All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

MLB season long-bet against teams.

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 1309
Posts: 34
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #1
With about 1/3 of the Season gone, I've found Five teams that will merit my fading them the rest of the way.   Other teams might be added to this list, in the near future if they start exhibiting the same crappy characteristics as the one's listed.

  Here's my  Fade List for the rest of the season:


Baltimore  15-33   "Orals"
Cleveland  17-28   "Stink-dians"
Seattle       18-28   "Maroned"
Houston     16-31   "We have a problem"
Brewskis    19-28   "Baseball in Wisconsin?"

Now, you play against them if the opposing team ML  is  -150 or lower.  so todays plays are
Angels +103,  Mets +104, and Cinn -120.   I think you'll make money the rest of the way with this
"System"  I don't see any of these teams improving, except maybe Seattle.   

Betting $200 on all 3 teams. 









 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 7910
Posted: #2
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 16599
Posted: #3

i would agree on cle, bal and hou

but expect to turn things around in mil and sea

GL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #4
Dith, I'm keeping a close eye on all the teams on this list.  All are big time at least on the Covers Baseball standings.   I might add teams as time goes by.   In the past I've done various "Bet Against" systems,  and made small profits.   I don't expect to get more than 2 plays a day out of this system,  considering that I need a sub 150 ML on the opposing team -especially when all the teams are on the road.   Thanks for your response.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #5
Dith, I'm keeping a close eye on all the teams on this list.  All are big time at least on the Covers Baseball standings.   I might add teams as time goes by.   In the past I've done various "Bet Against" systems,  and made small profits.   I don't expect to get more than 2 plays a day out of this system,  considering that I need a sub 150 ML on the opposing team -especially when all the teams are on the road.   Thanks for your response.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #6
Sat 5-29 NY Mets +113  Betting $200.  Probably only play, all others Fade Opponents  are way over -150.

Here's my  Fade List for the rest of the season:

Baltimore  15-33   "Orals"                              
Cleveland  17-28   "Stink-dians"
Seattle       18-28   "Maroned"
Houston     16-31   "We have a problem"
Brewskis    19-28   "Baseball in Wisconsin?"

Possible Addition: CWS    20-28.  4.45 ERA X .235 BA = FADE


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2002
Posts: 4896
Posted: #7

systems are the best...just gotta pick the right 1 and your in the $$$ good luck and we will see how you do

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 24519
Posted: #8
Put PIT on that list.
There is no 100% cappers in the world
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 22992
Posted: #9
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #10
Fri 1-2 -240 

(-200) Angels +103,    (-200) Mets +104,   and (+360)Cinn -120.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:

Put PIT on that list.


Yes, I might swap Pittsburgh for the Mariners, but they're on the list.
As they've only been favored twice in 49 games, it will likely be hard to get an opponent under the -150 cut-off, though.

Baltimore  15-34   "Orals"                              
Cleveland  17-29   "Stink-dians"
Seattle       19-28   "Maroned"
Houston     16-32   "We have a problem"
Brewskis    20-28   "Baseball in Wisconsin?
Pittsburgh  20-29   " Steelers Summer Camp starts in a few weeks"

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 58493
Posted: #12
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 34
Posted: #13
just take pitt under team total every day and u will be sucessful. lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 34
Posted: #14
trust it, take Pitt U TT every day and you will profit. Its hitting at a 65% success rate on the season
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1752
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:

Put PIT on that list.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #16
Sat 5-29 Betting $200 on NY Mets +119 vs Brewskis    20-28   "Baseball in Wisconsin? 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by sublime:

trust it, take Pitt U TT every day and you will profit. Its hitting at a 65% success rate on the season



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Iw1nBets:




 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #19
LAA -200 to -133 
Didn't see the line drop below -150 so I did not play.

NYM +113 Bet $200.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #20
Sat:  NYM +113 Bet $200.


Sun 5-30  NYM  +130  Bet $200
                LAA   -140    "      "

YTD 1-3    -440
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2002
Posts: 4896
Posted: #21

man u hit the books hard today with the Mets and the Angels walk off non injury day

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 89
Posted: #22
i like the sound of this system.might use it in the next couple weeks to see how she goes. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1878
Posted: #23
Gave this a try today.  3 - 1 so far, but I played the Yankees RL because of the high ML.

Nice, easy wins too! 

New York -1.5 (-140) wins 11 - 2 vs. Cleveland

Washington (+172) wins 14 - 3 vs. Houston

Florida (-125) wins 13 - 5 vs. Milwaukee

The one loss being the Cubs vs. Pittsburgh.  Which I wasn't too surprised at, Pittsburgh has pulled it off every time I've faded them so far this season.  I hate them.

Still have Minnesota pending vs. Seattle tonight


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by ctm1985:

Gave this a try today.  3 - 1 so far, but I played the Yankees RL because of the high ML.

Nice, easy wins too! 

New York -1.5 (-140) wins 11 - 2 vs. Cleveland

Washington (+172) wins 14 - 3 vs. Houston

Florida (-125) wins 13 - 5 vs. Milwaukee

The one loss being the Cubs vs. Pittsburgh.  Which I wasn't too surprised at, Pittsburgh has pulled it off every time I've faded them so far this season.  I hate them.

Still have Minnesota pending vs. Seattle tonight




CTM     I'm only doing ML's under -150, but if you want to  Run Line the plays, fire away.  (I might start doing that in June.)

YTD System is 5-4 +160  with Minny -117 (Betting $200) Pending.
Current Fade List
Baltimore   15-36   "Orals"                              
Cleveland   18-31   "Stink-dians"
Seattle        19-30   "Maroned"
Kansas City  21-31   "1980 World Series?"

Houston      17-34   "We have a problem"
Brewskis     21-30   "Baseball in Wisconsin?
Pittsburgh   21-31   " How much longer till Steelers FB??!!"
I've added the Royals to the "shit" list. 
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 16954
Posted: #25
I guarantee you will lose money doing this.
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.