Posted:
#26
So what you guys play only dog picks + money and lose 80% of your bets? Makes no sense lmao
***Sammy's Picks Of The Day*** YTD [72-46]]
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
@SammyKnows This isnt a bash, but just being able to pick winners, does not equate to actually making money. Your post actually sounds like you just pick games and dont actually bet them, because you would know if you are up or down money
@SammyKnows This isnt a bash, but just being able to pick winners, does not equate to actually making money. Your post actually sounds like you just pick games and dont actually bet them, because you would know if you are up or down money
This!! He doesn’t bet his games.
Posted:
#33
@cd329
Exactly why Sammy does not want anything to do regarding honest +/- $ record keeping; just post more winners than losers and CLAIM you are a winner. It ain't foots or buckets at -110 and he knows it. 54.38% IS NOT the break even point. A -150 favorite has a 66.67% return on risk, NOT the 90.91% return on risk of -110. He wouldn't be offended and insult me if he had any intention of being HONEST.
He also would not ask for help and then insult the guy who tried to give it to him. The return on risk factor is not something 80% of posters want to get caught on. That's the Covers MLB Betting Forum for you.
Pizz on it. I post the truth, and don't give a s**t who likes it or not, but a few people do. 14 years here under THE SAME USERNAME proved it. Sammy has probably been here multiple times under different names and will be back again when this one goes south.
Have a nice day Sammy 
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
@cd329 Exactly why Sammy does not want anything to do regarding honest +/- $ record keeping; just post more winners than losers and CLAIM you are a winner. It ain't foots or buckets at -110 and he knows it. 54.38% IS NOT the break even point. A -150 favorite has a 66.67% return on risk, NOT the 90.91% return on risk of -110. He wouldn't be offended and insult me if he had any intention of being HONEST. He also would not ask for help and then insult the guy who tried to give it to him. The return on risk factor is not something 80% of posters want to get caught on. That's the Covers MLB Betting Forum for you. Pizz on it. I post the truth, and don't give a s**t who likes it or not, but a few people do. 14 years here under THE SAME USERNAME proved it. Sammy has probably been here multiple times under different names and will be back again when this one goes south. Have a nice day Sammy
@cd329 Exactly why Sammy does not want anything to do regarding honest +/- $ record keeping; just post more winners than losers and CLAIM you are a winner. It ain't foots or buckets at -110 and he knows it. 54.38% IS NOT the break even point. A -150 favorite has a 66.67% return on risk, NOT the 90.91% return on risk of -110. He wouldn't be offended and insult me if he had any intention of being HONEST. He also would not ask for help and then insult the guy who tried to give it to him. The return on risk factor is not something 80% of posters want to get caught on. That's the Covers MLB Betting Forum for you. Pizz on it. I post the truth, and don't give a s**t who likes it or not, but a few people do. 14 years here under THE SAME USERNAME proved it. Sammy has probably been here multiple times under different names and will be back again when this one goes south. Have a nice day Sammy
Well said Key. Well said
Posted:
#38
@RayRayK
Quote Originally Posted by RayRayK:
@SammyKnows Ignore anyone who states any negative comments. This site has lots of young addicts who are very immature -Ignore them completely.
@SammyKnows Ignore anyone who states any negative comments. This site has lots of young addicts who are very immature -Ignore them completely.
Really? I am 77 years old and have over 50 years experience with sports gambling, the last 14 on this site. If youth and immaturity are a problem it belongs to you and/or Sammy. Don't tell a gambling mathematics expert he is "young and immature, look in a mirror. Maybe youth doesn't apply, but if you are still naive enough to believe in W/L records in MLB/NHL, the immaturity certainly does.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
Posted:
#41
@SammyKnows
My retirement is going very well on what I provided for myself. Thanx, but NO thanx.
Since you don't want a program to keep the record perfect it would probably get "distorted" anyway, then if you get nailed it will be "OH, so sorry, typo". Not to worry Sammy, I am not going to monitor you, so do whatever you like, but it would be nice to know if you play flat or "add the juice" to favorites." Still, either way RoR is the ultimate monitor. Some guys (ultimate fools) even short play their dogs, so the target profit is always $100 or 1 unit. Unless, of course, they bounce their "units" up and down so the losers are 1 unit plays and the winners are (magically) 2 unit plays. RoR eliminates the deception. Are you following this or have I lost you?
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
Posted:
#42
WTF is wrong with you guys. Who the hell cares what sammy does and how he doesit? Follow, dont follow, but please shit the fuck up and let the man post his plays. Fade him if he is so bad at licking games.
I never get i to this shit because most of you fucks are probably paid bots to get clicks.
sammy keep doing what your doing. GL tonight. Win or lose enjoy your evening
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
@SammyKnows My retirement is going very well on what I provided for myself. Thanx, but NO thanx. Since you don't want a program to keep the record perfect it would probably get "distorted" anyway, then if you get nailed it will be "OH, so sorry, typo". Not to worry Sammy, I am not going to monitor you, so do whatever you like, but it would be nice to know if you play flat or "add the juice" to favorites." Still, either way RoR is the ultimate monitor. Some guys (ultimate fools) even short play their dogs, so the target profit is always $100 or 1 unit. Unless, of course, they bounce their "units" up and down so the losers are 1 unit plays and the winners are (magically) 2 unit plays. RoR eliminates the deception. Are you following this or have I lost you?
isn’t this the guy who loaded up on under 15 in the sf/sd game acting like Vegas put out a bad number and didn’t realize the game was played at mile and half high stadium in Mexico???
@SammyKnows My retirement is going very well on what I provided for myself. Thanx, but NO thanx. Since you don't want a program to keep the record perfect it would probably get "distorted" anyway, then if you get nailed it will be "OH, so sorry, typo". Not to worry Sammy, I am not going to monitor you, so do whatever you like, but it would be nice to know if you play flat or "add the juice" to favorites." Still, either way RoR is the ultimate monitor. Some guys (ultimate fools) even short play their dogs, so the target profit is always $100 or 1 unit. Unless, of course, they bounce their "units" up and down so the losers are 1 unit plays and the winners are (magically) 2 unit plays. RoR eliminates the deception. Are you following this or have I lost you?
Hot Forum Topics
