I like Lincecum as the better side today, but remember this is the Cardinals offense, not the worst in MLB, the Padres. His own offense has been struggling and won't necessarily give him enough support to win, even if he does pitch another gem. jmho
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by pacdaddy69:
You like lincecum at home? No hitter last game
I like Lincecum as the better side today, but remember this is the Cardinals offense, not the worst in MLB, the Padres. His own offense has been struggling and won't necessarily give him enough support to win, even if he does pitch another gem. jmho
I really have no choice. Some fool has dumped a ton of money on Masterson, probably from reading 2 or 3 year old stats, but the Indians best bet in this series passed last night with Kluber versus Haren, and even that backfired. Josh Beckett is at 12-3 in quality starts and 6 of his last 7 have been exceptional. Maybe the fellow betting Masterson does not realize Beckett is back, and is bidding to be the #3 starter when the playoffs get here and the Dodgers go a 3 man rotation. Masterson at 7-10 in quality starts is one of the Tribe's problems, not it's savior. I made the line -200 and was not going to play since I have so much already going, but this is irresistible. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Add:Dodgers, F5, -145 (Masterson / Beckett)
I really have no choice. Some fool has dumped a ton of money on Masterson, probably from reading 2 or 3 year old stats, but the Indians best bet in this series passed last night with Kluber versus Haren, and even that backfired. Josh Beckett is at 12-3 in quality starts and 6 of his last 7 have been exceptional. Maybe the fellow betting Masterson does not realize Beckett is back, and is bidding to be the #3 starter when the playoffs get here and the Dodgers go a 3 man rotation. Masterson at 7-10 in quality starts is one of the Tribe's problems, not it's savior. I made the line -200 and was not going to play since I have so much already going, but this is irresistible. BOL
*Price (-170) @ 4/17/2014 vs. Yankees: 5 IP, 10 H, 6 earned runs...My favorite pick on the board today was Yankees TT over 3.5 runs. Interested in write-up, still might have to skip this game, GL.
0
*Price (-170) @ 4/17/2014 vs. Yankees: 5 IP, 10 H, 6 earned runs...My favorite pick on the board today was Yankees TT over 3.5 runs. Interested in write-up, still might have to skip this game, GL.
I really have no choice. Some fool has dumped a ton of money on Masterson, probably from reading 2 or 3 year old stats, but the Indians best bet in this series passed last night with Kluber versus Haren, and even that backfired. Josh Beckett is at 12-3 in quality starts and 6 of his last 7 have been exceptional. Maybe the fellow betting Masterson does not realize Beckett is back, and is bidding to be the #3 starter when the playoffs get here and the Dodgers go a 3 man rotation. Masterson at 7-10 in quality starts is one of the Tribe's problems, not it's savior. I made the line -200 and was not going to play since I have so much already going, but this is irresistible. BOL
Bettors are taking CLV because the Dodgers are 7-8 in Beckett starts this year.The Indians have a winning record with Masterson starting this year 9-8.Beckett has no upside now,while Masterson has only room to improve.The other favs with losing records with their starters today are CIN and ATL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Add:Dodgers, F5, -145 (Masterson / Beckett)
I really have no choice. Some fool has dumped a ton of money on Masterson, probably from reading 2 or 3 year old stats, but the Indians best bet in this series passed last night with Kluber versus Haren, and even that backfired. Josh Beckett is at 12-3 in quality starts and 6 of his last 7 have been exceptional. Maybe the fellow betting Masterson does not realize Beckett is back, and is bidding to be the #3 starter when the playoffs get here and the Dodgers go a 3 man rotation. Masterson at 7-10 in quality starts is one of the Tribe's problems, not it's savior. I made the line -200 and was not going to play since I have so much already going, but this is irresistible. BOL
Bettors are taking CLV because the Dodgers are 7-8 in Beckett starts this year.The Indians have a winning record with Masterson starting this year 9-8.Beckett has no upside now,while Masterson has only room to improve.The other favs with losing records with their starters today are CIN and ATL.
I like that Cubs play at that #. Bucholz is bad. Like really really bad. That guy gets blown up every single game. Jackson has showed signs of descency when he's not walking batters. Thats a coinflip to me but I would say Jackson is the better pitcher. I may hop on that f5 with you. GL
0
I like that Cubs play at that #. Bucholz is bad. Like really really bad. That guy gets blown up every single game. Jackson has showed signs of descency when he's not walking batters. Thats a coinflip to me but I would say Jackson is the better pitcher. I may hop on that f5 with you. GL
Scorpio - When we look at team results for various pitchers it is not necessarily reflective of how the pitcher himself did. Masterson has received good run support in his games - Beckett has not, but that does not mean the support will continue. The quality start indicator of Masterson 7-10 vs. Beckett 12-3 is what indicates how the pitcher himself has done, regardless of run support. Rating differential is 64.5 (far below average) to 76 (far above average) and that tells me what the pitcher is doing with various important skills. No contest, the Dodgers are far more likely to score against Masterson than the Indians are to score against Beckett. Now, I have to get those write ups I promised even if it is late. Cya soon.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Scorpio - When we look at team results for various pitchers it is not necessarily reflective of how the pitcher himself did. Masterson has received good run support in his games - Beckett has not, but that does not mean the support will continue. The quality start indicator of Masterson 7-10 vs. Beckett 12-3 is what indicates how the pitcher himself has done, regardless of run support. Rating differential is 64.5 (far below average) to 76 (far above average) and that tells me what the pitcher is doing with various important skills. No contest, the Dodgers are far more likely to score against Masterson than the Indians are to score against Beckett. Now, I have to get those write ups I promised even if it is late. Cya soon.
Rays: On any given day any given thing
can happen, that is why they call it gambling, but; at this time Price is his
usual dominant self with a 15-2 quality start record and 7 straight that
average 77.6, far above the Mendoza
line of 66.7. Kuroda at 8-8 and 66.0 is a little below the line and his offense
comes up a bit light itself with only 6 quality performances in their last 15
versus lefty and a 3.00 oera. The Rays look a little better at 9-6 and 3.6
versus righty.
Mets: The one offensive strong suit the
Mets carry is an ability to hit and score on lefties. They beat Wood in 5
innings last night and I should have had that game. I will not pass this one as
Minor is not as good as Wood and the Mets are now averaging 5.3 earned runs per
9 versus lefty.
Cubs: Two teams headed in opposite
directions. Jackson is a guy bettors love to hate and they will back Bucholz
(who stinks) and an offense (that stinks) versus anyone with the mighty Red Sox
“at home” which we all know is the safest and surest betting angle of all,
right?
Royals: Nolasco was wasted money by the
Twins and I said so right here last winter while some of you guys were busy
with foots and buckets. He was signed for only one reason, he was affordable
and the Twins have no intention of parting with any serious money for pitchers
as they wait for their own to develop. They may have caught lightening in a
bottle with Hughes but Nolasco was of no more interest to the Dodgers and they
have a pitchers park in the national League. This may be the end of the road
for Ricky, whom I admired in years past, but who today is no match for Shields
and the Royals offense, currently the most productive in MLB versus right handed
starters.
Mariners: Cosart is coming along very nicely
and will be a solid part of the Astros future, but Iwakuma has arrived and has
a far better offense behind him in a righty-righty match up. Remember that
because the Astros versus lefty is where you can currently make some money with
the long dog.
Dodgers: The Indians best bet in this series
was Kluber versus Haren but they blew the opportunity by making the struggling
Dan Haren look like a right handed Clayton Kershaw. Masterson-Beckett is no
contest in their current form and the Dodgers are even hitting a little better
than the Tribe at this time. I do not know where the money came from to drive
the line down but I thank whoever did it. I had Beckett -200 this morning and felt
that was a fair line.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Rays: On any given day any given thing
can happen, that is why they call it gambling, but; at this time Price is his
usual dominant self with a 15-2 quality start record and 7 straight that
average 77.6, far above the Mendoza
line of 66.7. Kuroda at 8-8 and 66.0 is a little below the line and his offense
comes up a bit light itself with only 6 quality performances in their last 15
versus lefty and a 3.00 oera. The Rays look a little better at 9-6 and 3.6
versus righty.
Mets: The one offensive strong suit the
Mets carry is an ability to hit and score on lefties. They beat Wood in 5
innings last night and I should have had that game. I will not pass this one as
Minor is not as good as Wood and the Mets are now averaging 5.3 earned runs per
9 versus lefty.
Cubs: Two teams headed in opposite
directions. Jackson is a guy bettors love to hate and they will back Bucholz
(who stinks) and an offense (that stinks) versus anyone with the mighty Red Sox
“at home” which we all know is the safest and surest betting angle of all,
right?
Royals: Nolasco was wasted money by the
Twins and I said so right here last winter while some of you guys were busy
with foots and buckets. He was signed for only one reason, he was affordable
and the Twins have no intention of parting with any serious money for pitchers
as they wait for their own to develop. They may have caught lightening in a
bottle with Hughes but Nolasco was of no more interest to the Dodgers and they
have a pitchers park in the national League. This may be the end of the road
for Ricky, whom I admired in years past, but who today is no match for Shields
and the Royals offense, currently the most productive in MLB versus right handed
starters.
Mariners: Cosart is coming along very nicely
and will be a solid part of the Astros future, but Iwakuma has arrived and has
a far better offense behind him in a righty-righty match up. Remember that
because the Astros versus lefty is where you can currently make some money with
the long dog.
Dodgers: The Indians best bet in this series
was Kluber versus Haren but they blew the opportunity by making the struggling
Dan Haren look like a right handed Clayton Kershaw. Masterson-Beckett is no
contest in their current form and the Dodgers are even hitting a little better
than the Tribe at this time. I do not know where the money came from to drive
the line down but I thank whoever did it. I had Beckett -200 this morning and felt
that was a fair line.
I really have no choice. Some fool has dumped a ton of money on Masterson, probably from reading 2 or 3 year old stats, but the Indians best bet in this series passed last night with Kluber versus Haren, and even that backfired. Josh Beckett is at 12-3 in quality starts and 6 of his last 7 have been exceptional. Maybe the fellow betting Masterson does not realize Beckett is back, and is bidding to be the #3 starter when the playoffs get here and the Dodgers go a 3 man rotation. Masterson at 7-10 in quality starts is one of the Tribe's problems, not it's savior. I made the line -200 and was not going to play since I have so much already going, but this is irresistible. BOL
Saw that Cle drop. goin against a contending team playin well at home? (s - - t that makes ya go, hmmmm)
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Add:Dodgers, F5, -145 (Masterson / Beckett)
I really have no choice. Some fool has dumped a ton of money on Masterson, probably from reading 2 or 3 year old stats, but the Indians best bet in this series passed last night with Kluber versus Haren, and even that backfired. Josh Beckett is at 12-3 in quality starts and 6 of his last 7 have been exceptional. Maybe the fellow betting Masterson does not realize Beckett is back, and is bidding to be the #3 starter when the playoffs get here and the Dodgers go a 3 man rotation. Masterson at 7-10 in quality starts is one of the Tribe's problems, not it's savior. I made the line -200 and was not going to play since I have so much already going, but this is irresistible. BOL
Saw that Cle drop. goin against a contending team playin well at home? (s - - t that makes ya go, hmmmm)
Cincy/SD? I just cant see betting on SD with that terrible offense.
STL/SF? Timmy fresh off the no-no and STL looked like crap the entire LA series....smells of a redbird victory
Angels/Sox? I dont think anyone really wants to back the WS, which is why they probably win both games today
Like your card today.
Well, the Richards-Noesi match up I liked yesterday is gone and I guess I should have stuck with it because LAA won the first 5, but I didn't like the overnite inflation in the line. Weaver is the obvious choice in the second game but I don't like that line either. St. Louis looks like a break out candidate tonight but the stats are really too close to call. Cincy is the better side of that game but since nobody hits in that tomb of a park the dog becomes dangerous. If either team scores 3 it might be enough. I am not making a call on it but consider the under in every San Diego home game. BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
If ya got time, what do your stats say about:
Cincy/SD? I just cant see betting on SD with that terrible offense.
STL/SF? Timmy fresh off the no-no and STL looked like crap the entire LA series....smells of a redbird victory
Angels/Sox? I dont think anyone really wants to back the WS, which is why they probably win both games today
Like your card today.
Well, the Richards-Noesi match up I liked yesterday is gone and I guess I should have stuck with it because LAA won the first 5, but I didn't like the overnite inflation in the line. Weaver is the obvious choice in the second game but I don't like that line either. St. Louis looks like a break out candidate tonight but the stats are really too close to call. Cincy is the better side of that game but since nobody hits in that tomb of a park the dog becomes dangerous. If either team scores 3 it might be enough. I am not making a call on it but consider the under in every San Diego home game. BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.