Noticed many books have offered this. I know certain pitchers are ground pitchers vs fly ball pitchers and some are strikeout pitchers.
Does anyone here think betting this is profitable? I don't know what pitchers are K pitchers but I do know the basics such as Max is K pitcher but Greinke is not. But most of the pitchers, i wouldn't know except the big name pitchers. I was surprised certain starting pitchers have K props as low as 2.5... but that is with heavy juice on the Over. But certain pitchers have K's of 3.5 with juice on the under and even heavy juice.
Does anyone here say betting this is more profitable than the regular lines? Of course juice is much higher 30 cents. But for example when you look at Verlander vs the Reds, he is a heavy favorite. You could bet his K prop at +money but its 8.5 K... which is a lot. But even if he gives up a few runs early on... once he gets settled in and starts striking guys out... you sometimes have a better chance of winning this as oppose to the regular line. Of course Houston could be up 10-0 and then say after 5 innings, they just go to the bullpen and he has 8Ks and say a low pitch count but there is no point since its hard for other team to win. Or say he gets injured or has to go out in the 5th inning with already 7Ks already... then its no good.
Also when he pitches, you don't want ground outs or double plays or fly outs... because that would mean you lose an out since you are betting K's. Also you don't walk them walking players because that would be using up the pitch count. However, say a pitcher has 3.5 K prop. This pitcher could literally be giving up a 3 run home run in the 1st inning and be down 3-0... then K the next 3 batters to end the inning. Then get another strikeout in the 2nd inning and the K prop would cash yet they could be down 3-0 in the 2nd inning. Its like if you bet over K... obviously you don't want the guy to give up hits and runs... however... you rather that then a flyout or popup or double play.
Anyone here have thoughts/opinions on this? Because if you bet an under K prop, you basically want quick ground or fly ball outs as quick as possible. You rather a hitter get a hit on a 0-2 count than a groundout. Its like a completely different way of betting as oppose to you betting a certain side.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Noticed many books have offered this. I know certain pitchers are ground pitchers vs fly ball pitchers and some are strikeout pitchers.
Does anyone here think betting this is profitable? I don't know what pitchers are K pitchers but I do know the basics such as Max is K pitcher but Greinke is not. But most of the pitchers, i wouldn't know except the big name pitchers. I was surprised certain starting pitchers have K props as low as 2.5... but that is with heavy juice on the Over. But certain pitchers have K's of 3.5 with juice on the under and even heavy juice.
Does anyone here say betting this is more profitable than the regular lines? Of course juice is much higher 30 cents. But for example when you look at Verlander vs the Reds, he is a heavy favorite. You could bet his K prop at +money but its 8.5 K... which is a lot. But even if he gives up a few runs early on... once he gets settled in and starts striking guys out... you sometimes have a better chance of winning this as oppose to the regular line. Of course Houston could be up 10-0 and then say after 5 innings, they just go to the bullpen and he has 8Ks and say a low pitch count but there is no point since its hard for other team to win. Or say he gets injured or has to go out in the 5th inning with already 7Ks already... then its no good.
Also when he pitches, you don't want ground outs or double plays or fly outs... because that would mean you lose an out since you are betting K's. Also you don't walk them walking players because that would be using up the pitch count. However, say a pitcher has 3.5 K prop. This pitcher could literally be giving up a 3 run home run in the 1st inning and be down 3-0... then K the next 3 batters to end the inning. Then get another strikeout in the 2nd inning and the K prop would cash yet they could be down 3-0 in the 2nd inning. Its like if you bet over K... obviously you don't want the guy to give up hits and runs... however... you rather that then a flyout or popup or double play.
Anyone here have thoughts/opinions on this? Because if you bet an under K prop, you basically want quick ground or fly ball outs as quick as possible. You rather a hitter get a hit on a 0-2 count than a groundout. Its like a completely different way of betting as oppose to you betting a certain side.
Yes i noticed that prop bet as well on pinnacle. If you know a pitcher will go deep, that seems to be a good bet. But is it better than the K prop though?
Verlander give up 3 runs early on. But if he keeps his pitch count low... he could go pretty deep. But the issue is he is a strikeout pitcher as well.
0
Yes i noticed that prop bet as well on pinnacle. If you know a pitcher will go deep, that seems to be a good bet. But is it better than the K prop though?
Verlander give up 3 runs early on. But if he keeps his pitch count low... he could go pretty deep. But the issue is he is a strikeout pitcher as well.
Yes i noticed that prop bet as well on pinnacle. If you know a pitcher will go deep, that seems to be a good bet. But is it better than the K prop though?
Verlander give up 3 runs early on. But if he keeps his pitch count low... he could go pretty deep. But the issue is he is a strikeout pitcher as well.
I was worried because he gave up those 3 runs but he still went deep. Tonight I have Kershaw over 19.5. He's off to a good start. Odds were 1.81 at pinny
0
Quote Originally Posted by donny600:
Yes i noticed that prop bet as well on pinnacle. If you know a pitcher will go deep, that seems to be a good bet. But is it better than the K prop though?
Verlander give up 3 runs early on. But if he keeps his pitch count low... he could go pretty deep. But the issue is he is a strikeout pitcher as well.
I was worried because he gave up those 3 runs but he still went deep. Tonight I have Kershaw over 19.5. He's off to a good start. Odds were 1.81 at pinny
Well if he gives up 3 runs early... well he isn't going to be out early on. Its when its in the middle or late innings when there is a chance they take the pitcher out right?
When you bet pitching outs, you basically want the quickest inning possible right? Thus quick outs and not strikeouts? Since strikeout uses up the pitch cuont? Thus its better to have a pitcher give up 2 run and 2 hits and pitch say 18 pitches for that inning vs giving up no run and 1 hit and using up say 25 pitches right?
0
Well if he gives up 3 runs early... well he isn't going to be out early on. Its when its in the middle or late innings when there is a chance they take the pitcher out right?
When you bet pitching outs, you basically want the quickest inning possible right? Thus quick outs and not strikeouts? Since strikeout uses up the pitch cuont? Thus its better to have a pitcher give up 2 run and 2 hits and pitch say 18 pitches for that inning vs giving up no run and 1 hit and using up say 25 pitches right?
Yah that's pretty much it. Quick outs. These seem easy. Yesterday and today I hit 4 out of 4. I also have a small play onkikuchi over 17.5 at 2.0 odds but I think I. Going tode that one
0
Yah that's pretty much it. Quick outs. These seem easy. Yesterday and today I hit 4 out of 4. I also have a small play onkikuchi over 17.5 at 2.0 odds but I think I. Going tode that one
So you are basically picking top pitchers then for this right? I mean its like its better to have back to back home runs hit by the other team and say 8 more pitches to get 3 quick outs for a 10 pitch inning then say a 35 pitch inning where bases are jammed and no runs allowed etc.
0
So you are basically picking top pitchers then for this right? I mean its like its better to have back to back home runs hit by the other team and say 8 more pitches to get 3 quick outs for a 10 pitch inning then say a 35 pitch inning where bases are jammed and no runs allowed etc.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.