W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
Good luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:
fade system
8-4 sides 140s system 4-3
W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
Good luck
I guess it is profitable with a chasing system as we add a unit for every lost on the next game.
ah, too complicated. This is a simple mickey mouse system that is not proven by any means because it is fruity looking.
Everything you say is true. W-L means nothing. To be profitable, one must not straight bet due to odds of such games being different. Goal is to lose small but when win, win the big money ball.
What has been happening is that these teams with the worst records in the league are pulling an upset. Bad luck for square betters who loves to chalk it up. That's me. ha
X_____________________________
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:
W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
Good luck
I guess it is profitable with a chasing system as we add a unit for every lost on the next game.
ah, too complicated. This is a simple mickey mouse system that is not proven by any means because it is fruity looking.
Everything you say is true. W-L means nothing. To be profitable, one must not straight bet due to odds of such games being different. Goal is to lose small but when win, win the big money ball.
What has been happening is that these teams with the worst records in the league are pulling an upset. Bad luck for square betters who loves to chalk it up. That's me. ha
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.