Kansas City Royals D Gee must start |
|||||||
924
Minnesota Twins E Santana must start |
YOU HAVE THE SUCKERS LINE (20 C) AND HE HAS THE DIME LINE (10C),THATS WHY THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.
Kansas City Royals D Gee must start |
|||||||
924
Minnesota Twins E Santana must start |
YOU HAVE THE SUCKERS LINE (20 C) AND HE HAS THE DIME LINE (10C),THATS WHY THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.
Eh... Didn't mean to cause a scene on your forum thread. My apologies, Key.
I feel better about going Twins O 4 because I don't trust their BP.
BOL
Eh... Didn't mean to cause a scene on your forum thread. My apologies, Key.
I feel better about going Twins O 4 because I don't trust their BP.
BOL
MLB – 2016
185-164-4, $ +3,799.49, +5.36% RoR
9/05, 1-5, - 1,076.92
9/06, Flat $240.00
Twins -110, Gee/Santana
I have said before
and stand behind it; Santana is one of this year’s most undervalued players and
Gee is #5 in the Royals rotation. There is simply no comparison. The real
kicker though is that the Twins currently have a better and more productive
offense than the Royals. Gee has had a couple of nice outings lately but if the
Twins can get to #2 Kennedy, why not #5 Gee. I make the true line on this game
Santana -234, and that is why I warned you early it was going up.
Marlins -147, Morgan/Urena
Nothing but failure
lately from the Marlins and now they come out as a 59.5% probability favorite?
Yes, there is that much difference (and more) between Urena and Morgan, who
will be back at AAA next year for more seasoning. There is also an offensive advantage for the
Marlins in facing a lefty (a very weak one, 52.7 vs MLB avg 62.5).
Rockies -127, Samardzija/Anderson
If the Giants are
capable of giving Chad Bettis a complete game, 2 hit shutout they are capable
of losing to anyone, and Anderson is not just anyone. Here we go again, Rockies
have fun at home versus the very, very average Samardzija, who will be replaced
in the playoff rotation by Moore.
BOL
Crashdavis "fade the Braves" is now 25-22, -764 (Nationals closed -2 something, doesn't matter)
MLB – 2016
185-164-4, $ +3,799.49, +5.36% RoR
9/05, 1-5, - 1,076.92
9/06, Flat $240.00
Twins -110, Gee/Santana
I have said before
and stand behind it; Santana is one of this year’s most undervalued players and
Gee is #5 in the Royals rotation. There is simply no comparison. The real
kicker though is that the Twins currently have a better and more productive
offense than the Royals. Gee has had a couple of nice outings lately but if the
Twins can get to #2 Kennedy, why not #5 Gee. I make the true line on this game
Santana -234, and that is why I warned you early it was going up.
Marlins -147, Morgan/Urena
Nothing but failure
lately from the Marlins and now they come out as a 59.5% probability favorite?
Yes, there is that much difference (and more) between Urena and Morgan, who
will be back at AAA next year for more seasoning. There is also an offensive advantage for the
Marlins in facing a lefty (a very weak one, 52.7 vs MLB avg 62.5).
Rockies -127, Samardzija/Anderson
If the Giants are
capable of giving Chad Bettis a complete game, 2 hit shutout they are capable
of losing to anyone, and Anderson is not just anyone. Here we go again, Rockies
have fun at home versus the very, very average Samardzija, who will be replaced
in the playoff rotation by Moore.
BOL
Crashdavis "fade the Braves" is now 25-22, -764 (Nationals closed -2 something, doesn't matter)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.