All Forums | MLB Betting

Multiple MLB Chase Systems (+250 units in 2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 114169
Posts: 643
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #226
Ninersfan I want to thank you for sometimes posting the night before.  Being on the west coast the early games r tough to make
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #227
What a game by Oakland 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #228
Recap of 4/28/13

4 game chase play:
#61: A's -135 (336/249) for Game 2 Winner
#62: A's -135 (336/249) for Game 2 Winner
#63: Giants -115 (247/215) for Game 2 Loser
#64: Giants -115 (247/215) for Game 2 Loser
#65: Dodgers -167 (392/235) for Game 2 Winner
#66: Yankees -110 (110/100) for Game 1 Winner

YTD: 56-0 +5600
Game 1: 37 (#28, #29 pending)
Game 2: 13 (#39, #48, #56, #63, #64 pending)
Game 3: 4 (#35, #37, #46 pending)
Game 4: 2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #229
Plays for 4/29/13

4 game chase play:
#35: Pirates +1.5 -210 (1733/825) for Game 3
#67: Tigers -248 (248/100) for Game 1
#68: Brewers -127 (127/100) for Game 1
#69: Cardinals -127 (127/100) for Game 1
#70: Yankees -258 (258/100) for Game 1

Notes:
A couple potential plays on Giants depending on the line. Will update an hour or so before game time.

good luck!

YTD: 56-0 +5600
Game 1: 37 (#28, #29 pending)
Game 2: 13 (#39, #48, #56, #63, #64 pending)
Game 3: 4 (#35, #37, #46 pending)
Game 4: 2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 424
Posted: #230
Thank you Sir.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #231
Additional plays for 4/29/13:

Giants just barely made the cut.

4 game chase play:
#63: Giants -105 (485/462) for Game 3
#71: Giants -105 (105/100) for Game 1

Sorry for the late notice
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #232
Giants

#35
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2554
Posted: #233
Plays for 4/29/13

4 game chase play:
#35: Pirates +1.5 -210 (1733/825) for Game 3
#67: Tigers -248 (248/100) for Game 1
#68: Brewers -127 (127/100) for Game 1
#69: Cardinals -127 (127/100) for Game 1
#70: Yankees -258 (258/100) for Game 1

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2554
Posted: #234
Additional plays for 4/29/13:

Giants just barely made the cut.

4 game chase play:
#63: Giants -105 (485/462) for Game 3
#71: Giants -105 (105/100) for Game 1

Sorry for the late notice [/Quote]
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #235
Recap of 4/29/13

4 game chase play:
#35: Pirates +1.5 -210 (1733/825) for Game 3 Loser, on to Game 4 on 4/30/13
#67: Tigers -248 (248/100) for Game 1 Winner
#68: Brewers -127 (127/100) for Game 1 Winner
#69: Cardinals -127 (127/100) for Game 1 Loser, on to Game 2 on 4/30/13
#70: Yankees -258 (258/100) for Game 1 Loser, on to Game 2 on 4/30/13
#63: Giants -105 (485/462) for Game 3 Winner
#71: Giants -105 (105/100) for Game 1 Winner


YTD: 60-0 +6000
Game 1: 40 (#28, #29 pending)
Game 2: 13 (#39, #48, #56, #69, #70 pending)
Game 3: 5 (#37, #46, #64 pending)
Game 4: 2 (#35 pending)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #236
Plays for 4/30/13

4 game chase play:
#35: Pirates +1.5 25.58u for Game 4 (I'm waiting on line movement...weird how line got worse overnight!)
#69: Cardinals -138 (313/227) for Game 2
#70: Yankees -287 (1027/358) for Game 2 (Yikes!)
#72: Royals -128 (128/100) for Game 1
#73: Mets -123 (123/100) for Game 1
#74: Phillies -115 (115/100) for Game 1

YTD: 60-0 +6000
Game 1: 40 (#28, #29 pending)
Game 2: 13 (#39, #48, #56, #69, #70 pending)
Game 3: 5 (#37, #46, #64 pending)
Game 4: 2 (#35 pending)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #237
Taking pirates RL regardless?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #238
Quote Originally Posted by JHaef28:

Taking pirates RL regardless?

yes i am but the question is how much...

i'm debating whether to transfer a few units around to a different chase. i will advise.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #239
Pirates game is bigggg game for us if so...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 109
Posted: #240
just saw this, sorry im late to the party. sounds interesting. gl with the pirates tonight
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #241

Pit line added.


4 game chase play:
#35: Pirates +1.5 -170 (4349/2558) for Game 4 
#69: Cardinals -138 (313/227) for Game 2
#70: Yankees -287 (1027/358) for Game 2 (Yikes!)
#72: Royals -128 (128/100) for Game 1
#73: Mets -123 (123/100) for Game 1
#74: Phillies -115 (115/100) for Game 1

Notes:
Lots riding on Pirates tonight. If you’re uncomfortable with it, feel free to transfer units around to other/future chases that you do like. I probably won’t be around to watch/gamecast the game so I’ll either be in for a horrible or a great surprise after the game. good luck…

YTD: 60-0 +6000
Game 1: 40 (#28, #29 pending)
Game 2: 13 (#39, #48, #56, #69, #70 pending)
Game 3: 5 (#37, #46, #64 pending)
Game 4: 2 (#35 pending)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 144
Posted: #242
Good luck brother
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #243
sorry guys...

I checked the score on my phone and was sick to my stomach to see that we were 2 outs away from being clear...

Definitely not how I wanted to end what would have been a great month but that's baseball for ya, it's a grind, lots of plays left. It's a new day tomorrow, let's take care of business and start a new streak!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #244
Recap of 4/30/13

4 game chase play:
#35: Pirates +1.5 -170 (4349/2558) for Game 4 Loser (-6807)
#69: Cardinals -138 (313/227) for Game 2 Winner
#70: Yankees -287 (1027/358) for Game 2 Winner
#72: Royals -128 (128/100) for Game 1 Winner
#73: Mets -123 (123/100) for Game 1 Loser, on to Game 2 on 5/1/13
#74: Phillies -115 (115/100) for Game 1 Loser, on to Game 2 on 5/1/13

YTD: 63-1 -507
Game 1: 41 (#28, #29 pending)
Game 2: 14 (#39, #48, #56, #73, #74 pending)
Game 3: 5 (#37, #46, #64 pending)
Game 4: 2
Losses: 1
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #245
Morning plays for 5/1/13

4 game chase play:
#73: Mets -134 (299/223) for Game 2
#75: Mets -134 (134/100) for Game 1

Rest of the card will come in the morning.

YTD: 63-1 -507
Game 1: 41 (#28, #29 pending)
Game 2: 14 (#39, #48, #56, #73, #74 pending)
Game 3: 5 (#37, #46, #64 pending)
Game 4: 2
Losses: 1
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #246
Tough one niners.  Keep up the good work
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #247
Why did you lose $6807? Wasn't your wager only $4349? Anyway looks like a great system , I dont know if you knew that Milwaukee owns the pirates might be a filter for future series? Good luck keep this going.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 424
Posted: #248

Ninersfan:

This message eludes to my previous one about a breakout of system losses.  First off, very sorry about the Pittsburgh game last night that sucked behind.

The reason I had asked about a breakout was that we all could evaluate system performance and also possibly assist you with suggestions on possible system filters etc. to cut down on losses such as this one.  We are all here to help one another.

Having read through this entire string I know you already have filters in place for your various systems.  I don't need to know what they are, or even the names of your systems if you don't want to share that information.  I just want to help if at all possible and once again be in a position to evaluate the strongest/weakest of the systems you utilize.

Again, I wish you continued success and I hope this is just a bump in the road to a very successful baseball season.  Better yet, I hope if not myself someone else can assist in an effort to cut down on the losses you suffered last year.

Thank you for all your hard work. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #249
Final card:

4 game chase play:
#73: Mets -134 (299/223) for Game 2
#75: Mets -134 (134/100) for Game 1
#74: Phillies -140 (301/215) for Game 2

Random Notes:
Took a huge hit last night, the amount of juice associated with that one was insane. For any of you that are new to chase systems, welcome to the life of chasers. We win a lot and lose sometimes but the losses are substantial in that it can wipe everything out, as is the case that happened with us last night. Just like any other capper, we hope to win more than we lose.

I took the night to think about the loss and find out ways to limit our exposure to some of these huge games and came up with an alternative solution. Going forward, if a chase begins to get expensive or if I’m not liking the matchup, I will transfer a few of the units onto other chases that I like more. That way, we can spread the money around a little bit in hopes of avoiding potential huge losses. When I move units around, I will make sure it’s noted properly.

Another alternative would be to parlay the games to reduce the juice but I’m not a big fan of parlays in baseball so I probably won’t be doing this, I prefer transferring units around.

I’d like to emphasize that this is what I will be doing… just because I do it does NOT mean you have to do it this way.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 326
Posted: #250
Quote Originally Posted by SweetDickWormy:

Ninersfan:

This message eludes to my previous one about a breakout of system losses.  First off, very sorry about the Pittsburgh game last night that sucked behind.

The reason I had asked about a breakout was that we all could evaluate system performance and also possibly assist you with suggestions on possible system filters etc. to cut down on losses such as this one.  We are all here to help one another.

Having read through this entire string I know you already have filters in place for your various systems.  I don't need to know what they are, or even the names of your systems if you don't want to share that information.  I just want to help if at all possible and once again be in a position to evaluate the strongest/weakest of the systems you utilize.

Again, I wish you continued success and I hope this is just a bump in the road to a very successful baseball season.  Better yet, I hope if not myself someone else can assist in an effort to cut down on the losses you suffered last year.

Thank you for all your hard work. 


Here's what I have:

4 game chase system 1 (it's a monster 4 chases in 1, I just lump it together because they are merely opposites of each other but it's run the same way)

2012: 401 wins, 8 losses +117.84units

4 game chase system 2 (it's a 2 in 1):

2012: 
Game 1: 122
Game 2: 49
Game 3: 23
Game 4: 8
Losses: 4

202-5 +33.25units


All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.