Rockies: Play to +124. A lot of theories come into play with the betting public believing in things like “the better team, at home” and “road team got a win, now they lose” BUT; those things are theories or truisms, not facts. The fact is Bettis is flying under the radar. The fact is the Rockies concede nothing here except home field and I have said enough times that is a consistently overvalued aspect of the game. Now I will concede that this qualifies as a value play, since I do not compute the Rockies witn a winning probability, only 47.1%, but that would justify a line of +112, not +168. Even at +124 there would exist a respectable edge to play for, but 168 is enormous.
Phillies: Play to -134. Kyle Lohse as a road favorite? One of the worst pitchers of the season on one of the worst teams of the season? Harang has slipped a little lately, but only to the point where his line value exceeds Lohse by 56 cents and his offense has shown some life lately. The Brewers are just 2-5 when Lohse takes the ball on the road and he personally, overall, is 6-10 h2h, and 4-12 in quality starts. That does not look like a road favorite to me.
White Sox: Play to even money. Yes, the Cardinals struggles with lefties could easily continue tonight versus Quintana, who is no Sales, but neither is anyone else this year. By the same token, Jon Lackey is no Lance Lynn either, so we move on to the offenses. We know the ChiSox are pathetic so nothing to really discuss there, but the overvalued Cardinals are no great shakes either. The Cardinals oera last 6 versus lefty starters is now just 1.49 and last night they didn’t get to any one of 4 relievers either, 3 of them right handed.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
6-30
$433 Pirates -111, (Cole/Verlander) W
$433 White Sox +105, (Sale/Lynn) W
YTD 93-61, +$10,574.97 (+25.43% RoR)
7-01
$469 Rockies +174, (Bettis/Hahn)
$469 Phillies +107, (Lohse/Harang)
$469 White Sox +136, (Quintana/Lackey)
BOL
Rockies: Play to +124. A lot of theories come into play with the betting public believing in things like “the better team, at home” and “road team got a win, now they lose” BUT; those things are theories or truisms, not facts. The fact is Bettis is flying under the radar. The fact is the Rockies concede nothing here except home field and I have said enough times that is a consistently overvalued aspect of the game. Now I will concede that this qualifies as a value play, since I do not compute the Rockies witn a winning probability, only 47.1%, but that would justify a line of +112, not +168. Even at +124 there would exist a respectable edge to play for, but 168 is enormous.
Phillies: Play to -134. Kyle Lohse as a road favorite? One of the worst pitchers of the season on one of the worst teams of the season? Harang has slipped a little lately, but only to the point where his line value exceeds Lohse by 56 cents and his offense has shown some life lately. The Brewers are just 2-5 when Lohse takes the ball on the road and he personally, overall, is 6-10 h2h, and 4-12 in quality starts. That does not look like a road favorite to me.
White Sox: Play to even money. Yes, the Cardinals struggles with lefties could easily continue tonight versus Quintana, who is no Sales, but neither is anyone else this year. By the same token, Jon Lackey is no Lance Lynn either, so we move on to the offenses. We know the ChiSox are pathetic so nothing to really discuss there, but the overvalued Cardinals are no great shakes either. The Cardinals oera last 6 versus lefty starters is now just 1.49 and last night they didn’t get to any one of 4 relievers either, 3 of them right handed.
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
0
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
0
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
Jules, my strategy is to reinvest profit to maximize return on risk, or minimize risk when the profit is not rolling in. The formula I use justifies either. The first four weeks of the season I religiously stuck with $200.00, i.e. 2% of bankroll. For another three weeks I religiously stuck with a risk of $214, justified by prior results. Seven weeks is plenty of discipline and established form (expectation) so I have "snowballed" since then, based on what is justified by profit, current bankroll, and EV (expected value). I hope that helps.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
Jules, my strategy is to reinvest profit to maximize return on risk, or minimize risk when the profit is not rolling in. The formula I use justifies either. The first four weeks of the season I religiously stuck with $200.00, i.e. 2% of bankroll. For another three weeks I religiously stuck with a risk of $214, justified by prior results. Seven weeks is plenty of discipline and established form (expectation) so I have "snowballed" since then, based on what is justified by profit, current bankroll, and EV (expected value). I hope that helps.
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
You're boring is and Key. Stop asking the same question in different threads. He's explained this multiple times.
BOL Key.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
You're boring is and Key. Stop asking the same question in different threads. He's explained this multiple times.
feel like the bankroll is going to take a hit today key, unsure why you are raising your stakes on lower probability wins --> wiping out profits, or could substantially increase the bankroll, only need 2 out of 3
0
feel like the bankroll is going to take a hit today key, unsure why you are raising your stakes on lower probability wins --> wiping out profits, or could substantially increase the bankroll, only need 2 out of 3
I asked yesterday for the first time and repeated today because I knew he'd read and give me an answer
Key I understand the principle if not the precise maths. I'm certainly not questioning your discipline as that is your byword.
To everyone else, just get stuffed if my question bothers you. I'm engaging in discussion and info. If he has answered this Q before I apologise though I think he hadn't as he just reached $20k.
I learnt something from his answer. Maybe others did too....
0
I asked yesterday for the first time and repeated today because I knew he'd read and give me an answer
Key I understand the principle if not the precise maths. I'm certainly not questioning your discipline as that is your byword.
To everyone else, just get stuffed if my question bothers you. I'm engaging in discussion and info. If he has answered this Q before I apologise though I think he hadn't as he just reached $20k.
I learnt something from his answer. Maybe others did too....
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
BAMTHANKS KEY!! YES SAME HERE AGAIN THANKS KEYELEMENT
0
Quote Originally Posted by HAVOC-22:
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
BAMTHANKS KEY!! YES SAME HERE AGAIN THANKS KEYELEMENT
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
agreed
0
Quote Originally Posted by HAVOC-22:
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
feel like the bankroll is going to take a hit today key, unsure why you are raising your stakes on lower probability wins --> wiping out profits, or could substantially increase the bankroll, only need 2 out of 3
Really? Why not worry about YOUR bets? Key seems to know what he is doing.
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by ConsistentFluke:
feel like the bankroll is going to take a hit today key, unsure why you are raising your stakes on lower probability wins --> wiping out profits, or could substantially increase the bankroll, only need 2 out of 3
Really? Why not worry about YOUR bets? Key seems to know what he is doing.
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
God who cares?! This has been covered numerous times already. All you need to see is COL, PHI, CWS and bet accordingly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
Key I bore myself sometimes but... I expected that as you bet $200 on a $10k initial stake you would proportionally increase to $400 now you have doubled your money. But your stake seems a little higher. What gives?
God who cares?! This has been covered numerous times already. All you need to see is COL, PHI, CWS and bet accordingly.
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
star for you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HAVOC-22:
Mr. Element, sir, I truly hope big brother never shuts you down as you provide, for the most part, the only quality insight on this site. Your threads have become my morning paper. Furthermore, you give sports investing validity in a world that frowns upon our trade thinking it's full of fat, uneducated gambling degenerates. I personally do not have any advanced stats or complicated matrices when handicapping but do adhere to strict money management practices. I wanted to thank you for sharing your insight (and at no cost for that matter) and wish you continued success.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.