Best available line on the Astros as I type is -265. That means they
need a 72.6% chance of winning just to be at the break even point over the
course of this matchup being played 1,000 times. 72.6% Really? They are a 47%
team overall and 40% in Keuchel’s starts and 6-13 versus lefty. They have turned in only 4 quality performances
in their last 15 games versus lefty and are producing just 3.5 earned runs per
9 in that category. I guess the 72.6% is based on both the Astros prior season
and Keuchel’s Cy Young, but it does not resemble anything like a reasonable
number.
Rockies +123, Chatwood/Chen
Ace on the hill as a dog. Looks like the public is betting home team and
“the better team”, neither of which may be true on this given day. This one is
much closer to coin flip but the bonus on the dog makes it a play.
Indians -212, Shields/Salazar
Fire the G.M. He should have addressed the Sox real need, a couple guys
that can hit right handed pitching. Even if Shields were in prime form, which
he obviously is not, he in no way addresses that problem. Salazar should kick
butt and take names today. With the Royals and Tigers playing each other the
Tribe know they can gain another game on someone today and they won’t let up. With
an 83.6% win probability I could play the Indians up to -367 and still have a
5% edge versus the quoted number, but it won’t be necessary because at -200 the
public starts to see value in the dog, whether it exists or not.
Cubs -247, Niese/Lester
See above. Miss match. Pirates have neither the pitching or the offense
here. Cubs roll.
Nationals -222, Scherzer/Rea
No, Max will not come completely unglued after his outstanding
performance versus the Cubs. He is a professional and what you see is what you
get, a heck of a lot more pitching and offensive potential than the Padres are
putting on the field today.
I am probably going to have one more if a line moves as I expect it to.
Sorry we (I) missed out on the Rangers at +$ yesterday. I was waiting for that, but
fatigue caught up with me and I crashed like a duck hit with double ought
buckshot. I even slept through all the games last night.
Now I can sit back and await the usual. Too much juice! Too many road
teams! Yer nuts! Yer stupid!
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
MLB – 2016
90-81-1, + $1,983.54, +5.77%
RoR
6/17, 1-3, -366.00
6/18 Flat $200.00
Reds +242, Reed/Keuchel
Best available line on the Astros as I type is -265. That means they
need a 72.6% chance of winning just to be at the break even point over the
course of this matchup being played 1,000 times. 72.6% Really? They are a 47%
team overall and 40% in Keuchel’s starts and 6-13 versus lefty. They have turned in only 4 quality performances
in their last 15 games versus lefty and are producing just 3.5 earned runs per
9 in that category. I guess the 72.6% is based on both the Astros prior season
and Keuchel’s Cy Young, but it does not resemble anything like a reasonable
number.
Rockies +123, Chatwood/Chen
Ace on the hill as a dog. Looks like the public is betting home team and
“the better team”, neither of which may be true on this given day. This one is
much closer to coin flip but the bonus on the dog makes it a play.
Indians -212, Shields/Salazar
Fire the G.M. He should have addressed the Sox real need, a couple guys
that can hit right handed pitching. Even if Shields were in prime form, which
he obviously is not, he in no way addresses that problem. Salazar should kick
butt and take names today. With the Royals and Tigers playing each other the
Tribe know they can gain another game on someone today and they won’t let up. With
an 83.6% win probability I could play the Indians up to -367 and still have a
5% edge versus the quoted number, but it won’t be necessary because at -200 the
public starts to see value in the dog, whether it exists or not.
Cubs -247, Niese/Lester
See above. Miss match. Pirates have neither the pitching or the offense
here. Cubs roll.
Nationals -222, Scherzer/Rea
No, Max will not come completely unglued after his outstanding
performance versus the Cubs. He is a professional and what you see is what you
get, a heck of a lot more pitching and offensive potential than the Padres are
putting on the field today.
I am probably going to have one more if a line moves as I expect it to.
Sorry we (I) missed out on the Rangers at +$ yesterday. I was waiting for that, but
fatigue caught up with me and I crashed like a duck hit with double ought
buckshot. I even slept through all the games last night.
Now I can sit back and await the usual. Too much juice! Too many road
teams! Yer nuts! Yer stupid!
I would not recommend parlaying Bc not all the favorites will win today. But BOL to all.
So you're just generalizing...."not all the favorites will win" on what basis? I won a 6 and 8 teamer this year both had mostly favs involved, but I capped each game "individually"
@Key, they are coming soon sir. They will be here Monday...after the Nba is over. Just be ready for em, you may see the conspiracy theorists pop in on you're threads.
I like the card today, BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by TMTran:
I would not recommend parlaying Bc not all the favorites will win today. But BOL to all.
So you're just generalizing...."not all the favorites will win" on what basis? I won a 6 and 8 teamer this year both had mostly favs involved, but I capped each game "individually"
@Key, they are coming soon sir. They will be here Monday...after the Nba is over. Just be ready for em, you may see the conspiracy theorists pop in on you're threads.
yes, i'm generalizing due to the previous bad experiences and i don't mean just all favorites. what i should of said were all the favorites with -200+. i had to learn from a hard way.
but with that being said, i absolutely love Key's card for today and always respected his calls.
BOL to all.
0
yes, i'm generalizing due to the previous bad experiences and i don't mean just all favorites. what i should of said were all the favorites with -200+. i had to learn from a hard way.
but with that being said, i absolutely love Key's card for today and always respected his calls.
I like the card a lot except I wouldn't bet on the Reds. I like the Astros in this position but they are extremely over priced. After the Astros tied the game at 2-2 they left several men on base in multiple innings after that and should have won. They will definitely be thinking about that. Plus Kuechel has been pitching slightly better lately so they should bounce back. If they were around -160 I would take them.
0
I like the card a lot except I wouldn't bet on the Reds. I like the Astros in this position but they are extremely over priced. After the Astros tied the game at 2-2 they left several men on base in multiple innings after that and should have won. They will definitely be thinking about that. Plus Kuechel has been pitching slightly better lately so they should bounce back. If they were around -160 I would take them.
I like the card a lot except I wouldn't bet on the Reds. I like the Astros in this position but they are extremely over priced. After the Astros tied the game at 2-2 they left several men on base in multiple innings after that and should have won. They will definitely be thinking about that. Plus Kuechel has been pitching slightly better lately so they should bounce back. If they were around -160 I would take them.
Everything you said here says you should place money on the Reds.
You're saying (i) Astros are extremely overpriced and (ii) the line would need to be 10 percentage points lower in terms of win probability (80pts in line value) for you to take them.
If you believe what you posted, then you wouldn't balk one bit at Key's Reds pick.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikeypicks:
I like the card a lot except I wouldn't bet on the Reds. I like the Astros in this position but they are extremely over priced. After the Astros tied the game at 2-2 they left several men on base in multiple innings after that and should have won. They will definitely be thinking about that. Plus Kuechel has been pitching slightly better lately so they should bounce back. If they were around -160 I would take them.
Everything you said here says you should place money on the Reds.
You're saying (i) Astros are extremely overpriced and (ii) the line would need to be 10 percentage points lower in terms of win probability (80pts in line value) for you to take them.
If you believe what you posted, then you wouldn't balk one bit at Key's Reds pick.
Yeah, it's like if you were given 20:1 odds to correctly pick a number from 1-10. Are you going to win? Probably not, but your expected value is very positive and you should take that bet every time.
0
Yeah, it's like if you were given 20:1 odds to correctly pick a number from 1-10. Are you going to win? Probably not, but your expected value is very positive and you should take that bet every time.
like your card but the numbers say houston win tonight.
What numbers are that? What about the one saying they don't play tonight. Next your going to tell me to take the under because the wind is blowing in today in Houston?
0
Quote Originally Posted by d1coach:
like your card but the numbers say houston win tonight.
What numbers are that? What about the one saying they don't play tonight. Next your going to tell me to take the under because the wind is blowing in today in Houston?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.