- No Road team has won a WS Game 2 in a year beginning with a 2: since 2000, home teams are 11-0 SU in Game 2s.
Since the Wild Card era ('95) started...
- Only 3 of 16 WS have had Games 1 & 2 decided by 1 run margins: In all 3 instances, Game 2 was won by the home team, which means, historically speaking, Texas is pushing shit uphill expecting to win by 1 run on Thursday.
- At least 1 of the first 2 games has totaled at least 6 runs: Wednesday's game was the equal lowest totaling Game 1 (5 runs) since the WC era began. The 4 previous Game 1s to total 5 runs were followed by 7, 9, 7 & 6 run Game 2s.
- Home teams are 12-0 SU in Game 2s when scoring at least 3 runs: The only road teams to win a Game 2 have held their opponents to 0, 1 & 2 run totals.
- No Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 loss (5 times) has subsequently won Game 2: These 5 teams combined to average 3.00 runs in their subsequent Game 2s (there's also been 2 instances of the Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 win and subsequently going on to lose Game 2, averaging a combined 1.50 runs, meaning road teams overall are 0-7 SU in Game 2s when having scored 3 runs or less in Game 1s).
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
- No Road team has won a WS Game 2 in a year beginning with a 2: since 2000, home teams are 11-0 SU in Game 2s.
Since the Wild Card era ('95) started...
- Only 3 of 16 WS have had Games 1 & 2 decided by 1 run margins: In all 3 instances, Game 2 was won by the home team, which means, historically speaking, Texas is pushing shit uphill expecting to win by 1 run on Thursday.
- At least 1 of the first 2 games has totaled at least 6 runs: Wednesday's game was the equal lowest totaling Game 1 (5 runs) since the WC era began. The 4 previous Game 1s to total 5 runs were followed by 7, 9, 7 & 6 run Game 2s.
- Home teams are 12-0 SU in Game 2s when scoring at least 3 runs: The only road teams to win a Game 2 have held their opponents to 0, 1 & 2 run totals.
- No Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 loss (5 times) has subsequently won Game 2: These 5 teams combined to average 3.00 runs in their subsequent Game 2s (there's also been 2 instances of the Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 win and subsequently going on to lose Game 2, averaging a combined 1.50 runs, meaning road teams overall are 0-7 SU in Game 2s when having scored 3 runs or less in Game 1s).
Not sure I am following... in a year beginning with a 2! So are you talking about since 2000? Surely they were not playing baseball or keep track of these stats in the year 200 or the year 2. So you have to be talking about since 2000. If so why not say that as opposed to the year beginning with a 2.
0
Not sure I am following... in a year beginning with a 2! So are you talking about since 2000? Surely they were not playing baseball or keep track of these stats in the year 200 or the year 2. So you have to be talking about since 2000. If so why not say that as opposed to the year beginning with a 2.
- No Road team has won a WS Game 2 in a year beginning with a 2: since 2000, home teams are 11-0 SU in Game 2s.
Since the Wild Card era ('95) started...
- Only 3 of 16 WS have had Games 1 & 2 decided by 1 run margins: In all 3 instances, Game 2 was won by the home team, which means, historically speaking, Texas is pushing shit uphill expecting to win by 1 run on Thursday.
- At least 1 of the first 2 games has totaled at least 6 runs: Wednesday's game was the equal lowest totaling Game 1 (5 runs) since the WC era began. The 4 previous Game 1s to total 5 runs were followed by 7, 9, 7 & 6 run Game 2s.
- Home teams are 12-0 SU in Game 2s when scoring at least 3 runs: The only road teams to win a Game 2 have held their opponents to 0, 1 & 2 run totals.
- No Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 loss (5 times) has subsequently won Game 2: These 5 teams combined to average 3.00 runs in their subsequent Game 2s (there's also been 2 instances of the Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 win and subsequently going on to lose Game 2, averaging a combined 1.50 runs, meaning road teams overall are 0-7 SU in Game 2s when having scored 3 runs or less in Game 1s).
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
- No Road team has won a WS Game 2 in a year beginning with a 2: since 2000, home teams are 11-0 SU in Game 2s.
Since the Wild Card era ('95) started...
- Only 3 of 16 WS have had Games 1 & 2 decided by 1 run margins: In all 3 instances, Game 2 was won by the home team, which means, historically speaking, Texas is pushing shit uphill expecting to win by 1 run on Thursday.
- At least 1 of the first 2 games has totaled at least 6 runs: Wednesday's game was the equal lowest totaling Game 1 (5 runs) since the WC era began. The 4 previous Game 1s to total 5 runs were followed by 7, 9, 7 & 6 run Game 2s.
- Home teams are 12-0 SU in Game 2s when scoring at least 3 runs: The only road teams to win a Game 2 have held their opponents to 0, 1 & 2 run totals.
- No Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 loss (5 times) has subsequently won Game 2: These 5 teams combined to average 3.00 runs in their subsequent Game 2s (there's also been 2 instances of the Road team totaling 3 runs or less in a Game 1 win and subsequently going on to lose Game 2, averaging a combined 1.50 runs, meaning road teams overall are 0-7 SU in Game 2s when having scored 3 runs or less in Game 1s).
That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw.
0
That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw.
That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw.
And if he hadn't missed the cut-off and the Cards had gone on to win...those trends still would have been just as meaningless in next season's World Series game 2
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw.
And if he hadn't missed the cut-off and the Cards had gone on to win...those trends still would have been just as meaningless in next season's World Series game 2
That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw.
welcome to betting baseball or do you even do that?
It looks like you just type up meaningless stats and then after the fact say, "Hey, look, i told you guys right here.....see Game 2 winners!!"
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw.
welcome to betting baseball or do you even do that?
It looks like you just type up meaningless stats and then after the fact say, "Hey, look, i told you guys right here.....see Game 2 winners!!"
And if he hadn't missed the cut-off and the Cards had gone on to win...those trends still would have been just as meaningless in next season's World Series game 2
bingo
0
Quote Originally Posted by P4P:
And if he hadn't missed the cut-off and the Cards had gone on to win...those trends still would have been just as meaningless in next season's World Series game 2
ly Posted by BetCrimes1984] That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw. [/Quote]
Why dont you take your meaningless stats and piss off back to CTG
0
[Quote: Original
ly Posted by BetCrimes1984] That 9th inning comeback overturned almost every one of those streaks which otherwise looked golden to said point. All overturned on the fact a cutout man missed a throw. [/Quote]
Why dont you take your meaningless stats and piss off back to CTG
Why dont you take your meaningless stats and piss off back to CTG
Curious. I'm not going anywhere. You maybe the same Zman recently banned there. If so, quite why I'm copping flak for something that had nothing to do with me, I'm unsure.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zman01:
Why dont you take your meaningless stats and piss off back to CTG
Curious. I'm not going anywhere. You maybe the same Zman recently banned there. If so, quite why I'm copping flak for something that had nothing to do with me, I'm unsure.
And if he hadn't missed the cut-off and the Cards had gone on to win...those trends still would have been just as meaningless in next season's World Series game 2
If you want to remain oblivious to the way reality unfolds, you're welcome to it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by P4P:
And if he hadn't missed the cut-off and the Cards had gone on to win...those trends still would have been just as meaningless in next season's World Series game 2
If you want to remain oblivious to the way reality unfolds, you're welcome to it.
Well I'm certainly glad Texas came back to win. Now next time you'll have to dig up some other miscellaneous stats to support the way you're leaning.
Here - View - shows what my pre-game lean was. Of course such an avenue required no money risked from me (but is not without any significance, since 25 to 100k is up for grabs), but it was only ever a lean, and why I never actually bet Texas for real (or STL for that matter, a fact I already posted in nbafan's thread).
You assume too much.
0
Quote Originally Posted by P4P:
Well I'm certainly glad Texas came back to win. Now next time you'll have to dig up some other miscellaneous stats to support the way you're leaning.
Here - View - shows what my pre-game lean was. Of course such an avenue required no money risked from me (but is not without any significance, since 25 to 100k is up for grabs), but it was only ever a lean, and why I never actually bet Texas for real (or STL for that matter, a fact I already posted in nbafan's thread).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.