Hey guys, i'm back with a post. This would have been my article, but the SBR guys aren't posting it yet? I don't think editors like to sift through all of my detail, but I think that's what makes me unique and you can't meaningfully contribute to anything in life if you aren't unique. So this is what I like today. Good luck if you decide to tail. Nothing is a guarantee, but I think that this is statistically most likely to hit.
Back the Diamondbacks to Keep the Cardinals Grounded in Series Finale
The Cardinals took their revenge on Arizona’s late-inning comeback victory in the Series Opener. They barely hung on for a 4-3 victory last night in order to end Arizona’s four-game win streak. Look for Arizona to win the series: behind superior pitching and hitting, this one shouldn’t be close.
The Diamondbacks have dealt with the best of Cardinals’ pitching. On Tuesday, they had their way with the Cardinals’ statistically below-average bullpen after Cardinals’ ace Carlos Martinez exited the game. Last night, they dealt with the Cardinals’ second-best pitcher, Adam Wainwright, and nearly came back against the same shaky bullpen. Today, their hitters get to go up against both a shaky starter and a shaky bullpen. Look especially for lefties to do well against Cardinals’ starter Lance Lynn. This year, lefties are batting .241 against Lynn, while righties are batting only .180. Watch out especially for right-fielder David Peralta, who is 5-for-7 with a home run in his career against Lynn, and for third baseman Jake Lamb, who is batting .335 this season against right-handed pitchers.
Probable Pitchers
Lance Lynn (5-5 3.86 ERA) pitches for St. Louis. His 3.86 ERA masks considerable issues with his pitching, which are summarized by his 5.54 FIP (this is like ERA, but factors out luck). He hasn’t completed the sixth inning since May 23rd. He is throwing a lot of pitches because he is unable to command his stuff: his 3.75 BB/9 rate is a career high. Velocity has been an issue as well, particularly with his fastball, which he throws 43.7% of the time, and his sinker, which he throws 34.7% of the time. His fastball velocity this season averages 92.6 mph, which is .9 mph lower than his career average. His sinker is averaging 91.7 mph, .5 less than his career average. But his velocity was at its worst in his last start, in which he threw his fastball at an average of just 90.95 mph, and his sinker at an average of 90.40 mph. Partly in order to compensate for his velocity struggles, he has relied more on his off-speed pitches, particularly the sinker. For example, in his last start vs Pittsburgh he threw his sinker at an almost 50% rate. Lynn’s adjustments have not worked: in his past two outings, he has given up 14 earned runs, including four home runs. He struck out just eight batters in those two outings, although he averages 8.69 K/9 in his career. He walked five in the 10.1 innings he pitched. His FIP and ERA were both above 8 in each outing. So Lynn is struggling with his stuff because his pitches are easier to see and easier to hit. The vastly diverging vertical and horizontal release points of his pitches shows that he is unable to mask his pitches, meaning that opposing batters are easily able to discern whether a fastball or sinker is approaching them. Also, the decrease in his velocity is giving opposing batters more time to react to his pitches. His high walk and home run rates indicate that he is unable to compensate for his velocity struggles by effectively locating his pitches. Rest hasn't seemed to help Lynn, as he pitched against Pittsburgh with five days’ rest. For one of baseball’s elite offenses today he’ll only get four days’ rest.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Hey guys, i'm back with a post. This would have been my article, but the SBR guys aren't posting it yet? I don't think editors like to sift through all of my detail, but I think that's what makes me unique and you can't meaningfully contribute to anything in life if you aren't unique. So this is what I like today. Good luck if you decide to tail. Nothing is a guarantee, but I think that this is statistically most likely to hit.
Back the Diamondbacks to Keep the Cardinals Grounded in Series Finale
The Cardinals took their revenge on Arizona’s late-inning comeback victory in the Series Opener. They barely hung on for a 4-3 victory last night in order to end Arizona’s four-game win streak. Look for Arizona to win the series: behind superior pitching and hitting, this one shouldn’t be close.
The Diamondbacks have dealt with the best of Cardinals’ pitching. On Tuesday, they had their way with the Cardinals’ statistically below-average bullpen after Cardinals’ ace Carlos Martinez exited the game. Last night, they dealt with the Cardinals’ second-best pitcher, Adam Wainwright, and nearly came back against the same shaky bullpen. Today, their hitters get to go up against both a shaky starter and a shaky bullpen. Look especially for lefties to do well against Cardinals’ starter Lance Lynn. This year, lefties are batting .241 against Lynn, while righties are batting only .180. Watch out especially for right-fielder David Peralta, who is 5-for-7 with a home run in his career against Lynn, and for third baseman Jake Lamb, who is batting .335 this season against right-handed pitchers.
Probable Pitchers
Lance Lynn (5-5 3.86 ERA) pitches for St. Louis. His 3.86 ERA masks considerable issues with his pitching, which are summarized by his 5.54 FIP (this is like ERA, but factors out luck). He hasn’t completed the sixth inning since May 23rd. He is throwing a lot of pitches because he is unable to command his stuff: his 3.75 BB/9 rate is a career high. Velocity has been an issue as well, particularly with his fastball, which he throws 43.7% of the time, and his sinker, which he throws 34.7% of the time. His fastball velocity this season averages 92.6 mph, which is .9 mph lower than his career average. His sinker is averaging 91.7 mph, .5 less than his career average. But his velocity was at its worst in his last start, in which he threw his fastball at an average of just 90.95 mph, and his sinker at an average of 90.40 mph. Partly in order to compensate for his velocity struggles, he has relied more on his off-speed pitches, particularly the sinker. For example, in his last start vs Pittsburgh he threw his sinker at an almost 50% rate. Lynn’s adjustments have not worked: in his past two outings, he has given up 14 earned runs, including four home runs. He struck out just eight batters in those two outings, although he averages 8.69 K/9 in his career. He walked five in the 10.1 innings he pitched. His FIP and ERA were both above 8 in each outing. So Lynn is struggling with his stuff because his pitches are easier to see and easier to hit. The vastly diverging vertical and horizontal release points of his pitches shows that he is unable to mask his pitches, meaning that opposing batters are easily able to discern whether a fastball or sinker is approaching them. Also, the decrease in his velocity is giving opposing batters more time to react to his pitches. His high walk and home run rates indicate that he is unable to compensate for his velocity struggles by effectively locating his pitches. Rest hasn't seemed to help Lynn, as he pitched against Pittsburgh with five days’ rest. For one of baseball’s elite offenses today he’ll only get four days’ rest.
Patrick Corbin (6-7 4.89 ERA) counters for Arizona. His high ERA masks his recent show of good form. His FIP is 2.09 or lower in his last two home starts and 3.64 or lower in his last three starts overall. He owes his improvement generally to more consistency throughout his outings: he had been having that one bad inning or making that one bad pitch—the first inning in Miami and the fifth in Milwaukee provide two examples of this. Corbin had had a game plan to start the season and it’s finally coming to fruition. His plan was to get ahead in the count and throw more sliders. His first-pitch strike rate is 63.7% this season, which is 6.9% above last year’s number. Last season, 26.5% of his pitches were sliders, this season he is throwing sliders 33.8% of the time. He is throwing his slider particularly (at an almost 50% rate) when he gets ahead of the count. His ability to effectively use the slider has complemented his ability to get ahead of counts. Last season, when he threw the slider, 33% of the time it was a strike and 42% of the time it was a ball, while it induced a 22.65% whiff rate. In his last three outings, when he threw his slider, 41% of the time it was a strike, only 30.53 % it was a ball and 29.47% of the time the opposing batter swung and missed. Corbin, this season, is able to command a more effective slider, which is the biggest reason for his improved ability to put away batters after getting ahead of them in the count. Corbin’s command has improved generally in all his pitches, as indicated by his improvement in BB/9 rate from 3.82 last season to 2.55 this season. His improvement in command is largely why he is able to start off opposing batters with a strike at such a high rate and is also why he is able to finish them off more effectively. In his past three outings, he has induced ground balls at a rate of over 50% because he has been able to keep his pitches down in the zone and induce weak enough contact.
The Verdict
Corbin is in great form because he has improved his stuff and command, has been more consistent throughout his outings and is forcing batters to keep the ball on the ground—a crucial ability in hitters-friendly Chase Field, where Corbin’s 3.77 FIP in 2017 (compared to 6.11 on the road) indicates that he is at his best. Lynn, on the other hand, is struggling with his stuff and his command. He has been getting shelled lately and he gets only four days’ rest with which to recover his velocity and resolve his deeper struggles.
0
Patrick Corbin (6-7 4.89 ERA) counters for Arizona. His high ERA masks his recent show of good form. His FIP is 2.09 or lower in his last two home starts and 3.64 or lower in his last three starts overall. He owes his improvement generally to more consistency throughout his outings: he had been having that one bad inning or making that one bad pitch—the first inning in Miami and the fifth in Milwaukee provide two examples of this. Corbin had had a game plan to start the season and it’s finally coming to fruition. His plan was to get ahead in the count and throw more sliders. His first-pitch strike rate is 63.7% this season, which is 6.9% above last year’s number. Last season, 26.5% of his pitches were sliders, this season he is throwing sliders 33.8% of the time. He is throwing his slider particularly (at an almost 50% rate) when he gets ahead of the count. His ability to effectively use the slider has complemented his ability to get ahead of counts. Last season, when he threw the slider, 33% of the time it was a strike and 42% of the time it was a ball, while it induced a 22.65% whiff rate. In his last three outings, when he threw his slider, 41% of the time it was a strike, only 30.53 % it was a ball and 29.47% of the time the opposing batter swung and missed. Corbin, this season, is able to command a more effective slider, which is the biggest reason for his improved ability to put away batters after getting ahead of them in the count. Corbin’s command has improved generally in all his pitches, as indicated by his improvement in BB/9 rate from 3.82 last season to 2.55 this season. His improvement in command is largely why he is able to start off opposing batters with a strike at such a high rate and is also why he is able to finish them off more effectively. In his past three outings, he has induced ground balls at a rate of over 50% because he has been able to keep his pitches down in the zone and induce weak enough contact.
The Verdict
Corbin is in great form because he has improved his stuff and command, has been more consistent throughout his outings and is forcing batters to keep the ball on the ground—a crucial ability in hitters-friendly Chase Field, where Corbin’s 3.77 FIP in 2017 (compared to 6.11 on the road) indicates that he is at his best. Lynn, on the other hand, is struggling with his stuff and his command. He has been getting shelled lately and he gets only four days’ rest with which to recover his velocity and resolve his deeper struggles.
I don’t like for Lynn to turn things around on the road, where his FIP this season is 6.14, compared to 4.71 at home—a disparity that is consistent throughout his career— or during the day, when his career ERA is 4.59 compared to 2.96 at night. His inability to keep the ball in the ballpark is especially concerning in Chase Field, where, in his career, he has already given up his second-highest slugging % (.541) to opponents out of any stadium in which he pitched threw or more times. Should Lynn rely on his sinker to the degree in which he did in his last outing vs the Pirates, who are statistically 28th against this pitch and still dominated him, note that the Diamondbacks’ wOBA (this is like OPS, which is on-base plus slugging, but also factors in run-scoring potential; an average number is .320) against the sinker is .394 so far in Chase Field. Against the fastball the Diamondbacks’ wOBA is .372. Lynn also has statistical downside as his career ERA is .16 lower than his career FIP. Over time, these numbers tend to converge. So he doesn't even have luck on his side today.
I like for Corbin to continue his success against the Cardinals. The Cardinals’ 3.51 BB/9 rate, good for eighth in the MLB, indicates that their lineup is patient at the plate. Corbin should take advantage of St. Louis’s lack of aggression by getting ahead of counts. He’ll then be able to capitalize particularly with the use of his slider. The Cardinals’ wOBA against the slider is just .273, almost .50 lower than what is considered to be a good figure. Corbin, as a left-handed ground ball pitcher, matches up optimally against the Cardinals, whose OPS (on-base plus slugging; .730 is an average figure) is just .690 against lefties and .712 against ground ball pitchers. Corbin faced the Cardinals twice last season: in his first outing he got shelled. Then he faced them about a month later and produced a 2.83 FIP. His major adjustment was to throw the sinker with 22% lower frequency, as the Cardinals hit this pitch relatively well. Corbin is absolutely able to utilize other pitches besides the sinker to induce a high proportion of ground balls. Now that he has the recipe for success against the Cards, I expect Corbin, who has improved and found his form precisely because he is staying away from the sinker, to execute. Corbin also has statistical upside as his career ERA is .23 higher than his career FIP. Over time these numbers tend to converge. So he even has luck on his side today.
Arizona’s bullpen also has a decisive advantage. In Arizona’s last 15 games, Diamondback relievers have combined for an ERA of under 1. Their FIP on the season is 3.44, which currently ranks fifth. Their best relievers will be fresh. The Cardinals, on the other hand, have grown notorious for blowing leads—enough so to cause uncertainty as to which reliever will have which role, which is why Rosenthal, and not Oh, closed last night. The Cards’ bullpen likely won’t have a lead to blow and coming back from the deficit that Lynn should create won’t be easy without a fresh Rosenthal. Despite pitching relatively few innings, their bullpen ranks 16th with a 4.05 FIP and is a major reason why the team is only 11-15 in one-run ballgames, even though their starters rank seventh with a 4.11 FIP.
I expect the Diamondbacks to score early vs Lynn and later as well vs the Cards’ shaky bullpen. I expect Corbin and Arizona’s bullpen to continue to be solid enough to ensure a blowout.
I don’t like for Lynn to turn things around on the road, where his FIP this season is 6.14, compared to 4.71 at home—a disparity that is consistent throughout his career— or during the day, when his career ERA is 4.59 compared to 2.96 at night. His inability to keep the ball in the ballpark is especially concerning in Chase Field, where, in his career, he has already given up his second-highest slugging % (.541) to opponents out of any stadium in which he pitched threw or more times. Should Lynn rely on his sinker to the degree in which he did in his last outing vs the Pirates, who are statistically 28th against this pitch and still dominated him, note that the Diamondbacks’ wOBA (this is like OPS, which is on-base plus slugging, but also factors in run-scoring potential; an average number is .320) against the sinker is .394 so far in Chase Field. Against the fastball the Diamondbacks’ wOBA is .372. Lynn also has statistical downside as his career ERA is .16 lower than his career FIP. Over time, these numbers tend to converge. So he doesn't even have luck on his side today.
I like for Corbin to continue his success against the Cardinals. The Cardinals’ 3.51 BB/9 rate, good for eighth in the MLB, indicates that their lineup is patient at the plate. Corbin should take advantage of St. Louis’s lack of aggression by getting ahead of counts. He’ll then be able to capitalize particularly with the use of his slider. The Cardinals’ wOBA against the slider is just .273, almost .50 lower than what is considered to be a good figure. Corbin, as a left-handed ground ball pitcher, matches up optimally against the Cardinals, whose OPS (on-base plus slugging; .730 is an average figure) is just .690 against lefties and .712 against ground ball pitchers. Corbin faced the Cardinals twice last season: in his first outing he got shelled. Then he faced them about a month later and produced a 2.83 FIP. His major adjustment was to throw the sinker with 22% lower frequency, as the Cardinals hit this pitch relatively well. Corbin is absolutely able to utilize other pitches besides the sinker to induce a high proportion of ground balls. Now that he has the recipe for success against the Cards, I expect Corbin, who has improved and found his form precisely because he is staying away from the sinker, to execute. Corbin also has statistical upside as his career ERA is .23 higher than his career FIP. Over time these numbers tend to converge. So he even has luck on his side today.
Arizona’s bullpen also has a decisive advantage. In Arizona’s last 15 games, Diamondback relievers have combined for an ERA of under 1. Their FIP on the season is 3.44, which currently ranks fifth. Their best relievers will be fresh. The Cardinals, on the other hand, have grown notorious for blowing leads—enough so to cause uncertainty as to which reliever will have which role, which is why Rosenthal, and not Oh, closed last night. The Cards’ bullpen likely won’t have a lead to blow and coming back from the deficit that Lynn should create won’t be easy without a fresh Rosenthal. Despite pitching relatively few innings, their bullpen ranks 16th with a 4.05 FIP and is a major reason why the team is only 11-15 in one-run ballgames, even though their starters rank seventh with a 4.11 FIP.
I expect the Diamondbacks to score early vs Lynn and later as well vs the Cards’ shaky bullpen. I expect Corbin and Arizona’s bullpen to continue to be solid enough to ensure a blowout.
Best analysis on covers and it's not even close. Thanks Jags, unbelievable write up. STL has struggled over the last couple of years vs lefties this play caught my eye last night but this has convinced me even more. Thanks for taking the time to put this yoga the man. Much appreciated
Don’t let the last play affect the next play
0
Best analysis on covers and it's not even close. Thanks Jags, unbelievable write up. STL has struggled over the last couple of years vs lefties this play caught my eye last night but this has convinced me even more. Thanks for taking the time to put this yoga the man. Much appreciated
Typically the larger the write up on covers the bigger the fade. I think if covers kept stats for major write ups they'd be in the negatives large.
With that being said I didn't read it because I don't believe that much thought should be implemented, but I've always been a fan of your picks so I'll tail or at least pay attention to this game to see how ya did.
BOL man.
0
Typically the larger the write up on covers the bigger the fade. I think if covers kept stats for major write ups they'd be in the negatives large.
With that being said I didn't read it because I don't believe that much thought should be implemented, but I've always been a fan of your picks so I'll tail or at least pay attention to this game to see how ya did.
Most large write-ups probably lose because 1) they contain mostly fluff, so there isn't actually sound reasoning behind the pick and 2) probably a heavily juiced play that the person finds is really easy and it turns out to be too good to be true.
There are probably three major things that can go wrong with my pick that I can articulate more specifically than I do in my article:
1) I didn't get to ask Lance how his arm is feeling, in order to better ascertain whether he'll recuperate his velocity. Maybe he rediscovers his form today? Seems unlikely because the change would be so drastic.
2) The Cards hit the sinker extremely well, perhaps Corbin forgets to stay away from it so much particularly as he did in his second start vs the Cards last year.
3) The Cards hit better during the day and the Dbacks hit worse during the day--I don't hold too much stock in day/night splits for lineups and I don't see why the disparity can't change
I write for SBR and use level of detail to try to stand out from the other writers. I was a philosophy major at UVA and enjoy analysis. But I hope that my feeling flattered by the very kind feedback that I receive doesn't make me guilty.
Best of luck on whatever you decide to play.
0
I understand the point.
Most large write-ups probably lose because 1) they contain mostly fluff, so there isn't actually sound reasoning behind the pick and 2) probably a heavily juiced play that the person finds is really easy and it turns out to be too good to be true.
There are probably three major things that can go wrong with my pick that I can articulate more specifically than I do in my article:
1) I didn't get to ask Lance how his arm is feeling, in order to better ascertain whether he'll recuperate his velocity. Maybe he rediscovers his form today? Seems unlikely because the change would be so drastic.
2) The Cards hit the sinker extremely well, perhaps Corbin forgets to stay away from it so much particularly as he did in his second start vs the Cards last year.
3) The Cards hit better during the day and the Dbacks hit worse during the day--I don't hold too much stock in day/night splits for lineups and I don't see why the disparity can't change
I write for SBR and use level of detail to try to stand out from the other writers. I was a philosophy major at UVA and enjoy analysis. But I hope that my feeling flattered by the very kind feedback that I receive doesn't make me guilty.
*Regarding the second objection: such stupidities are imo all too common, I always wonder at the amount of fastballs Gyorko gets to see, even though he consistently kills this pitch--I guess because he isn't such a well-known threat? But I think a game plan for an entire lineup will be more well thought-out. The recipe is certaintly there, last year in Corbin's second try vs this team.
0
*Regarding the second objection: such stupidities are imo all too common, I always wonder at the amount of fastballs Gyorko gets to see, even though he consistently kills this pitch--I guess because he isn't such a well-known threat? But I think a game plan for an entire lineup will be more well thought-out. The recipe is certaintly there, last year in Corbin's second try vs this team.
Typically the larger the write up on covers the bigger the fade. I think if covers kept stats for major write ups they'd be in the negatives large.
With that being said I didn't read it because I don't believe that much thought should be implemented, but I've always been a fan of your picks so I'll tail or at least pay attention to this game to see how ya did.
BOL man.
The Truth
0
Quote Originally Posted by rewinds2k:
Typically the larger the write up on covers the bigger the fade. I think if covers kept stats for major write ups they'd be in the negatives large.
With that being said I didn't read it because I don't believe that much thought should be implemented, but I've always been a fan of your picks so I'll tail or at least pay attention to this game to see how ya did.
You haven't read my previous posts then. I don't have an answer as to why the dbacks couldn't hit very poor Cards pitching and why they only put in Chafin when they were already down. Show me what I missed in my analysis or don't bother posting...I owe nobody anything.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:
The Truth
You haven't read my previous posts then. I don't have an answer as to why the dbacks couldn't hit very poor Cards pitching and why they only put in Chafin when they were already down. Show me what I missed in my analysis or don't bother posting...I owe nobody anything.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.