I shudder to think about people taking investing advice from Key Element. When he's out to dinner with a big group, do you think everyone let's him calculate the tip?
I shudder to think about people taking investing advice from Key Element. When he's out to dinner with a big group, do you think everyone let's him calculate the tip?
I shudder to think about people taking investing advice from Key Element. When he's out to dinner with a big group, do you think everyone let's him calculate the tip?
I shudder to think about people taking investing advice from Key Element. When he's out to dinner with a big group, do you think everyone let's him calculate the tip?
Key Element? Do you mind giving us all another lesson on math and statistical probability? I don't know how many "laughing stars" we would assign to that!
Key Element? Do you mind giving us all another lesson on math and statistical probability? I don't know how many "laughing stars" we would assign to that!
Key Element? Do you mind giving us all another lesson on math and statistical probability? I don't know how many "laughing stars" we would assign to that!
Rangers +152, Hamels (22-11), Stroman (4-1)
Key Element? Do you mind giving us all another lesson on math and statistical probability? I don't know how many "laughing stars" we would assign to that!
Rangers +152, Hamels (22-11), Stroman (4-1)
Key. I had Texas in game one, and again today. I never said I didn't like the pick. And in regard to your last post, this is much better. You are best off just quoting the lines and making a pick without dragging any of that distracting math into it. By the way, 7th grade was how many years ago???
Rangers +152, Hamels (22-11), Stroman (4-1)
Key. I had Texas in game one, and again today. I never said I didn't like the pick. And in regard to your last post, this is much better. You are best off just quoting the lines and making a pick without dragging any of that distracting math into it. By the way, 7th grade was how many years ago???
Rangers +152, Hamels (22-11), Stroman (4-1)
Parents PLEASE don't let your kids skip school.....or they might do math like KE. The below will forever be a Covers Classic.
FFT. Consider the money angle. At +167 the Rangers pay 167 cents per dollar of risk. At -174 (best available) the Blue Jays pay 57.5 cents per dollar. 167/57.5 = 2.9. Are the Jays really 3 times more likely to win this game than the Rangers? A 75% probability in a playoff game versus Cole Hamels and the Rangers? The real choice here is between investing and gambling. Even if I thought the Jays had a 75% chance of winning or called it a "lock" the wager itself is foolish.
Hey Key....can u explain all this agan?
Parents PLEASE don't let your kids skip school.....or they might do math like KE. The below will forever be a Covers Classic.
FFT. Consider the money angle. At +167 the Rangers pay 167 cents per dollar of risk. At -174 (best available) the Blue Jays pay 57.5 cents per dollar. 167/57.5 = 2.9. Are the Jays really 3 times more likely to win this game than the Rangers? A 75% probability in a playoff game versus Cole Hamels and the Rangers? The real choice here is between investing and gambling. Even if I thought the Jays had a 75% chance of winning or called it a "lock" the wager itself is foolish.
Hey Key....can u explain all this agan?
Parents PLEASE don't let your kids skip school.....or they might do math like KE. The below will forever be a Covers Classic.
FFT. Consider the money angle. At +167 the Rangers pay 167 cents per dollar of risk. At -174 (best available) the Blue Jays pay 57.5 cents per dollar. 167/57.5 = 2.9. Are the Jays really 3 times more likely to win this game than the Rangers? A 75% probability in a playoff game versus Cole Hamels and the Rangers? The real choice here is between investing and gambling. Even if I thought the Jays had a 75% chance of winning or called it a "lock" the wager itself is foolish.
Hey Key....can u explain all this agan?
Parents PLEASE don't let your kids skip school.....or they might do math like KE. The below will forever be a Covers Classic.
FFT. Consider the money angle. At +167 the Rangers pay 167 cents per dollar of risk. At -174 (best available) the Blue Jays pay 57.5 cents per dollar. 167/57.5 = 2.9. Are the Jays really 3 times more likely to win this game than the Rangers? A 75% probability in a playoff game versus Cole Hamels and the Rangers? The real choice here is between investing and gambling. Even if I thought the Jays had a 75% chance of winning or called it a "lock" the wager itself is foolish.
Hey Key....can u explain all this agan?
But what about when they don't calculate the tip for him? He might leave a 75% tip!
But what about when they don't calculate the tip for him? He might leave a 75% tip!
[/Quote
I have an MBA with an emphasis in statistics. I do realize that I did get carried away with my mocking of Key Element (I am guilty as charged) but I found his analysis hilarious. I can assure you that his explanation and analysis of probability contained in this post is 100% incorrect. If you were to use his methods in the future, you would end up with a misrepresentation of true odds and would surely lose money in the long run. Thus, I was trying to protect people from actually making wagers based on the information he provided.
[/Quote
I have an MBA with an emphasis in statistics. I do realize that I did get carried away with my mocking of Key Element (I am guilty as charged) but I found his analysis hilarious. I can assure you that his explanation and analysis of probability contained in this post is 100% incorrect. If you were to use his methods in the future, you would end up with a misrepresentation of true odds and would surely lose money in the long run. Thus, I was trying to protect people from actually making wagers based on the information he provided.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.