No contest: Pitching + offense + run production + home field + momentum + Indians blood
available.
Pirates -116, Vogelsong/Garza
You know how Jim
Rome says “don’t look Raider fan in the eye”? Well, I feel the same about Matt
Garza, especially as he declines and Vogelsong continues to impress.
Astros -138, Smyly/Fiers
Little known facts:
Astros are 9-3 for quality performances out of the break versus lefty starters,
with 6 straight qp’s and a 9.76 oera in those games.
Cubs, RL, -1.5, +153,
Montgomery/Norris
Perfect storm:
Montgomery is undervalued. Dodgers just got shut down by another lefty (Moore)
last night. Norris is over the hill. Cubs have 12-3 qp record with a 7.20 oera
over that span and 10.80 the last 5.
BOL
Crashdavis “fade the Braves” is now 22-15, -275 (Diamondbacks closed
-168)
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
MLB – 2016
166-152-3, $ +2,939.74, +4.59%
RoR
8/25, 1-1, +33.60
8/26, Flat $240.00
Tigers -206, Nolasco/Verlander
No contest: Pitching + offense + run production + home field + momentum + Indians blood
available.
Pirates -116, Vogelsong/Garza
You know how Jim
Rome says “don’t look Raider fan in the eye”? Well, I feel the same about Matt
Garza, especially as he declines and Vogelsong continues to impress.
Astros -138, Smyly/Fiers
Little known facts:
Astros are 9-3 for quality performances out of the break versus lefty starters,
with 6 straight qp’s and a 9.76 oera in those games.
Cubs, RL, -1.5, +153,
Montgomery/Norris
Perfect storm:
Montgomery is undervalued. Dodgers just got shut down by another lefty (Moore)
last night. Norris is over the hill. Cubs have 12-3 qp record with a 7.20 oera
over that span and 10.80 the last 5.
BOL
Crashdavis “fade the Braves” is now 22-15, -275 (Diamondbacks closed
-168)
Hey key wanted to get your thoughts on the Royals tonight. Kennedy been throwing very well of late and wright could be rusty. A little concerned about Kennedy pitching at Fenway being a fly ball pitcher but the price is very tempting. Regardless, Bol on your plays sir. If you get the chance would love to get your take. Thank you
Don’t let the last play affect the next play
0
Hey key wanted to get your thoughts on the Royals tonight. Kennedy been throwing very well of late and wright could be rusty. A little concerned about Kennedy pitching at Fenway being a fly ball pitcher but the price is very tempting. Regardless, Bol on your plays sir. If you get the chance would love to get your take. Thank you
You like the RL in the Tigers game or parlay with the Cubs? If the Tigers lose with that much juice or the cubs, you'll lose pretty much the same as if you put less money on a parlay.
Thanks
0
GL Key
You like the RL in the Tigers game or parlay with the Cubs? If the Tigers lose with that much juice or the cubs, you'll lose pretty much the same as if you put less money on a parlay.
Key, is it worth it to lay on the RL for Tigers? That juice is too high
You might consider the 5 inning rrun line, since the Tigers will definitely bat in the bottom of the 5th, but I NEVER, repeat NEVER, lay the 9 inning run line on a home team.
1. Too many folks forget (or try to) that when you use the run line to lower the juice, you also increase the risk, which is why the run line has lower juice.
2. If the Tigers lead by 1 at the end of the 8th, I will be hoping for 3 quick outs, but you will be praying, begging, pleading(take your pick) that the Angels SCORE, to keep the game going.
3. If they do and you consider yourself lucky, you still have to win by 2 and your ONLY hope will be that whatever the Angels scored in the top of the 9th the Tigers can overcome by 2 with a walk off home run, since any method of winning by 1 (which they will play to do) does you no good.
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by themomenyteam:
Key, is it worth it to lay on the RL for Tigers? That juice is too high
You might consider the 5 inning rrun line, since the Tigers will definitely bat in the bottom of the 5th, but I NEVER, repeat NEVER, lay the 9 inning run line on a home team.
1. Too many folks forget (or try to) that when you use the run line to lower the juice, you also increase the risk, which is why the run line has lower juice.
2. If the Tigers lead by 1 at the end of the 8th, I will be hoping for 3 quick outs, but you will be praying, begging, pleading(take your pick) that the Angels SCORE, to keep the game going.
3. If they do and you consider yourself lucky, you still have to win by 2 and your ONLY hope will be that whatever the Angels scored in the top of the 9th the Tigers can overcome by 2 with a walk off home run, since any method of winning by 1 (which they will play to do) does you no good.
Hey key wanted to get your thoughts on the Royals tonight. Kennedy been throwing very well of late and wright could be rusty. A little concerned about Kennedy pitching at Fenway being a fly ball pitcher but the price is very tempting. Regardless, Bol on your plays sir. If you get the chance would love to get your take. Thank you
I have the BoSox as the eventual winner, but if you like K.C, I will grant you the line is too high (I made it -133 max), making the Royals the "value" side of the play. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by KC_4_LIFE:
Hey key wanted to get your thoughts on the Royals tonight. Kennedy been throwing very well of late and wright could be rusty. A little concerned about Kennedy pitching at Fenway being a fly ball pitcher but the price is very tempting. Regardless, Bol on your plays sir. If you get the chance would love to get your take. Thank you
I have the BoSox as the eventual winner, but if you like K.C, I will grant you the line is too high (I made it -133 max), making the Royals the "value" side of the play. BOL
You might consider the 5 inning rrun line, since the Tigers will definitely bat in the bottom of the 5th, but I NEVER, repeat NEVER, lay the 9 inning run line on a home team.
1. Too many folks forget (or try to) that when you use the run line to lower the juice, you also increase the risk, which is why the run line has lower juice.
2. If the Tigers lead by 1 at the end of the 8th, I will be hoping for 3 quick outs, but you will be praying, begging, pleading(take your pick) that the Angels SCORE, to keep the game going.
3. If they do and you consider yourself lucky, you still have to win by 2 and your ONLY hope will be that whatever the Angels scored in the top of the 9th the Tigers can overcome by 2 with a walk off home run, since any method of winning by 1 (which they will play to do) does you no good.
BOL
thanks for the info, it helps a lot
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
You might consider the 5 inning rrun line, since the Tigers will definitely bat in the bottom of the 5th, but I NEVER, repeat NEVER, lay the 9 inning run line on a home team.
1. Too many folks forget (or try to) that when you use the run line to lower the juice, you also increase the risk, which is why the run line has lower juice.
2. If the Tigers lead by 1 at the end of the 8th, I will be hoping for 3 quick outs, but you will be praying, begging, pleading(take your pick) that the Angels SCORE, to keep the game going.
3. If they do and you consider yourself lucky, you still have to win by 2 and your ONLY hope will be that whatever the Angels scored in the top of the 9th the Tigers can overcome by 2 with a walk off home run, since any method of winning by 1 (which they will play to do) does you no good.
Glad you appreciate it. I have posted the same at least a hundred times on Covers but it largely gets ignored, and almost no one comes back to say thanx.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by themomenyteam:
thanks for the info, it helps a lot
Glad you appreciate it. I have posted the same at least a hundred times on Covers but it largely gets ignored, and almost no one comes back to say thanx.
You like the RL in the Tigers game or parlay with the Cubs? If the Tigers lose with that much juice or the cubs, you'll lose pretty much the same as if you put less money on a parlay.
Thanks
A parlay, even a two teamer, is much more difficult than two straight bets. Having to win both is much more difficult than one and/or the other. No thanx.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dubabud:
GL Key
You like the RL in the Tigers game or parlay with the Cubs? If the Tigers lose with that much juice or the cubs, you'll lose pretty much the same as if you put less money on a parlay.
Thanks
A parlay, even a two teamer, is much more difficult than two straight bets. Having to win both is much more difficult than one and/or the other. No thanx.
Like this card alot today, Key. Played the Bucs. Wanted to play the Stros too but didn't have the stones to do it. My local had the line pegged at 145 all along and I was hoping to get them around 15 cents cheaper. I strongly considered the Cubs. I'm not sure how Bud Norris even still pitches in the majors. Ultimately decided to wait till I can get more data on Montgomery as a starter with his new club. Good luck tonight and thanks for what you have done over the years. I've been quietly stacked coins using your opinions on games. Regardless of whether I played, passed, or had the other side, the things you say have merit and I make sure to take them into consideration. So thanks, and may you continue to be successful.
0
Like this card alot today, Key. Played the Bucs. Wanted to play the Stros too but didn't have the stones to do it. My local had the line pegged at 145 all along and I was hoping to get them around 15 cents cheaper. I strongly considered the Cubs. I'm not sure how Bud Norris even still pitches in the majors. Ultimately decided to wait till I can get more data on Montgomery as a starter with his new club. Good luck tonight and thanks for what you have done over the years. I've been quietly stacked coins using your opinions on games. Regardless of whether I played, passed, or had the other side, the things you say have merit and I make sure to take them into consideration. So thanks, and may you continue to be successful.
Like this card alot today, Key. Played the Bucs. Wanted to play the Stros too but didn't have the stones to do it. My local had the line pegged at 145 all along and I was hoping to get them around 15 cents cheaper. I strongly considered the Cubs. I'm not sure how Bud Norris even still pitches in the majors. Ultimately decided to wait till I can get more data on Montgomery as a starter with his new club. Good luck tonight and thanks for what you have done over the years. I've been quietly stacked coins using your opinions on games. Regardless of whether I played, passed, or had the other side, the things you say have merit and I make sure to take them into consideration. So thanks, and may you continue to be successful.
Only 251 posts in 4 years? That is some serious lurking. Thanx
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2fade:
Like this card alot today, Key. Played the Bucs. Wanted to play the Stros too but didn't have the stones to do it. My local had the line pegged at 145 all along and I was hoping to get them around 15 cents cheaper. I strongly considered the Cubs. I'm not sure how Bud Norris even still pitches in the majors. Ultimately decided to wait till I can get more data on Montgomery as a starter with his new club. Good luck tonight and thanks for what you have done over the years. I've been quietly stacked coins using your opinions on games. Regardless of whether I played, passed, or had the other side, the things you say have merit and I make sure to take them into consideration. So thanks, and may you continue to be successful.
Only 251 posts in 4 years? That is some serious lurking. Thanx
Any thoughts on the over between the Cards and the A's?
My concern is that Weaver looked good in AAA but has struggled so far. The Cards should hit Detwiler but not sure if the A's hit Weaver, and he doesn't appear to be worth laying 200 until he's actually had good major league start. Thoughts?
0
Any thoughts on the over between the Cards and the A's?
My concern is that Weaver looked good in AAA but has struggled so far. The Cards should hit Detwiler but not sure if the A's hit Weaver, and he doesn't appear to be worth laying 200 until he's actually had good major league start. Thoughts?
Any thoughts on the over between the Cards and the A's?
My concern is that Weaver looked good in AAA but has struggled so far. The Cards should hit Detwiler but not sure if the A's hit Weaver, and he doesn't appear to be worth laying 200 until he's actually had good major league start. Thoughts?
No way I lay either side in that game, and I am not crazy about the total either, just not enough data for an accurate projection. Gun to my head I guess I would play over, but that is a darn good game to pass on, and I am. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by NaciremaDream:
Any thoughts on the over between the Cards and the A's?
My concern is that Weaver looked good in AAA but has struggled so far. The Cards should hit Detwiler but not sure if the A's hit Weaver, and he doesn't appear to be worth laying 200 until he's actually had good major league start. Thoughts?
No way I lay either side in that game, and I am not crazy about the total either, just not enough data for an accurate projection. Gun to my head I guess I would play over, but that is a darn good game to pass on, and I am. BOL
Been following for a long time key. I was watching Seattle game the other night, and the commentator mentioned how Seattle struggled badly at cellular field, and also struggled badly against left handed pitching. They are facing one of the best lefty's tonight. Do you like either side?
Thanks for the write ups and good luck
0
Been following for a long time key. I was watching Seattle game the other night, and the commentator mentioned how Seattle struggled badly at cellular field, and also struggled badly against left handed pitching. They are facing one of the best lefty's tonight. Do you like either side?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.