If you have never read my wagering strategy I encourage you to do so. Whether or not you adopt is it your choice.
MLB 2012 Regular Season: 363-369 +245.87 Units 6.72% ROI
MLB 2012 Playoffs: 12-9-3 +10.29 Units 14.6% ROI
MLB 2012 @ 1 unit per play = +51.23 Net Units
5.25.2013, 3-1, +16.55 Units, +82.8% ROI
YTD – 110-112-19, +46.38 Units, +4.22% ROI
5 & 9 Innings – ALWAYS Specify Pitchers – NO action plays
All plays are 5 Units Flat, unless otherwise noted
Indians F5 (+115) FG (+125) (Kluber / Doubront)
I guess this could be called an anti-Doubront or anti-home field advantage or anti-public play. I don’t really see any reason the BoSox would have a significant advantage over Kluber backed by the Indians offense.
Angels F5 (-125) FG (-112) (Williams / Davis)
We have had more than a little fun picking on Joe Blanton and against the Angels in his starts this year but the Royals counter with Wade Davis, another disaster on the hill and I would expect Ned Yost’s pulse to rise and heart to flutter when he has to hand him the ball. Jerome Williams has looked pretty good lately and the Angels have finally started to hit as they were projected to. This is an ectremely uneven matchup and Wade Davis, the Royals offense, home field advantage, and “won’t get swept at home” theory are not enough to justify the very cheap line.
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
If you have never read my wagering strategy I encourage you to do so. Whether or not you adopt is it your choice.
MLB 2012 Regular Season: 363-369 +245.87 Units 6.72% ROI
MLB 2012 Playoffs: 12-9-3 +10.29 Units 14.6% ROI
MLB 2012 @ 1 unit per play = +51.23 Net Units
5.25.2013, 3-1, +16.55 Units, +82.8% ROI
YTD – 110-112-19, +46.38 Units, +4.22% ROI
5 & 9 Innings – ALWAYS Specify Pitchers – NO action plays
All plays are 5 Units Flat, unless otherwise noted
Indians F5 (+115) FG (+125) (Kluber / Doubront)
I guess this could be called an anti-Doubront or anti-home field advantage or anti-public play. I don’t really see any reason the BoSox would have a significant advantage over Kluber backed by the Indians offense.
Angels F5 (-125) FG (-112) (Williams / Davis)
We have had more than a little fun picking on Joe Blanton and against the Angels in his starts this year but the Royals counter with Wade Davis, another disaster on the hill and I would expect Ned Yost’s pulse to rise and heart to flutter when he has to hand him the ball. Jerome Williams has looked pretty good lately and the Angels have finally started to hit as they were projected to. This is an ectremely uneven matchup and Wade Davis, the Royals offense, home field advantage, and “won’t get swept at home” theory are not enough to justify the very cheap line.
Heck man, I LOVE the Angels line drop. It represents better value for me. Two things my picks are never subject to are public opinion or line movement. I have just as good reasons for the way I assess a game as do the supposed "smart money" line movers. Maybe I am the "smart money"?
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by JBrilman:
Not concerned about the angles line drop?
Heck man, I LOVE the Angels line drop. It represents better value for me. Two things my picks are never subject to are public opinion or line movement. I have just as good reasons for the way I assess a game as do the supposed "smart money" line movers. Maybe I am the "smart money"?
Heck man, I LOVE the Angels line drop. It represents better value for me. Two things my picks are never subject to are public opinion or line movement. I have just as good reasons for the way I assess a game as do the supposed "smart money" line movers. Maybe I am the "smart money"?
Is that you Billy?
GL bud and enjoy your Sunday with the fam.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Heck man, I LOVE the Angels line drop. It represents better value for me. Two things my picks are never subject to are public opinion or line movement. I have just as good reasons for the way I assess a game as do the supposed "smart money" line movers. Maybe I am the "smart money"?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.