra 10 cents on every win and cost you 10 cents less on every loss, you are able to claim +60 units when those of us betting your games at normal sportsbooks are dead even.
You have posted approximately 600 plays since the season started.
Six hundred plays, earning an extra .10 units on every winner and losing .10 units less on every loser gives you 60 extra units of profit that none of us have earned when betting your games.
Let's be honest here. For most of us betting your picks, you are dead even on the season. NOT +60 UNITS.
Not even close, brother.
even if that was the case.....you can go fuck yourself.....he just posts what he does....nothing more...nothing less....and your whole 10c either way thing is completely stupid....how can a loss cost you 10 cent less when you bet 75% dogs??....
sometimes i hate covers....
nice work Game
0
Quote Originally Posted by sportswatcher:
Let me explain something to all the people who are following your picks.
You claim you are up 60 units, and you are using the lines at Matchbook to calculate this profit.
By using these lines, which give you an extra 10 cents on every win and cost you 10 cents less on every loss, you are able to claim +60 units when those of us betting your games at normal sportsbooks are dead even.
You have posted approximately 600 plays since the season started.
Six hundred plays, earning an extra .10 units on every winner and losing .10 units less on every loser gives you 60 extra units of profit that none of us have earned when betting your games.
Let's be honest here. For most of us betting your picks, you are dead even on the season. NOT +60 UNITS.
Not even close, brother.
even if that was the case.....you can go fuck yourself.....he just posts what he does....nothing more...nothing less....and your whole 10c either way thing is completely stupid....how can a loss cost you 10 cent less when you bet 75% dogs??....
Didnt see the A's getting throttled tonight against the Giants at home. But the Giants keep on winning with little offense. That pitcher for Oakland sucked his numbers were not worth a play in this tonight. And Randy has pitched well in his career against them. Oakland!
0
Didnt see the A's getting throttled tonight against the Giants at home. But the Giants keep on winning with little offense. That pitcher for Oakland sucked his numbers were not worth a play in this tonight. And Randy has pitched well in his career against them. Oakland!
Did you play it? If not, what do you care about the outcome? If you did play it, what did you like about it?
exactly swoop, give me ANY game on the board and I can give you an angle to bet either side. These guys who tail 11 games and then critique one are getting freaking old.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Swoop:
Did you play it? If not, what do you care about the outcome? If you did play it, what did you like about it?
exactly swoop, give me ANY game on the board and I can give you an angle to bet either side. These guys who tail 11 games and then critique one are getting freaking old.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Classic! Nice job game
but good for you for saving yourself some aggravation! 
Hot Forum Topics
