There's a common misconception in betting that bets have to be "worth it" in order for people to bet it, as in they don't want to pay the high juice. But why? The system is 3-0 on games -201 and higher. So when you look at a wager and see you have to bet $200 to win $100 it looks "not worth it". I don't know about you but winning money is worth it to me. Whether I have to bet $110, $150, $200 or $250 to win $100, it's still $100 in the pocket when it wins. Does it suck when you pay that much juice and it loses? Of course. But the system hardly loses on such picks, that's the point. When looking at games with ML's -191 and higher, the system is 4-1. So let's assume on every one of those games we bet $200 to win $100. We would have won $100 four times, and lost $200 once, yielding a profit of $200. Meanwhile you don't want to pay the juice and you are taking teams that are -110. Let's say that you can choose these games at 60%, which is solid. That means you are winning 3 out of every 5 bets. So hypothetically you are winning $100 three times while losing $110 twice, yielding a profit of $80. So while you're out there bashing those who take heavy favorites, they are making more money than you are (assuming they win at as high a percentage as the system does). Over 60% of the system picks have ML's of -140 or lower, so it's not like I'm just only taking heavy favorites without any research to it. This system is well thought out and has been hitting at a high rate since it began. So if you don't like betting favorites then go somewhere else.
0
There's a common misconception in betting that bets have to be "worth it" in order for people to bet it, as in they don't want to pay the high juice. But why? The system is 3-0 on games -201 and higher. So when you look at a wager and see you have to bet $200 to win $100 it looks "not worth it". I don't know about you but winning money is worth it to me. Whether I have to bet $110, $150, $200 or $250 to win $100, it's still $100 in the pocket when it wins. Does it suck when you pay that much juice and it loses? Of course. But the system hardly loses on such picks, that's the point. When looking at games with ML's -191 and higher, the system is 4-1. So let's assume on every one of those games we bet $200 to win $100. We would have won $100 four times, and lost $200 once, yielding a profit of $200. Meanwhile you don't want to pay the juice and you are taking teams that are -110. Let's say that you can choose these games at 60%, which is solid. That means you are winning 3 out of every 5 bets. So hypothetically you are winning $100 three times while losing $110 twice, yielding a profit of $80. So while you're out there bashing those who take heavy favorites, they are making more money than you are (assuming they win at as high a percentage as the system does). Over 60% of the system picks have ML's of -140 or lower, so it's not like I'm just only taking heavy favorites without any research to it. This system is well thought out and has been hitting at a high rate since it began. So if you don't like betting favorites then go somewhere else.
There's a common misconception in betting that bets have to be "worth it" in order for people to bet it, as in they don't want to pay the high juice. But why? The system is 3-0 on games -201 and higher. So when you look at a wager and see you have to bet $200 to win $100 it looks "not worth it". I don't know about you but winning money is worth it to me. Whether I have to bet $110, $150, $200 or $250 to win $100, it's still $100 in the pocket when it wins. Does it suck when you pay that much juice and it loses? Of course. But the system hardly loses on such picks, that's the point. When looking at games with ML's -191 and higher, the system is 4-1. So let's assume on every one of those games we bet $200 to win $100. We would have won $100 four times, and lost $200 once, yielding a profit of $200. Meanwhile you don't want to pay the juice and you are taking teams that are -110. Let's say that you can choose these games at 60%, which is solid. That means you are winning 3 out of every 5 bets. So hypothetically you are winning $100 three times while losing $110 twice, yielding a profit of $80. So while you're out there bashing those who take heavy favorites, they are making more money than you are (assuming they win at as high a percentage as the system does). Over 60% of the system picks have ML's of -140 or lower, so it's not like I'm just only taking heavy favorites without any research to it. This system is well thought out and has been hitting at a high rate since it began. So if you don't like betting favorites then go somewhere else.
Excellent explanation, old sport!
Better impossible
Tailing you
BOL to you and to your system!
0
Quote Originally Posted by KingBruce:
There's a common misconception in betting that bets have to be "worth it" in order for people to bet it, as in they don't want to pay the high juice. But why? The system is 3-0 on games -201 and higher. So when you look at a wager and see you have to bet $200 to win $100 it looks "not worth it". I don't know about you but winning money is worth it to me. Whether I have to bet $110, $150, $200 or $250 to win $100, it's still $100 in the pocket when it wins. Does it suck when you pay that much juice and it loses? Of course. But the system hardly loses on such picks, that's the point. When looking at games with ML's -191 and higher, the system is 4-1. So let's assume on every one of those games we bet $200 to win $100. We would have won $100 four times, and lost $200 once, yielding a profit of $200. Meanwhile you don't want to pay the juice and you are taking teams that are -110. Let's say that you can choose these games at 60%, which is solid. That means you are winning 3 out of every 5 bets. So hypothetically you are winning $100 three times while losing $110 twice, yielding a profit of $80. So while you're out there bashing those who take heavy favorites, they are making more money than you are (assuming they win at as high a percentage as the system does). Over 60% of the system picks have ML's of -140 or lower, so it's not like I'm just only taking heavy favorites without any research to it. This system is well thought out and has been hitting at a high rate since it began. So if you don't like betting favorites then go somewhere else.
I know I'm new here, but I've actually been tailing you for about 4 months now. I never made an account until a couple of days ago and you are one of the very few I'd trust putting juice into their picks. Thanks again Bruce!
0
I know I'm new here, but I've actually been tailing you for about 4 months now. I never made an account until a couple of days ago and you are one of the very few I'd trust putting juice into their picks. Thanks again Bruce!
Thanks King! Been tailing for a couple months now.... missed your NCAAF picks this week but look forward to them this week! Again thanks for all the MLB help...win or lose it is appreciated!
0
Thanks King! Been tailing for a couple months now.... missed your NCAAF picks this week but look forward to them this week! Again thanks for all the MLB help...win or lose it is appreciated!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
