Yankees-Blue
Jays, Under 5, F5, -115(Whitley / Stroman)
BOL
Yankees: Both of the young
starters are under valued in this spot. The love of the public for both
offenses has created a very high number Last 15 versus righty the Yankees are
producing only 3.2 earned runs per 9 and the BJ’s just 2.3.
Might have one more later, not sure yet.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
Yankees-Blue
Jays, Under 5, F5, -115(Whitley / Stroman)
BOL
Yankees: Both of the young
starters are under valued in this spot. The love of the public for both
offenses has created a very high number Last 15 versus righty the Yankees are
producing only 3.2 earned runs per 9 and the BJ’s just 2.3.
Key, Does it make you nervous that both pitchers just faced each other last week? I totally agree with your logic but I think pitchers have a big advantage first time through the league but I'm afraid that won't be the case
0
Good Job Yesterday!
Key, Does it make you nervous that both pitchers just faced each other last week? I totally agree with your logic but I think pitchers have a big advantage first time through the league but I'm afraid that won't be the case
Key, Does it make you nervous that both pitchers just faced each other last week? I totally agree with your logic but I think pitchers have a big advantage first time through the league but I'm afraid that won't be the case.
Your money, your choice. Do what you want to do. Follow your gut or your heart.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chambers:
Good Job Yesterday!
Key, Does it make you nervous that both pitchers just faced each other last week? I totally agree with your logic but I think pitchers have a big advantage first time through the league but I'm afraid that won't be the case.
Your money, your choice. Do what you want to do. Follow your gut or your heart.
Your money, your choice. Do what you want to do. Follow your gut or your heart.
Always! I respect your opinion so I was just curious if that was an angle you subscribed to generally and if it factored in to your play. I can't say I have watched either pitcher close enough to see if they have legit stuff or if hitters just haven't caught on yet. The # seems high it's an under play or no play, I will probably tail like I usually do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Your money, your choice. Do what you want to do. Follow your gut or your heart.
Always! I respect your opinion so I was just curious if that was an angle you subscribed to generally and if it factored in to your play. I can't say I have watched either pitcher close enough to see if they have legit stuff or if hitters just haven't caught on yet. The # seems high it's an under play or no play, I will probably tail like I usually do.
Always! I respect your opinion so I was just curious if that was an angle you subscribed to generally and if it factored in to your play. I can't say I have watched either pitcher close enough to see if they have legit stuff or if hitters just haven't caught on yet. The # seems high it's an under play or no play, I will probably tail like I usually do.
That being said, I will expound a little further for you. The total of 5 is set by public perception. The perception is rookie starter + rookie starter + Yankees offense + BJ's offense + the park. To the public that just screams OVER, and they will bet that way. But what is the reality. The park won't change so I will have to concede that, but isn't the park factor established by the performances of the BJ's and their opponents offenses? Of course it is, the park itself does not score runs, that is up to the pitchers and hitters. Now, versus an MLB benchmark of 66.7, Whitley and Stroman check in at 73.8, 70.6, indicating both are doing very well in their limited number of starts, 7 and 4. So, as noted above, they are probably under valued. There is one perception exploded. As for the offenses, the Yankees have turned in only 5 quality performances versus the last 15 right handed starters they have faced and are scoring only 3.2 earned runs per game. The BJ's look a little better at 8 of 15, but somehow are scoring only 2.3 earned runs per 9. With an MLB benchmark of 4 per 9, you are left with your team (Whitley-Stroman) having a large advantage over the other team (Yanks-BJ's offenses). Advantages of the pitching team over the offensive team should neutralize the park factor. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chambers:
Always! I respect your opinion so I was just curious if that was an angle you subscribed to generally and if it factored in to your play. I can't say I have watched either pitcher close enough to see if they have legit stuff or if hitters just haven't caught on yet. The # seems high it's an under play or no play, I will probably tail like I usually do.
That being said, I will expound a little further for you. The total of 5 is set by public perception. The perception is rookie starter + rookie starter + Yankees offense + BJ's offense + the park. To the public that just screams OVER, and they will bet that way. But what is the reality. The park won't change so I will have to concede that, but isn't the park factor established by the performances of the BJ's and their opponents offenses? Of course it is, the park itself does not score runs, that is up to the pitchers and hitters. Now, versus an MLB benchmark of 66.7, Whitley and Stroman check in at 73.8, 70.6, indicating both are doing very well in their limited number of starts, 7 and 4. So, as noted above, they are probably under valued. There is one perception exploded. As for the offenses, the Yankees have turned in only 5 quality performances versus the last 15 right handed starters they have faced and are scoring only 3.2 earned runs per game. The BJ's look a little better at 8 of 15, but somehow are scoring only 2.3 earned runs per 9. With an MLB benchmark of 4 per 9, you are left with your team (Whitley-Stroman) having a large advantage over the other team (Yanks-BJ's offenses). Advantages of the pitching team over the offensive team should neutralize the park factor. BOL
What did I say? It is down to 4.5 and the juice has now flipped to tge over, so now you can watch people pick the over. Nearer game time, working boys get home, amateur money balances the books.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
What did I say? It is down to 4.5 and the juice has now flipped to tge over, so now you can watch people pick the over. Nearer game time, working boys get home, amateur money balances the books.
So let me get this right. After half a season or more, you are 2.6% up after all of your extended previews and that's great stuff. Yet Kaka is at least 20% up without previews and I nearly 30% up this season. But because you write stuff the gang luv you. Got it now.
0
So let me get this right. After half a season or more, you are 2.6% up after all of your extended previews and that's great stuff. Yet Kaka is at least 20% up without previews and I nearly 30% up this season. But because you write stuff the gang luv you. Got it now.
So let me get this right. After half a season or more, you are 2.6% up after all of your extended previews and that's great stuff. Yet Kaka is at least 20% up without previews and I nearly 30% up this season. But because you write stuff the gang luv you. Got it now.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Learnersrealm:
So let me get this right. After half a season or more, you are 2.6% up after all of your extended previews and that's great stuff. Yet Kaka is at least 20% up without previews and I nearly 30% up this season. But because you write stuff the gang luv you. Got it now.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.